| Literature DB >> 31070526 |
Xiu Chen1, Jiahong Cao1, Yong Sun1, Yaolan Dai1, Jiali Zhu1, Xuemei Zhang1, Xiaoqin Zhao1, Liwen Wang1, Tingting Zhao1, Yongbiao Li1, Youping Liu2, Guihua Wei1, Tiane Zhang2, Zhiyong Yan1.
Abstract
CONTEXT: Schisandrae chinensis fructus, the dried ripe fruit of Schisandra chinensis (Turcz.) Baill. (Magnoliaceae) has been used for thousands of years as a traditional Chinese herb, which can attenuate and prevent the development of cardiovascular events.Entities:
Keywords: Haematoxylin–eosin (H&E) staining; endothelial injury; high-performance liquid chromatography; immunohistochemistry; lipid lowering; oxidative stress; statins
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 31070526 PMCID: PMC6282463 DOI: 10.1080/13880209.2018.1523933
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pharm Biol ISSN: 1388-0209 Impact factor: 3.503
Figure 1.HPLC chromatogram of schisandrin, schisandrin A and schisandrin B in EESC. Schisandrin (peak 1), schisandrin A (peak 2), schisandrin B (peak 3). (A) HPLC chromatogram of schisandrin, schisandrin A, and schisandrin B. (B) HPLC chromatogram of schisandrin, schisandrin A, and schisandrin B in EESC.
Body weights (g).
| Group | 9 week | 10 week | 11 week | 12 week |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal | 391.59 ± 42.79 | 408.13 ± 43.49 | 428.5 ± 45.69 | 434.72 ± 46.34 |
| Model | 358.94 ± 32.64 | 375.51 ± 34.16 | 371.71 ± 32.98 | 363.52 ± 30.94 |
| Simvastatin | 368.81 ± 34.92 | 378.23 ± 34.45 | 369.28 ± 32.49 | 364.55 ± 29.97 |
| EESC-L | 386.57 ± 38.25 | 398.99 ± 37.94 | 385.37 ± 35.44 | 382.41 ± 32.76 |
| EESC-M | 365.95 ± 35.49 | 376.24 ± 35.91 | 367.83 ± 33.83 | 360.19 ± 31.67 |
| EESC-H | 361.09 ± 36.53 | 364.52 ± 33.09 | 351.79 ± 30.25 | 349.86 ± 28.96 |
Results are expressed as mean ± SEM, n = 10 for each group.
Simvastatin group (4 mg/kg/d); EESC-L: low-dose EESC group (0.35 g/kg/d); EESC-M: medium-dose EESC group (0.7 g/kg/d); EESC-H: high-dose EESC group (1.4 g/kg/d).
p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Figure 2.Effect of EESC on histopathological changes in rat aorta (H&E staining). (A) magnification ×40, bar: 100 μm; (B) magnification ×200, bar: 10 μm. Arrows indicate pathological changes.
Figure 4.Serum lipid levels. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM, n = 10 for each group. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. ▵p < 0.05, ▵▵p < 0.01 compared with the normal group; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 compared with the model group.
Effects of EESC on lipid peroxidation and antioxidative enzyme activities.
| Group | MDA(nmol/mL) | GSH-PX(U/L) | CAT(U/mL) | SOD(U/mL) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal | 5.78 ± 0.84 | 278.00 ± 4.09 | 2.32 ± 0.24 | 137.42 ± 4.41 |
| Model | 17.00 ± 7.00ΔΔ | 257.34 ± 4.93 | 1.15 ± 0.21 | 106.77 ± 2.52ΔΔΔ |
| Simvastatin | 5.11 ± 0.53** | 271.56 ± 9.90 | 3.04 ± 0.86** | 110.09 ± 2.80 |
| EESC-L | 4.67 ± 0.62** | 328.89 ± 13.50*** | 4.28 ± 0.74*** | 120.72 ± 1.52** |
| EESC-M | 5.22 ± 0.86** | 368.89 ± 11.96*** | 4.40 ± 0.69*** | 113.62 ± 1.68 |
| EESC-H | 5.56 ± 0.62** | 426.67 ± 13.58*** | 1.65 ± 0.46 | 113.13 ± 3.49 |
Results are expressed as mean ± SEM, n = 10 for each group.
Simvastatin group (4 mg/kg/d); EESC-L: low-dose EESC group (0.35 g/kg/d); EESC-M: medium-dose EESC group (0.7 g/kg/d); EESC-H: high-dose EESC group (1.4 g/kg/d).
p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. ▵▵p < 0.01, ▵▵▵p < 0.001 compared with the normal group; **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, compared with the model group.
Figure 5.Nrf-2 and HO-1 expression were detected by immunohistochemical staining (magnification ×400, bar: 40 μm). The arrows point to positive expression of Nrf-2 and HO-1 proteins. (A) Analysis of Nrf-2 expression. (B) Analysis of HO-1 expression. (C) Nrf-2 mean density. (D) HO-1 mean density. The values are shown as mean ± SEM for six rats. ▵▵▵p < 0.001 compared with the normal group. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 compared with the model group.
Effects of EESC on vascular endothelial protection.
| Group | ox-LDL(ug/mL) | ET-1(ng/L) | TXB2(ng/L) | 6-keto-PGF1α(ng/L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal | 26.41 ± 2.81 | 567.28 ± 50.57 | 82.15 ± 8.68 | 122.41 ± 14.94 |
| Model | 62.61 ± 3.58ΔΔΔ | 640.63 ± 86.54 | 162.31 ± 23.44ΔΔ | 67.84 ± 11.29Δ |
| Simvastatin | 28.92 ± 3.53*** | 375.98 ± 30.00** | 82.66 ± 11.20** | 170.03 ± 21.24*** |
| EESC-L | 43.28 ± 4.83** | 382.12 ± 45.01** | 145.00 ± 22.01 | 178.91 ± 7.69*** |
| EESC-M | 44.15 ± 4.31** | 473.03 ± 54.59* | 152.96 ± 17.46 | 244.76 ± 23.89*** |
| EESC-H | 43.07 ± 3.47** | 532.43 ± 58.35 | 187.15 ± 14.06 | 210.93 ± 38.71*** |
Results are expressed as mean ± SEM, n = 10 for each group.
Simvastatin group (4 mg/kg/d); EESC-L: low-dose EESC group (0.35 g/kg/d); EESC-M: medium-dose EESC group (0.7 g/kg/d); EESC-H: high-dose EESC group (1.4 g/kg/d).
p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Δp < 0.05, ΔΔp < 0.01, ΔΔΔp < 0.001 compared with the normal group; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 compared with the model group.