Chengjian Chen1, Bin Liu2. 1. Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, National University of Singapore, 4 Engineering Drive 4, Singapore, 117585, Singapore. 2. Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, National University of Singapore, 4 Engineering Drive 4, Singapore, 117585, Singapore. cheliub@nus.edu.sg.
Abstract
Once considered the exclusive property of metal complexes, the phenomenon of room-temperature phosphorescence (RTP) has been increasingly realized in pure organic luminophores recently. Using precise molecular design and synthetic approaches to modulate their weak spin-orbit coupling, highly active triplet excitons, and ultrafast deactivation, organic luminophores can be endowed with long-lived and bright RTP characteristics. This has sparked intense explorations into organic luminophores with enhanced RTP features for different applications. This Review discusses the fundamental mechanism of RTP in pure organic luminophores, followed by design principles, enhancement strategies, and formulation methods to achieve highly phosphorescent and long-lived organic RTP luminophores even in aqueous media. The current challenges and future directions of this field are also discussed in the summary and outlook.
Once considered the exclusive property of metalcomplexes, the phenomenon of room-temperature phosphorescence (RTP) has been increasingly realized in pure organicluminophores recently. Using precise molecular design and synthetic approaches to modulate their weak spin-orbit coupling, highly active triplet excitons, and ultrafast deactivation, organicluminophorescan be endowed with long-lived and bright RTPcharacteristics. This has sparked intense explorations into organicluminophores with enhanced RTP features for different applications. This Review discusses the fundamental mechanism of RTP in pure organicluminophores, followed by design principles, enhancement strategies, and formulation methods to achieve highly phosphorescent and long-lived organicRTPluminophores even in aqueous media. The current challenges and future directions of this field are also discussed in the summary and outlook.
The photophysical relaxation processes of excited molecules after light absorption, including radiative emission, vibrational relaxation, internal conversion, singlet-triplet intersystem crossing (ISC), triplet state relaxation, energy transfer to 3O2, etc., form the basis of a wide range of advanced applications, spanning from optoelectronics to photomedicine[1-5]. These relaxation pathways, particularly the ISC between singlet and triplet excited states to yield phosphorescence, have increasingly become the subject of active research and explorations[6-10]. Through a comprehensive understanding and manipulation of the phosphorescence mechanism, novel materials with persistent and stable room-temperature phosphorescence (RTP) have been designed and engineered in the last decade[6-12].The phenomenon of RTP has long been regarded as the exclusive feature of metallic and inorganiccomplexes. The dependence of ISC and phosphorescence lifetime on efficient spin–orbit coupling as well as the prominent effect of oxygen quenching on the triplet excited state in organicluminophores have rendered the realization of pure organicRTP extremely challenging. This explains the rarity of practical and efficient pure organicluminophores as compared to their metal-containing RTPcounterparts. Nevertheless, through precise molecular design and synthetic approaches to address directly their weak spin–orbit coupling effect and ultrafast triplet exciton deactivation, pure organicluminophores have been progressively endowed with long-lived and strong RTP in the last several years[6-10]. As compared to metal-containing luminophores, pure organicRTPluminophores, including persulfurated derivatives[13,14], fluorene derivatives[15,16], dibenzothiophene and related sulfur-containing heteroaromatic derivatives[17,18], carbazole and related nitrogen-containing heteroaromatic derivatives[19,20], sulfur-nitrogen-containing heteroaromatic derivatives[21,22], borate derivatives[23,24], and polyacid derivatives[25,26], etc., are desirable due to the versatility in their molecular design and engineering.While organicRTP, which was probably originated from a small amount of impurities, was noted as early as 1930s[27], the observations on RTP of pure organicluminophores have only been reported after another 30–40 years[28-31]. After that, the development of pure organicRTPluminophores has been plagued with uncertainty and a long period of inactivity until recently, when boron difluoride dibenzoylmethane moiety incorporated into poly(lactic acid) (PLA) was observed to display unusual RTP[32]. Since then, a plethora of organicluminophores with long-lived phosphorescence under ambient conditions has been increasingly discovered and realized[6-10]. These notable breakthroughs have sparked active investigations into the rational design and formulation of pure organicluminophores with enhanced RTP performance. Design principles based on halogen bonding[33-35], H-aggregation[36-38], and n–π transition[39,40], while RTP enhancement strategies based on co-crystallization[34,41-43], rigid matrix host–guest system[44-46], structural modified host–guest system[47,48], and dopant-based system[49], have brought about the effective realization of enhanced organicRTP. With their special features and advantages, this class of organicluminophores has been actively demonstrated to have immense potential for specific applications, including organic optoelectronics[50-54], anti-counterfeiting labeling for advanced data security[36,37,46], highly sensitive sensing[44,45,55], and high-contrast time-gated in vitro and in vivo phosphorescence biological imaging[56-60]. Intriguingly, for applications such as optoelectronics and data security, pure organicRTPluminophorescould be deposited directly on a wide range of substrates, including semiconducting matrices, plastics, glasses, and papers, and utilized without complicated treatments. For biological applications, however, organicRTPluminophores need to be equipped with sufficient aqueous dispersibility and appropriately processed because the triplet excited state is highly sensitive to oxygen[48], a molecule that is crucial for physiological functions. As a result, specialized processing strategies are necessary to successfully generate pure organicRTPluminophores with long luminescence lifetime, good water dispersibility, and excellent biocompatibility for biological applications[57-59]. Collectively, this indicates that the effective realization and applications of organicRTPluminophores are an integrated process, covering optical characterization, molecular design, organic synthesis, mechanical study, physical processing, surface modification, and functional evaluation.Herein, we provide a general overview on the emergence of pure organicRTPluminophores and the rational enhancement of their performance based on structure-property relationship. Specifically, we focus on organic small molecule-based RTPluminophores due to the more established understanding of their RTP mechanisms, as well as the wider explorations into their molecular design, performance enhancement, and potential applications. In contrast, the more complex organicRTPluminophores, including carbon dot- and macromolecule-based (i.e., proteins, starch, carbohydrates, and cellulose) RTPluminophores, will not be discussed in detail as their RTP mechanisms have been less well characterized and understood[61-64]. In this Review, the fundamental mechanism of phosphorescence, which forms the basis of the molecular design of organicluminophores with persistent RTP is first introduced. Specifically, the utilization and manipulation of ISC between singlet and triplet states for realizing stable organic molecular RTP are discussed. By keeping these fundamental principles in mind, we further describe the design principles of pure organicRTPluminophores and the various ingenious strategies used to strengthen and maximize their phosphorescence feature. In particular, we focus on approaches to enhance the ISC rate and lifetime as well as to suppress the non-radiative deactivation pathways of triplet excitons. We next highlight the techniques used to formulate organicRTPluminophores for specific applications. Particular emphasis here is on the nanocrystallization and nanoencapsulation methods used to process organicRTPluminophores for phosphorescence applications in aqueous media. This Review eventually summarizes and presents our perspectives on the current challenges and potential opportunities in the field.
Mechanism of organic room-temperature phosphorescence
Organic photoluminescent materials have generated considerable interests in recent years due to their tunable luminescent properties, which can be obtained through precise design of molecular structures and control of solid-state intermolecular interactions. When an organic molecule absorbs incident photons, electrons will be excited from ground state to excited state and holes will be simultaneously generated. The generated electron-hole pairs, when they are attracted to each other through electrostatic force, are commonly known as excitons.In general, the emission characteristics of organic photoluminescent molecules are significantly dependent on the electronic transitions between the different states of excitons. By controlling the properties of excitons, such as their configuration, energy level, and lifetime, the emission properties of organic luminescent molecules can be fine-tuned. The numerous possible photophysical pathways taking place between the singlet and triplet excited states in organic molecules are summarized in the Jablonski diagram below (Fig. 1a).
