Literature DB >> 31074658

Economic modeling to evaluate the impact of chronic myeloid leukemia therapy management on the oncology care model in the US.

Elias J Jabbour1, Martin F Mendiola2, Melissa Lingohr-Smith3, Jay Lin3, Dinara Makenbaeva2.   

Abstract

Objective: To develop an economic model to evaluate changes in healthcare costs driven by restricting usage of branded tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) through substitution with generic imatinib among chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients in a typical Oncology Care Model (OCM) practice, and examine the impact on Performance-Based Payment (PBP) eligibility.
Methods: An Excel-based economic model of an OCM practice with 1,000 cancer patients during a 6-month episode of care was developed. Cancer types and proportions of patients treated in the practice were estimated from an OCM report. All-cause healthcare costs were obtained from published literature. It was assumed that if a practice restricts usage of branded TKIs for newly-diagnosed CML patients, 80% of the market share of branded imatinib and 50% of the market shares of 2nd-gen TKIs would shift to generic imatinib. Among established TKI-treated patients, it was assumed that 80% of the market share of branded imatinib and no patients treated with 2nd-gen TKIs would shift to the generic.
Results: Four CML patients were estimated for a 1,000-cancer patient OCM practice with a total baseline healthcare cost of $51,345,812 during a 6-month episode. If the practice restricts usage of branded TKIs, the shift from 2nd-gen TKIs to generic imatinib would reduce costs by $12,970, while shifting from branded to generic imatinib lowers costs by $25,250 during a 6-month episode. Minimum reductions of $3,013,832 in a one-sided risk model and $2,372,010 in a two-sided risk model are required for PBP eligibility; the shift from 2nd-gen TKIs to generic imatinib would account for 0.4% and 0.5% of the savings required for a PBP, respectively. Conclusions: This analysis indicates that the potential cost reduction associated with restricting branded TKI usage among CML patients in an OCM setting will represent only a small proportion of the cost reduction needed for PBP eligibility.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chronic myeloid leukemia; I10; I19; healthcare costs; oncology care model; performance-based payment; tyrosine kinase inhibitors

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31074658     DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2019.1618316

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Econ        ISSN: 1369-6998            Impact factor:   2.448


  4 in total

1.  A Systematic Literature Review of the Economic Evaluations of Treatments for Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia.

Authors:  Rumjhum Agrawal; Joao Vieira; Jacqueline Ryan; Harish Negi; Tanvi Rajput; Regina Corbin; Ricardo Viana
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 4.558

2.  Determination of the Cut-off Value for Imatinib Plasma Levels Linked to Occurrence of Bone Pain in CML Patients.

Authors:  Marwa S Hamza; Samia A Shouman; Raafat Abdelfattah; Heba S Moussa; Mervat M Omran
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 4.319

3.  Health Care Cost Associated With Contemporary Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia Therapy Compared With That of Other Hematologic Malignancies.

Authors:  Jennifer J Wilkes; Gary H Lyman; David R Doody; Shasank Chennupati; Laura K Becker; Pamela E Morin; Lena E Winestone; Henry J Henk; Eric J Chow
Journal:  JCO Oncol Pract       Date:  2020-08-21

4.  Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Genetic Testing and Tailored First-Line Therapy for Patients With Metastatic Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors.

Authors:  Sudeep Banerjee; Abhishek Kumar; Nicole Lopez; Beiqun Zhao; Chih-Min Tang; Mayra Yebra; Hyunho Yoon; James D Murphy; Jason K Sicklick
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-09-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.