| Literature DB >> 31072322 |
Nyasiro S Gibore1, Theodora A L Bali2, Stephen M Kibusi3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Men's involvement can impact the delays in the decision to seek health care and in reaching a health facility, which are contributing causes for increased maternal mortality. Despite of the call to involve men in antenatal care, their participation is not well understood. This study aimed to determine the level of men's involvement in antenatal care and the factors influencing their involvement in these services.Entities:
Keywords: Male involvement; Men and antenatal care; Spousal pregnancy-related support
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31072322 PMCID: PMC6509760 DOI: 10.1186/s12978-019-0721-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Reprod Health ISSN: 1742-4755 Impact factor: 3.223
Socio-demographic characteristics of respondents (N = 966)
| Variable | Category | N (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 15–24 | 56 (5.8) |
| 25–34 | 294 (30.4) | |
| 35–44 | 309 (32.0) | |
| ≥ 45 | 307 (31.8) | |
| Occupation | Employed | 80 (8.3) |
| Agricultural | 653 (67.3) | |
| Agro pastoral | 30 (3.1) | |
| Business | 144 (14.9) | |
| Casual labourer | 59 (6.1) | |
| Education level | No education | 136 (14.1) |
| Primary education | 749 (77.5) | |
| Secondary education | 62 (6.4) | |
| Tertiary education | 19 (2.0) | |
| Ethnicity | Gogo | 515 (53.3) |
| Rangi | 205 (21.2) | |
| Sandawe | 4 (0.4) | |
| Kaguru | 86 (8.9) | |
| Hehe | 21 (2.2) | |
| Others (Fipa, Mbulu, Ngoni) | 135 (14.0) | |
| Religion | Christian | 716 (74.1) |
| Muslim | 250 (25.9) | |
| Marriage relationship | Arranged marriage | 56 (5.8) |
| Chosen each other | 910 (94.2) | |
| Marriage type | Monogamous | 884 (91.5) |
| Polygamous | 82 (9.5) | |
| Number of children | 1–2 | 327 (33.9) |
| 3–4 | 322 (33.3) | |
| ≥ 5 | 317 (32.8) | |
| Distance to health facility | ≤ 5 km | 854 (85.0) |
| ≥ 5 km | 110 (15.0) |
Fig. 1Level of Men’s Involvement in Antenatal Care
Association between Background Characteristics of Respondents and Level of Men’s Involvement in ANC (N = 965)
| Variables | Level of involvement | Total | χ2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low involvement | High involvement | ||||
| n(%) | n(%) | n(%) | |||
| Age | |||||
| 15–30 | 100 (44.8) | 123 (55.2) | 223 (100) | ||
| > 30 | 345 (46.4) | 398 (53.6) | 743 (100) | 0.175 | 0.676 |
| Occupation | |||||
| Employed | 141 (50.9) | 136 (49.1) | 277 (100) | ||
| Not employed | 304 (44.1) | 385 (56.0) | 689 (100) | 3.656 | 0.056 |
| Education level | |||||
| No education | 37 (51.4) | 35 (48.6) | 72 (100) | ||
| Primary education | 343 (45.7) | 408 (54.3) | 751 (100) | ||
| Above primary education | 65 (45.5) | 78 (54.5) | 143 (100) | 0.889 | 0.641 |
| Ethnicity | |||||
| Gogo | 198 (38.4) | 317 (61.6) | 515 (100) | ||
| Others | 247 (54.8) | 204 (45.2) | 451 (100) | 25.777 | *** |
| Religion | |||||
| Christian | 296 (41.3) | 420 (58.7) | 716 (100) | ||
| Muslim | 149 (59.6) | 101 (40.6) | 250 (100) | 24.865 | *** |
| Marriage relationship | |||||
| Arranged Marriage | 415 (46.5) | 477 (53.5) | 892 (100) | ||
| Chosen each other | 30 (40.5) | 44 (59.5) | 74 (100) | 0.985 | 0.321 |
| Marriage type | |||||
| Monogamous | 26 (46.4) | 30 (53.6) | 56 (100) | ||
| Polygamous | 419 (46.0) | 491 (54,0) | 910 (100) | 0.003 | 0.955 |
| Time | |||||
| ≤ 1 h | 149 (42.1) | 205 (57.9) | 354 (100) | ||
| > 1 h | 296 (48.4) | 316 (51.6) | 612 (100) | 3.555 | * |
| Access ANC information | |||||
| Yes | 354 (42.8) | 474 (57.2) | 828 (100) | ||
| No | 91 (65.9) | 47 (34.1) | 138 (100) | 25.599 | *** |
| Number of children | |||||
| 1–4 | 306 (47.7) | 335 (52.3) | 641 (100) | ||
| ≥ 5 | 139 (42.8) | 186 (57.2) | 325 (100) | 2.143 | 0.143 |
| Distance to health facility | |||||
| ≤ 5 km | 405 (47.4) | 450 (52.6) | 855 (100) | ||
| ≥ 5 km | 40 (36.0) | 71 (64.0) | 111 (100) | 5.078 | * |
| Attitude of health care providers | |||||
| Positive | 353 (44.2) | 445 (55.8) | 798 (100) | 6.189 | * |
| Negative | 92 (54.8) | 76 (45.2) | 168 (100) | ||
*Statistically significant at *p-value< 0.05, **p-value< 0.01, ***p-value< 0.001
Multivariate Logistic Regression Analysis of the Factors influencing High level Men’s Involvement in Antenatal Care
| Variable | Crude OR (95% CI) | P-value | Adjusted OR (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Occupation | ||||
| Employed | 0.739 (0.541–1.009) | 0.057 | 0.692 (0.511–0.936) | * |
| Not employed | 1 | |||
| Ethnicity | ||||
| Gogo | 1.507 (1.071–2.121) | * | 1.495 (1.066–2.097) | * |
| Others | 1 | |||
| Religion | ||||
| Christian | 1.799 (1.225–2.643) | ** | 1.826 (1.245–2.677) | ** |
| Muslim | 1 | |||
| Time | ||||
| ≤ 1 h | 1.480 (1.118–1.959) | ** | 1.444 (1.094–1.906) | * |
| > 1 h | 1 | |||
| Access to Information | ||||
| Yes | 3.027 (2.039–4.494) | *** | 3.077 (2.076–4.562) | *** |
| No | 1 | |||
| Number of children | ||||
| 1–4 | 0.801 (0.600–1.757) | 1.071 | ||
| ≥ 5 | 1 | |||
| Distance to health facility | ||||
| ≤ 5 km | 0.717 (0.465–1.104) | 0.131 | ||
| ≥ 5 km | 1 | |||
| Attitude of health care providers | ||||
| Positive | 1.548 (1.090–2.199) | * | 0.568 (0.400–1.808) | |
| Negative | 1 | |||
*Statistically significant at *p-value < 0.05, **p-value < 0.01, ***p-value< 0.001