| Literature DB >> 31067759 |
Mário Sérgio Ribeiro1,2, Tania Ayllón3,4, Viviana Malirat5, Daniel Cardoso Portela Câmara6,7, Cristina Maria Giordano Dias8, Guilherme Louzada9, Davis Fernandes-Ferreira10,11, Roberto de Andrade Medronho12, Renata Campos Acevedo13.
Abstract
Many RNA viruses have recently emerged, threatening humans and causing harm to animals and plants. Bunyaviruses represent one of the largest groups of RNA viruses and are able to infect a wide range of hosts (invertebrates, vertebrates, and plants). Recently, new insect-specific viruses have been isolated from mosquitoes and phlebotomine sandflies worldwide. Little is known regarding the impact of these viruses on the vector life cycles and the stages of oviposition, breeding, blood feeding, and the mosquito's lifespan. This study describes, for the first time in South America, the detection and characterization of a recently discovered bunyavirus corresponding to the Wutai mosquito phasivirus, confirming its high prevalence in the Culex spp. and Aedes spp. mosquitoes collected in the urban environment of Rio de Janeiro city, Brazil. The knowledge of the mosquito's insect-specific virus infection can improve virus evolution studies and may contribute to the understanding of intrinsic factors that influence vector competence to transmit pathogenic viruses.Entities:
Keywords: Bunyavirus; Insect-specific viruses; Phasivirus; Wutai virus; entomological surveillance
Year: 2019 PMID: 31067759 PMCID: PMC6587333 DOI: 10.3390/insects10050135
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Insects ISSN: 2075-4450 Impact factor: 2.769
Figure 1Sequence alignment of RdRp third conserved motif of selected viruses. (A) Amino acid alignment showing pre-motif A and motifs A, B, C, D, and E, highlighted by boxes. Highly conserved amino acid residues between Wutai-Mosquito-Phasivirus/BRA/2015 and selected bunyaviruses are marked in black. The only difference found within the motifs between Wutai-Mosquito-Phasivirus/BRA/2015 and the species prototype strain Wutai-Mosquito-Virus/CHI/2012, in position 92 of the alignment is highlighted. Sequence alignment position is indicated in an upper marker line, every 10 residues. Number 1 in the alignment corresponds to amino acid position 1001 of the Wutai-Mosquito-Phasivirus/BRA/2015 and Badu-Virus/AUS/2003; 949 of Wutai-Mosquito-Virus/CHI/ and Culex-Bunyavirus-1/USA/2016; 1002 of Phasi-Charoen-like-Virus/BRA/2015; 970 of Wuhan-Fly-Virus/CHI/2013; 909 of Yichang-Insect-Virus/CHI/2013; 885 of SFTS-Phlebovirus/CHI/2010; 880 of Gouleako-Virus/CI/2004; and 895 of Cumuto-Virus/TTO/2009. Numbers at the end of each line indicates the total number of amino acids in the corresponding row. (B) Pairwise comparison of percentage of differences per site, calculated at the nucleotide (upper right) and amino acid (lower left) levels between the Wutai-Mosquito-Phasivirus/BRA/2015 and the selected bunyaviruses are shown. All the positions containing gaps and missing data were eliminated. There were a total of 966 nucleotide and 321 amino acid positions in the final datasets.
Figure 2Genetic relationship of Wutai mosquito phasivirus with other members of the Phasiviridae family and other related bunyaviruses. Phylogenetic trees were constructed for (A) L segment (5800 bp); (B) M segment (2620 bp); and (C) S segment (511 pb). The evolutionary history was inferred by using the Maximum Likelihood method based on the General Time Reversible model for segments L and M and on the Tamura 3-parameter model for segment S [15]. A discrete Gamma distribution was used to model evolutionary rate differences among sites (5 categories). The rate variation model allowed for some sites to be evolutionarily invariable for segments L and M. The trees are drawn to scale, with branch lengths measured in the number of substitutions per site. All positions containing gaps and missing data were eliminated. Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA7 [16], with 1000 replicates. Only bootstrap values > 70% are shown at the node.
Figure 3Geographic distribution of trapping locations. (A) Brazil; (B) Rio de Janeiro state; (C) Metropolitan region.
Distribution of the Wutai mosquito phasivirus positive (pos) Culex spp. pools according to the trapping locations.
| Locations | Males | Pools | Non-Engorged Females | Pools | Engorged Females | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Pos | |||||
| 1 | 107 | 12 (6) | 74 | 11 (8) | 0 | - |
| 2 | 180 | 4 (2) | 77 | 4 (1) | 47 | 1 (2.1%) |
| 3 | 21 | 1 (1) | 55 | 4 (0) | 21 | 0 |
| 4 | 0 | - | 0 | - | 2 | 0 |
| 5 | 0 | - | 15 | 1 (0) | 21 | 0 |
| 6 | 49 | 4 (2) | 43 | 4 (3) | 0 | - |
| 7 | 5 | 1 (1) | 12 | 2 (1) | 6 | 0 |
| 8 | 0 | - | 0 | - | 3 | 0 |
| 9 | 32 | 3 (0) | 18 | 2 (1) | 31 | 0 |
| 10 | 347 | 2 (2) | 98 | 1 (1) | 15 | 0 |
| 11 | 0 | - | 0 | - | 74 | 8 (10.81%) |
| 12 | 83 | 4 (3) | 26 | 2(0) | 0 | - |
| 13 | 0 | - | 0 | - | 3 | 0 |
|
| 824 | 31 (17) | 418 | 32 (15) | 223 | 9 (4.03%) |
Distribution of the Wutai mosquito phasivirus positive (pos) Aedes spp. pools according to the trapping locations.
| Locations | Males | Pools | Non-Engorged Females | Pools | Engorged Females | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Pos | |||||
| 2 | 64 | 13 (0) | 22 | 11 (0) | 0 | - |
| 3 | 33 | 10 (0) | 20 | 7 (0) | 0 | - |
| 4 | 0 | - | 5 | 3 (0) | 0 | - |
| 7 | 13 | 7 (0) | 16 | 7 (0) | 0 | - |
| 9 | 26 | 9 (0) | 28 | 11 (0) | 1 | 0 |
| 10 | 14 | 4 (1) | 157 | 4 (0) | 0 | - |
| 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| Total | 150 | 43 (1) | 248 | 43 (0) | 3 | 0 |
Figure 4Molecular phylogenetic analysis of Wutai mosquito phasivirus. The phylogenetic tree was constructed by using partial nucleotide sequence of the L segment (315 bp). The evolutionary history was inferred by using the Maximum Likelihood method based on the Tamura 3-parameter model. A discrete Gamma distribution was used to model the evolutionary rate differences among the sites (five categories (+G, parameter = 37,057)). The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths measured in the number of substitutions per site. Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA7, with 1000 replicates. Only bootstrap values > 70% are shown at the node. The bold-sequences were determined in this study.