Literature DB >> 31071973

Investigation on Mass Sensitivity of N-M Type Electrode Quartz Crystal Microbalance.

Qiao Chen1, Xianhe Huang2, Wei Pan3, Yuan Xu4, Zhichao Fan5.   

Abstract

Mass sensitivity plays a crucial role in the practical application of quartz crystal microbalances (QCMs)-based quantitative analysis. n-m type QCMs have many applications, so it is necessary to clarify the relationship between the mass sensitivity and the electrode of the n-m type QCM. The performance of gold-plated films with different electrodes was studied by theoretical calculation and experiment. The results show that the mass sensitivity on the surface of the n electrode and the surface of the m electrode are essentially the same. Meanwhile, the mass sensitivity of n-m type QCMs varies with the diameter of the n and m electrodes. When the diameter of the n electrode is close to half the diameter of the m electrode, mass sensitivity is at maximum value. These results are important for the further designs and applications of n-m type QCMs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  mass sensitivity; n-m type electrode; quartz crystal microbalance (QCM)

Year:  2019        PMID: 31071973      PMCID: PMC6539312          DOI: 10.3390/s19092125

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sensors (Basel)        ISSN: 1424-8220            Impact factor:   3.576


1. Introduction

Quartz crystal microbalances (QCMs) have gained increasing popularity in various fields, such as chemistry [1,2,3,4,5], biomedicine [6,7,8,9,10], and environmental fields [11,12,13,14], due to high sensitivity, simple operation principles, a digital output, and low-cost components. QCMs consist of a disk of the piezoelectric AT-cut quartz sandwiched between two metal excitation electrodes. The QCMs of different electrode shapes are shown in Figure 1. Among various QCMs, n-m type QCMs are commonly used because their quality factor (Q) is higher, which means there are more stable oscillations at particular resonance frequencies, i.e., lower noise levels [15]. The electrode with a small diameter (upper electrode) is denoted as the n electrode, and the electrode with a big diameter (lower electrode) is denoted as the m electrode.
Figure 1

Quartz crystal microbalances (QCMs) with different electrode shapes.

Mass sensitivity describes the mass-frequency relationship of the surface of the QCM [16] and plays a pivotal role in the quantitative analysis of QCM applications. The mass sensitivity of QCMs with different electrode structures, such as m-m type, n-m type, ring type, dot-ring type, and double ring type electrodes, has been previously studied [11,15,17,18,19,20,21,22]. By measuring the frequency change associated with localized mass deposits created by electrochemical deposition, Hillier et al. constructed experimental fitted curves for the mass sensitivity distribution of n-m type QCMs [18]. Through theoretical analysis and experimentation, Josse et al. analyzed the radial dependence of mass sensitivity distribution with different loading factors for n-m type QCMs [15]. Considering that spatially uneven electrodeposition can cause errors between theoretical and experimentally measured mass loads on electrochemical quartz crystal microbalances (EQCM), Kelly et al. discussed the spatial variation of the mass sensitivity factor of n-m type QCMs by changes in the spatial, deposited-mass distribution [21]. To obtain a uniform mass sensitivity distribution, Richardson et al. compared the sensitivity of n-m type QCMs and ring QCMs and constructed a fitted curve for the mass sensitivity of a 5 MHz n-m type QCM [20]. Yang et al. studied the mass sensitivity of the quartz crystal microbalance for various configurations and various thicknesses of the electrodes [19]. However, to our knowledge, there are few studies on whether the mass sensitivity of n-m type QCMs on the n electrode and the m electrode are the same. The relationship between the diameter ratio of the n electrode and the m electrode and the mass sensitivity of n-m type QCMs is unclear. These problems have brought difficulties to QCM application analysis. In this article, these issues will be investigated.

