| Literature DB >> 31067803 |
Małgorzata Sikora1, Michał Świeca2, Monika Franczyk3, Anna Jakubczyk4, Justyna Bochnak5, Urszula Złotek6.
Abstract
Enzymatic browning of sprouts during storage is a serious problem negatively influencing their consumer quality. Identifying and understanding the mechanism of inhibition of polyphenol oxidases (PPOs) in lentil sprouts may offer inexpensive alternatives to prevent browning. This study focused on the biochemical characteristics of PPOs from stored lentil sprouts, providing data that may be directly implemented in improving the consumer quality of sprouts. The purification resulted in approximately 25-fold enrichment of two PPO isoenzymes (PPO I and PPO II). The optimum pH for total PPOs, as well as for PPO I and PPO II isoenzymes, was 4.5-5.5, 4.5-5.0, and 5.5, respectively. The optimal temperature for PPOs was 35 °C. Total PPOs and the PPO I and PPO II isoenzymes had the greatest affinity for catechol (Km = 1.32, 1.76, and 0.94 mM, respectively). Ascorbic acid was the most effective in the inhibition of dark color formation by total PPOs, and showed ca. 62%, 43%, and 24% inhibition at 20-, 2-, and 0.2-mM concentrations. Ascorbic acid, l-cysteine, and sodium metabisulfite (20 mM) significantly inhibited color development in the reactions catalyzed by both isoenzymes of PPO. Ba2+, Fe3+, and Mn2+ (10 mM) completely inhibited PPO activity. This study of the effect of antibrowning compounds and cations on PPO activity provides data that can be used to protect lentil sprouts against enzymatic browning during storage and processing.Entities:
Keywords: biochemical characteristic; enzymatic browning; inhibitory profile; lentil; polyphenol oxidase; purification; sprouts
Year: 2019 PMID: 31067803 PMCID: PMC6560442 DOI: 10.3390/foods8050154
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Figure 1Anion exchange chromatographic elution profiles obtained after applying dissolved and desalted saline precipitate extract of lentil sprouts.
Purification chart of polyphenol oxidases (PPOs) from lentil sprouts.
| Total Volume (mL) | Activity (U/mL) | Protein (mg/mL) | Total Activity (U) | Specific Activity (U/mg) | Yield (%) | Purification Fold | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crude extract | 250 | 550 | 732.00 | 137500 | 0.75 | 100.0 | 1.00 | |
| Salting out and dialysis | 55 | 2265 | 644.97 | 124575 | 3.51 | 90.60 | 4.67 | |
| Ion exchange chromatography | PPO I | 13 | 1815 | 92.56 | 23595 | 19.61 | 17.16 | 26.10 |
| PPO II | 19 | 4475 | 237.12 | 85016 | 18.87 | 61.83 | 25.11 | |
Kinetic parameters of PPOs from lentil sprouts assessed with the use of several phenol substrates.
| 4-methylcatechol | PPO I | 4878 ± 244 | 3.00 ± 0.14 | 1626 |
| PPO II | 3846 ± 192 | 3.40 ± 0.15 | 1131 | |
| Total | 5410 ± 270 | 1.50 ± 0.07 | 3607 | |
| Catechol | PPO I | 952 ± 48 | 1.76 ± 0.08 | 541 |
| PPO II | 1111 ± 56 | 0.94 ± 0.04 | 1176 | |
| Total | 1737 ± 87 | 1.32 ± 0.06 | 1320 | |
| Gallic acid | PPO I | 2817 ± 141 | 2.25 ± 0.10 | 1250 |
| PPO II | 3742 ± 152 | 5.00 ± 0.23 | 769 | |
| Total | 8250 ± 413 | 7.25 ± 0.33 | 1138 | |
| Caffeic acid | PPO I | 769±38 | 3.81 ± 0.17 | 202 |
| PPO II | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 0 | 0 | 0 |
All values represent the means of triplicate measurements.
Figure 2Effects of temperature (A) and pH (B) on the activity of lentil sprout PPOs.
