Literature DB >> 31073361

Comparative Evaluation between Single Noncompression Miniplate and Two Noncompression Miniplates in the Treatment of Mandibular Angle Fractures.

Shubhamoy Mondal1, Gaurav Singh1, Madan Mishra1, Amit Gaur1, Abhinav Srivastava1.   

Abstract

This study was conducted to compare the outcome of single noncompression miniplate versus two noncompression miniplates in the treatment of mandibular angle fracture. A total of 40 patients were divided into two groups: Group I ( n  = 20), patients were treated by single miniplate at superior border of mandible by intraoral approach; Group II ( n  = 20), patients were treated by one miniplate at superior border of mandible, intraorally, and another at the lateral aspect of angle, transbuccally by trocar and cannula. Comparative evaluation was done at 1, 2, 4, 6, and 12 weeks and 6 months. The findings of this study suggest that there was no significant difference in postoperative complications (malocclusion, pain, swelling, infection, facial nerve injury, wound dehiscence, plate exposure) and bite force between the two groups.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bite force; mandibular angle fracture; miniplate osteosynthesis; noncompression miniplate; transbuccal approach

Year:  2018        PMID: 31073361      PMCID: PMC6506254          DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1629907

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr        ISSN: 1943-3875


  23 in total

1.  Bite forces in patients after treatment of mandibular angle fractures with miniplate osteosynthesis according to Champy.

Authors:  K L Gerlach; A Schwarz
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.789

2.  Treatment modalities for mandibular angle fractures.

Authors:  Andrew J L Gear; Elena Apasova; John P Schmitz; Warren Schubert
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.895

3.  One miniplate versus two in the management of mandibular angle fractures: a prospective randomised study.

Authors:  Arshad Siddiqui; George Markose; Khursheed F Moos; Jeremy McMahon; Ashraf F Ayoub
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2006-11-15       Impact factor: 1.651

4.  Biomechanical comparison of different plating techniques in repair of mandibular angle fractures.

Authors:  Alper Alkan; Nükhet Celebi; Bora Ozden; Burcu Baş; Samet Inal
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2007-07-24

5.  Transoral 2.0-mm locking miniplate fixation of mandibular fractures plus 1 week of maxillomandibular fixation: a prospective study.

Authors:  Ayman Chritah; Stewart K Lazow; Julius R Berger
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.895

6.  The pain visual analog scale: is it linear or nonlinear?

Authors:  P S Myles; S Troedel; M Boquest; M Reeves
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.108

7.  Transoral 2.0-mm miniplate fixation of mandibular fractures plus 2 weeks' maxillomandibular fixation: a prospective study.

Authors:  Reza Bolourian; Stewart Lazow; Julius Berger
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 1.895

Review 8.  Treatment methods for fractures of the mandibular angle.

Authors:  E Ellis
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 2.789

Review 9.  Biomechanics of the facial skeleton.

Authors:  R H Rudderman; R L Mullen
Journal:  Clin Plast Surg       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 2.017

10.  Internal fixation of mandibular angle fractures: a comparison of 2 techniques.

Authors:  Pushkar Mehra; Haitham Murad
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.895

View more
  1 in total

1.  Is There a Safe Zone for Lateral Border Fixation of Mandibular Angle Fractures?

Authors:  Steven G Press; Andrew J Miller; Michelle Campbell Luschen
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2020-12-24
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.