Literature DB >> 31071073

Racial Disparities in Mortality Associated with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus - Fulton and DeKalb Counties, Georgia, 2002-2016.

S Sam Lim, Charles G Helmick, Gaobin Bao, Jennifer Hootman, Rana Bayakly, Caroline Gordon, Cristina Drenkard.   

Abstract

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic, systemic autoimmune disease with often nonspecific symptoms that can lead to a delay in diagnosis. The disease disproportionately affects women and minorities. Blacks with SLE also have more severe disease and develop it at an earlier age (1). Despite an increase in the 5-year survival rate from 50% in 1955 to approximately 90% in the 2000s, attributed largely to advances in management of SLE (2), premature mortality among SLE patients persists, often as a result of disease severity, infections, and cardiovascular disease. Because existing SLE mortality estimates based on death certificate data are known to underestimate SLE deaths (3), SLE mortality was analyzed using 2002-2004 data from the population-based Georgia Lupus Registry (1). Incident and prevalent SLE cases matched to the National Death Index through 2016 identified 97 and 401 deaths, respectively. Standardized mortality ratios adjusted for age group, sex, and race were two to three times higher among persons with SLE relative to expected deaths in the general population. Blacks had significantly higher cumulative mortality than did whites, and blacks with both incident and prevalent cases were significantly younger at death (mean age 51.8 and 52.3 years, respectively) than were whites (mean age 64.4 and 65.0 years, respectively). Whites had lower mortality after diagnosis than did blacks; among incident cases, mortality among whites did not occur until 5 years after SLE diagnosis, whereas blacks had significantly and persistently higher mortality from the time of diagnosis. There were no significant differences by sex. Current CDC-supported efforts encourage early detection, diagnosis, and treatment, and enhanced self-management skills to mitigate racial disparities and improve outcomes overall among persons with SLE.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31071073      PMCID: PMC6542193          DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6818a4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep        ISSN: 0149-2195            Impact factor:   17.586


Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic, systemic autoimmune disease with often nonspecific symptoms that can lead to a delay in diagnosis. The disease disproportionately affects women and minorities. Blacks with SLE also have more severe disease and develop it at an earlier age (). Despite an increase in the 5-year survival rate from 50% in 1955 to approximately 90% in the 2000s, attributed largely to advances in management of SLE (), premature mortality among SLE patients persists, often as a result of disease severity, infections, and cardiovascular disease. Because existing SLE mortality estimates based on death certificate data are known to underestimate SLE deaths (), SLE mortality was analyzed using 2002–2004 data from the population-based Georgia Lupus Registry (). Incident and prevalent SLE cases matched to the National Death Index through 2016 identified 97 and 401 deaths, respectively. Standardized mortality ratios adjusted for age group, sex, and race were two to three times higher among persons with SLE relative to expected deaths in the general population. Blacks had significantly higher cumulative mortality than did whites, and blacks with both incident and prevalent cases were significantly younger at death (mean age 51.8 and 52.3 years, respectively) than were whites (mean age 64.4 and 65.0 years, respectively). Whites had lower mortality after diagnosis than did blacks; among incident cases, mortality among whites did not occur until 5 years after SLE diagnosis, whereas blacks had significantly and persistently higher mortality from the time of diagnosis. There were no significant differences by sex. Current CDC-supported efforts encourage early detection, diagnosis, and treatment, and enhanced self-management skills to mitigate racial disparities and improve outcomes overall among persons with SLE. The Georgia Lupus Registry () was designed to collect data on all residents of two Georgia counties (Fulton and DeKalb) in the Atlanta metropolitan area with large black and white populations. The public health surveillance exemption to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act Privacy Rule (https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/privacy/index.html) allowed investigators to obtain protected health information (PHI) without written consent of the patient. Application of this exemption enabled investigators to ascertain all potential cases, determine whether potential cases met case definition criteria, and provide enough information to prevent duplicate counting of patients examined in multiple facilities. PHI was stored securely, and its use was limited to authorized research personnel, maximizing the use of deidentified data whenever feasible. The primary sources of potential cases included hospitals, rheumatologists, nephrology groups, and dermatology groups in and around the two counties. Administrative databases were queried retrospectively for billing codes for lupus and related conditions. Secondary sources included laboratories (including pathology laboratories) and queries in other population databases (). Abstractors were trained and underwent regular quality assessments. The study was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Boards at Emory University and the Georgia Department of Public Health. CDC determined this study did not meet the definition of human subjects research (public health practice). SLE prevalence was estimated for 2002 and incidence for 2002–2004 from the Georgia Lupus Registry. Denominator data for the two counties were obtained from postcensal population estimates. Age-adjusted estimates and 95% confidence intervals were calculated based on the standard 2000 projected age distribution (). A case of SLE was defined as meeting either the 1997 update of the 1982 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) revised classification criteria (meeting four or more of the 11 criteria*) (,) or an alternative definition (three of the ACR criteria plus a documented diagnosis of SLE by the patient’s board-certified rheumatologist). All incident and prevalent SLE cases were matched to the National Death Index through 2016. Cause of death codes were available but not analyzed because of poor reliability regarding SLE attribution (). Standardized mortality ratios were calculated as the ratio of observed deaths among persons with prevalent SLE to expected deaths in the general county populations; subgroups were compared using the same age group, sex, and race categories. The number of expected deaths was calculated by multiplying the death rate of the general population in Fulton and DeKalb counties by the total number of SLE patients in each group. There were too few deaths to calculate standardized mortality ratios for the incident SLE group. Cumulative mortality used Kaplan-Meier survival analysis for both incident and prevalent cases to determine the percentage of SLE patients dying since their diagnosis (). Analyses were performed using SAS software (version 9.4; SAS Institute). During 2002–2004, a total of 336 incident SLE cases were identified; these SLE patients were demographically similar to the patients in 1,353 cases with prevalent SLE in 2002 (87%–90% female, 74%–76% black, and 23% white) but were older at SLE diagnosis (mean age 40.6 years) than were patients with prevalent SLE (34.6 years). Among patients with prevalent and incident SLE, 401 and 97 deaths, respectively, occurred through 2016. Standardized mortality ratios using 2002–2016 data were 2.3–3.3 times higher for persons with prevalent SLE relative to expected deaths in the general population (Table). Black females with prevalent SLE were three times more likely to die than were black females in the general population (standardized mortality ratio = 3.38). Cumulative mortality was significantly higher among blacks than among whites for both incident (Figure 1) and prevalent (Figure 2) SLE; death occurred at a younger age among blacks with incident SLE cases (mean age = 51.8 ± 17.5 years) and prevalent SLE cases (mean 52.3 ± 15.9 years) than it did among whites (64.4 ± 18.9 years and 65.0 ± 16.3 years, respectively) (p<0.001). Mortality among whites was markedly lower in the years immediately following diagnosis compared with mortality among blacks; among incident cases, no deaths were observed among whites until 5 years after SLE diagnosis, whereas mortality among blacks was persistently higher from the time of diagnosis. In addition, whites with SLE had the same cumulative mortality proportion (9%) in 10 years as that observed in blacks in 2 years (Figure 1). There were no significant differences by sex.
TABLE

Standardized mortality ratios for patients with prevalent cases of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) from 2002 to 2016, adjusted by age, sex, and black/white race* — Georgia Lupus Registry

CharacteristicNo. of SLE patients (%)Deaths
Standardized mortality ratio (95% CI)
ObservedExpected
Overall (black and white)
1,335 (100)
400
128
3.12 (2.83–3.44)
Sex
Male
135 (10.1)
51
17
2.98 (2.27–3.92)
Female
1,200 (89.9)
349
111
3.14 (2.83–3.49)
Race
Black
1,024 (76.7)
324
97
3.34 (3.00–3.72)
White
311 (23.3)
76
31
2.43 (1.94–3.04)
Race/Sex (total = 1,200)
Black female
924 (77.0)
287
85
3.38 (3.01–3.79)
White female276 (23.0)62262.36 (1.84–3.02)

Abbreviation: CI = confidence interval.

