| Literature DB >> 31068911 |
Fatih Anfasa1,2, Marco Goeijenbier1,3, Widagdo Widagdo1, Jurre Y Siegers1, Noreen Mumtaz1, Nisreen Okba1, Debby van Riel1, Barry Rockx1, Marion P G Koopmans1, Joost C M Meijers4,5, Byron E E Martina1,6.
Abstract
Zika virus (ZIKV) infection is typically characterized by a mild disease presenting with fever, maculopapular rash, headache, fatigue, myalgia, and arthralgia. A recent animal study found that ZIKV-infected pregnant Ifnar -/-mice developed vascular damage in the placenta and reduced amount of fetal capillaries. Moreover, ZIKV infection causes segmental thrombosis in the umbilical cord of pregnant rhesus macaques. Furthermore, several case reports suggest that ZIKV infection cause coagulation disorders. These results suggest that ZIKV could cause an alteration in the host hemostatic response, however, the mechanism has not been investigated thus far. This paper aims to determine whether ZIKV infection on HUVECs induces apoptosis and elevation of tissue factor (TF) that leads to activation of secondary hemostasis. We infected HUVECs with two ZIKV strains and performed virus titration, immunostaining, and flow cytometry to confirm and quantify infection. We measured TF concentrations with flow cytometry and performed thrombin generation test (TGT) as a functional assay to assess secondary hemostasis. Furthermore, we determined the amount of cell death using flow cytometry. We also performed enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to determine interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-8 production and conducted blocking experiments to associate these cytokines with TF expression. Both ZIKV strains infected and replicated to high titers in HUVECs. We found that infection induced elevation of TF expressions. We also showed that increased TF expression led to shortened TGT time. Moreover, the data revealed that infection induced apoptosis. In addition, there was a significant increase of IL-6 and IL-8 production in infected cells. Here we provide in vitro evidence that infection of HUVECs with ZIKV induces apoptosis and elevation of TF expression that leads to activation of secondary hemostasis.Entities:
Keywords: HUVECs; Zika virus; apoptosis; endothelial cells; secondary hemostasis; tissue factor
Year: 2019 PMID: 31068911 PMCID: PMC6491739 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00817
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Source host, isolation and passage history of the ZIKV strains used in the study.
| Lineage | Strain | Source host | Year of isolation | Location | Passage history | Genbank Accession number | EVAg number |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asian | ZIKVNL00013 | Human | 2016 | Suriname | 4 × Vero | KU937936 | 011V-01621 |
| African | Uganda 976 | Monkey | 1961 | Uganda | 2 × SMB, 3 × Vero E6, 1 × Vero | NA | 007V-EVAg1585 |
FIGURE 1Zika virus (ZIKV) infects and replicates efficiently in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs). HUVECs were infected with two ZIKV strains at two multiplicity of infections (MOIs; 1 and 0.1) and samples were collected at the designated times. (A) Infectious titers of supernatants collected at 0, 24, and 48 h post-infection (hpi). Experiments were done in triplicate and data are representative of three independent experiments. Bars represent standard error of the mean (SEM). (B) HUVECs were infected at two MOIs (0.1 and 1) and stained for the presence of ZIKV envelope by flow cytometry at 24 and 48 hpi. Experiments were done in triplicate and data are representative of two independent experiments. The results are displayed as mean and bars represent SEM. (C) Representative flow cytometry analyses plot to determine the percentage of infected cells at 48 hpi. (D) HUVECs were infected with two ZIKV strains and then imaged for the presence of viral envelope protein at 24 and 48 hpi. 200× magnification.
