| Literature DB >> 31072057 |
Cong Zhang1,2, Zhende Zhu3,4, Shu Zhu5,6, Zhilei He7, Duan Zhu8,9, Jinzhong Liu10,11, Songsong Meng12,13.
Abstract
Concrete creep has become one of the major problems that threatens concrete structural development and construction. However, a reasonable and accurate calculation model for numerical analysis is the key to control and solve the creep deformation of concrete. To better describe the concrete nonlinear creep damage evolution rule, the visco-elasticity Plasticity Rheological Theory, Riemann Liouville Theory and Combined Model Theory are quoted, and the Able dashpot is used to reconstruct fractional-order soft-body composite elements to propose the expression of the stress-strain relationship of the elastomer, visco-elasticity plasticity body, and Viscoplasticity body, considering the evolution of the concrete compression damage process. A nonlinear creep damage constitutive model of concrete, based on fractional calculus theory, is conducted, and the parameters of the specific calculation method of the model are given. The influence of stress level σ, fractional order n and material parameter α on the concrete creep process is determined by a sensitivity analysis of the model parameters. The creep process and deformation amount of concrete in practical engineering can be effectively controlled by the results of the proposed sensitivity analysis. The research results can be used to provide guidance and reference for the safe construction of concrete engineering in actual practice.Entities:
Keywords: concrete creep; constitutive model; creep damage; fractional derivative; nonlinear; sensitivity analysis
Year: 2019 PMID: 31072057 PMCID: PMC6540125 DOI: 10.3390/ma12091505
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1(a) Newton dashpot; (b) Able dashpot.
Figure 2Creep Constitutive model.
Figure 3The curve of the concrete creep tests under different stress.
Parameter table of concrete creep model.
| Stress/MPa |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20.9 | 45.2 | 13.5 | 235 | 263 | – | – | – | 0.31 |
| 33.9 | 40.1 | 24.0 | 191 | 332 | – | – | – | 0.36 |
Figure 4The fitting curve of the test curve and the model at (a) 20.9 MPa and (b) 33.9 MPa).
Figure 5The curve of concrete creep test under different stress. (a) 16.9 MPa and 25.7 MPa; (b) 30 MPa and 35.7 MPa.
Parameter table of concrete creep model.
| Stress/MPa |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16.9 | 38.5 | 8.7 | 171 | 281 | – | – | – | 0.3 |
| 25.7 | 42.8 | 14.0 | 105 | 317 | – | – | – | 0.29 |
| 30.0 | 32.3 | 18.7 | 246 | 254 | 26.3 | 854 | 0.001 | 0.38 |
| 35.7 | 37.8 | 20.2 | 239 | 384 | 30.9 | 688 | 0.0013 | 0.48 |
Figure 6Fitting curves of test curves and built models. (a) σ = 16.9 MPa; (b) σ = 25.7 MPa; (c) σ = 30.0 MPa; (d) σ = 35.7 MPa.
Figure 7Sensitivity analysis under different stress .
Figure 8Sensitivity analysis under different orders of n.
Figure 9Sensitivity analysis under different material parameters α.