| Literature DB >> 31069328 |
Evan H Phillips1, Adam H Lorch2, Abigail C Durkes3, Craig J Goergen.
Abstract
We report here on the early pathology of a well-established murine model of dissecting abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). Continuous infusion of angiotensin II (AngII) into apolipoprotein E-deficient mice induces the formation of aortic dissection and expansion at some point after implantation of miniosmotic pumps containing AngII. While this model has been studied extensively at a chronic stage, we investigated the early pathology of dissecting AAA formation at multiple scales. Using high-frequency ultrasound, we screened 12-week-old male mice daily for initial formation of these aneurysmal lesions between days 3 and 10 post-implantation. We euthanized animals on the day of diagnosis of a dissecting AAA or at day 10 if no aneurysmal lesion developed. Aortic expansion and reduced vessel wall strain occurred in animals regardless of whether a dissecting AAA developed by day 10. The aortas of mice that did not develop dissecting AAAs showed intermediate changes in morphology and biomechanical properties. RNA sequencing and gene expression analysis revealed multiple proinflammatory and matrix remodeling genes to be upregulated in the suprarenal aorta of AngII-infused mice as compared to saline-infused controls. Histology and immunohistochemistry confirmed that extracellular matrix remodeling and inflammatory cell infiltration, notably neutrophils and macrophages, occurred in AngII-infused mice with and without dissecting AAAs but not saline-infused controls. Understanding early disease processes is a critical step forward in translating experimental results in cardiovascular disease research. This work advances our understanding of this well-established murine model with applications for improving early diagnosis and therapy of acute aortic syndrome in humans.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 31069328 PMCID: PMC6481730 DOI: 10.1063/1.5053708
Source DB: PubMed Journal: APL Bioeng ISSN: 2473-2877
Experimental design for in vivo monitoring and euthanasia. Twelve animals were assigned to either cohort 1 (AngII AAA) or 2 (AngII No AAA) depending on whether a dissecting AAA was identified by day 10 after AngII pump implantation. Three additional animals were monitored but excluded from the study. Two of these animals were moribund at day 5, and one experienced an aortic rupture on day 6 before a full US dataset was collected. Five animals in cohort 3 (saline) were implanted with saline-filled pumps. The number of animals () in cohort 1 that were diagnosed on a given day is bolded and italicized.
FIG. 1.Volumetric growth and reduction in vessel wall strain occur with exogenous AngII infusion regardless of dissecting AAA status. (a) Individual volume/length values at baseline and the animal-specific endpoint across AngII AAA, AngII No AAA, and Saline cohorts. 2-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Sidak multiple comparisons. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.001. Open circles: baseline; Black circles: endpoint. (b) Example 3D B-mode data from the AngII AAA and Saline cohorts. White arrowhead: false lumen. Blue arrowhead: intramural thrombus. Asterisk: inferior vena cava; V: ventral; Cr: cranial. (c) Representative volumetric renderings reveal the complex morphology in a leftward-expanding lesion from an AngII AAA cohort mouse, vessel expansion without a focal dissection or thrombus from an AngII No AAA mouse, and a healthy-looking aorta from a Saline cohort mouse. In the AngII AAA example, the space between the true lumen (red) and the outer aortic wall (cyan) is the expanded media and adventitia resulting from a focal aortic dissection. Scale bar: 1 mm. L: left. Cr: cranial. (d) Representative time-averaged inner diameter measurements from each animal cohort. Each plot displays mean inner diameter values ± SD over the course of a cardiac cycle. The difference between the peak systolic (D) and end diastolic (D) inner diameters is shown for each example. (e) Effective maximum diameter (EMD) values at the animal-specific endpoint. One-way ANOVA with Tukey multiple comparisons. (f) Individual circumferential cyclic strain (CCS) values at the animal-specific endpoint. One-way ANOVA with Tukey multiple comparisons. (g) Correlation between vessel strain and the aortic diameter. CCS values at the animal-specific endpoint are plotted against the corresponding EMD values (triangles: Saline cohort; squares: AngII No AAA cohort; circles: AngII AAA cohort). Linear regression (solid line) and 95% confidence interval (dashed lines) are shown. Slope: −13.11. Pearson correlation coefficient (r): −0.82. p = 0.0001. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.001.