* Age on July 1 was used for adjustment. The standardized mortality ratio is a ratio between the observed number of deaths in those with SLE and the number of deaths expected, based on age, sex, and race specific rates in Fulton and DeKalb counties. CIs are based on a generalized estimating equation model with Poisson distribution.

† Eighteen persons who were not identified as black or white, including one who died, were excluded.

FIGURE 1

Cumulative mortality* of incident systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) cases diagnosed during 2002–2004, by black/white race — Georgia Lupus Registry, 2002–2016

* Cumulative mortality for incident SLE cases was calculated using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis to indicate the probability of SLE patients dying at a specified time since diagnosis. Difference p = 0.008, by log rank test.

FIGURE 2

Cumulative mortality* of prevalent systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) cases diagnosed in 2002, by black/white race — Georgia Lupus Registry, 2002–2016

* Cumulative mortality for prevalent SLE cases was calculated using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis to indicate the probability of SLE patients dying at a specified time since 2002. Difference p = 0.025, by log rank test.

Abbreviation: CI = confidence interval. * Age on July 1 was used for adjustment. The standardized mortality ratio is a ratio between the observed number of deaths in those with SLE and the number of deaths expected, based on age, sex, and race specific rates in Fulton and DeKalb counties. CIs are based on a generalized estimating equation model with Poisson distribution. † Eighteen persons who were not identified as black or white, including one who died, were excluded. Cumulative mortality* of incident systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) cases diagnosed during 2002–2004, by black/white race — Georgia Lupus Registry, 2002–2016 * Cumulative mortality for incident SLE cases was calculated using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis to indicate the probability of SLE patients dying at a specified time since diagnosis. Difference p = 0.008, by log rank test. Cumulative mortality* of prevalent systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) cases diagnosed in 2002, by black/white race — Georgia Lupus Registry, 2002–2016 * Cumulative mortality for prevalent SLE cases was calculated using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis to indicate the probability of SLE patients dying at a specified time since 2002. Difference p = 0.025, by log rank test.

Discussion

Despite increasing awareness of SLE and advancements in treatment (), mortality among persons with SLE remains high, with the highest standardized mortality ratio among black females. The effect of this racial disparity in mortality is further underscored by the fact that the prevalence of SLE in blacks is three times that in whites (). These findings are similar to those reported in a 2002 study, which also found a higher incidence and prevalence among women and blacks, but the current study used more accurate methods to ascertain cases (). A recent nationwide study using causes of death from 1968 through 2013 obtained from death certificate data in CDC’s WONDER database (https://wonder.cdc.gov) showed that age-standardized mortality rates decreased over time among SLE patients but remained high relative to non-SLE mortality, with the highest mortality rates in women, blacks, and residents of the South and West U.S. Census regions (). Both of these studies depended solely on death certificates to identify cases of SLE, which only capture an estimated 40%–60% of SLE cases (,). The findings in this report are subject to at least four limitations. First, racial identity was assigned based primarily on the physician’s assessment as documented in the medical record, which might not reflect the patient’s self-identity. Second, some cases might have been missed in the original registry. Third, there might be variability in SLE diagnosis by rheumatologists, and undiagnosed cases were not sought. Finally, these results might not be generalizable outside the two counties. Strengths of the current study include the use of a population-based lupus registry identifying nearly all validated SLE cases in the two-county area and the long follow-up period, resulting in data on more SLE deaths than would be identified by death certificate diagnoses alone. Prioritizing the identification of reversible mortality factors and developing strategies to address them could aid in mitigating racial disparities and improving outcomes overall in SLE. The first-ever National Public Health Agenda for Lupus () describes a plan to address lupus from a public health perspective. Other CDC-supported, population-based lupus registries and longitudinal follow-up activities include examining natural history, treatment, access to care, and disparities as potential factors in SLE mortality and progression (https://www.cdc.gov/lupus/funded/lupus-studies.htm). The Lupus Foundation of America and the American College of Rheumatology are working together to encourage early detection and treatment of lupus, enhance the self-management skills of patients with lupus, and improve health care providers’ ability to make accurate diagnoses. Additional information is available at https://www.cdc.gov/lupus/funded/awareness.htm.