2. Theory

The practical mass sensitivity has a Gaussian distribution [18,23]. It depends on the particle displacement amplitude function A of the QCM and the distance from a given point to the center [17]. The mass sensitivity function of the QCM is defined as follows [11,18,24]: where is a mass sensitivity function with a unit of (Hz·kg−1), is Sauerbrey’s mass sensitivity constant, is the particle displacement amplitude function and is the distance from that point to the center. In QCM sensors, the particle displacement amplitude function is independent to the angular direction [15,17]. The particle displacement amplitude function in Equation (1) is a solution of the following Bessel equation [11,15,17] where depends on material constants of the quartz crystal and , where = E, P and U (E, P, and U represent the fully electroded region, partially electroded region, and non-electroded region, respectively); c is the velocity at which waves travel through the crystal. The relationship between c and the material parameters is: . and are the density and shear modulus of the piezoelectric quartz crystal, respectively; is cut-off frequency of the fully electroded region (), partially electroded region (), and non-electroded region (), respectively. The results of the numerical theoretical calculations show that the mass sensitivity of the n electrode and the m electrode are essentially the same. Additionally, consistent with the original results, a decrease in the diameter of the n electrode or the diameter of the m electrode will improve mass sensitivity [25]. However, if the diameter of the n electrode diameter or the diameter of the m electrode is too small, the dynamic resistance (R) will increase; the Q value and frequency stability will be low; at the same time, the particle amplitude will reduce, and mass sensitivity will decrease. Considering the effect of the ratio of the diameters of the two electrodes on mass sensitivity, the results show that the mass sensitivity of n-m type QCMs was at maximum value when the diameter of the n electrode is close to half the diameter of the m electrode. When the fundamental resonant frequency was 10 MHz, the thickness of the gold electrode with a diameter of 2.5 and 5.1 mm on both sides was 500 Å. By calculation, the mass sensitivity of the AT-cut n-m type QCM is 3.13 × 1012 Hz·kg−1 at the center of the electrode.

3. Experiment

It is difficult to directly detect the mass sensitivity of QCMs. The data on the mass sensitivity of QCMs in the published literature are mostly relative or normalized results [15,26]. Our previous work [27] proposed the equivalent mass sensitivity, which takes into account the Gaussian distribution characteristics and effects of the electrodes on mass sensitivity. Then, a thin film was added onto the surface of the QCM to indirectly verify mass sensitivity distribution. Additionally, the theoretical frequency shift can be calculated according to the following equation: where r is the radius of the specified circular region onto which mass load is attached. is the equivalent mass sensitivity. A series of QCM experiments, which plated a rigid gold film onto the surface of the QCM, were performed to investigate the mass sensitivity of n-m type QCMs indirectly. The experimental environment was selected in a class 10,000 ultra-clean room of Wintron Electronic Co., Ltd. (Zhengzhou, China). The ambient temperature in the ultra-clean room was maintained at 23 °C. A total of 36 AT-cut, plano–plano,10-MHz quartz wafers with a diameter of 8.7 mm were used in this experiment. Figure 2 is a schematic diagram of the experimental set-up. To investigate the mass sensitivity, QCMs were divided into 3 groups according to the different diameters of electrodes.
Figure 2

Schematic diagram of the experimental setup.

In the first plating process, group A was plated gold n electrodes and m electrodes with a diameter of 1.4 and 5.1 mm (QCM-1.4/5.1); group B was plated gold n electrodes and m electrodes with a diameter of 2.5 and 5.1 mm (QCM-2.5/5.1); group C was plated gold n electrodes and m electrodes with a diameter of 3.5 and 5.1 mm (QCM-3.5/5.1). The thickness of all the gold electrodes was 500 Å and their resonant frequencies were measured and recorded as f1. In the second plating process, 12 QCMs for each group, A, B, and C, were divided into two subgroups. A total of 6 QCMs had a coated gold film on the n electrodes with a diameter of 1 mm and a thickness of 500 Å, and the other QCMs were coated on the m electrodes with the same film. Their resonant frequencies were measured and recorded as . was the frequency shift caused by the thin gold film plated in the second plating process. The equipment used in the plating process was the S&AW-5600 BASE PLATING SYSTEM (Saunders & Associates, LLC. Phoenix, AZ, USA). The coating thickness was set by the equipment program.

