| Literature DB >> 31069023 |
Dusko Vulic1,2, Drenka Secerov Zecevic1, Marija Burgic1,3, Zoran Vujkovic4,5, Sinisa Ristic6, Jelena Marinkovic4, Snezana Medenica6, Nathan D Wong1,7.
Abstract
Background: Risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) has been associated with stress from serving in a war, but it has not been established whether children who experience war-related stress are at increased CVD risk. Objective: This study aimed to compare CVD risk factors in young adults according to whether they experienced traumatic events as children during the 1990-1995 war in Bosnia and Herzegovina, and whether those exposed to trauma have evidence of subclinical atherosclerosis. Method: We examined 372 first-year medical students who were preschool children during the war (1990-1995) (average age 19.5 ± 1.7 years, 67% female) in 2007-2010. They completed the Semi-Structured Interview for Survivors of War. CVD risk factors and carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) measurements were obtained and compared in individuals with and without trauma. We also examined whether increased CIMT was independently associated with trauma after adjustment for other risk factors.Entities:
Keywords: Cardiovascular disease; children; intimal medial thickness; risk factors; trauma; • Our investigation was to examine whether there are differences in cardiovascular risk factors and subclinical atherosclerosis in persons previously exposed compared to not exposed to trauma during the war in Bosnia and Herzegovina.• We demonstrated that while traditional risk factors are not strongly related to the presence of post-war trauma in young adults, those with greater CIMT appear to have been more likely to have had been prevoiusly exposed to trauma.
Year: 2019 PMID: 31069023 PMCID: PMC6493224 DOI: 10.1080/20008198.2019.1601988
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Psychotraumatol ISSN: 2000-8066
Levels of risk factors in students with vs without trauma.
| Variable | With trauma | Without trauma | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 19.3 ± 1.69 | 19.5 ± 1.70 | 0.338* |
| Gender (male/female; % male) | 17/37 (31.5) | 105/213 (33.0) | 0.824* |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 21.65 ± 3.04 | 21.59 ± 3.11 | 0.903* |
| Waist-to-hip ratio | 0.78 ± 0.07 | 0.78 ± 0.06 | 0.952* |
| Smoking status (current smoker/not smoker; % smokers) | 4/50 (7.4) | 56/262 (17.6) | 0.059* |
| SBP (mmHg) | 113.4 ± 16.2 | 114.4 ± 14.5 | 0.644* |
| Target value of SBP (< 140 mmHg) | 3/51 (5.6) | 9/309 (2.8) | 0.295* |
| DBP (mmHg) | 71.2 ± 11.9 | 74.0 ± 10.2 | 0.112* |
| Target value of DBP (< 90 mmHg) | 0/54 (0.0) | 8/310 (2.5) | 0.239* |
| Glucose in blood (mmol/l) | 4.23 ± 0.67 | 4.65 ± 0.95 | 0.002* |
| Target value of glucose (< 6 mmol/l) | 0/54 (0.0) | 13/305 (4.1) | 0.130* |
| Total cholesterol (mmol/l) | 4.11 ± 0.76 | 4.18 ± 0.68 | 0.545* |
| Target value of total cholesterol (< 5 mmol/l) | 6/48 (11.1) | 36/282 (11.3) | 0.964* |
| HDL-C (mmol/l) | 1.54 ± 0.29 | 1.49 ± 0.36 | 0.407* |
| Target value of HDL-C (> 1.0 mmol/l in men; > 1.2 mmol/l in women) | 2/52 (3.7) | 41/277 (12.9) | 0.051* |
| LDL-C (mmol/l) | 2.21 ± 0.66 | 2.32 ± 0.62 | 0.220* |
| Target value of LDL-C (< 3 mmol/l) | 6/48 (11.1) | 49/269 (15.4) | 0.411* |
| Triglycerides (mmol/l) | 0.80 ± 0.49 | 0.79 ± 0.41 | 0.952* |
| Target value of triglycerides (< 1.7 mmol/l) | 4/54 (7.4) | 10/308 (3.1) | 0.128* |
Data are shown as mean ± SD or n/N (%). *p < 0.001.
BMI, body mass index; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.
Mean levels of carotid ultrasound measurements in those with vs without trauma.
| Variable | With trauma | Without trauma | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RCC | 0.54 ± 0.09 | 0.51 ± 0.09 | 0.115 |
| RIC | 0.54 ± 0.10 | 0.49 ± 0.09 | 0.009 |
| LCC | 0.55 ± 0.07 | 0.52 ± 0.09 | 0.166 |
| LIC | 0.53 ± 0.08 | 0.50 ± 0.09 | 0.073 |
Data are shown as mean ± SD.
RCA, right common carotid; RIC, right internal carotid; LCC, left common carotid; LIC, left internal carotid.
Odds of trauma according to age, gender, and risk factors from multivariable logistic regression (n = 372).
| Variable | OR | 95% CI for OR | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower | Upper | |||||
| Age (years) | −0.100 | 0.117 | 0.392 | 0.905 | 0.719 | 1.138 |
| Gender (male vs female) | 0.468 | 0.388 | 0.228 | 1.597 | 0.746 | 3.418 |
| Smoking (yes vs no) | −0.833 | 0.558 | 0.135 | 0.435 | 0.146 | 1.297 |
| BMI (≥ 30 vs ≤ 30 kg/m2) | 0.721 | 0.429 | 0.093 | 2.056 | 0.888 | 4.765 |
| Triglycerides (≥ 1.7 vs ≤ 1.7 mmol/l) | 1.664 | 0.717 | 0.020 | 5.280 | 1.296 | 21.518 |
| HDL-C (≥ 1.2 vs ≤ 1.2 mmol/l female; ≥ 1.0 vs ≤ 1.0 mmol/l male) | −1.419 | 0.802 | 0.077 | 0.242 | 0.050 | 1.165 |
| LDL-C (≥ 3 vs ≤ 3 mmol/l) | −0.660 | 0.533 | 0.216 | 0.517 | 0.182 | 1.469 |
| Glucose (≥ 6.0 vs ≤ 6.0 mmol/l) | −0.782 | 1.139 | 0.492 | 0.457 | 0.049 | 4.261 |
| Constant | −0.592 | 2.300 | 0.797 | 0.553 | ||
BMI, body mass index; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
For independent variables code 1 is given to risk and code 0 to no risk; gender: 1, male; 2, female.
Odds of trauma according to carotid intima–media thickness (CIMT) measurements from logistic regression, unadjusted and adjusted for age, gender, and risk factors (n = 149).
| Univariate | Multivariate | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | ||
| All participants ( | ||||
| 1.37 (0.92–2.04) | 0.119 | 1.69 (1.02–2.79) | 0.041 | |
| 1.68 (1.12–2.53) | 0.012 | 2.31 (1.35–3.94) | 0.002 | |
| 1.32 (0.89–1.97) | 0.169 | 1.83 (1.06–3.15) | 0.030 | |
| 1.46 (0.96–2.21) | 0.076 | 1.93 (1.13–3.31) | 0.017 | |
RCC, right common carotid; RIC, right internal carotid; LCC, left common carotid; LIC, left internal carotid.
Multivariate: adjusted for age, gender, smoking, body mass index, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, glucose, and triglycerides.
Z: standardized values of variables to represent odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) per 1 standard deviation (SD) change. The OR per 1 SD increase in the corresponding CIMT variables and the 95% CI were also calculated. We estimated ORs and their 95% CIs for an SD increment of each measurement (thereby facilitating comparisons of effect sizes for individual measurements).