Literature DB >> 31071707

Anaerobic capacity assessment in elite swimmers through inertial sensors.

Sabrina Demarie1, Emanuele Chirico, Antonio Gianfelici, Giuseppe Vannozzi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to assess if changes in speed and stroke parameters, as measured by an inertial sensor during a maximal effort swimming test, could provide an effective detection of anaerobic capacity in elite swimmers. APPROACH: Fourteen elite swimmers performed a 75 m maximal swimming test. Changes in speed and stroke parameters, estimated by a body-worn inertial sensor, were analysed to provide insight into stroke mechanics during swimming. Their relationships with the output of the Wingate Anaerobic Test were analysed. Best times in competition were also considered to assess swimmer's performance. MAIN
RESULTS: Mean power measured using the Wingate cycle ergometer test highly correlated with mean speed attained by the swimmers during the proposed 75 m swimming test (R range: .700-.809, p   <  .05). Mean power in the Wingate Anaerobic Test and mean speed in the 75 m swimming test highly correlated with best times attained by the swimmers (R range: .736-.855, p   <  .01; R range: .659-.952, p   <  .05, for Wingate and 75 m swimming test, respectively). Moreover, stroke variables were investigated: in this regard, a significant decrease in stroke rate and swimming speed and a significant increase in stroke length were observed between the first and the third lap (p   <  .01). SIGNIFICANCE: The present in-water free swimming test provided insight into specific physiological/mechanical aspects of elite swimmers. The correlation of the swimming and the Wingate tests with swimmer's performance in competition confirms that they both reflect the skills and anaerobic qualities a swimmer uses in a race. The wearable inertial sensor could represent a feasible solution to evaluate stroke parameters, allowing a timely follow-up of variations in swimming biomechanics along the course of the test and the identification of differences in biomechanical strategy between swimmers. This analysis is of great interest for swimmers and coaches to characterise swimmer's technique weakness and strength, and to plan individual race pacing strategy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31071707     DOI: 10.1088/1361-6579/ab205d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Meas        ISSN: 0967-3334            Impact factor:   2.833


  4 in total

Review 1.  Wearables in Swimming for Real-Time Feedback: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jorge E Morais; João P Oliveira; Tatiana Sampaio; Tiago M Barbosa
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 3.847

2.  Prediction and Analysis of Tokyo Olympic Games Swimming Results: Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Swimmers' Performance.

Authors:  Sabrina Demarie; Emanuele Chirico; Christel Galvani
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-13       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Energy Consumption of Water Running and Cycling at Four Exercise Intensities.

Authors:  Sabrina Demarie; Emanuele Chirico; Cecilia Bratta; Cristina Cortis
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-08

4.  Effect of Dry-Land Core Training on Physical Fitness and Swimming Performance in Adolescent Elite Swimmers.

Authors:  Mu-Yeop Ji; Jin-Ho Yoon; Ki-Jae Song; Jae-Keun Oh
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 1.429

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.