Fig. 1
Fundamental mechanism of organic room-temperature phosphorescence (RTP) phenomenon. a Jablonski diagram illustrating the different photophysical relaxation processes, particularly the intersystem crossing (ISC) between singlet and triplet states, which forms the basis for phosphorescence of organic luminophores. b Schematic illustration of the El-Sayed’s rule for ISC and its utilization for controlling phosphorescence decay rate based on the molecular-orbital hybridization of the lowest triplet states. b is adapted with permission from ref. [39]. Copyright (2016) Cell Press
Fundamental mechanism of organic room-temperature phosphorescence (RTP) phenomenon. a Jablonski diagram illustrating the different photophysical relaxation processes, particularly the intersystem crossing (ISC) between singlet and triplet states, which forms the basis for phosphorescence of organicluminophores. b Schematic illustration of the El-Sayed’s rule for ISC and its utilization for controlling phosphorescence decay rate based on the molecular-orbital hybridization of the lowest triplet states. b is adapted with permission from ref. [39]. Copyright (2016) Cell PressAs one of the two radiative photophysical relaxation processes, phosphorescence occurs when there is an ISC from an excited energy state (usually a singlet state) to another state with a higher spin multiplicity (usually a triplet state), followed by radiative deactivation to the ground state. In contrast to fluorescence, phosphorescence is inherently slower and possesses a longer lifetime. To yield phosphorescence, it is imperative to have an effective non-radiative ISC between the isoenergetic singlet excited state (S1) and Tn. The rate of ISC is an intrinsic feature of organic molecule and therefore, dependent on its electronicconfiguration and electronic level. To populate Tn from S1, an efficient spin–orbit coupling is essential.In accordance to El-Sayed’s rule, effective spin–orbit coupling and a high ISC rate (kISC) can be achieved in pure organicluminophores if the non-radiative transition from singlet to triplet excited states involves different molecular-orbital configurations because of the effective overlapping orbitals (Fig. 1b)[39,65]. For instance, ISCcan occur from 1(n,π*) singlet to3(π,π*) triplet excited states or from 1(π,π*) singlet to 3(n,π*) triplet excited states. However, ISC from singlet to triplet excited states with similar electronicconfigurations, such as from 1(n,π*) to 3(n,π*) or from 1(π,π*) to 3(π,π*), is not favorable due to minimal orbital overlapping, which results in inefficient spin–orbit coupling. Consequently, the presence of n orbitals perpendicular to π orbitals is beneficial to facilitate a strong spin–orbit coupling and promote the ISC from singlet to triplet excited states. Furthermore, the electronicconfiguration of triplet excited state is a combination of two configurations with varying percentages of α3(n,π*) + βπ3(π,π*), in which α + βπ = 1, and because of this, the rate of phosphorescence relaxation becomes tunable. As a result, the molecular design and precise tuning of the triplet excited state with appropriate proportions of hybrid (n,π*) and (π,π*) configurations are important to achieve effective long-lived RTPluminophores[39].In addition to mixing singlet and triplet states with different electronicconfigurations to enhance spin–orbit coupling, the rate of the ISC process from S1 to Tn can be considerably strengthened by introducing a small splitting energy gap (ΔEST) between these excited states[39]. Separately, the inclusion of heavy-metal atoms, such as platinum, iridium, and halogen atoms (e.g., bromine and iodine atoms), is also beneficial in triggering spin–orbit coupling to strengthen the rate of ISC from S1 to Tn, as well as the rate of radiative relaxation from T1 to S0[33,34,56]. This is necessary for phosphorescence to compete with other photophysical processes, such as fluorescence, internal conversion, non-radiative deactivation pathways from T1 to S0, as well as oxygen quenching under ambient conditions. In fact, luminophores with high ISC quantum efficiency typically display fast kISC, which can compete with fluorescence decay and internal conversion in the S1 depopulation process. Because of this, another crucial requirement for RTP to occur in pure organicluminophores is the higher rate of radiative transition (kP) than that of non-radiative transition from the triplet excited state to ground state (knr). Under ambient conditions, the non-radiative loss typically surpasses the radiative decay[66,67]. At the same time, since ISC is a forbidden process according to the principle of angular momentum conservation, it takes place on a longer time scale and triplet exciton luminescence has longer lifetimes. With the increase in luminescence lifetime of triplet excitons, they are highly susceptible to external environmental factors, including heat and oxygen in the air[68]. Consequently, it is extremely challenging to realize bright and highly efficient luminescence from long-lived triplet excitons under ambient conditions, especially in pure organicluminophores. The suppression of non-radiative relaxations and external quenching thus becomes a crucial factor in realizing highly effective and bright RTP in pure organicluminophores[48,67].To display persistent RTP, pure organicluminophores also need to have a slow T1 decay rate. One of the most promising ways to achieve this is to stabilize the lowest triplet excited states T1 by forming numerous lower-lying energy states with suppressed non-radiative decay in H-aggregates[36]. With the increase in the number of such triplet excited states at lower-energy level (T1*), the decay rate from T1 to S0 decreases considerably. This is because the newly formed triplet excited states can function as emission-forbidden energy trapping states, which will eventually lead to the generation of long-lived persistent organicRTP.Altogether, to achieve pure organicRTPluminophores with both high phosphorescence quantum yield and persistent phosphorescence lifetime, several factors need to be fulfilled. These include: (1) an efficient spin flipping due to the ISC process from S1 to Tn, (2) a low non-radiative relaxation rate to promote phosphorescence from T1 to S0, and (3) a slow decay of T1 to realize long-lived phosphorescence. Various rational design principles and enhancement strategies have thus been geared towards meeting these requirements recently, which are discussed in the following sections.
Design of pure organic room-temperature phosphorescent luminophores
Tremendous efforts have been channeled towards formulating rational rules for designing bright and long-lived pure organicRTPluminophores in recent years. In general, this unique class of organicluminophorescan be designed systematically through major strategies based on halogen bonding[33-35], H-aggregation[36-38], and n–π transition[39,40] (Fig. 2). Collectively, these strategies aim to strengthen the ISC transitions from the singlet to triplet excited states and simultaneously mitigate the prominent non-radiative relaxations of triplet excited states.
Fig. 2
Major design strategies in realizing pure organic RTP based on halogen bonding, H-aggregation, and n–π transition. a Chemical structure of MBB. b Photographs of the different states of MBB crystals under normal light (left) and UV light (right) illuminations at ambient condition. c Molecular packing structure of MBB crystal. d Chemical structure of luminophore Br6A. e Photograph of Br6A crystal under UV light irradiation (left) and the molecular packing structure of Br6A crystal, illustrating the halogen bond between carbonyl oxygen and bromine (right). f Schematic illustration of the realization of phosphorescence of Br6A in crystal form. g General chemical structures of different organic molecules designed to control the lifetime of excited states through the incorporation of alkyl or aromatic substituents to facilitate H-aggregate formation and stabilize triplet exciton. R1 and R2 can be H, Cl, C2H5, C12H8N, etc. h Schematic illustration of the generation of lower-lying energy states for stabilization of the lowest triplet excited state (T1) to achieve long organic phosphorescence. i Chemical structure of DPhCzT. j Crystal structure of DPhCzT depicting the H-aggregate formation through the measured angle of 80.9o between the interconnected axis and transition dipoles. k Chemical structure of DCzPhP. l Steady-state photoluminescence (left) and phosphorescence (right) profiles of DCzPhP. Insets illustrate the different states of DCzPhP before (left) and after (right) switching off the 365-nm excitation under room temperature. m Chemical structure of CPhCz. n Luminescence decay of CPhCz after a 5-min visible light excitation. o Chemical structures of rationally designed organic molecule with carbonyl group and non-bonding electrons (left) and BDBF (right). p Photographs of the different states of BDBF in solution, amorphous, and crystal forms at 77 and 300 K. q Calculated energy levels with the proportion of α of the different excited states of BDBF. r Chemical structure of CIBDBT. s Crystal structure of CIBDBT. t Photographs of the different states of CIBDBT before (top) and after (bottom) switching off the 365-nm excitation source. u Calculated energy levels, electronic transitions, and frontier molecular orbitals of the highest occupied molecular orbitals H, H-2, and the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital L. a, b, and c are adapted/reproduced with permission from ref. [33]. Copyright (2010) American Chemical Society. d, e, and f are adapted/reproduced with permission from ref. [34]. Copyright (2011) Springer Nature. g is adapted with permission from ref. [36,37]. Copyright (2015) Springer Nature and (2017) Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. h, i, j, k, and l are adapted/reproduced with permission from ref. [36]. Copyright (2015) Springer Nature. m and n are adapted/reproduced with permission from ref. [37]. Copyright (2017) Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. o, p, and q are adapted with permission from ref. [39]. Copyright (2016) Cell Press. r, s, t, and u are adapted/reproduced with permission from ref. [40]. Copyright (2017) Springer Nature