FIGURE 2Zika virus infection of HUVECs leads to increased tissue factor (TF) expression and activation of secondary hemostasis. HUVECs were infected with an MOI of 0.1 or 5 with both ZIKV strains and thrombin generation time (TGT) test was performed as a functional assay to assess secondary hemostasis at 24 and 48 h post-infection (A,B). TGT was significantly shortened for ECs infected with ZIKVAF (MOI 0.1 and 5) and ZIKVAS (MOI 5) at 48 hpi (B). (C,D) TF concentration was calculated from a standard curve to determine whether there is an increase of TF expression at 24 and 48 hpi based on previous study (Goeijenbier et al., 2015) TF expression increased significantly at 48 hpi for both strains (ZIKVAF: MOI 0.1 and 5; ZIKVAS: MOI 5). Experiments were done in eight replicates and data are representative of three independent experiments. (E,F) TF expression was also confirmed with flow cytometry. Increased TF expression was observed for both virus strains against BPL and negative control (NC) at 24 and 48 hpi. Approximately 61 % of cells expressed TF at 48 hpi for ZIKVAF. (G,H) Double staining experiments were performed to determine whether increased TF expression occurred in infected or bystander cells. Black bars represent the total amount of TF+ cells while gray bars represent the percentage of double positive cells for both ZIKV and TF. Less than 40% of total TF+ cells were double positive for both ZIKV and TF at 24 hpi (G). Meanwhile, <25% of total TF+ cells were double positive for both ZIKV and TF at 48 hpi (H). Experiments were done in triplicate and data are representative of two independent experiments. All the results are displayed as mean and bars represent SEM. Statistical analyses were performed against mock. Statistical significance is shown: ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01; ∗∗∗p < 0.001.
FIGURE 3Zika virus infection on HUVECs induces cell death mainly through infection. HUVECs were infected with a MOI of 5 with both ZIKV strains. (A) Cytopathic effect (CPE) was observed at 48 h post-infection (hpi) for both ZIKV strains with light microscopy at 200× magnification. More CPE was observed with ZIKVAF. (B,C) To measure cell death, cells were stained for DNA fragmentation with the terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) assay kit at 24 and 48 h post-infection (hpi). Both ZIKV strains induced cell death at 48 hpi. ZIKVAF induced more cell death compared to ZIKVAS (p < 0.01). Experiments were done in triplicate and data are representative of two independent experiments. (D) To determine whether cell death was caused by direct infection or bystander effect, we performed double staining directed against ZIKV envelope protein and TUNEL with flow cytometry. HUVECs were infected at an MOI of 5 and samples were collected at 48 hpi. Majority of the TUNEL+ cells were also positive for ZIKV ENV. (E) Representative flow cytometry analyses plot to determine the ZIKV ENV+ and TUNEL+ cells at 48 hpi. Experiments were done in triplicate and data are representative of two independent experiments. All the results are displayed as mean and bars represent SEM. Statistical significance is shown: ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01; ∗∗∗p < 0.001.
FIGURE 4Zika virus-infected HUVECs produce pro-inflammatory cytokines. HUVECs were infected with a MOI of 5 with both ZIKV strains and supernatants were collected at the designated times. Significantly, increased levels of IL-6 (A) and IL-8 (B) were detected at 48 h post-infection (hpi) for ZIKVAF. (C,D) To investigate whether the concentrations of anti-IL-6 and -IL-8 that we used were sufficient to neutralize IL-6 and IL-8 concentrations at 24 and 48 hpi, we determined the gene expression levels of NFKB1, TIMP-1, and HIF1A, which are the downstream activation pathways of IL-6 (NFKB1 and TIMP1) and IL-8 (NFKB1 and HIF1A). The gene expression levels of NFKB1 and TIMP1 were significantly lower in IL-6 with anti-IL-6 treatment (AB) compared to positive controls (PC; IL-6 protein only) and similar to negative controls (NCs) (C). The gene expression levels of NFKB1 and HIF1A were significantly reduced in IL-8 with anti-IL-8 treatment (A,B) compared to PC (IL-8 protein only) and equal to NC (D). (E,F) Modest TF expression reduction was observed after IL-6 and IL-8 blocking experiments at 24 and 48 hpi. The results are based on three (Panels (A,B) and two (Panels C–F) independent experiments. All experiments were performed in triplicate except for Panels (C,D) that was performed in duplicate. The results are displayed as mean and bars represent SEM. Statistical significance is shown: ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01; ∗∗∗p < 0.001.