FIG. 2.Gene expression analysis across cohorts. (a) Venn diagram of 346 significant differentially expressed genes (DEGs) selected according to a fold change greater than 1.5 and an adjusted p-value less than 0.1. The number of uniquely expressed genes (dashed line circles) is highest for the comparison with the highest expected contrast and lowest for the comparison with the lowest expected contrast. (b) Heat map and dendrogram of 346 DEGs across comparisons. Raw z-scores are color-coded. Scale bar: upregulated (red), downregulated (green), and no change (black). (c) Real-time PCR validation of selected DEGs (mir223, Eln, Col4a3, Mmp9, and Il1b) across comparisons. Ppia was first validated and used as a housekeeping gene for each run. Each assay was run in duplicate, and 3–5 biological replicates per cohort were used. One-way ANOVA with Holm-Sidak multiple comparisons of each cohort (*p < 0.05; **p < 0.001). (d) and (e) Linear regression analysis between the diameter, strain, and gene expression of Mmp9 and Il1b across three cohorts. EMD (mm) and CCS (%) values are plotted against the corresponding animal-specific delta CT values (housekeeping gene-corrected cycle threshold values for a target gene) for (d) Mmp9 and (e) Il1b. Note that higher CT values represent longer amplification and lower relative expression. Pearson correlation coefficients (r): −0.89 (Mmp9 vs EMD); 0.86 (Mmp9 vs CCS); −0.94 (Il1b vs EMD); 0.87 (Il1b vs CCS). Solid symbols: EMD values; open symbols: CCS values; circles: AngII AAA cohort; squares: AngII No AAA cohort; triangles: Saline cohort. Two data points from the AngII AAA cohort were excluded as outliers.
Top 30 upregulated genes with the associated log2 fold change for AngII AAA vs. AngII No AAA comparison.
| Top 30 upregulated genes (AngII AAA vs. AngII No AAA) | ||
|---|---|---|
| Gene name | Full name | log2 (fold change) |
| Hsd3b1 | Hydroxy-delta-5-steroid dehydrogenase, 3 beta- and steroid delta-isomerase 1 | 6.03 |
| Cyp21a1 | Cytochrome P450, family 21, subfamily a, polypeptide 1 | 5.23 |
| Il1r2 | Interleukin 1 receptor, type II | 5.05 |
| S100a8 | S100 calcium binding protein A8 (calgranulin A) | 4.94 |
| S100a9 | S100 calcium binding protein A9 (calgranulin B) | 4.85 |
| Arg1 | Arginase 1 | 4.85 |
| Cyp11a1 | Cytochrome P450, family 11, subfamily a, polypeptide 1 | 4.77 |
| Chil3 | Chitinase-like 3 | 4.73 |
| Ppbp | Pro-platelet basic protein; | 4.73 |
| Chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 7 | ||
| Csf3r | Colony stimulating factor 3 receptor | 4.60 |
| Cyp11b1 | Cytochrome P450, family 11, subfamily b, polypeptide 1 | 4.52 |
| Mmp8 | Matrix metalloproteinase 8 | 4.42 |
| Neutrophil collagenase | ||
| Akr1b7 | Aldo-keto reductase family 1, member B7 | 4.42 |
| Star | Steroidogenic acute regulatory protein | 4.33 |
| Ccl2 | Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 2 | 4.21 |
| Monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 | ||
| Slfn4 | Schlafen 4 | 4.16 |
| Clec4d | C-type lectin domain family 4, member d | 4.12 |
| Pf4 | Platelet factor 4 | 4.09 |
| Chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 4 | ||
| Hmox1 | Heme oxygenase 1 | 4.07 |
| Spp1 | Secreted phosphoprotein 1 | 3.99 |
| Osteopontin | ||
| Cxcl5 | Chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 5 | 3.99 |
| Mmp9 | Matrix metalloproteinase 9 | 3.97 |
| Cxcr2 | Chemokine (C-X-C motif) receptor 2 | 3.93 |
| Interleukin 8 receptor, alpha | ||
| F630028O10Rik,Mir223 | RIKEN cDNA F630028O10 gene miR-223 | 3.88 |
| Nrgn | Neurogranin | 3.70 |
| Pram1 | PML-RAR alpha-regulated adaptor molecule 1 | 3.65 |
| Clec4n | C-type lectin domain family 4, member n | 3.64 |
| Dectin-2 | ||
| Ccr1 | Chemokine (C-C motif) receptor 1 | 3.62 |
| Cxcl2 | Chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 2 | 3.61 |
| Ifitm1 | Interferon induced transmembrane protein 1 | 3.59 |
Top 30 downregulated genes with the associated log2 fold change for AngII AAA vs. AngII No AAA comparison.