Major design strategies in realizing pure organicRTP based on halogen bonding, H-aggregation, and n–π transition. a Chemical structure of MBB. b Photographs of the different states of MBBcrystals under normal light (left) and UV light (right) illuminations at ambient condition. c Molecular packing structure of MBBcrystal. d Chemical structure of luminophoreBr6A. e Photograph of Br6Acrystal under UV light irradiation (left) and the molecular packing structure of Br6Acrystal, illustrating the halogen bond between carbonyl oxygen and bromine (right). f Schematic illustration of the realization of phosphorescence of Br6A in crystal form. g General chemical structures of different organic molecules designed to control the lifetime of excited states through the incorporation of alkyl or aromatic substituents to facilitate H-aggregate formation and stabilize triplet exciton. R1 and R2 can be H, Cl, C2H5, C12H8N, etc. h Schematic illustration of the generation of lower-lying energy states for stabilization of the lowest triplet excited state (T1) to achieve long organic phosphorescence. i Chemical structure of DPhCzT. j Crystal structure of DPhCzT depicting the H-aggregate formation through the measured angle of 80.9o between the interconnected axis and transition dipoles. k Chemical structure of DCzPhP. l Steady-state photoluminescence (left) and phosphorescence (right) profiles of DCzPhP. Insets illustrate the different states of DCzPhP before (left) and after (right) switching off the 365-nm excitation under room temperature. m Chemical structure of CPhCz. n Luminescence decay of CPhCz after a 5-min visible light excitation. o Chemical structures of rationally designed organic molecule with carbonyl group and non-bonding electrons (left) and BDBF (right). p Photographs of the different states of BDBF in solution, amorphous, and crystal forms at 77 and 300 K. q Calculated energy levels with the proportion of α of the different excited states of BDBF. r Chemical structure of CIBDBT. s Crystal structure of CIBDBT. t Photographs of the different states of CIBDBT before (top) and after (bottom) switching off the 365-nm excitation source. u Calculated energy levels, electronic transitions, and frontier molecular orbitals of the highest occupied molecular orbitals H, H-2, and the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital L. a, b, and c are adapted/reproduced with permission from ref. [33]. Copyright (2010) American Chemical Society. d, e, and f are adapted/reproduced with permission from ref. [34]. Copyright (2011) Springer Nature. g is adapted with permission from ref. [36,37]. Copyright (2015) Springer Nature and (2017) Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. h, i, j, k, and l are adapted/reproduced with permission from ref. [36]. Copyright (2015) Springer Nature. m and n are adapted/reproduced with permission from ref. [37]. Copyright (2017) Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. o, p, and q are adapted with permission from ref. [39]. Copyright (2016) Cell Press. r, s, t, and u are adapted/reproduced with permission from ref. [40]. Copyright (2017) Springer NatureOne of the earliest attempts in realizing persistent organicRTPluminophores relied on the crystallization-induced restriction of intramolecular motions (Fig. 2a–c)[33]. In this study, the crystals from a series of organicluminophores based on benzophenone and its halogenated derivatives, as well as methyl 4-bromobenzoate (MBB) were prepared (Fig. 2a). All luminogens were generally non-emissive when they existed in the solution form due to annihilation of triplet excitons by active intramolecular rotations and vibrations. However, in the crystalline state, both crystal lattices and intermolecular interactions confined the intramolecular motions, resulting in bright RTP under ultraviolet (UV) irradiation at room temperature (Fig. 2b). While this study has largely focused on the effect of crystallization, considerable attention has also been paid to the role of halogen bonding, which was one of the intermolecular interactions central to RTP emission of organiccrystals. Halogen bonding is generally a weak non-covalent interaction between a nucleophilic atom or a negatively charged ion and a positively polarized halogen atom. Owing to its directionality, this type of bonding has become increasingly crucial in crystal engineering. Heavy halogen atoms, such as bromine and iodine, are able to introduce heavy atom effect when bonded with luminophores to strengthen the efficiency of ISC process between singlet and triplet states. A closer look at the molecular packing of the crystal structure of MBB revealed the locking and stabilization of its conformation by numerous C–H···O and C=O···Br–C intermolecular interactions and halogen bonds, with distances of 2.55 and 3.05 Å, respectively (Fig. 2c). This illustrates the crucial roles of carbonyl group (C=O) and heavy atom of organicluminophores in rigidifying their structure to achieve more efficient spin–orbit coupling and enable bright phosphorescence.The more pronounced effect of halogen bonding in facilitating a directed heavy atom effect to generate organicRTP was reported around the same time (Fig. 2d–f)[34]. Here, a small molecule of 2,5-dihexyloxy-4-bromobenzaldehyde (Br6A) was firstly synthesized (Fig. 2d). When Br6Aluminophores were in solution, they did not display any halogen bonding. Under this condition, there was inefficient generation of triplet excitons, resulting in ineffective RTP. This was evident from the weak fluorescence of Br6A in chloroform, with a lifetime of 0.5 ns and a quantum yield of 0.5%, when it was excited at 360 nm. However, Br6Acrystals displayed distinct green emission with a phosphorescent lifetime of 5.4 ms and a quantum yield of 2.9% (Fig. 2e). As revealed through single-crystal X-ray diffraction (XRD), the molecular packing structure of Br6Acrystal revealed the close proximity of carbonyl oxygen with bromine within the crystal. In fact, the C=O···Br angle of 126o strongly indicates the presence of halogen bond. Furthermore, the distance of 2.86 Å between the carbonyl oxygen and bromine atoms is one of the shortest distances among the halogen bonds. The crystallization-induced halogen bond was most likely the reason for the strong phosphorescence detected from the crystalline Br6A, although heavy atom effect would also play a role (Fig. 2f). More clearly, the strong halogen bonding of Br6Acrystal induced a unique directed heavy atom effect specifically at the triplet generation sites, which could significantly boost triplet generation, activate triplet emission, and suppress fluorescence and vibrational loss to enhance phosphorescence. It was found that Br6A suffered from self-quenching and therefore, its RTP was extremely weak and short-lived. Encouragingly, numerous studies have demonstrated that the phosphorescence quantum efficiency and lifetime of Br6Acould be significantly enhanced through various ingenious RTP enhancement strategies[34,41,44].In addition to halogen bonding, another increasingly explored strategy to design organicRTPluminophores with long lifetime is the stabilization of triplet excitons through molecular H-aggregation (Fig. 2g–n)[36,37]. In one of the more recent studies, a series of carbazole-based luminophoresconsisting of N, O, and P atoms was prepared (Fig. 2g). These atoms are able to expedite the spin-forbidden ISC of singlet to triplet excited states[69]. Furthermore, planar configurations with well-defined aromatic substituents were incorporated in the molecular design to stimulate the parallel alignment of the molecules and facilitate the generation of stable H-aggregates, which could possibly enhance the singlet excited state lifetimes[70]. The unique design features demonstrated in this work were largely inspired by the generation of persistent RTP in inorganicluminophores based on charge carrier trapping[71]. It was hypothesized that the existence of an energy trapping state T1* in these organicluminophorescould lead to stabilization of triplet excited states for the generation of long-lived organicRTP (Fig. 2h). To test this idea, 4,6-diphenyl-2-carbazolyl-1,3,5-triazine (DPhCzT) was synthesized (Fig. 2i) to show green RTP with a considerably long phosphorescence lifetime of 1.06 s and a quantum efficiency of 1.25%. First-principle time-dependent density functional theory (TD-DFT) revealed a small energy gap of < 0.3 eV between the lowest singlet and triplet excited states in DPhCzT monomer, which favored the singlet-to-triplet ISC process[72]. Moreover, XRD analysis of the single-crystal structure of DPhCzT uncovered the presence of H-aggregates as the measured angle between the transition dipoles and the interconnected axis was 80.9o, which was larger than the critical value of 54.7o differentiating J-aggregation and H-aggregation[36] (Fig. 2j). To demonstrate the general applicability of triplet exciton stabilization through molecular H-aggregation strategy in inducing persistent organicRTP, other pure organicluminophores with N, O, and P atoms, including di(9H-carbazolyl)-phenylphosphine (DCzPhP), were synthesized (Fig. 2k). By tailoring its molecular structure, DCzPhP was able to emit bright red RTP (Fig. 2l).Extending the design concept of triplet exciton stabilization through H-aggregation, a range of organicRTPluminophores with halogen substituents, including (9H-carbazol-9-yl)(4-chlorophenyl)-methanone (CPhCz), was synthesized in a more recent study (Fig. 2m)[37]. Owing to the synergistic integration of two functional strategies, these aromaticamide derivatives could be excited by visible light to emit organicRTP. More clearly, strong intermolecular interactions on the xy plane redshifted the absorption of the luminophores, while on the z-axis, molecules with H-aggregations stabilized the triplet excitons of the long-lived organicRTP. CPhCz had a high phosphorescence efficiency of 8.3% and displayed a long phosphorescence duration of 104 s under a brightness identifiable by naked eye (i.e., 0.32 mcd m-2) (Fig. 2n).Stabilization of triplet excitons for long-lived organicRTPcan also be achieved by controlling the intermolecular interactions in the crystalline state using external stimuli[73]. In fact, several recent studies have demonstrated the realization of ultralong organicRTP through UV photoactivation-enabled manipulation of intermolecular interactions[60,74]. For example, in one of the studies, the phenomenon of photoinduced RTP was realized in 10-phenyl-10H-phenothiazine-5,5-dioxide derivatives through UV light-enhanced π–π interactions of aromatic rings[60,74]. In another work, photoactivated dynamicRTP was achieved in a series of organicluminophores with a triazinecore, a carbozole unit, and alkoxylchains with different length[73]. By irradiation under UV light for 8 min, the organicluminophorescould be activated to exhibit RTP with emission lifetimes increasing from 1.8 to 1330 ms. These luminophorescould be deactivated to emit short-lived phosphorescence by leaving them under ambient conditions for about 3 h or thermally treating them. Separately, instead of attaching alkyl chains onto the triazinecore to fine-tune the molecular configuration, the flexible alkyl chains can be