| Literature DB >> 31073299 |
Amanda Cabral1,2, Darlan da Silva Cândido1,2, Sandra Maria Monteiro1,2, Francine Lemos3, David Saitovitch4, Irene L Noronha2,5, Letícia Ferreira Alves6, Murilo Vieira Geraldo6, Jorge Kalil1,2,7, Edecio Cunha-Neto1,2,7, Ludmila Rodrigues Pinto Ferreira1, Verônica Coelho1,2,7.
Abstract
Background: Operational tolerance (OT) is a state of graft functional stability that occurs after at least 1 year of immunosuppressant withdrawal. MicroRNAs (microRNA) are small non-coding RNAs that downregulate messenger RNA/protein expression of innumerous molecules and are critical for homeostasis. We investigated whether OT in kidney transplantation displays a differential microRNA profile, which would suggest that microRNAs participate in Operational Tolerance mechanisms, and may reveal potential molecular pathways.Entities:
Keywords: cell death; chronic rejection; epigenetics; immunoregulation; kidney transplantation; microRNAs; operational tolerance
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31073299 PMCID: PMC6496457 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00740
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Demographic and clinical data of study subjects.
| Age (Years) | 55 | 42 | 42 | 48 | 32 | 37 | 31 | 57 | 43 (32–57) | 45 (28–59) | 45 (29–61) | ||
| Sex (F, M) | M | M | F | F | M | M | F | M | |||||
| Transplantation number | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 ( | 1 ( | NA | NA | |
| Time of transplantation (years) | 27 | 5 | 12 | 28 | 17 | 6 | 11 | 31 | 17 (5–28) | 7 (1–13) | NA | NA | |
| HLA (A, B, DR) mismatches | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 6 ( | 6 ( | NA | NA | |
| Donor (Live/ Deceased) | Live | Deceased | Live | Live | Live | Deceased | Live | Live | Live (n = 6) Dead ( | Live (n = 4) Dead ( | NA | NA | |
| Creatinine | 1.15 | 1.62 | 0.89 | 0.74 | 1.71 | 1.1 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.23 (0.89–1.71) | 1.93 (1.3–4.4) | NA | NA | |
| Immunosuppressive time free (years) | 7 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 30 | 7 (2–30) | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Immunosuppressive used | Aza, Pred | Pred Tacro MMF | Cya Aza Pred | Pred Aza | Cya Aza Pred | Tacr Pred MMF Eve | TacrMPS Pred | Aza Pred | Pred ( | Pred ( | NA | NA | NA |
The ordinal variables were initially analyzed by the Shapiro-Wilk test to verify normality.
Chi-square test;
t test;
Mann-Whitney.
The numerical data are represented as mean. The minimum and maximum values of the age of each group, transplant time, number of HLA disparities, donor type and creatinine are shown in parenthesis. The
p < 0.005. Operational Tolerance (OT) n = 8; Chronic Rejection (CR) n = 12; Healthy Individuals (HI) n = 12. NA, Not applicable; F, Female; M, Male; Pred, prednisone; Tacro, tacrolimus; MMF, mycophenolate mofetil; MPS, mycophenolate sodium, Cya, cyclosporine A; Aza, azathioprine, Eve, Everolimus. The data provided refer to the date of sample collection and inclusion in Multicenter study.
Figure 1Differential profile of microRNA serum levels in Operational Tolerance. (A) Volcano plot shows microRNAs differentially detected between Operational Tolerance (OT) x Chronic Rejection (CR) (OT-CR differential profile). OT n = 8; CR n = 5. Red dots indicate microRNAs with higher levels and green dots indicate lower levels in OT in comparison to CR. The data are shown in fold change (x-axis) and statistical significance (–log10, p-value, y-axis). The dashed gray line indicates that the dots above have a p < 0.05 and the dots below the line a p > 0.05. Statistical calculation by t-test. (B) Volcano plot shows microRNAs differentially detected between Operational Tolerance (OT) x Healthy Individuals (HI). OT n = 8; HI n = 5. Red dots indicate microRNAs with higher levels and green dots indicate lower levels in OT in comparison to HI. The data are shown in fold change (x-axis) and statistical significance (–log10, p-value, y-axis). The dashed gray line indicates that the dots above have a p < 0.05 and the dots below the line a p > 0.05. Statistical calculation by t-test.
Number of targets of the microRNAs comprised in the OT vs. CR differential profile.
| 1,190 | 290 | – | |
| 1,001 | 165 | 1 | |
| 733 | 136 | – | |
| 666 | 133 | 3 | |
| 506 | 60 | 1 | |
| 309 | 45 | 1 | |
| 205 | 37 | – | |
| Total | 4,610 | 866 | 6 |
This differential profile of microRNA levels, for the global profile, was obtained by quantitative real-time PCR using pre-printed TaqMan® Low Density Array (TLDA) microfluidic cards, containing a panel for 768 microRNAs. Using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA), we first determined the total number of putative targets, and the number of highly predicted and experimentally observed targets for the microRNAs of the OT-CR differential profile. The experimentally demonstrated targets are (considering data in the IPA and data from the literature): for miR-27a-5p (BCL2), for miR-331-3p (CDCA5, ERBB2, KIF23), for miR-885-5p (CASP3), and for miR-638 (CDK2). OT, Operational Tolerance (n = 8); CR, Chronic rejection, (n = 5).
