| Literature DB >> 31068078 |
Hiroshi Kumagai1,2,3, Toru Yoshikawa4, Kanae Myoenzono5, Keisei Kosaki1,3, Nobuhiko Akazawa1,6, Koichiro Tanahashi1, Kaname Tagawa5, Asako Zempo-Miyaki4, Seiji Maeda1.
Abstract
Male sexual function is regulated by vascular function and impaired vascular function is closely related with erectile dysfunction (ED). Vascular functions are positively influenced by physical fitness (i.e., aerobic capacity, muscle strength, and flexibility). The detailed associations between physical fitness and male sexual function remain poorly understood. The present study aimed to clarify the influence of physical fitness on male sexual function. In 177 adult men, peak oxygen consumption (VO2 peak), handgrip strength (HGS), and sit and reach were measured as indices of physical fitness. Arterial stiffness and erectile function were assessed by carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) and the International Index of Erectile Function 5 (IIEF5) questionnaire, respectively. IIEF5 score was significantly correlated with VO2 peak ( rs = 0.52), HGS ( rs = 0.37), and cfPWV ( rs = -0.44); and multivariate linear regression analyses showed that VO2 peak, HGS, and cfPWV were significantly associated with IIEF5 score after considering confounders. The receiver operator characteristic curve analysis suggested that the cutoff values for predicting ED were 29.0 ml/min/kg for VO2 peak and 39.3 kg for HGS. The IIEF5 score was the highest in the subjects with the values of both VO2 peak and HGS were higher than their respective cutoff values, while the IIEF5 score was the lowest in the subjects with the values of both VO2 peak and HGS were lower than their respective cutoff values. These results suggest that the maintenance of high aerobic capacity and muscular strength may offset deterioration of male sexual function.Entities:
Keywords: aerobic fitness; arterial stiffness; erectile dysfunction; exercise capacity; muscular strength
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31068078 PMCID: PMC6509982 DOI: 10.1177/1557988319849171
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Mens Health ISSN: 1557-9883
Characteristics of Studied Men (n = 177).
| Variable | |
|---|---|
| Age, years | 57±16 |
| Height, cm | 167.8±6.6 |
| Body mass, kg | 63.7±8.8 |
| Body mass index, kg/m2 | 22.6±2.6 |
| Waist circumference, cm | 81.2±8.5 |
| Total cholesterol, mg/dl | 213±35 |
| HDL cholesterol, mg/dl | 65±15 |
| LDL cholesterol, mg/dl | 124±33 |
| Triglycerides, mg/dl | 100±47 |
| Glucose, mg/dl | 102±20 |
| HbA1c, mg/dl | 5.5±0.5 |
| Testosterone, nmol/l | 21.6±6.5 |
| VO2 peak, ml/min/kg | 28.6±8.3 |
| Grip strength, kg | 38.9±6.1 |
| Sit and reach, cm | 35.0±9.0 |
| Heart rate, bpm | 60±9 |
| Systolic blood pressure, mmHg | 124±14 |
| Diastolic blood pressure, mmHg | 78±10 |
| cfPWV, cm/s | 876±181 |
| IIEF5 score, points | 18±5 |
Note. Data are shown as the mean ± SD or frequency counts (%), as appropriate. cfPWV = carotid–femoral pulse wave velocity; HbA1c = hemoglobin A1c; HDL = high-density lipoprotein; IIEF5 = International Index of Erectile Function 5; LDL = low-density lipoprotein; VO2 peak = peak oxygen consumption.
Figure 1.Correlations between physical fitness and serum testosterone levels, cfPWV, and IIEF5 scores.
cfPWV = carotid–femoral pulse wave velocity; IIEF5 = International Index of Erectile Function 5; VO2 peak = peak oxygen consumption; HGS = handgrip strength.
Independent Correlates of Log-Transformed IIEF5 Score.
| Variable |
| |
|---|---|---|
| Dependent variable: IIEF5[ | ||
| Age, years[ | −0.024 | .802 |
| Height, cm | 0.126 | .108 |
| HbA1c, mg/dl[ | −0.107 | .134 |
| Testosterone, nmol/l[ | 0.095 | .157 |
| cfPWV, cm/s[ |
|
|
| VO2 peak, ml/min/kg[ |
|
|
| Handgrip strength, kg[ |
|
|
Note. aLog transformed. HbA1c = hemoglobin A1c; IIEF5 = International Index of Erectile Function 5; VO2 peak = peak oxygen consumption.
Figure 2.ROC curve of VO2 peak (A) and HGS (B) for the prediction of ED (IIEF5: less than 22 points).
AUC = area under the curve; ED = erectile dysfunction; HGS = handgrip strength; IIEF5 = International Index of Erectile Function 5; ROC = receiver operator characteristic; VO2 peak = peak oxygen consumption.
Figure 3.Combined effects of VO2 peak and HGS on IIEF5 score (A) and cfPWV (B). The participants were stratified based on whether the values of the VO2 peak and HGS were higher or lower than the cutoff values of VO2 peak and HGS calculated by ROC analysis. ap < .01 versus low-VO2 peak and low-HGS group, bp < .01 versus low-VO2 peak and high-HGS group or high-VO2 peak and low-HGS group. cfPWV = carotid–femoral pulse wave velocity; HGS = handgrip strength; IIEF5 = International Index of Erectile Function 5; ROC = receiver operator characteristic; VO2 peak = peak oxygen consumption.