| Top 30 downregulated genes (AngII AAA vs AngII No AAA) | ||
|---|---|---|
| Gene name | Full name | log2 (fold change) |
| Sost | Sclerostin | −3.98 |
| Tnnt2 | Troponin T2, cardiac | −3.97 |
| 1700003D09Rik | RIKEN cDNA 1700003D09 gene | −3.14 |
| Optc | Opticin | −2.93 |
| Pgbd1 | piggyBac transposable element derived 1 | −2.73 |
| Serpina1d | Serine (or cysteine) peptidase inhibitor, clade A, member 1D | −2.69 |
| Igfbp2 | Insulin-like growth factor binding protein 2 | −2.64 |
| Casq1 | Calsequestrin 1 | −2.56 |
| Lhx9 | LIM homeobox protein 9 | −2.49 |
| Samd7 | Sterile alpha motif domain containing 7 | −2.45 |
| Drd1 | Dopamine receptor D1 | −2.44 |
| 9330102E08Rik | RIKEN cDNA 9330102E08 gene | −2.38 |
| Pnoc | Prepronociceptin | −2.29 |
| Col4a3 | Collagen, type IV, alpha 3 | −2.27 |
| Vax2os | Ventral anterior homeobox 2, opposite strand | −2.27 |
| Cnn1 | Calponin 1 | −2.26 |
| Eln | Elastin | −2.24 |
| Mfap4 | Microfibrillar-associated protein 4 | −2.20 |
| Rp1l1 | Retinitis pigmentosa 1 homolog like 1 | −2.14 |
| Clec3b | C-type lectin domain family 3, member b | −2.12 |
| Fmod | Fibromodulin | −2.11 |
| Adamts8 | A disintegrin-like and metallopeptidase (reprolysin type) with thrombospondin type 1 motif, 8 | −2.10 |
| Chmp4c | Charged multivesicular body protein 4C | −2.07 |
| Trim71 | Tripartite motif-containing 71 | −2.06 |
| Ccdc141 | Coiled-coil domain containing 141 | −2.05 |
| Itgbl1 | Integrin, beta-like 1 | −2.05 |
| Adamtsl2 | ADAMTS-like 2 | −2.03 |
| Nov | CCN3 Nephroblastoma overexpressed gene | −1.98 |
| Dusp27 | Dual specificity phosphatase 27 (putative) Gm209 | −1.96 |
| Susd5 | Sushi domain containing 5 | −1.95 |
FIG. 3.Enriched gene ontology (GO) terms for biological processes across cohorts. Venn diagram showing the numbers of unique and common GO terms for biological processes across cohorts. Example biological processes from various comparisons are displayed. Adjusted p < 0.05 (using weight pruning correction) was used as a threshold for statistical significance.
FIG. 4.Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E), Movat's Pentachrome (MOV), and Martius, Scarlet and Blue (MSB) aortic tissue histology. (a) MOV staining of a dissecting AAA (AngII AAA cohort) shows focal breakage of elastin (black). MSB staining shows an intramural thrombus by positive fibrin (red) and red blood cell (yellow) stains in proximity to the focal dissection identified. Very minimal adventitial collagen can be seen in this sample. Suprarenal aortas from the AngII No AAA (b) and Saline (c) cohorts show only minor microstructural defects in elastin lamellar units. Minimal adventitial collagen (white arrowheads) is observed for vessels from the AngII No AAA cohort, while the Saline cohort (c) and some infrarenal aortas (IRA) from the AngII AAA cohort (d) have more adventitial collagen (black arrowheads). AngII AAA scale bars: 500, 200, and 50 μm. AngII No AAA, Saline, and IRA (AngII AAA) scale bars: 200 and 50 μm.
FIG. 5.Immunohistochemistry (IHC) and semi-quantitation of MMP-9, IL-1β, neutrophils, and macrophages. (a)–(d) DAB single stain IHC of MMP-9, IL-1β, Ly6G+ neutrophils, and total macrophages (F4/80+) on example AngII AAA (a), AngII No AAA (b), Saline (c), and IRA (d) tissues. MMP-9 is co-distributed with neutrophils and macrophages in the adventitia (a). In the dissected region, neutrophils are abundant and MMP-9 and IL-1β are observed along the interface with the elastic lamina (a). Vessels from the Saline cohort (c) and the infrarenal aortas (IRA) from the AngII AAA cohort (d) show weak immunolabeling other than background and periadventitial staining. Scale bars: 200 μm. (e) Semi-quantitation was performed on medium and strong immunopositive areas within the vessel wall. Unpaired t-tests were run to compare the AngII AAA and AngII No AAA cohorts (* p < 0.05; ns, not significant).