Figure 2Signaling pathways comprising target molecules of microRNAs of the OT-CR differential profile. (A) The first 11 canonical pathways derived from the IPA (Ingenuity Pathway analysis), involving microRNAs of the OT-CR differential profile. Following the “Core Analysis” of the IPA analysis, these 11 canonical pathways arose. The chart shows category rankings. At the top of the graph we show the levels of significance (–log (p-value), Fisher's exact test, defined here at 1.25). The “Ratio” value represents the number of microRNA targets in the pathway divided by the total number of pathway molecules. N° molecules: total number of genes in the pathway; N° microRNAs: total number of the microRNAs of the OT-CR differential profile in the pathway; N° targets: total number of targets of the microRNAs comprised in the OT-CR differential profile, in the pathway. Boxes in red highlight the cell death pathways. (B) Graphical representation of the Death Receptor Pathway potentially regulated by the microRNAs of the OT-CR differential profile. The analyses are derived from the IPA software. In this pathway, six microRNAs of the differential profile may target several molecules involved in the mechanisms of cell death. The numbers in the figure indicate the miRNAs and the arrows link to their respective targets. (1) miR-27a-5p (targets: RIP/RIPK1, BCL2*,TL1/TFNSF15), (2) miR-331-3p (targets: TNFTL1/TFNSF15, CASP9), (3) miR-885-5p (targets: CASP3*, RAIDD/CRADD), (4) miR-1233-3p (targets: TL1/TFNSF15, DFFB), (5) miR-638: (targets: TBK1,TNF), (6) miR-1260a (targets: DAXX, ASK1/MAP3K5, BCL2,TL1/TFNSF15). The *experimentally observed targets. The differences in microRNA expression are represented by the gradation of color intensity (hypoexpressed green and hyperexpressed red). The legend in the figure discriminates the prediction of the regulation of the targets. On the right side of the table we have the list of targets and the respective microRNAs involved in the pathway. *Experimentally demonstrated targets.
Potential effects of the microRNAs comprised in the OT-CR differential profile on the different targets of the death receptor pathway.
| OT > CR | < | Kinase involved in the transduction of necroptosis signals ( | Decreased death stimulus in OT than in CR | ||
| < | Positive cell survival regulator ( | Increased cell survival in CR | |||
| < | Can activate | Lower expression of pro-inflammatory and cell survival genes in OT | |||
| OT > CR | < | Can activate | Lower expression of pro-inflammatory and cell survival genes in OT | ||
| < | Involved in several proinflammatory responses ( | Decreased proinflammatory responses in OT | |||
| < | Activates | Decreased cell death in OT than in CR | |||
| OT > CR | < | Induces DNA fragmentation ( | Decreased cell death in OT than in CR | ||
| < | Induces DNA fragmentation and condensation ( | Decreased cell death in OT than in CR | |||
| OT < CR | > | Can activate | Higher expression of pro-inflammatory and cell survival genes in OT | ||
| > | Interacts with | Induction of apoptosis in OT | |||
| > | Activates c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinases ( | Increased propagation of the signals of the MAP3K5 pathway in OT | |||
| > | Positive cell survival regulator ( | Increased cell survival in OT | |||
| OT < CR | > | Involved in several proinflammatory responses ( | Increased proinflammatory responses in OT | ||
| > | Can activate | Higher expression of pro-inflammatory and cell survival genes in OT | |||
| OT < CR | > | Can activate | Higher expression of pro-inflammatory and cell survival genes in OT | ||
| > | Involved in promoting cell death ( | Increased cell death in OT than in CR |
(>) higher; (< ) lower, comparing OT vs. CR. OT, Operational Tolerance; CR, Chronic rejection.
Targets experimentally observed in cell death pathways.
Figure 3Programmed cell death as a target for microRNAs in OT. Kegg Mapper webtool was used to map the influence of the OT-CR differential microRNA profile. Members of Apoptosis pathway annotated in Kegg are shown in yellow. Genes targeted by differentially detected microRNAs in OT are shown in orange. Targets of miR-885-5p are marked in red (Mcl-1; Bcl-2; Apaf-1, CASP3, IKK, TRAFIQ).
Figure 4Validation assay showing increased levels of miR-885-5p in operational tolerance. Following the detection of higher levels of miR-885-5p in OT compared to chronic rejection in the global analysis, we performed a validation experiment by individual quantitative real-time PCR, using a specific primer for miR-885-5p, in a larger number of study subjects, using individual samples (OT n = 8, CR n = 12, HI n = 12; OT, operational tolerance; CR, chronic rejection; HI, Healthy individuals). Values are expressed as 2−ΔΔCt for miR-885-5p serum levels. For the statistical calculation we used the Kruskal-Wallis method followed by the Dunns post-test, and the results were considered significant if p < 0.05. **p = 0.0063 (OT × CR) and 0.0035 (OT × HI).
Figure 5Summary of our main findings and some hypotheses we have raised for potential mechanisms in OT, involving the microRNAs comprised in the OT-CR differential profile. At the top of the figure, we show the set of microRNAs comprised in the OT-CR differential profile indicating those presenting higher or lower levels in OT. Then, we indicate the microRNAs whose levels may be preserved in OT in relation the physiologic state, and those with decreased levels. Among the potential mechanisms of tolerance involving these microRNAs, we highlight the death receptor pathway. Our hypothesis is that OT may also involve mechanisms mediated by microRNAs affecting the cell death pathway. These mechanisms would favor the survival of cells most likely with the regulatory profile, as well as of graft tissue, contrary to what is could be occurring in CR. Understanding these mechanisms may contribute to the development of novel strategies to promote cell survival in renal transplantation, favoring the development of transplantation tolerance, in the future.