Literature DB >> 31073645

High-frequency measurements of gas ebullition in a Brazilian subtropical reservoir-identification of relevant triggers and seasonal patterns.

Lediane Marcon1, Tobias Bleninger2, Michael Männich2, Stephan Hilgert3.   

Abstract

Water bodies, either natural or constructed impoundments, are sources of methane to the atmosphere, in which ebullition is frequently mentioned to be the dominant pathway. Ebullition is a complex process that is spatially dependent on factors acting over large distances (atmospheric pressure changes, wind) and factors acting locally (sediment characteristics, gas production) and is temporally variable due to the parameters' oscillation with time. Its quantification through measurements is still limited, as is the identification of production processes and triggers for ebullition. This research focused on obtaining high temporal resolution measurements of gas ebullition from a water supply reservoir located in Brazil, to compare its temporal variability with changes in reservoir conditions, and obtain insights on its spatial patterns. Three automated bubble traps were deployed in the reservoir and measured gas flux from February 2017 to March 2018. The time series data showed a large temporal variability in ebullition. Less intense fluxes occurred with higher frequency, and short-duration events made a larger contribution to the total amount of gas emitted. A strong seasonal variation was observed, in which the mean flux recorded during periods when the reservoir was stratified was 2-16 fold the bubbling rates recorded during colder months and mixed water column. In addition, high flux events were correlated with decreasing atmospheric pressure and increased wind intensities. Lastly, we show that the mean gas emission flux tends to be underestimated during short sampling periods (probability > 41% for sampling periods shorter than 10 days).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Automatic funnels; Bubbling events; Emissions time series; Methane emissions

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31073645     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-019-7498-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  9 in total

1.  Global phosphorus retention by river damming.

Authors:  Taylor Maavara; Christopher T Parsons; Christine Ridenour; Severin Stojanovic; Hans H Dürr; Helen R Powley; Philippe Van Cappellen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  A method for the assessment of long-term changes in carbon stock by construction of a hydropower reservoir.

Authors:  Julio Werner Yoshioka Bernardo; Michael Mannich; Stephan Hilgert; Cristovão Vicente Scapulatempo Fernandes; Tobias Bleninger
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 5.129

3.  Redistribution of methane emission hot spots under drawdown conditions.

Authors:  Stephan Hilgert; Cristovão Vicente Scapulatempo Fernandes; Stephan Fuchs
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 7.963

4.  Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Freshwater Reservoirs: What Does the Atmosphere See?

Authors:  Yves T Prairie; Jukka Alm; Jake Beaulieu; Nathan Barros; Tom Battin; Jonathan Cole; Paul Del Giorgio; Tonya DelSontro; Frédéric Guérin; Atle Harby; John Harrison; Sara Mercier-Blais; Dominique Serça; Sebastian Sobek; Dominic Vachon
Journal:  Ecosystems       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 4.217

5.  Continuous Seasonal River Ebullition Measurements Linked to Sediment Methane Formation.

Authors:  Jeremy Wilkinson; Andreas Maeck; Zeyad Alshboul; Andreas Lorke
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  Methane fluxes show consistent temperature dependence across microbial to ecosystem scales.

Authors:  Gabriel Yvon-Durocher; Andrew P Allen; David Bastviken; Ralf Conrad; Cristian Gudasz; Annick St-Pierre; Nguyen Thanh-Duc; Paul A del Giorgio
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Sediment trapping by dams creates methane emission hot spots.

Authors:  Andreas Maeck; Tonya Delsontro; Daniel F McGinnis; Helmut Fischer; Sabine Flury; Mark Schmidt; Peer Fietzek; Andreas Lorke
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-07-15       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  Size does matter: importance of large bubbles and small-scale hot spots for methane transport.

Authors:  T DelSontro; D F McGinnis; B Wehrli; I Ostrovsky
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 9.028

9.  Organic carbon burial in global lakes and reservoirs.

Authors:  Raquel Mendonça; Roger A Müller; David Clow; Charles Verpoorter; Peter Raymond; Lars J Tranvik; Sebastian Sobek
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 14.919

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.