Effects of various antibrowning agents on the activity of lentil sprout PPOs.
| Concentration of Compounds | % of Inhibition | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PPO I | PPO II | Total | ||
| Ascorbic acid | 20 | 79.66 ± 3.03 | 79.42 ± 1.80 | 62.57 ± 2.38 |
| 2 | 50.85 ± 1.93 | 59.42 ± 2.58 | 43.86 ± 1.67 | |
| 0.2 | 46.61 ± 1.77 | 62.32 ± 0.71 | 24.56 ± 0.93 | |
| 20 | 71.67 ± 2.72 | 72.09 ± 3.14 | 26.97 ± 1.02 | |
| 2 | 68.33 ± 2.60 | 55.81 ± 2.43 | 21.35 ± 0.81 | |
| 0.2 | 56.67 ± 2.15 | 34.88 ± 1.52 | 10.11 ± 0.38 | |
| Na2S2O5 | 20 | 76.03 ± 2.89 | 71.58 ± 3.11 | 25.88 ± 0.98 |
| 2 | 56.20 ± 2.14 | 64.21 ± 2.79 | 14.12 ± 0.54 | |
| 0.2 | 18.18 ± 0.69 | 24.21 ± 1.05 | 1.18 ± 0.04 | |
| EDTA | 20 | 26.67 ± 1.01 | 39.77 ± 1.73 | 14.63 ± 0.56 |
| 2 | 24.17 ± 0.92 | 36.36 ± 1.58 | 3.66 ± 0.14 | |
| 0.2 | 20.83 ± 0.79 | 34.09 ± 1.48 | 2.44 ± 0.09 | |
| Citric acid | 20 | 30.13 ± 1.14 | 60.82 ± 2.65 | 43.18 ± 1.64 |
| 2 | 22.44 ± 0.85 | 54.39 ± 2.37 | 37.88 ± 1.44 | |
| 0.2 | 7.69 ± 0.29 | 57.89 ± 2.52 | 8.33 ± 0.32 | |
| Sodium azide | 20 | 22.50 ± 0.85 | 22.89 ± 1.00 | 9.09 ± 0.35 |
| 2 | 17.50 ± 0.67 | 15.66 ± 0.68 | 8.08 ± 0.31 | |
| 0.2 | 5.83 ± 0.22 | 8.43 ± 0.37 | 2.02 ± 0.08 | |
| Dithiothreitol | 20 | 17.50 ± 0.67 | 37.89 ± 1.65 | 30.26 ± 1.15 |
| 2 | 22.50 ± 0.86 | 31.58 ± 1.37 | 13.16 ± 0.50 | |
| 0.2 | 22.50 ± 0.86 | 15.58 ± 1.72 | 1.32 ± 0.05 | |
All values represent the means of triplicate measurements.
Effects of metal ions on the activity of PPOs from lentil sprouts.
| Ion Concentration (mM) | Residual Activity (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | 2 | ||
| Na+ | PPO I | 75.82 ± 3.26 | 82.42 ± 3.54 |
| PPO II | 90.38 ± 3.89 | 142.31 ± 6.12 | |
| Total | 89.81 ± 3.86 | 106.48 ± 4.58 | |
| K+ | PPO I | 76.99 ± 3.31 | 118.58 ± 5.10 |
| PPO II | 101.35 ± 4.36 | 159.46 ± 6.86 | |
| Total | 99.23 ± 4.27 | 109.46 ± 4.71 | |
| Mg2+ | PPO I | 46.90 ± 2.02 | 50.44 ± 2.17 |
| PPO II | 51.35 ± 2.21 | 52.70 ± 2.27 | |
| Total | 61.54 ± 2.65 | 67.69 ± 2.91 | |
| Zn2+ | PPO I | Nd | 42.24 ± 1.82 |
| PPO II | Nd | 38.42 ± 1.65 | |
| Total | Nd | 48.78 ± 2.10 | |
| Ba2+ | PPO I | Nd | 54.23 ± 2.33 |
| PPO II | Nd | 54.43 ± 2.34 | |
| Total | Nd | 86.05 ± 3.70 | |
| Fe3+ | PPO I | Nd | 53.49 ± 2.30 |
| PPO II | Nd | 56.96 ± 2.45 | |
| Total | Nd | 58.28 ± 2.51 | |
| Mn2+ | PPO I | Nd | 48.98 ± 2.11 |
| PPO II | Nd | 32.92 ± 1.42 | |
| Total | Nd | 27.30 ± 1.17 | |
All values represent the means of triplicate measurements. Nd: not detected.