Takashi Nagai1, Nathaniel A Bates2, Timothy E Hewett3, Nathan D Schilaty2. 1. Biomechanics Laboratories, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; Sports Medicine Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester and Minneapolis, MN, USA. Electronic address: nagai.takashi@mayo.edu. 2. Biomechanics Laboratories, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; Sports Medicine Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester and Minneapolis, MN, USA; Department of Physiology & Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. 3. Biomechanics Laboratories, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; Sports Medicine Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester and Minneapolis, MN, USA; Department of Physiology & Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Relationships between joint position sense and the sensorimotor characteristics such as joint stiffness, time to detect motion, and time to peak torque during a perturbation test have rarely been investigated due to methodological challenges. The purpose of this study was to compare joint position sense and the sensorimotor characteristics in healthy individuals. METHODS: A total of 26 subjects were recruited and completed joint position sense and a perturbation test on isokinetic dynamometer. Joint position sense was assessed by comparison of the absolute angle difference between a reference and replicated position. During the perturbation test, the dynamometer moved the knee flexion angle from 70° to 30° (0° represents a full knee extension) at the velocity of 500° per second at random. Subjects were asked to react and pull back the leg as soon as they perceived the movement. Pearson or Spearman's correlation coefficients were used to assess these relationships (P < 0.05). FINDINGS: Larger joint position sense absolute error values were significantly correlated with higher short-range at 50 milliseconds (r = 0.572, P = 0.002), at 100 milliseconds (ρ = 0.416, P = 0.035), and reactive joint stiffness (r = 0.395, P = 0.046). INTERPRETATION: There was a paradoxical relationship between higher joint stiffness and worsened joint position sense. Potential reasons include sensory weighting within the sensorimotor system and thixotropic properties (after-effects of muscle eccentric contractions to increase stiffness and alter joint position sense).
BACKGROUND: Relationships between joint position sense and the sensorimotor characteristics such as joint stiffness, time to detect motion, and time to peak torque during a perturbation test have rarely been investigated due to methodological challenges. The purpose of this study was to compare joint position sense and the sensorimotor characteristics in healthy individuals. METHODS: A total of 26 subjects were recruited and completed joint position sense and a perturbation test on isokinetic dynamometer. Joint position sense was assessed by comparison of the absolute angle difference between a reference and replicated position. During the perturbation test, the dynamometer moved the knee flexion angle from 70° to 30° (0° represents a full knee extension) at the velocity of 500° per second at random. Subjects were asked to react and pull back the leg as soon as they perceived the movement. Pearson or Spearman's correlation coefficients were used to assess these relationships (P < 0.05). FINDINGS: Larger joint position sense absolute error values were significantly correlated with higher short-range at 50 milliseconds (r = 0.572, P = 0.002), at 100 milliseconds (ρ = 0.416, P = 0.035), and reactive joint stiffness (r = 0.395, P = 0.046). INTERPRETATION: There was a paradoxical relationship between higher joint stiffness and worsened joint position sense. Potential reasons include sensory weighting within the sensorimotor system and thixotropic properties (after-effects of muscle eccentric contractions to increase stiffness and alter joint position sense).
Authors: Bohdanna T Zazulak; Timothy E Hewett; N Peter Reeves; Barry Goldberg; Jacek Cholewicki Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2007-01-31 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Gregory D Myer; Kevin R Ford; Kim D Barber Foss; Chunyan Liu; Todd G Nick; Timothy E Hewett Journal: Clin J Sport Med Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 3.638