introduced to link carbazole moieties with heavy atoms to modulate spin–orbit coupling and strengthen intermolecular heavy atom effect for persistent organicRTP[75]. Carbazole-based organicRTPluminophorescould be designed to exhibit yellow persistent RTP emission with a high quantum yield of 39.5% and a long lifetime of about 200 ms[75]. Interestingly, although the strong persistent RTP emission was initially attributed to the carbazole derivatives, additional purification of the same luminophores revealed the disappearance of the yellow RTP[76]. As such, the small traces of impurities existed in the organiccompounds were most likely responsible for the observed persistent RTP.Another major strategy to promote singlet-triplet ISC in order to populate triplet states and achieve long-lived organicRTP is the enhancement of spin–orbit coupling based on n–π transition (Fig. 2o–u)[39,40]. This design concept was well documented in a recent structure-property relationship study, which investigated the effect of molecular orbital on the phosphorescence wavelength, lifetime, and efficiency[39]. Here, a series of benzophenone-based luminophores integrating carbonyl groups with non-binding electrons and different π-conjugated groups was prepared (Fig. 2o). Taking 1-(dibenzo[b,d]furan-2-yl)phenylmethanone (BDBF) as an example, carbonyl groups were incorporated to provide n orbitals, which could enhance spin–orbit coupling to trigger ISC from the excited singlet state S1 to different triplet states Tn. Meanwhile, π-conjugated units were introduced to provide π orbitals and endow T1 state with 3(π,π*) configuration, which could induce a slow phosphorescence rate and a persistent phosphorescence lifetime. By varying the π-conjugated units, the (n,π*) and (π,π*) molecular orbitals could be mixed to generate tunable T1 state with distinct 3(π,π*) configuration and energy levels, which in turn, enabled the tuning of phosphorescence color, lifetime, and quantum yield. The luminophores prepared in this work were generally not luminescent in both solution and amorphous states, but became highly emissive when they were transformed into crystals at room temperature (Fig. 2p). For example, BDBFcrystals displayed RTP with a phosphorescence lifetime of 232 ms and efficiency of 34.5%. First-principle TD-DFT calculations were performed on BDBF to unravel the mechanism of its RTP (Fig. 2q). It was noted that, because of a high Δα (which is defined as α– αTn) of 46.3% between S1 and T2 (where α and α were 79.1% and 32.8%, respectively) indicating an enhanced n–π transition and stronger spin–orbit coupling, as well as a high βπ,T1 of 99.7% indicating the prominent 3(π,π*) configuration of T1, BDBF possessed a long phosphorescence lifetime.Interestingly, the n–π transition design concept can also be extended to enable white phosphorescence emission from a single pure organicluminophore at room temperature. Pure organic white RTP was realized through intrasystem mixing of dual-emission bands, which were originated from the high- and low-lying triplet excitons (Fig. 2r–u)[40]. Fundamentally, if there are two radiative relaxations from both the higher and lower triplet excited states, dual phosphorescence could be observed[77,78]. In this study, four arylphenone derivatives consisting of heavy halogen atom (i.e., Br, Cl, or F), carbonyl group, and π-extended dibenzothiophene subunit, particularly 4-chlorobenzoyldibenzothiophene (CIBDBT), were prepared (Fig. 2r). While these organic molecules were not luminescent in solutions, they were capable of displaying dual RTP emission in crystalline state. The mechanism that enables this unique phenomenon is the combined effect of: (1) enhanced ISC due to the presence of lone pair electrons in carbonyl group and heavy halogen atom, with (2) multiple triplet excited states having distinct energy levels and orbital configurations due to the π-extended dibenzothiophene subunit. Intriguingly, upon 365 nm UV irradiation, CIBDBTcould emit white phosphorescence, which turned yellow after the removal of excitation source (Fig. 2t). The crystal structure of CIBDBT showed that the luminophore existed in dimeric units linked by π–π interaction (Fig. 2s). The small dihedral angle of 21.8o between dibenzothiophene and the carbonyl group indicates their strong conjugation within the luminophore. This raises the possibility that (n,π*) from the carbonyl group and (π,π*) could synergistically form hybrid triplet excited states. In fact, theoretical calculations showed that there were two low-lying triplet excited states (i.e., T1 and T2) below the lowest excited singlet state (i.e., S1), where the lower-energy T1 and the higher-energy T2 are the mixed states dominated by (π,π*) and (n,π*) transitions, respectively (Fig. 2u). The (π,π*) transition localized to the benzophenone unit (i.e., the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital L) from the π-conjugated dibenzothiophene (e.g., the highest occupied molecular orbital H), while the (n,π*) transition exhibited charge transfer from deeper orbitals (e.g., H-2) to L. All these suggest the importance of the existence of both low- and high-lying triplet excited states with (π,π*) and (n,π*) transitions in the design of organic persistent dual RTPluminophores.
Enhancement of organic room-temperature phosphorescence
It is essential for pure organicRTPluminophores to be bright and with long lifetime for practical applications. While a majority of the pure organicluminophores display weak and short-lived RTP in the scale of ms, encouragingly, the RTP performance of organicluminophorescan be greatly strengthened. To this end, various approaches which are capable of suppressing the non-radiative deactivation pathways and reducing the quenching of triplet excitons, as well as enhancing their ISC rate and lifetime have been increasingly explored. These mainly include co-crystal assembly[34,41-43], rigid matrix host–guest system[44-46], structural modified host–guest system[47,48], and dopant-based system[49].
Co-crystallization
Co-crystallization relies on the synergisticco-assembly of luminophores with host crystals to achieve a directed heavy atom effect in order to trigger a more effective ISC process to improve RTP (Fig. 3a–g)[34]. In one of the pioneering reports demonstrating this enhancement concept, a pure organicluminophoreBr6A was synthesized and co-crystallized with its bi-halogenated analog host of 2,5-dihexyloxy-1,4-dibromobenzene (Br6) to generate a co-crystal of Br6A/Br6 (Fig. 3a)[34]. Br6 has a similar crystal structure and size to Br6A. Therefore, the presence of Br6 in the co-crystals could minimize the formation of excimers and suppress the self-quenching of Br6A to yield more effective RTP with a high quantum yield of 55%, almost 20-fold brighter than that of Br6A alone (Fig. 3b). It is interesting to note that the emission of Br6A/Br6 co-crystals was still originated from the pure Br6Acrystals as evidenced by their narrow excitation band, which is within the absorption spectrum of Br6A but not Br6. XRD analysis of the crystal structures of both Br6A and Br6 revealed their similar packing motifs and aromatic ring distances. This suggests that Br6Aluminophore was incorporated into the Br6 host through substitution.
Fig. 3
Enhancement of organic RTP based on co-crystallization and rigid matrix host–guest system. a Chemical structures of a pair of aldehyde luminophore (BrnA) and analogous host (Brn) used in co-crystallization, where X are CHO and Br for luminophore and host, respectively, and N refers to the alkoxy chain length with varying amount of carbon atoms. b Schematic illustration of the mechanism of RTP enhancement based on co-crystallization, where luminophores (i.e., brominated aromatic aldehydes) are substituted into the host crystals (i.e., dibrominated analogs to the luminophores) and isolated to minimize the excimer-induced self-quenching and enhance the overall RTP quantum yield. c Photographs of the co-crystals formed from BrnA (i.e., Br5A, Br6A, Br7A, and Br8A) and Brn (i.e., Br5, Br6, Br7, and Br8) with different alkoxy chain lengths consisting of five to eight carbon atoms, under 365 nm UV light excitation. The numerical values within the co-crystals indicate their photoluminescence quantum efficiencies. d Chemical structures of different luminophore/host pairs, i.e., BrC6A/BrC6, BrS6A/BrS6, and Np6A/Np6. e Photographs of the co-crystals mixed from Br6A/Br6, BrC6A/BrC6, BrS6A/BrS6, and Np6A/Np6 combinations under 365-nm UV light irradiation. f Chemical structures of 1,4-DITFB and Naphthalene. g Packing structure of the co-crystal of 1,4-DITFB and Naphthalene (Nap-DITFB). h Excitation (in blue) and emission (in green) profiles of Nap-DITFB co-crystal. Inset shows the co-crystal of 1,4-DITFB and Naphthalene under 365-nm UV light irradiation. i Chemical structure of the host PMMA. j Photoluminescence profiles of pure Br6A luminophore and Br6A embedded in different variants of PMMA. k Chemical structures of the guest G1 and the host PVA. l Schematic illustration of the mechanism of RTP enhancement based on rigid matrix host–guest system, where G1 is embedded within PVA and the PVA–PVA hydrogen bonds, the G1-PVA hydrogen bonds, as well as the G1–G1 halogen bonds collectively contribute to organic RTP enhancement. a and c are adapted/reproduced with permission from ref. [41]. Copyright (2014) American Chemical Society. b, d, and e are adapted with permission from ref. [34]. Copyright (2011) Springer Nature. f and h are adapted with permission from ref. [42]. Copyright (2012) The Royal Society of Chemistry. g is reproduced with permission from ref. [6]. Copyright (2015) The Royal Society of Chemistry. i and j are reproduced with permission from ref. [44]. Copyright (2013) American Chemical Society. k and l are adapted/reproduced with permission from ref. [45]. Copyright (2014) Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co
