Literature DB >> 3107414

Nonoperative observation therapy for splenic injuries: a safe therapeutic option?

G K Luna, E P Dellinger.   

Abstract

Combining these reported and estimated incidences of mortality from overwhelming postsplenectomy infection, splenic salvage with nonoperative observation therapy and operative therapy, and the incidence of posttransfusion hepatitis and related mortality provides a conditional probability estimation of the risks of death with nonoperative observation therapy and operative therapy (Figure 4). The combined mortality rates for nonoperative observation and operative therapies are based on the following measured and estimated statistics: The post-transfusion hepatitis death rate per unit of blood transfused is 0.14 percent. Forty percent of children and 20 percent of adults who have successful nonoperative observation therapy receive an average of 2 units of blood. One hundred percent of children and adults in whom nonoperative observation therapy is unsuccessful receive an average of 4 units of blood. Twenty percent of children and adults who undergo operation initially receive an average of 2 units of blood. Ten percent of observed children require laparotomy and 75 percent of these patients then undergo splenectomy. Forty percent of adults who have nonoperative observation initially later require laparotomy, 93 percent of whom also require splenectomy. Ten percent of children and adults treated with initial operation later require splenectomy. Death from overwhelming postsplenectomy infection occurs in 0.026 percent of adults who undergo splenectomy and 0.052 percent of children who undergo splenectomy. Given these assumptions, the conditional probability of death in a child who initially undergoes nonoperative observation therapy is 0.17 percent compared with 0.06 percent for initial operative therapy. In adults, 0.26 percent of the observed patients die compared with 0.06 percent for those operated on initially. As stated, many of the percentages or probabilities listed are estimations based on the best available clinical data. The inability to establish a mortality rate from overwhelming postsplenectomy infection remotely resembling that reported for otherwise healthy patients required an unsubstantiated estimate. However, even when mortality rates from overwhelming postsplenectomy infection of 0.43 percent and 0.6 percent were substituted, early laparotomy still produced lower mortality rates. This continues to be true if one assumes that early laparotomy will result in 50 percent or even 100 percent of patients undergoing splenectomy, although in these cases the statistical differences would be less. We acknowledge that these statistics may exceed or underestimate the true risk of either treatment plan.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3107414     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9610(87)90794-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  10 in total

1.  Non-operative management of blunt splenic injury.

Authors:  E J Gibney
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-06-29

2.  Bleeding, clotting, and the use of blood products in trauma care.

Authors:  M M Knudson; J A Collins
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1989-08

3.  Laparoscopic surgery and the management of traumatic hemoperitoneum in stable patients.

Authors:  D V Shatz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Splenorrhaphy. The alternative.

Authors:  D V Feliciano; V Spjut-Patrinely; J M Burch; K L Mattox; C G Bitondo; P Cruse-Martocci; G L Jordan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Nonoperative Management of Blunt Splenic Trauma: Also Feasible and Safe in Centers with Low Trauma Incidence and in the Presence of Established Risk Factors.

Authors:  Gustav Norrman; Bobby Tingstedt; Mikael Ekelund; Roland Andersson
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2008-12-08       Impact factor: 3.693

Review 6.  Nonoperative management of blunt hepatic trauma is the treatment of choice for hemodynamically stable patients. Results of a prospective trial.

Authors:  M A Croce; T C Fabian; P G Menke; L Waddle-Smith; G Minard; K A Kudsk; J H Patton; M J Schurr; F E Pritchard
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Blunt hepatic and splenic trauma in children: correlation of a CT injury severity scale with clinical outcome.

Authors:  L Ruess; C J Sivit; M R Eichelberger; G A Taylor; S J Bond
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  1995

Review 8.  Spontaneous splenic rupture in infectious mononucleosis: a review.

Authors:  M M Asgari; D G Begos
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  1997 Mar-Apr

9.  Non-operative management of blunt hepatic and splenic injuries-practical aspects and value of radiological scoring systems.

Authors:  Margot Fodor; Florian Primavesi; Dagmar Morell-Hofert; Matthias Haselbacher; Eva Braunwarth; Benno Cardini; Eva Gassner; Dietmar Öfner; Stefan Stättner
Journal:  Eur Surg       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 0.953

10.  Changing Aspects in the Management of Splenic Injury Patients: Experience of 129 Isolated Splenic Injury Patients at Level 1 Trauma Center from India.

Authors:  Dinesh Bagaria; Atish Kumar; Amulya Ratan; Amit Gupta; Abhinav Kumar; Subodh Kumar; Biplab Mishra; Sushma Sagar
Journal:  J Emerg Trauma Shock       Date:  2019 Jan-Mar
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.