| Literature DB >> 31072143 |
Songtao Wu1, Yanfang Yang1,2,3, Bo Liu1,2,3, Zhoutao Xie1, Weichen Xiong1, Pengfei Hao1, Wenping Xiao1, Yuan Sun1, Zhongzhu Ai1,2,3, Hezhen Wu1,2,3.
Abstract
This study explored the possible bioactive ingredients and target protein of Rostellularia procumbens (L.) Nees. The results of optical turbidimetry revealed that the ethyl acetate extraction obtained from R. procumbens (L.) Nees could inhibit platelet aggregation. Gene chip was used to investigate differentially expressed genes. According to the results of the gene chip, the targets of compounds isolated from the ethyl acetate extraction were predicted by network pharmacology. Computational studies revealed that chinensinaphthol methyl ether and neojusticin B may target the integrin αIIbβ3 protein. The results of Prometheus NT.48 and microscale thermophoresis suggested that the molecular interactions between the two compounds with purified integrin αIIbβ3 protein in the optimal test conditions were coherent with the docking results. To our best knowledge, this is the first report to state that chinensinaphthol methyl ether and neojusticin B target the integrin αIIbβ3 protein.Entities:
Keywords: Chinensinaphthol methyl ether; Prometheus NT.48; gene chip; integrin α; microscale thermophoresis; neojusticin B; network pharmacology; platelet aggregation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31072143 PMCID: PMC6522982 DOI: 10.1080/14756366.2019.1609468
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem ISSN: 1475-6366 Impact factor: 5.051
Figure 1.Curves of inhibition of platelet aggregation induced by ADP of (A) 80% ethanol, (B) ethyl acetate, (C) n-butanol, and (D) water extract from Rostellularia procumbens (L.) Nees.
The top different 42 genes of platelet expression between the ethyl acetate extract group and blank group.
| Gene symbol | Betweenness | Indegree | Outdegree | Degree |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRKACG | 94,737.81 | 6 | 44 | 50 |
| ADCY5 | 75,328.3 | 32 | 18 | 50 |
| PRKCA | 66,572.86 | 11 | 32 | 43 |
| CREBBP | 66,251.38 | 15 | 26 | 41 |
| PTGS2 | 53,449.43 | 19 | 11 | 30 |
| PLCB2 | 44,137.16 | 35 | 26 | 61 |
| PLCB4 | 44,137.16 | 35 | 26 | 61 |
| NFKB1 | 43,688.56 | 18 | 29 | 47 |
| TJP1 | 41,733.01 | 25 | 19 | 44 |
| CTNNB1 | 37,713.52 | 24 | 8 | 32 |
| ENPP3 | 34,186.49 | 14 | 14 | 28 |
| ADCY4 | 29,712.44 | 30 | 18 | 48 |
| GLB1 | 28,178.83 | 10 | 10 | 20 |
| GJA1 | 26,950.54 | 11 | 9 | 20 |
| ACTB | 25,842.48 | 30 | 16 | 46 |
| CYP2C9 | 23,028.48 | 28 | 28 | 56 |
| CDC42 | 21,745.7 | 11 | 10 | 21 |
| MAPK10 | 21,496.44 | 28 | 17 | 45 |
| MAPK8 | 21,496.44 | 28 | 17 | 45 |
| CYP4A11 | 21,389.71 | 20 | 19 | 39 |
| PIK3CG | 21,374.9 | 48 | 14 | 62 |
| NT5E | 21,374 | 22 | 22 | 44 |
| PTGS1 | 18,877.33 | 10 | 11 | 21 |
| STAT1 | 18,844.37 | 14 | 13 | 27 |
| PIK3R1 | 18,754.65 | 43 | 15 | 58 |
| PLD2 | 18,491.23 | 14 | 14 | 28 |
| PIK3CD | 18,266.94 | 42 | 14 | 56 |
| MAOB | 18,000.65 | 13 | 13 | 26 |
| GSK3B | 17,754.69 | 6 | 13 | 19 |
| MAPK11 | 17,135.02 | 24 | 21 | 45 |
| MAPK14 | 17,135.02 | 24 | 21 | 45 |
| EGFR | 17,081.33 | 21 | 18 | 39 |
| VEGFA | 16,074.26 | 11 | 6 | 17 |
| ATF4 | 15,173.42 | 16 | 8 | 24 |
| CRKL | 14,861.02 | 20 | 10 | 30 |
| PPP2CB | 14,831.02 | 6 | 10 | 16 |
| PPP2R1A | 14,831.02 | 6 | 10 | 16 |
| GBA | 14,292.23 | 7 | 7 | 14 |
| IMPAD1 | 13,152.14 | 9 | 9 | 18 |
| HK3 | 13,138.31 | 13 | 12 | 25 |
| CYP3A4 | 12,935.99 | 24 | 24 | 48 |
| ITGB2 | 12,473.6 | 5 | 12 | 17 |
Figure 2.Top 10 components of the KEGG pathway and GO enrichment analyses. (A) KEGG pathways. (B) Biological process. (C) Cell components. (D) Molecular function.