Enhancement of organicRTP based on co-crystallization and rigid matrix host–guest system. a Chemical structures of a pair of aldehydeluminophore (BrnA) and analogous host (Brn) used in co-crystallization, where X are CHO and Br for luminophore and host, respectively, and N refers to the alkoxy chain length with varying amount of carbon atoms. b Schematic illustration of the mechanism of RTP enhancement based on co-crystallization, where luminophores (i.e., brominated aromatic aldehydes) are substituted into the host crystals (i.e., dibrominated analogs to the luminophores) and isolated to minimize the excimer-induced self-quenching and enhance the overall RTP quantum yield. c Photographs of the co-crystals formed from BrnA (i.e., Br5A, Br6A, Br7A, and Br8A) and Brn (i.e., Br5, Br6, Br7, and Br8) with different alkoxy chain lengths consisting of five to eight carbon atoms, under 365 nm UV light excitation. The numerical values within the co-crystals indicate their photoluminescence quantum efficiencies. d Chemical structures of different luminophore/host pairs, i.e., BrC6A/BrC6, BrS6A/BrS6, and Np6A/Np6. e Photographs of the co-crystals mixed from Br6A/Br6, BrC6A/BrC6, BrS6A/BrS6, and Np6A/Np6 combinations under 365-nm UV light irradiation. f Chemical structures of 1,4-DITFB and Naphthalene. g Packing structure of the co-crystal of 1,4-DITFB and Naphthalene (Nap-DITFB). h Excitation (in blue) and emission (in green) profiles of Nap-DITFBco-crystal. Inset shows the co-crystal of 1,4-DITFB and Naphthalene under 365-nm UV light irradiation. i Chemical structure of the host PMMA. j Photoluminescence profiles of pure Br6Aluminophore and Br6A embedded in different variants of PMMA. k Chemical structures of the guest G1 and the host PVA. l Schematic illustration of the mechanism of RTP enhancement based on rigid matrix host–guest system, where G1 is embedded within PVA and the PVA–PVAhydrogen bonds, the G1-PVAhydrogen bonds, as well as the G1–G1 halogen bonds collectively contribute to organicRTP enhancement. a and c are adapted/reproduced with permission from ref. [41]. Copyright (2014) American Chemical Society. b, d, and e are adapted with permission from ref. [34]. Copyright (2011) Springer Nature. f and h are adapted with permission from ref. [42]. Copyright (2012) The Royal Society of Chemistry. g is reproduced with permission from ref. [6]. Copyright (2015) The Royal Society of Chemistry. i and j are reproduced with permission from ref. [44]. Copyright (2013) American Chemical Society. k and l are adapted/reproduced with permission from ref. [45]. Copyright (2014) Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & CoIt is important to highlight that, in addition to luminophores and their analogous host crystals of the same sizes, mismatched luminophore-host pairs with different alkoxy chain lengths were also generated, albeit with lower phosphorescence quantum efficiencies. This was reported in a recent study, which explored the emission brightness of a series of co-crystals mixed from different combinations of aldehydes and their analogous host crystals with varying alkoxy chain lengths between five and eight carbon atoms (Fig. 3c)[41]. Significantly brighter emission could only be achieved with matched luminophore-host pairs of similar sizes. In fact, with an increase in the size differences between the luminophores and hosts, a corresponding decrease in quantum efficiencies of the resultant mixed crystals was observed. Separately, by coupling luminophores possessing different electron densities and triplet levels with their analogous host crystals, additional organicco-crystals with different emission colors could be engineered (Fig. 3d, e)[34]. For example, co-crystals constructed from the luminophore/host combinations of 4- bromo-2,5-diheptylbenzaldehyde/1,4-dibromo-2,5-diheptylbenzene (BrC6A/BrC6), 4-bromo-2,5-bis(hexylthio)benzaldehyde/(2,5-dibromo-1,4-phenylene)bis(hexylsulfane) (BrS6A/BrS6), and 5-bromo-2,6-bis(hexyloxy)-1-naphthaldehyde/1,5-dibromo-2,6-bis(hexyloxy)naphthalene (Np6A/Np6) could emit bright blue, yellow, and orange phosphorescence, respectively, under ambient conditions.In addition to the co-crystallization of luminophores with their analogous host crystals, organic emitters can be paired up with non-analogous host crystals (Fig. 3f–h). In one study reporting such pairing, 1,4-diiodotetrafluorobenzene (1,4-DITFB) and the polyaromatic hydrocarbon naphthalene (Nap) were prepared and co-crystallized to generate Nap-DITFB (Fig. 3f)[42]. Here, 1,4-DITFB and Nap served as halogen bonding donor and π-type halogen bonding acceptor, respectively. While polyaromatic hydrocarbons are typically good luminescent materials, it is challenging to observe their phosphorescence. The incorporation of 1,4-DITFB as a halogen bonding donor was, therefore, anticipated to improve the phosphorescence of the co-crystals. Analysis on the crystal structure of Nap-DITFB revealed the presence of C–I···π halogen bonding in the co-crystals (Fig. 3g). The stability of the co-crystal structure was also maintained by additional weak intermolecular interactions, notably C–H···I hydrogen bonding, C-F···F-Ccontact, and edge-to-edge π-π stacking. With the maximum excitation at 323 nm, Nap-DITFBcould emit strong green phosphorescence with a phosphorescence lifetime of 0.067 ms (Fig. 3h). Altogether, the introduction of heavy atom 1,4-DITFB diluted the solid-state naphthaleneconcentration to suppress its self-quenching, while the C–I···π halogen and C–H···I hydrogen interactions rigidified the molecular environment, resulting in an improved ISC process and considerably enhanced organicRTP.
Rigid matrix host–guest system
Although bright organicRTPcan be achieved through co-crystallization based on a directed heavy atom effect, the practical applications of the resultant organiccrystalline luminophores are still largely hampered by their crystal quality[79]. For device fabrication and processing applications, including sensors, solid-state lighting, and organic light-emitting diodes, amorphous solids and polymers are much easier to process than crystalline materials. However, amorphous organic systems with bright RTP are challenging to realize. Rigorous vibration and diffusion movements, such as α and β transitions, are typically rampant in amorphous phase under ambient conditions[45]. These unavoidable phenomena in amorphous matrices favor the vibrational loss of triplet excitons of organicluminophores, causing significant quenching of their phosphorescence[80,81]. As such, suppressing the vibrational and diffusional motions in an amorphous environment is extremely important as these movements compete with phosphorescent decay.To address this issue, increasing activities have been geared towards confining pure organicRTPluminophores within carefully chosen rigid amorphous polymer matrices with minimal amorphous phase relaxations, such as poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) and polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) (Fig. 3i–l)[44,45]. With this notable feature, these polymer matrices were anticipated to mitigate the vibrational triplet decay to realize emissive triplet relaxation and boost the overall phosphorescence efficiency. Taking the luminophoreBr6A as an example, it could be embedded within PMMA to improve its phosphorescence brightness and efficiency (Fig. 3i–j)[44]. Specifically, Br6A was embedded within a series of PMMA with different tacticity, i.e., atacticPMMA (aPMMA), isotacticPMMA (iPMMA), syndiotacticPMMA (sPMMA) (Fig. 3i) and their RTP emission intensity was evaluated. Among all samples, the iPMMA-embedded Br6A showed the brightest phosphorescence, with a phosphorescence quantum efficiency up to 7.5% (Fig. 3j). This was attributed to the high isotacticity and low β-relaxation characteristic of iPMMA. Generally, amorphous PMMA with different tacticity arrangements displays varying degrees of β-relaxation, which influences the vibrational loss of triplet excited states and phosphorescence efficiency. In fact, the degree of β-relaxation of amorphous PMMA decreases with decreasing syndiotacticity, but increases with decreasing isotacticity. Therefore, with increasing isotacticity in iPMMA, its β-relaxation decreased correspondingly and phosphorescence brightness and quantum efficiency of the embedded Br6A were significantly improved.The suppression of both vibrational and diffusional motions in an amorphous environment under ambient conditions can also be rationally achieved by introducing active non-covalent intermolecular interactions in the matrices[45,46]. For instance, a recent study has demonstrated this concept by relying on the strong halogen and hydrogen bonding between an amorphous polymer matrix and the embedded organicluminophore to effectively minimize vibrational dissipation and enable bright phosphorescence (Fig. 3k–l)[45]. In this work, an organicluminophore 2,2’-(2-bromo-5-formyl-1,4-phenylene)bis(oxy)diaceticacid (G1) with a bromoaldehydecore and carboxylic acid side chains was rationally embedded within amorphous PVA with hydrogen bonds (Fig. 3k). In principle, the bromoaldehydecore of G1 was expected to induce strong intermolecular halogen bonds between luminophores to suppress their vibrational dissipation and improve ISC (Fig. 3l). In addition, the carboxylic acid side chains of G1 would facilitate the formation of strong intermolecular hydrogen bonds between G1 and PVA to strengthen the restriction of luminophore vibrational loss. Additionally, the PVA–PVAhydrogen bonding would minimize diffusion of the polymer matrices. These intermolecular interactions synergistically reinforced RTP of G1 via the strengthened restriction of vibrational and diffusional motions. This was clear from the strong RTP exhibited by the G1-PVA hybrid system, where its high phosphorescence quantum efficiency of 24% was approximately three times higher than that of Br6A-iPMMA.Besides via rigid matrix host–guest systems, the RTP of amorphous organicluminophores has been shown to be significantly enhanced via a structural modified host–guest system (Fig. 4a–e)[47,48]. To illustrate this enhancement principle, a rigid steroidal compound β-cyclodextrin (β-CD) was recently modified with various phosphorescent moieties to prepare a series of non-crystalline metal-free single RTPluminophores, including 6-bromo-2-naphthol-modified β-cyclodextrin (BrNp-β-CD) (Fig. 4a)[47]. These amorphous small molecular CD derivatives exhibited intense RTP luminescence in solid-state with phosphorescence lifetimes between 0.96 and 2.67 ms. This phenomenon was ascribed to the strong intermolecular hydrogen bonding between adjacent CDs, which mitigated the non-radiative vibrational deactivation of luminophores and protected them from quenchers, leading to efficient RTP emission. β-CD generally has a cavity, which is known to be able to host a plethora of guest molecules for the generation of a host–guest complex. As a proof of concept, a water-soluble fluorescent coumarin derivative (1s,3s)-N-(4-((2-oxo-2H-chromen-7-yl)oxy)butyl)adamantan-1-aminium chloride (AC) was introduced as a guest molecule into the cavity of BrNp-β-CD host to generate a structural modified host–guest complex AC@BrNp-β-CD (Fig. 4b). The supramolecular system possessed dual-emission properties originated from the individual components of AC and BrNp-β-CD and was capable of emitting multicolor luminescence, including white-light emission when excited at 295 nm. Intriguingly, this emission color could be manipulated by tuning the molar ratio of AC and BrNp-β-CD, or the excitation wavelength.