4. Results and Discussion

The frequencies of all 36 QCMs (three groups) were measured using the S&A250B-1 network analyzer (Saunders & Associates, LLC. Phoenix, AZ, USA), and the results are shown in Table 1. and are the average value and the standard deviation of frequency shift, respectively, in each subgroup. and are the average value and the standard deviation of frequency shift, respectively, in each group. As is shown in Table 1, all the standard deviations, , , were very small, indicating the high stability of the experimental system and the environment.
Table 1

Experimental values.

GroupABC
Electroden-Electrodem-Electroden-Electrodem-Electroden-Electrodem-Electrode
Δf (Hz)269027102550273022402310
259026702600268022402330
238026402700276021102290
257025202520267022402330
263025402400264023202300
248026102640262022702270
Δfa (Hz) 2556.672615.002568.332683.332236.672305.00
δa (Hz)110.9473.96104.3953.1769.4742223.45
Δfc (Hz)2585.832625.83 2270.83
δ (Hz) 94.9199.2260.97

※ The analysis of experimental and theoretical results is shown in Section 4.3.

4.1. Effect of Different Electrodes on N-M type QCMs

By comparing frequency changes caused by the second coating process on the n and m electrodes, the results showed that the mass sensitivity of the n electrode surface and m electrode surface were essentially the same. This result is consistent with theoretical calculations, and the error (2% to 4%) between the mass sensitivity of the n electrode surface and m electrode surface may be caused by experimental errors or model errors.

4.2. Effect of Different Ratios of Diameters of Electrodes on N-M Type QCMs

Experimental results also showed that the mass sensitivity of QCM-1.4/5.1 was close to QCM-2.5/5.1. To further analyze the mass sensitivity of QCM-1.4/5.1 and QCM-2.5/5.1, the dynamic resistance R of the equivalent circuit parameters was measured by the S&A250B-1 network analyzer (shown in Table 2).
Table 2

Dynamic resistance (R) of all quartz crystal microbalance (QCMs).

GroupsR (Ω)
A81.6477.6167.1971.4767.3076.7777.5968.0492.0477.1797.2280.04
B21.4223.4521.9823.9819.5919.4425.3728.2724.7324.4623.4522.02
C12.9511.3510.0412.7624.6113.1411.3711.3312.7611.2013.0211.75
is the mass change caused by the second plating process. Experimental results showed that the mass sensitivity of QCM-1.4/5.1, QCM-2.5/5.1 and QCM-3.5/5.1 is 3.40, 3.45, and 2.99 Hz.ng-1, respectively. By comparing the mass sensitivity of the three groups, the results showed that the mass sensitivity of n-m type QCMs was at maximum value when the diameter of the n electrode was close to half the diameter of the m electrode, which was consistent with the calculation. Although the mass sensitivity of the QCMs increased as the diameter of the electrode decreased, as R increased, the particle amplitude decreased, so the mass sensitivity decreased. Therefore, under the joint effect of the diameter of the electrode and dynamic resistance, the mass sensitivity of the QCM-1.4/5.1 was lower than QCM-2.5/5.1. The dynamic capacitance of group B and group C was approximately 7.0 and 15.0 , and the corresponding quality factor Q was approximately and , respectively. In other words, group B possessed the highest mass sensitivity and a higher Q. So, group B had more advantages than group A and group C.

4.3. The Mass Sensitivity of QCM-2.5/5.1

We continued to analyze the data of group B (QCM-2.5/5.1). According to Equation (3), the equivalent mass sensitivity was Hz·kg−1 at the electrode center within a diameter of 1 mm. So, the theoretical frequency shift , caused by , was 2245 Hz. The relative error between and is 14.81%. is caused by ignoring the fringing field effect in the theoretical calculation.

