Literature DB >> 31073593

The impact of beak tissue sloughing and beak shape variation on the behavior and welfare of infrared beak-treated layer pullets and hens.

S Struthers1, H L Classen1, S Gomis2, T G Crowe3, K Schwean-Lardner1.   

Abstract

This research examined how infrared beak treatment (IRBT), sloughing of the treated beak tissue, and the variations in beak shape that can occur post-IRBT impact the welfare and mortality of Lohmann LSL-Lite (LW) and Lohmann Brown (LB) pullets and hens. Two experiments were conducted and birds for both experiments were treated on the day of hatch. IRBT equipment settings were adjusted to create 4 specific beak shapes: shovel (SHV), step (STP), standard (STAN), and an untreated sham control (C). Experiment 1 pullets (n = 80 per strain) were reared in bioassay cages from 1 to 29 D of age (4 replicates per treatment). Data collected included time and presence of beak sloughing, pecking force, behavioral expression, and mortality. Experiment 2 pullets (n = 320 per strain) were reared in floor pens from 1 D to 18 wk of age (2 replicates per treatment) and then conventional cages from 18 to 60 wk of age (6 replicates per treatment). Data collected for Experiment 2 included behavioral expression, feather cover, comb damage, and mortality. Data were analyzed using PROC MIXED (SAS® 9.4) with Tukey's test to separate means. Differences were significant when P ≤ 0.05. IRBT and sloughing had no effect on pecking force or mortality throughout rearing. The variations in post-IRBT beak shape had minor effects on behavior. During rearing, STAN pullets were more active than C pullets but STP and STAN pullets performed less exploratory pecking. During the laying period, SHV and STP hens preened more than C hens. The IRBT treatments, regardless of beak shape, reduced feather loss, comb damage, and cannibalism-related mortality during the laying period. Overall, the results indicate that LW and LB pullets and hens can cope with the change in beak shape that occurs with IRBT, and that welfare is not negatively impacted if some variation in beak shape occurs.
© 2019 Poultry Science Association Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lohmann; beak shape; cannibalism; shovel beak

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31073593     DOI: 10.3382/ps/pez274

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Poult Sci        ISSN: 0032-5791            Impact factor:   3.352


  3 in total

1.  Dietary supplementation with β-mannanase and probiotics as a strategy to improve laying hen's welfare.

Authors:  Camila Lopes Carvalho; Ines Andretta; Gabriela Miotto Galli; Gabriel Bueno Martins; Nathalia de Oliveira Telesca Camargo; Thais Bastos Stefanello; Raquel Melchior; Marcos Kipper da Silva
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-09-20

2.  Understanding How Infrared Beak Treatment Affects the Beak Tissue and the Healing Response of Brown and White Feathered Layer Pullets.

Authors:  Sarah Struthers; Ashish Gupta; Susantha Gomis; Eugenia Herwig; Karen Schwean-Lardner
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-07       Impact factor: 2.752

3.  The Effect of Hard Pecking Enrichment during Rear on Feather Cover, Feather Pecking Behaviour and Beak Length in Beak-Trimmed and Intact-Beak Laying Hen Pullets.

Authors:  Paula Elizabeth Baker; Christine Janet Nicol; Claire Alexandra Weeks
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 2.752

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.