What is already known about this topic?

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a systemic autoimmune disease that disproportionately affects women and minorities. The 5-year survival rate of patients with SLE has been improving.

What is added by this report?

Using improved methods by following SLE patients carefully defined in a population-based registry, standardized mortality ratios were two to three times higher in persons with SLE than in the general population. Compared with whites with SLE, cumulative SLE mortality was significantly higher among blacks, with deaths occurring sooner after diagnosis and at a mean age approximately 13 years younger.

What are the implications for public health practice?

Current CDC-supported efforts to encourage early detection, diagnosis, and treatment, and to enhance self-management skills might mitigate racial disparities and improve overall outcomes in SLE.
  8 in total

1.  Updating the American College of Rheumatology revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  M C Hochberg
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1997-09

2.  The incidence and prevalence of systemic lupus erythematosus, 2002-2004: The Georgia Lupus Registry.

Authors:  S Sam Lim; A Rana Bayakly; Charles G Helmick; Caroline Gordon; Kirk A Easley; Cristina Drenkard
Journal:  Arthritis Rheumatol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 10.995

3.  Lack of recording of systemic lupus erythematosus in the death certificates of lupus patients.

Authors:  J Calvo-Alén; G S Alarcón; R Campbell; M Fernández; J D Reveille; G S Cooper
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2005-06-14       Impact factor: 7.580

4.  Do Death Certificates Underestimate the Burden of Rare Diseases? The Example of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Mortality, Sweden, 2001-2013.

Authors:  Titilola Falasinnu; Marios Rossides; Yashaar Chaichian; Julia F Simard
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 2.792

5.  Trends in deaths from systemic lupus erythematosus--United States, 1979-1998.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2002-05-03       Impact factor: 17.586

6.  All-cause, cause-specific and age-specific standardised mortality ratios of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus in Ontario, Canada over 43 years (1971-2013).

Authors:  Konstantinos Tselios; Dafna D Gladman; Barry J Sheane; Jiandong Su; Murray Urowitz
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 19.103

7.  The 1982 revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  E M Tan; A S Cohen; J F Fries; A T Masi; D J McShane; N F Rothfield; J G Schaller; N Talal; R J Winchester
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1982-11

8.  46-Year Trends in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Mortality in the United States, 1968 to 2013: A Nationwide Population-Based Study.

Authors:  Eric Y Yen; Magda Shaheen; Jennifer M P Woo; Neil Mercer; Ning Li; Deborah K McCurdy; Arun Karlamangla; Ram R Singh
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 25.391

  8 in total
  19 in total

Review 1.  A comprehensive framework for navigating patient care in systemic sclerosis: A global response to the need for improving the practice of diagnostic and preventive strategies in SSc.

Authors:  Lesley Ann Saketkoo; Tracy Frech; Cecília Varjú; Robyn Domsic; Jessica Farrell; Jessica K Gordon; Carina Mihai; Nora Sandorfi; Lee Shapiro; Janet Poole; Elizabeth R Volkmann; Monika Lammi; Kendra McAnally; Helene Alexanderson; Henrik Pettersson; Faye Hant; Masataka Kuwana; Ami A Shah; Vanessa Smith; Vivien Hsu; Otylia Kowal-Bielecka; Shervin Assassi; Maurizio Cutolo; Cristiane Kayser; Victoria K Shanmugam; Madelon C Vonk; Kim Fligelstone; Nancy Baldwin; Kerri Connolly; Anneliese Ronnow; Beata Toth; Maureen Suave; Sue Farrington; Elana J Bernstein; Leslie J Crofford; László Czirják; Kelly Jensen; Monique Hinchclif; Marie Hudson; Matthew R Lammi; Jennifer Mansour; Nadia D Morgan; Fabian Mendoza; Mandana Nikpour; John Pauling; Gabriela Riemekasten; Anne-Marie Russell; Mary Beth Scholand; Elise Seigart; Tatiana Sofia Rodriguez-Reyna; Laura Hummers; Ulrich Walker; Virginia Steen
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2021-09-15       Impact factor: 4.991