Fig. 4
Enhancement of organic RTP based on structural modified host–guest system and dopant system. a Chemical structures of the cyclodextrin-modified host BrNp-β-CD and the guest AC. b Photographs of different states of the individual guest and host, as well as the host–guest system under daylight (left) and UV light excitation (right). c Chemical structures of the secondary amino-substituted deuterated guest and the host β-estradiol. d Sum of the non-radiative triplet deactivation rate (knr) and triplet quenching rate (kq) of a range of host–guest films in which the host was β-estradiol and the secondary amino-substituted aromatic hydrocarbon guests were either deuterated (open circles) or not (solid circles). e Photographs of different states of the deuterated host–guest system under UV light excitation and after switching it off over time. f Chemical structures of the donor (guest) TMB and the acceptor (host) PPT. g Schematic illustration of the mechanism of RTP enhancement based on dopant system where charge-transfer states are formed during photoexcitation (i and ii), followed by the formation of charge-separation states (iii) and the eventual exciplex emission (iv and v). a and b are adapted with permission from ref. [47]. Copyright (2018) American Chemical Society. c, d, and e are adapted with permission from ref. [48]. Copyright (2013) Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. f and g are reproduced with permission from ref. [49]. Copyright (2017) Springer Nature
Enhancement of organicRTP based on structural modified host–guest system and dopant system. a Chemical structures of the cyclodextrin-modified host BrNp-β-CD and the guest AC. b Photographs of different states of the individual guest and host, as well as the host–guest system under daylight (left) and UV light excitation (right). cChemical structures of the secondary amino-substituted deuterated guest and the host β-estradiol. d Sum of the non-radiative triplet deactivation rate (knr) and triplet quenching rate (kq) of a range of host–guest films in which the host was β-estradiol and the secondary amino-substituted aromatic hydrocarbon guests were either deuterated (open circles) or not (solid circles). e Photographs of different states of the deuterated host–guest system under UV light excitation and after switching it off over time. f Chemical structures of the donor (guest) TMB and the acceptor (host) PPT. g Schematic illustration of the mechanism of RTP enhancement based on dopant system where charge-transfer states are formed during photoexcitation (i and ii), followed by the formation of charge-separation states (iii) and the eventual exciplex emission (iv and v). a and b are adapted with permission from ref. [47]. Copyright (2018) American Chemical Society. c, d, and e are adapted with permission from ref. [48]. Copyright (2013) Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. f and g are reproduced with permission from ref. [49]. Copyright (2017) Springer NatureIn addition to host molecules, modification can also be applied to guest molecules to reinforce the overall RTP performance. One of the earliest studies in this area formulated a structural modified host–guest system based on deuterated guest molecules (Fig. 4c–e)[48]. Specifically, the unique metal-free organic host–guest RTP systems were achieved through synergistic integration of a secondary amino-substituted deuterated carbon as a phosphorescent guest with its hydroxyl steroid analog as a host matrix (Fig. 4c). The two individual components of this amorphous host–guest system played crucial roles in affording long-lived RTP emission. In particular, the different amorphous hydroxyl steroidal compounds, such as β-estradiol, used as hosts possessed high rigidity and oxygen barrier characteristics, which could heavily suppress the quenching of long-lived triplet excitons. On the other hand, the aromatic hydrocarbons employed as guests were highly deuterated and secondary amino-substituted to minimize their non-radiative relaxations and enhance ISC. Interestingly, the advantage of highly deuterated guests were particularly pronounced in one of the characterization studies with β-estradiol as the host matrix (Fig. 4d). Various deuterated secondary amino-substituted aromatic hydrocarbon guests and their undeuterated counterparts were synthesized and combined with β-estradiol to generate a series of structural modified host–guest systems. Over a range of temperatures from 111 to 500 K, deuteration of the aromatic hydrocarbons was noted to reduce both the non-radiative triplet deactivation rate (knr) and triplet quenching rate (kq), which is crucial to achieve long-lived triplet excitons and effective phosphorescence emission. Crucially, by leveraging on this RTP enhancement concept, persistent phosphorescence with a lifetime of >1 s and a quantum yield of >10% could be realized for a pure organic amorphous host–guest complex under ambient conditions (Fig. 4e).One of the most exciting breakthroughs in the enhancement of RTP of pure organicluminophores has been reported most recently, in which organic long persistent luminescence was realized based on a dopant-based host–guest system (Fig. 4f, g)[49]. This work was largely inspired by the common use of mixtures of electron-donating and -accepting molecules to generate charge-separated states in organic photovoltaics[82,83]. Leveraging on a simple mixture of two organic molecules, i.e., N,N,N’,N’-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) and 2,8-bis(diphenylphosphoryl)dibenzo[b,d]thiophene (PPT) serving as electron-donating and electron-accepting molecules, respectively, TMB/PPT amorphous film with a remarkable phosphorescence lifetime of >1 h was demonstrated (Fig. 4f). The unique features of this long lifetime luminescence enhancement principle lie in the generation of long-lived intermediate charge-separated states and their gradual recombination, which proceeded in sequential steps (Fig. 4g (i–v)). Firstly, upon photoexcitation, the electrons from the highest occupied molecular orbital of TMB transferred to that of PPT, resulting in the creation of intermediate charge-transfer states between PPT and TMB (Fig. 4g (i) and Fig. 4g (ii)). Next, through charge-hopping among the PPT molecules, the PPT radical anions would diffuse to sequester the TMB radical cations, leading to the formation of stable charge-separated states (Fig. 4g (iii)). The generation of these intermediate persistent charge-separated states was essential to retard charge recombination in order to realize long-lived emission. The subsequent charge recombination of the TMB radical cations and PPT radical anions (Fig. 4g (iv)) would then produce exciplexes (i.e., 25% singlet exciplexes and 75% triplet exciplexes (Fig. 4g (v)). As the photogenerated radical anions and cations could maintain their energy and accumulate in the TMB/PPT blend, the exciplex emission could last for an extended period of time after the removal of photoexcitation. Interestingly, reverse ISC through thermal activation could occur in this exciplex system due to the existence of a small energy gap between S1 and T1. It is important to highlight that the duration of the persistent phosphorescence emission was strongly dependent on several factors, such as the excitation duration and power, sample temperature, and concentration of the TMB dopant. For instance, to have a long phosphorescence lifetime, a low TMBconcentration was needed as this could ensure a large distance between TMB and PPT, which in turn, maintained a low recombination probability of PPT radical anions with TMB radical cations.Overall, the keys to achieving long-lived and bright RTP emission lie in the enhancement of ISC process coupled with the heavy suppression of non-radiative deactivation pathways of triplets. Therefore, by satisfying these crucial requirements, the functions and performance of pure organicRTPluminophorescan be maximized for different applications through rational design and enhancement strategies.
Advanced processing of pure organic RTP luminophores for biological applications
Despite the fact that organicluminophores with enhanced RTP have only started to be rationally designed in the last few years, active explorations have been channeled towards identifying their potential applications. These primarily include information encryption for anti-counterfeiting labeling, organic optoelectronics, ultrahigh density optical recording, and sensing[7,8]. Several key features that render organicRTPluminophores attractive for these applications, as compared to conventional short-lived organic fluorophores and thermally activated delayed fluorescent molecules, are their external stimuli-driven dynamic and reversible luminescence, and persistent room-temperature luminescent lifetime of beyond milliseconds to a few seconds. Moreover, it is possible to use pure organicRTPluminophores directly for these applications without the need for complex processing. As in-depth discussions on the potential applications of organicRTPluminophores in these areas have been previously covered in several reviews[7,8], we therefore focus more on the emerging biological applications of pure organicRTPluminophores.OrganicRTPluminophores typically need to be specifically formulated for biological applications. This is because the effective utilizations of organicRTPluminophores for biological sensing and imaging hinge on stringent requirements, such as long-wavelength and bright RTP emission, suitable size, good water dispersibility, and excellent biocompatibility. As a promising application of organicRTP, biological imaging benefits from the utilization of organicluminophores with long-wavelength luminescence. Because of this, various organicRTPluminophores with long-wavelength (e.g., red emission) have been increasingly developed through ingenious approaches. These include utilizing heteroaromatic molecules with red emission (e.g., benzo[2,1,3]thiadiazoles)[21], expanding π–conjugated structures[34], and introducing appropriate red emitter dopants to facilitate the exciplex-dopant energy transfer and hence, redshift the emission wavelength[84].Apart from specific strategies in designing pure organicRTPluminophores with long-wavelength emission, there is a crucial need to process these luminophores so that they can remain sufficiently emissive in biological environment. This is because, when organicRTPluminophores are in contact with oxygen in aqueous media, their triplet excited states can be easily quenched[48]. Encouragingly, recent years have seen the emergence of various strategies to address this issue. Of particular interests are nanocrystallization of amorphous phosphorescent aggregates[57] and polymer-assisted nanoencapsulation of phosphorescent luminophores[37,58-60].