5. Conclusions

In this paper, through theoretical calculations and experimental verification, the results show that the mass sensitivity of the n electrode surface and the m electrode surface were essentially the same in n-m type QCMs. Meanwhile, the mass sensitivity of n-m type QCMs varied with the diameter of the n and m electrodes. When the diameter of the n electrode was close to half the diameter of the m electrode, the mass sensitivity was at maximum value. This study will provide a reference for further designs and applications of n-m type QCMs.
  14 in total

1.  The modified design of ring electrode quartz crystal resonator for uniform mass sensitivity distribution.

Authors:  Jinyang Gao; Xianhe Huang; Yan Wang
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.725

2.  Comments on the effects of nonuniform mass loading on a quartz crystal microbalance.

Authors:  J R Vig; A Ballato
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.725

3.  170-MHz electrodeless quartz crystal microbalance biosensor: capability and limitation of higher frequency measurement.

Authors:  Hirotsugu Ogi; Hironao Nagai; Hironao Naga; Yuji Fukunishi; Masahiko Hirao; Masayoshi Nishiyama
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 6.986

4.  The Exploration and Confirmation of the Maximum Mass Sensitivity of Quartz Crystal Microbalance.

Authors:  Xian-He Huang; Wei Pan; Jian-Guo Hu; Qing-Song Bai
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 2.725

5.  QCM-nanomagnetic beads biosensor for lead ion detection.

Authors:  Qingli Zhang; Haixia Cui; Xingliang Xiong; Jun Chen; Ying Wang; Jia Shen; Yiting Luo; Longcong Chen
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 4.616

6.  Detection of AU(III) ions using a poly(N,N-dimethylacrylamide)-coated QCM sensor.

Authors:  Hideaki Tokuyama; Eri Kitamura; Yoshimi Seida
Journal:  Talanta       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 6.057

7.  Laser response of a quartz crystal microbalance: frequency changes induced by light irradiation in the air phase.

Authors:  Takayoshi Kawasaki; Tetsuhiro Mochida; Jun-ichi Katada; Yoshio Okahata
Journal:  Anal Sci       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.081

8.  A Practical Model of Quartz Crystal Microbalance in Actual Applications.

Authors:  Xianhe Huang; Qingsong Bai; Jianguo Hu; Dong Hou
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 3.576

9.  Impact of surface wettability on S-layer recrystallization: a real-time characterization by QCM-D.

Authors:  Jagoba Iturri; Ana C Vianna; Alberto Moreno-Cencerrado; Dietmar Pum; Uwe B Sleytr; José Luis Toca-Herrera
Journal:  Beilstein J Nanotechnol       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 3.649

10.  Design and Validation of a 150 MHz HFFQCM Sensor for Bio-Sensing Applications.

Authors:  Román Fernández; Pablo García; María García; José V García; Yolanda Jiménez; Antonio Arnau
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 3.576

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Advances in the Mass Sensitivity Distribution of Quartz Crystal Microbalances: A Review.

Authors:  Xianhe Huang; Qiao Chen; Wei Pan; Yao Yao
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 3.847

2.  Impedance Analysis of Chitin Nanofibers Integrated Bulk Acoustic Wave Humidity Sensor with Asymmetric Electrode Configuration.

Authors:  Qiao Chen; Dong Liu; Xian-He Huang; Yao Yao; Kun-Lei Mao
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 5.719

3.  Assessing the Mass Sensitivity for Different Electrode Materials Commonly Used in Quartz Crystal Microbalances (QCMs).

Authors:  Xianhe Huang; Qiao Chen; Wei Pan; Jianguo Hu; Yao Yao
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-14       Impact factor: 3.576

4.  Analysis of the Effect of Electrode Materials on the Sensitivity of Quartz Crystal Microbalance.

Authors:  Qiao Chen; Xianhe Huang; Yao Yao; Kunlei Mao
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 5.076

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.