Literature DB >> 31071712

Hemiablation of Localized Prostate Cancer by High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound: A Series of 35 Cases.

Peter V Glybochko1, Alexander V Amosov1, German E Krupinov1, Nikolay V Petrovskii2, Ilya S Lumpov1.   

Abstract

Prostate cancer (PrC) is one of the most common tumors diagnosed in men. The detection rate of localized PrC has been dramatically enhanced by screening and the development of visualization methods. There are currently several techniques for focal treatment available, among which the most interesting in our opinion is high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU). Currently, HIFU hemiablation of PrC is not an established treatment, although evidence of its effectiveness and safety is growing. We have been performing HIFU hemiablation since 2013 and here report our results to add to the evidence on the effectiveness of the technique. Between October 2013 and December 2016, we performed HIFU hemiablation of the prostate for a total of 35 patients with confirmed PrC stage <cT2a at our urology clinic and retrospectively examined duration of ablation, pre- and postoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, prostate volume, erectile function, and dysuria. The mean duration of ablation was 22 min (10-35). The mean postoperative hospital stay was 4 days. None of the patients experienced serious complications. Postoperative PSA tests showed the greatest decrease after 3 months to 2.4 ng/mL on average (p < 0.001). The pathological focus seen on MRI before the procedure in each case was absent after 3 months. Control biopsy after 12 months revealed residual cancer in the contralateral lobe in 4 patients. The findings obtained during follow-up and from control biopsies indicate that the treatment was highly efficacious with a low rate of nonserious postoperative complications. HIFU hemiablation proved to be a reliable therapeutic modality for localized PrC and was associated with a low rate of complications and comparable risk of recurrence. Despite the fact that this method of treatment is currently experimental, the results of this case series and other studies indicate its feasibility and safety.
© 2019 The Author(s) Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Focal therapy; HIFU ablation; Prostate cancer; Ultrasound hemiablation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31071712      PMCID: PMC6643494          DOI: 10.1159/000499739

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncology        ISSN: 0030-2414            Impact factor:   2.935


  13 in total

Review 1.  [High intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) in urology].

Authors:  E Chartier-Kastler; L Yonneau; P Conort; A Haertig; M O Bitker; F Richard
Journal:  Prog Urol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 0.915

2.  Focal therapy in prostate cancer: determinants of success and failure.

Authors:  Hashim Uddin Ahmed; Caroline Moore; Emilie Lecornet; Mark Emberton
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.942

3.  High-intensity focused ultrasound in prostate cancer: results after 3 years.

Authors:  C Chaussy; S Thüroff
Journal:  Mol Urol       Date:  2000

4.  Screening and prostate-cancer mortality in a randomized European study.

Authors:  Fritz H Schröder; Jonas Hugosson; Monique J Roobol; Teuvo L J Tammela; Stefano Ciatto; Vera Nelen; Maciej Kwiatkowski; Marcos Lujan; Hans Lilja; Marco Zappa; Louis J Denis; Franz Recker; Antonio Berenguer; Liisa Määttänen; Chris H Bangma; Gunnar Aus; Arnauld Villers; Xavier Rebillard; Theodorus van der Kwast; Bert G Blijenberg; Sue M Moss; Harry J de Koning; Anssi Auvinen
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  Nerve-sparing focal cryoablation of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Thomas J Polascik; Janice M Mayes; Vladimir Mouraviev
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.309

Review 6.  High-intensity focused ultrasound for the treatment of localized prostate cancer: 5-year experience.

Authors:  Andreas Blana; Bernhard Walter; Sebastian Rogenhofer; Wolf F Wieland
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 7.  Active surveillance and radical therapy in prostate cancer: can focal therapy offer the middle way?

Authors:  Hashim Uddin Ahmed; Mark Emberton
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-08-14       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 8.  Will focal therapy become a standard of care for men with localized prostate cancer?

Authors:  Hashim Uddin Ahmed; Doug Pendse; Rowland Illing; Clare Allen; Jan H P van der Meulen; Mark Emberton
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Oncol       Date:  2007-11

Review 9.  Focal therapy for localized prostate cancer: a critical appraisal of rationale and modalities.

Authors:  Scott E Eggener; Peter T Scardino; Peter R Carroll; Michael J Zelefsky; Oliver Sartor; Hedvig Hricak; Thomas M Wheeler; Samson W Fine; John Trachtenberg; Mark A Rubin; Mak Ohori; Kentaro Kuroiwa; Michel Rossignol; Lucien Abenhaim
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-10-15       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  High-intensity-focused ultrasound in the treatment of primary prostate cancer: the first UK series.

Authors:  H U Ahmed; E Zacharakis; T Dudderidge; J N Armitage; R Scott; J Calleary; R Illing; A Kirkham; A Freeman; C Ogden; C Allen; M Emberton
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Focal prostate cancer therapy in the era of multiparametric MRI: a review of options and outcomes.

Authors:  John R Heard; Aurash Naser-Tavakolian; Michael Nazmifar; Michael Ahdoot
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 5.455

Review 2.  High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound: A Review of Mechanisms and Clinical Applications.

Authors:  Vismaya S Bachu; Jayanidhi Kedda; Ian Suk; Jordan J Green; Betty Tyler
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-08-10       Impact factor: 4.219

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.