Nanocrystallization
OrganicRTPluminophores are highly attractive for biological applications, such as phosphorescence and lifetime imaging. This is because, with long lifetimes extending beyond milliseconds to a few seconds, organicRTPluminophores have the capability to minimize biological tissue autofluorescence and background interference, which typically last up to several nanoseconds. At the same time, pure organicRTPluminophores are able to mitigate the extended utility of external illumination source and they possess excellent biocompatibility. Although organicRTPcrystals possess such attractive features, there have been minimal successful attempts to use them for biological applications. This has been attributed to several factors. To date, a majority of the demonstrated bright pure organicRTPluminophores possess short-wavelength emissions. Many current strategies to yield bright organicRTP are not compatible with biological applications as additional molecules or matrices have been deliberately incorporated for the synthesis of these compounds. Unfortunately, the presence of these additives may interfere with biological systems and compromise the biocompatibility of the eventual organicRTPluminophores. Meanwhile, for those organiccompounds exhibiting crystallization-induced phosphorescence, their sizes are typically too large for biological applications.To solve these problems, our group has recently developed a unique nanocrystallization strategy (Fig. 5)[57]. As shown in Fig. 5a, the nanocrystallization strategy relies on three primary processes, i.e., precipitation, seeding, and ultrasonication, to maximize the nucleation rate of crystals while simultaneously minimize their growth rate[85]. Amorphous nanoaggregates are initially formed through injection of an organiccompound in a good solvent (e.g., tetrahydrofuran) into its antisolvent (e.g., water). Once crystal seeds of the organiccompound are introduced to direct and induce crystallization, the suspension is subjected to ultrasonication to promote detachment of the crystals from their seeds, which serve as new seeds to accelerate the nucleation rate and formation of nanocrystals. Interestingly, the crystal size can be simply fine-tuned by varying the ratio of the antisolvent to good solvent. The conversion of amorphous nanoaggregates to nanocrystals is typically accompanied by changes in optical properties. The nanocrystallization method is widely applicable to a range of organic molecules with various chemical structures and sizes.
Fig. 5
Nanocrystallization of amorphous nanoaggregates to yield organic RTP contrast agents for bioimaging. a Schematic illustration of the seed-assisted nanocrystallization process. b Chemical structure of C-C4-Br with red persistent RTP. c Scanning electron microscopy image of the C-C4-Br nanocrystals. Inset shows the selected area electron diffraction pattern of the nanocrystals. d Photoluminescence of the C-C4-Br amorphous nanoaggregates and nanocrystals (both in orange) and fluorescein (green) under various illumination states. e Confocal laser scanning microscopy images of breast cancer cells treated with amorphous nanoaggregates (left) and nanocrystals (right) of C-C4-Br. a is adapted with permission from ref. [85]. Copyright (2017) Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. b, c, d, and e are adapted with permission from ref. [57]. Copyright (2017) Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co
Nanocrystallization of amorphous nanoaggregates to yield organicRTPcontrast agents for bioimaging. a Schematic illustration of the seed-assisted nanocrystallization process. b Chemical structure of C-C4-Br with red persistent RTP. c Scanning electron microscopy image of the C-C4-Br nanocrystals. Inset shows the selected area electron diffraction pattern of the nanocrystals. d Photoluminescence of the C-C4-Br amorphous nanoaggregates and nanocrystals (both in orange) and fluorescein (green) under various illumination states. e Confocal laser scanning microscopy images of breast cancercells treated with amorphous nanoaggregates (left) and nanocrystals (right) of C-C4-Br. a is adapted with permission from ref. [85]. Copyright (2017) Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. b, c, d, and e are adapted with permission from ref. [57]. Copyright (2017) Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & CoTo realize nanocrystals with bright long-wavelength phosphorescence for biological applications, we designed a new RTP molecule (4-(4-(9H-carbazol-9-yl)butoxy)phenyl)(4-bromophenyl)methanone (C-C4-Br) by adding a butoxy spacer in between the carbazole and the 4-bromobenzophenone groups to spatially separate them (Fig. 5b). This soft spacer was incorporated in order to enhance the overall heavy halogen atom effect through strengthening the bond between the carbazolyl plane of one molecule and the bromine atom of the neighboring molecule. Following the steps shown in Fig. 5a, the nanocrystals of C-C4-Br with rod-like morphology and a size of 180 nm were synthesized (Fig. 5c). Along with the generation of C-C4-Br nanocrystals, their RTP emission was assessed (Fig. 5d). Of all three specimens under examination, i.e., C-C4-Br nanoaggregates, C-C4-Br nanocrystals, and fluorescein, only the nanocrystals were emissive and observable under all illumination conditions, in the presence and absence of visible light and UV light irradiations. Both the nanocrystals and nanoaggregates of C-C4-Br were then used for in vitro phosphorescence imaging of breast cancercells (Fig. 5e). No photoluminescence could be detected from the cancercells treated with the nanoaggregates. In contrast, the nanocrystal-treated cells displayed bright red phosphorescence emission. Furthermore, the phosphorescence lifetime of C-C4-Br nanocrystals was 0.14 s and could be utilized to clearly differentiate the nanocrystal-labeled cells from the fluorescein dye interference and background autofluorescence. The nanocrystals also displayed excellent biocompatibility. All these have clearly illustrated the effective cellular internalization and highly emissive phosphorescence of nanocrystals, and most importantly, the superiority of nanocrystalline RTPluminophores over their amorphous counterparts for biological applications.
Nanoencapsulation
Further to the top-down nanocrystallization, bottom-up approach such as nanoencapsulation was also used to process organicRTPluminophores for biological applications[37,58-60] (Fig. 6). Using this approach, pure organicRTPluminophores are generally wrapped within an amphiphilic shell to endow the eventual structures with excellent water dispersibility and good cellular uptake. For example, pure organicRTP nanocrystals of BDBF (Fig. 2o) have recently been encapsulated within an amphiphilicsaponin with a unique permeabilization property for improved intracellular delivery and imaging of live cancercells (Fig. 6a, b)[58]. The saponin-encapsulated BDBF nanocrystals were prepared by introducing saponin into the BDBF nanocrystals dispersed in phosphate-buffered saline (Fig. 6a). These processed nanocrystals had a uniform size of about 460 nm. To demonstrate the advantage of the saponin-based encapsulation process, the saponin-encapsulated BDBF nanocrystals were used for in vitro phosphorescence imaging of HeLacells. It was noted that these nanocrystals were able to diffuse through the permeabilized membrane of HeLacells, stain the cells with high photostability, and maintain the persistent lifetimes of up to 100 ms, which is significantly longer than background autofluorescence (Fig. 6b).
Fig. 6
Nanoencapsulation and surface functionalization of nanocrystals and amorphous nanoaggregates to yield organic RTP contrast agents for bioapplications. a Schematic illustration of the nanoencapsulation of BDBF RTP nanocrystals using saponin. b Confocal laser scanning microscopy images of HeLa cells treated with pure BDBF nanocrystals (left) and saponin-encapsulated BDBF nanocrystals (right). c Schematic illustration of the syntheses of amorphous organic semiconducting nanoparticles with ultralong RTP, i.e., OSN-T and OSN-B, using top-down (top) and bottom-up (down) approaches, respectively. d Fluorescence (left) and ultralong phosphorescence (right) imaging of lymph node in living mice using intradermally administered OSN-T. a and b are adapted with permission from ref. [58]. Copyright (2017) American Chemical Society. c and d are adapted with permission from ref. [59]. Copyright (2017) Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co
Nanoencapsulation and surface functionalization of nanocrystals and amorphous nanoaggregates to yield organicRTPcontrast agents for bioapplications. a Schematic illustration of the nanoencapsulation of BDBFRTP nanocrystals using saponin. b Confocal laser scanning microscopy images of HeLacells treated with pure BDBF nanocrystals (left) and saponin-encapsulated BDBF nanocrystals (right). c Schematic illustration of the syntheses of amorphous organic semiconducting nanoparticles with ultralong RTP, i.e., OSN-T and OSN-B, using top-down (top) and bottom-up (down) approaches, respectively. d Fluorescence (left) and ultralong phosphorescence (right) imaging of lymph node in living mice using intradermally administered OSN-T. a and b are adapted with permission from ref. [58]. Copyright (2017) American Chemical Society. c and d are adapted with permission from ref. [59]. Copyright (2017) Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & CoRecent studies have also shown that the nanoencapsulation technique can be used to process pure organicRTPluminophores prepared from both top-down and bottom-up synthetic strategies (Fig. 6c, d)[59,60]. For instance, a series of organicRTPluminophores, including DPhCzT (OS1) (Fig. 2i), was prepared through both the top-down transformation of solid crystals into nanoparticles (OSNs-T) and the bottom-up nanoprecipitation of nanoparticles (OSNs-B)[59]. An amphiphilictriblock copolymer of PEG-b-PPG-b-PEG (F127) was subsequently utilized to encapsulate OSNs-T and OSNs-B in order to stabilize and endow them with good aqueous dispersibility (Fig. 6c). Although each pair of the nanoparticles possessed the same phosphorescence dye and spherical morphology, the hydrodynamic diameter of all OSNs-B (~20 nm) was notably smaller than that of OSNs-T (~70 to 80 nm). Both sets of organic nanoparticles did not induce any noticeable cytotoxicity. Interestingly, all three OSNs-T exhibited enhanced phosphorescence as compared to their OSNs-Bcounterparts, possibly due to the stronger molecular packing and enhanced stabilization of triplet excitons. In addition, of all OSNs-T, OSN1-T, which was prepared from DPhCzT, exhibited the strongest and longest phosphorescence, which could be detected using a whole-animal imaging set-up after switching off external illumination. OSN1-T was then selected and used for proof-of-concept in vivo long-term phosphorescence imaging (Fig. 6d). Even at a low nanoparticle concentration of 7.5 nM, the phosphorescence of OSN1-Tcould be clearly observed in the subcutaneous tissue of living mice. Importantly, due to the mitigation of tissue autofluorescence, OSN1-T enabled a highly sensitive imaging of axillary lymph node in living mice with a signal-to-noise ratio of 40, while fluorescence imaging could not distinguish the lymph node from normal tissue.Separately, the F127-mediated nanoencapsulation strategy was also used to wrap organicRTP aggregates CPhCz (Fig. 2m) to generate water-dispersible RTP nanoparticles for in vitro phosphorescence imaging[37]. These nanoparticles had an average size of about 68 nm and exhibited a long phosphorescence with an emission lifetime of ~0.65 s. The attractive RTP feature of the nanoencapsulated CPhCz nanoparticles was then utilized for labeling and phosphorescence imaging of hepatocellular cells. Similar approach to encapsulate organic long-lived RTPluminophores, i.e., specific derivative of 10-phenyl-10H-phenothiazine-5,5-dioxide, using F127 to generate water-dispersible nanoparticles for in vivo phosphorescence imaging has also been demonstrated in a recent study[60]. The F127-encapsulated nanoparticles were intradermally administered into living mice and their ultralong RTP was clearly observed.In short, these studies have demonstrated general applicability of nanoencapsulation method in generating dispersible RTP nanoparticles with retained phosphorescence brightness and lifetimes for real-time phosphorescence imaging.