Figure 3.Network diagram constructed by Cytoscape. (A) Network diagram of active components/target genes/enrichment pathways. (B) Network diagram of target gene/platelet aggregation-related pathways.
AutoDock binding free energies (ΔGb) and bonds of the docked inhibitors against integrin αIIbβ3.
| Bonds between groups of compounds and amino acids of integrin αIIbβ3 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PDB code | Inhibitors | ΔGb (kcal/mol) | Groups of comp. | Amino acid | Bonds name |
| Neojusticin B | −5.875 | O | ARG214 | H-bond | |
| O | ALA218 | H-bond | |||
| Benzene ring | PHE160 | π–π stacking | |||
| Chinensinaphthol methyl ether | −5.130 | Benzene ring | MG1460 | Pi-cation | |
| Benzene ring | PHE160 | π–π stacking | |||
| 2VC2 | Five-membered ring | PHE160 | π–π stacking | ||
| Justicidin E | −4.707 | Five-membered ring | PHE160 | ππ–π stacking | |
| Five-membered ring | TYR190 | π–π stacking | |||
| Five-membered ring | ARG214 | Pi-cation | |||
| Justicidin B | −4.471 | Benzene ring | PHE160 | π–π stacking | |
| Cilinaphthalide B | −4.575 | Benzene ring | PHE160 | π–π stacking | |
Figure 4.Thermal unfolding curves. (A) Thermal unfolding curves in the presence of Hepes and pbs. (B) Thermal unfolding curves in the presence of Ttis. Insets show the detergent-dependence of the first unfolding transition midpoint (Tm1).
Figure 5.Molecular interaction of integrin αIIbβ3 using NT.LabelFree analysis. (A) MST time traces of 16 different neojusticin B concentrations (ranging from 0.0173 to 71 mM). (B) MST time traces of 16 different chinensinaphthol methyl ether concentrations (ranging from 0.00845 to 69.3 mM). (C) Dependence of the MST signal on the neojusticin B concentration (measured 30 s after turning on heating; data from A). The solid line is a fit with Michaelis–Menten kinetics, yielding an apparent dissociation constant of Kd = 113.47 ± 76.536 nm. (D) Dependence of the MST signal on the chinensinaphthol methyl ether concentration (measured 30 s after turning on heating; data from B). The solid line is a fit with Michaelis–Menten kinetics, yielding an apparent dissociation constant of Kd = 25.22 ± 34.934 nm.
Figure 6.Molecular interaction of integrin αIIbβ3 using NT.115 analysis. (A) MST time traces of 16 different neojusticin B concentrations (ranging from 0.000173 to 2.84 mM). (B) MST time traces of 16 different chinensinaphthol methyl ether concentrations (ranging from 0.000677 to 5.55 mM). (C) Dependence of the MST signal on the neojusticin B concentration (measured 30 s after turning on heating; data from A). The solid line is a fit with Michaelis–Menten kinetics, yielding an apparent dissociation constant of Kd = 1.1592 ± 2.5447 μm. (D) Dependence of the MST signal on the chinensinaphthol methyl ether concentration (measured 30 s after turning on heating; data from B). The solid line is a fit with Michaelis–Menten kinetics, yielding an apparent dissociation constant of Kd = 9.8229 ± 0.21873 μm.