2.  Social Factors, Epigenomics and Lupus in African American Women (SELA) Study: protocol for an observational mechanistic study examining the interplay of multiple individual and social factors on lupus outcomes in a health disparity population.

Authors:  Emily L Vara; Carl D Langefeld; Bethany J Wolf; Timothy D Howard; Gregory A Hawkins; Queen Quet; Lee H Moultrie; L Quinnette King; Ivan D Molano; Stephanie L Bray; Lori Ann Ueberroth; S Sam Lim; Edith M Williams; Diane L Kamen; Paula S Ramos
Journal:  Lupus Sci Med       Date:  2022-06

3.  Factors Associated with the Initiation and Retention of Patients with Lupus in the Chronic Disease Self-Management Program.

Authors:  Titilola Falasinnu; Gaobin Bao; Teresa J Brady; S Sam Lim; Cristina Drenkard
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2021-11-04       Impact factor: 5.178

4.  Racial and ethnic differences in medication use among beneficiaries of social security disability insurance with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Iris Navarro-Millán; Mangala Rajan; Geyanne E Lui; Lisa M Kern; Laura C Pinheiro; Monika M Safford; Sebastian E Sattui; Jeffrey R Curtis
Journal:  Semin Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 5.532

5.  Using Critical Race Theory to Understand Trial Participation Among Black Individuals With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Qualitative Study of Patients and Caregivers.

Authors:  Rodlescia S Sneed; Maryann Mason; Jessica N Williams; Corine Sinnette; Kreager Taber; Karen Mancera-Cuevas; Gina Curry; Patricia Canessa; Rosalind Ramsey-Goldman; Candace H Feldman
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2021-09-12       Impact factor: 5.178

6.  Mortality Among Hospitalized Individuals With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in the US Between 2006 and 2016.

Authors:  Christine Anastasiou; Laura Trupin; David V Glidden; Jing Li; Milena Gianfrancesco; Stephen Shiboski; Gabriela Schmajuk; Jinoos Yazdany
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2021-08-31       Impact factor: 5.178

7.  Pathways linking census tract typologies with subjective neighborhood disorder and depressive symptoms in the Black Women's Experiences Living with Lupus (BeWELL) Study.

Authors:  Connor D Martz; Evelyn A Hunter; Michael R Kramer; Yijie Wang; Kara Chung; Michael Brown; Cristina Drenkard; S Sam Lim; David H Chae
Journal:  Health Place       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 4.931

8.  Anticipatory racism stress, smoking and disease activity: the Black women's experiences living with lupus (BeWELL) study.

Authors:  Erica C Spears; Amani M Allen; Kara W Chung; Connor D Martz; Evelyn A Hunter; Thomas E Fuller-Rowell; S Sam Lim; Christina Drenkard; David H Chae
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2021-06-22

Review 9.  Global epidemiology of systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  Megan R W Barber; Cristina Drenkard; Titilola Falasinnu; Alberta Hoi; Anselm Mak; Nien Yee Kow; Elisabet Svenungsson; Jonna Peterson; Ann E Clarke; Rosalind Ramsey-Goldman
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 32.286

10.  Increasing Ancestral Diversity in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Clinical Studies.

Authors:  Jessica N Williams; Maria Dall'Era; S Sam Lim; Candace H Feldman; Kathleen A Arntsen; Ashira D Blazer; Tawara Goode; Joan T Merrill; Saira Sheikh; Anne M Stevens; Peter E Lipsky; Karen H Costenbader
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 5.178

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.