Summary and outlook
Motivated by the rapid advancements in the molecular design, formulation, and processing strategies, pure organic long-lived RTPluminophores have been increasingly demonstrated in recent years. Efficient singlet-triplet ISC, slow triplet excited state decay rate, and suppressed non-radiative relaxation rates, which are essential factors to the realization of pure organicRTP, have been enabled through various molecular design strategies, such as halogen bonding[33-35], H-aggregation[36-38], and n–π transition[39,40]. Concurrently, the emergence and development of various organicRTP enhancement approaches, notably co-crystallization[34,41-43], rigid matrix host–guest system[44-46], structural modified host–guest system[47,48], and dopant-based system[49], have significantly enhanced and elevated the performance of pure organicRTPluminophores, in terms of phosphorescence quantum efficiency and lifetime.As an emerging class of luminescent materials, pure organicluminophores with persistent and bright RTP have remarkable properties, such as configurable molecular structures, tunable photoluminescence properties, long phosphorescence emission lifetime, and stimuli-responsiveness. Because of these attractive properties, they are poised to have tremendous potential applications. For instance, the long-lived phosphorescence of organicRTPluminophorescoupled with their stimuli-responsiveness have been actively explored for applications in sensing and anti-counterfeiting labeling for data security protection. Additionally, the extended luminescence lifetimes of organicRTPluminophores are beneficial to the mitigation of background autofluorescence, which enables highly specific and sensitive biological imaging. With such unique features and potential applications, the value and importance of pure organicRTPluminophores have grown exponentially in the last several years, spurring increasing explorations to uncover all aspects of this unique group of organic materials. Some of these important aspects include: (1) re-investigations and deeper elucidations of the fundamental mechanisms of a range of pure organicRTPluminophores (i.e., organic small molecules, macromolecules, and carbon dots), (2) more facile and efficient design of novel and robust pure organicRTPluminophores with high brightness and long lifetime, (3) further enhancements of the phosphorescence features and performance of these organicRTPluminophores (e.g., organicRTP lifetime, long-wavelength emission, full-color emission, etc.), (4) comprehensive evaluations of the biological effects of pure organicRTPluminophores, and (5) further exploitations of the potential applications of pure organicRTPluminophores.Firstly, while increasing studies have highlighted the uniqueness and superiority of pure organicRTPluminophores, it is important to highlight that the development of this field is still in its infancy. As a result, certain proposed mechanisms underlying the occurrence of organicRTP may warrant deeper investigations or revisits. For instance, although a large body of literature has demonstrated the strong persistent RTP emission of the carbazole-based organiccompounds when they exist in crystal state, there has been a correction report pointing that this RTP emission could possibly be originated from small amount of impurities[76]. This interesting observation has underlined the importance of sample purity before any phosphorescence characterization. As such, some of the currently well-received principles may require further verifications. More efforts are definitely needed to elucidate these RTP enhancement mechanisms thoroughly before the rational design strategies can be tested and established.Despite the fact that a large number of investigations to date have focused primarily on RTP mechanisms of organic small molecules, those of other structures, such as carbon dots[61,62] and macromolecules (e.g., proteins, starch, carbohydrates, cellulose, and conjugated polymers)[63,64], have not been widely explored. For example, macromolecules from natural products have been reported to exhibit obvious long-lived phosphorescence under ambient conditions[63], although the driving mechanisms are still not well understood and await further exploration. Similarly, preliminary studies on carbon dots have demonstrated that these nanomaterials are capable of emitting long-lived phosphorescence under ambient conditions when they are embedded in rigid matrices, such as PVA[86] and silica gel[87]. More efforts are consequently essential to unravel the mechanisms, rational design, and enhancement strategies of the long-lived RTP phenomenon of more complex organic materials.Secondly, leveraging on more comprehensive insights into the mechanisms of a wide range of pure organicRTPluminophores, increasing focus should be placed on developing more facile and efficient design strategies to realize highly robust organicRTPluminophores. Currently, there are still limited types of pure organicRTPluminophores with high brightness and persistent RTP emission. Although this may be partly attributed to the infancy of the field, it is worth mentioning that most of the organicRTPluminophores have been designed through complex approaches. Moreover, these luminophorescan only manifest their RTP emission under stringent conditions. All these have inevitably limited the types of available high-performance organicRTPluminophores for practical applications. An increased understanding of pure organicRTP is, therefore, crucial to overcome this limitation as the newly gained insights will be beneficial to the development of a more rational and facile design framework to expand the library of pure organicRTPluminophores.Thirdly, in addition to a deeper understanding of the fundamental mechanisms and improved designs of pure organicRTPluminophores, significant enhancements to their phosphorescence performance should be carried out in tandem. It is noteworthy that the phosphorescence features of organicRTPluminophores are still not comparable to those of their inorganiccounterparts, especially in terms of phosphorescence quantum efficiency and lifetime. Encouragingly, there are clear signs that recent activities have been geared towards bridging the performance gaps between organic and inorganicRTPluminophores. This is evident from one of the most recent demonstrations of a persistent organicdopant-based RTP system with a remarkably long phosphorescence lifetime of ~1 h under ambient conditions[49]. With this breakthrough, there has been growing confidence that maximization of the phosphorescence performance of pure organicRTPluminophores to rival that of inorganicluminophorescould possibly be achieved in the near future. Systematic investigations are thus needed for pushing this performance limit of organicRTPluminophores.Fourthly, another important aspect of pure organicRTP that requires deeper examinations is the biological effects of organicRTPluminophores. While there has been great excitement for the imminent utilization of organicRTPluminophores for a wide range of applications, further advancement needs to proceed with care. In fact, to fully realize the practical applications of pure organicRTPluminophores, specifically their biological applications, it is imperative to understand their biological characteristics so that these functional nanomaterials can be rationally engineered and used safely. Unfortunately, to date, the information on the toxicological profiles and biocompatibility of pure organicRTPluminophores is still relatively scarce and largely unknown. With the increasing explorations into potential applications of pure organicRTPluminophores, their biological characteristics definitely deserve more attention and investigation.Lastly, more potential applications of organicRTPluminophores need to be further exploited and developed. In fact, it is essential to identify the “killer” applications of pure organicRTPluminophores, which they are capable of revolutionizing and which they will have competitive advantages over conventional and other similar nanomaterials. Additionally, while many studies have reported the promising utilizations of pure organicRTPluminophores, most of these demonstrations have largely been confined at an early proof-of-concept stage. More works are required in tandem to move these early-stage demonstrations into maturation and possible commercialization.In summary, it remains to be seen if organicRTPluminophorescan rival or even surpass their inorganiccounterparts and live up to the expectations. However, with a more in-depth understanding of the fundamental mechanisms of the phenomenon of organicRTPcoupled with the further development in the rational design and RTP enhancement strategies, we envision that pure organicluminophores with long-lived and bright RTP emission may find potential widespread applications in the near future.
Authors: Zhen Xu; Clàudia Climent; Christopher M Brown; Duane Hean; Christopher J Bardeen; David Casanova; Michael O Wolf Journal: Chem Sci Date: 2020-11-02 Impact factor: 9.825
Authors: Bibhisan Roy; Iván Maisuls; Jianyu Zhang; Felix C Niemeyer; Fabio Rizzo; Christoph Wölper; Constantin G Daniliuc; Ben Zhong Tang; Cristian A Strassert; Jens Voskuhl Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2021-12-07 Impact factor: 16.823