| Literature DB >> 31073136 |
Zoltán Bátori1, András Vojtkó2, István Elek Maák3,4, Gábor Lőrinczi3, Tünde Farkas5, Noémi Kántor3, Eszter Tanács6, Péter János Kiss3,7, Orsolya Juhász3,8, Gábor Módra3,7, Csaba Tölgyesi9, László Erdős6, Dianne Joy Aguilon3,7,10, Gunnar Keppel11,12,13.
Abstract
Fine-scale topographic complexity creates important microclimates that can facilitate species to grow outside their main distributional range and increase biodiversity locally. Enclosed depressions in karst landscapes ('dolines') are topographically complex environments which produce microclimates that are drier and warmer (equator-facing slopes) and cooler and moister (pole-facing slopes and depression bottoms) than the surrounding climate. We show that the distribution patterns of functional groups for organisms in two different phyla, Arthropoda (ants) and Tracheophyta (vascular plants), mirror this variation of microclimate. We found that north-facing slopes and bottoms of solution dolines in northern Hungary provided key habitats for ant and plant species associated with cooler and/or moister conditions. Contrarily, south-facing slopes of dolines provided key habitats for species associated with warmer and/or drier conditions. Species occurring on the surrounding plateau were associated with intermediate conditions. We conclude that karst dolines provide a diversity of microclimatic habitats that may facilitate the persistence of taxa with diverse environmental preferences, indicating these dolines to be potential safe havens for multiple phyla under local and global climate oscillations.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31073136 PMCID: PMC6509348 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-43603-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Study sites and study design. (A) Location of the Bükk Mountains in Hungary. (B) Study area and studied karst dolines (1–3). (C) Different parts of doline 1. (D) Early morning fog in dolines. (E) Semi-dry grassland on the plateau between dolines. (F) Wet meadow in the bottom of a doline. (G) Location of the study sites (site 1–6) in and around a doline. (H) Set-up of bait stations in a cross-shaped pattern.
Figure 2Schematic illustration of the differentiation of microhabitats within karst dolines in Bükk, Hungary, with regard to (A) abundant ant and plant taxa and (B) microclimate. North-facing slopes and bottoms of dolines are consistently cooler and moister, while south-facing slopes are consistently warmer and drier than their surroundings. Abundant taxa of both phyla differ among microhabitats.
Synoptic table of ants and plants associated with different microhabitats (south-facing slopes, bottoms and north-facing slopes of dolines, and the plateau) in Bükk (Hungary).
| Ants | Plants |
|---|---|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Within blocks, species are listed by increasing values of the phi (Φ) coefficient of association between species and habitat (in parenthesis). Four of the species, marked with an asterisk, were diagnostic for two different microhabitats.
Figure 3Non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) ordination for (A) ant and (B) plant assemblages in different microhabitats (south-facing slopes, bottoms and north-facing slopes of dolines, and the plateau) with fitted vectors of mean daily temperature (T24) and relative humidity (RH24), mean daytime temperature (Td) and relative humidity (RHd), and mean night temperature (Tn) and relative humidity (RHn). Vector length indicates the strength of correlation (see Supplementary Table S3). Microclimate variables that were significantly correlated to the ordination (T24, Td, RH24 and RHd) are indicated in boldface.
Comparisons of the ant and plant assemblages in different microhabitats (south-facing slopes, bottoms and north-facing slopes of dolines, and the plateau) with permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA).
| Ants | Plants | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| S-facing slopes vs. Bottoms | 20.96 | 0.327 | 10.88 | 0.279 | ||
| S-facing slopes vs. N-facing slopes | 15.70 | 0.389 | 7.82 | 0.349 | ||
| S-facing slopes vs. Plateau | 11.37 | 0.171 | 5.34 | 0.169 | ||
| N-facing slopes vs. Bottoms | 1.35 | 0.034 | 0.261 | 2.86 | 0.164 | |
| N-facing slopes vs. Plateau | 8.83 | 0.141 | 6.84 | 0.204 | ||
| Bottoms vs. Plateau | 4.89 | 0.071 | 5.08 | 0.237 | ||
The p values were corrected with the FDR (false discovery rate) method. Significant differences are indicated by bold p values.
Figure 4Occurrences of ant and plant species (mean ± SE) belonging to different functional groups of temperature requirements (warmer, intermediate and cooler) in different microhabitats (S: south-facing slopes, B: bottoms and N: north-facing slopes of dolines, and P: the plateau). Significant differences detected using mixed-effect models (see Supplementary Table S4) are indicated by different lower case letters (a–c).
Figure 5Occurrences of ant and plant species (mean ± SE) belonging to different functional groups of moisture requirements (drier, intermediate and moister) in different microhabitats (S: south-facing slopes, B: bottoms and N: north-facing slopes of dolines, and P: the plateau). Significant differences detected using mixed-effect models (see Supplementary Table S5) are indicated by different lower case letters (a–c).