OBJECTIVE: Avoidance of radiation-induced optic neuropathy (RION) from stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) requires precise anatomical localization; however, no prior studies have characterized the physiologic motion of the optic chiasm. We measured the extent of chiasm motion and its impact on SRS dose. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, serial MRI was performed in multiple planes in 11 human subjects without optic pathway abnormalities to determine chiasm motion across time. Subsequently, the measured displacement was applied to the hypothetical chiasm dose received in 11 patients treated with SRS to a perichiasmatic lesion. RESULTS: On sagittal images, the average anteroposterior chiasm displacement was 0.51 mm [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.27 - 0.75 mm], and the average superior-inferior displacement was 0.48 mm (95% CI 0.22 - 0.74 mm). On coronal images, the average superior-inferior displacement was 0.42 mm (95% CI 0.13 - 0.71 mm), and the average lateral displacement was 0.75 mm (95% CI 0.42 - 1.08 mm). In 11 patients who underwent SRS to a perichiasmatic lesion, the average displacements increased the maximum chiasm dose (Dmax) by a mean of 14 % (range 6-23 %; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Average motion of the optic chiasm was approximately 0.50-0.75 mm, which increased chiasm Dmax by a mean of 14%. In the occasional patient with higher-than-average chiasm motion in a region of steep dose gradient, the increase in chiasm Dmax and risk of RION could be even larger. Similarly, previously reported chiasm dose constraints may underestimate the true dose received during radiosurgery. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: To limit the risk of RION, clinicians may consider adding a 0.50-0.75 mm expansion to the chiasm avoidance structure.
OBJECTIVE: Avoidance of radiation-induced optic neuropathy (RION) from stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) requires precise anatomical localization; however, no prior studies have characterized the physiologic motion of the optic chiasm. We measured the extent of chiasm motion and its impact on SRS dose. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, serial MRI was performed in multiple planes in 11 human subjects without optic pathway abnormalities to determine chiasm motion across time. Subsequently, the measured displacement was applied to the hypothetical chiasm dose received in 11 patients treated with SRS to a perichiasmatic lesion. RESULTS: On sagittal images, the average anteroposterior chiasm displacement was 0.51 mm [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.27 - 0.75 mm], and the average superior-inferior displacement was 0.48 mm (95% CI 0.22 - 0.74 mm). On coronal images, the average superior-inferior displacement was 0.42 mm (95% CI 0.13 - 0.71 mm), and the average lateral displacement was 0.75 mm (95% CI 0.42 - 1.08 mm). In 11 patients who underwent SRS to a perichiasmatic lesion, the average displacements increased the maximum chiasm dose (Dmax) by a mean of 14 % (range 6-23 %; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Average motion of the optic chiasm was approximately 0.50-0.75 mm, which increased chiasm Dmax by a mean of 14%. In the occasional patient with higher-than-average chiasm motion in a region of steep dose gradient, the increase in chiasm Dmax and risk of RION could be even larger. Similarly, previously reported chiasm dose constraints may underestimate the true dose received during radiosurgery. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: To limit the risk of RION, clinicians may consider adding a 0.50-0.75 mm expansion to the chiasm avoidance structure.
Authors: Stanley H Benedict; Kamil M Yenice; David Followill; James M Galvin; William Hinson; Brian Kavanagh; Paul Keall; Michael Lovelock; Sanford Meeks; Lech Papiez; Thomas Purdie; Ramaswamy Sadagopan; Michael C Schell; Bill Salter; David J Schlesinger; Almon S Shiu; Timothy Solberg; Danny Y Song; Volker Stieber; Robert Timmerman; Wolfgang A Tomé; Dirk Verellen; Lu Wang; Fang-Fang Yin Journal: Med Phys Date: 2010-08 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Jing Cai; Ke Sheng; Jason P Sheehan; Stanley H Benedict; James M Larner; Paul W Read Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2007-08-10 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Charles Mayo; Mary K Martel; Lawrence B Marks; John Flickinger; Jiho Nam; John Kirkpatrick Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2010-03-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Arjun Sahgal; Vivian Weinberg; Lijun Ma; Eric Chang; Sam Chao; Alexander Muacevic; Alessandra Gorgulho; Scott Soltys; Peter C Gerszten; Sam Ryu; Lilyana Angelov; Iris Gibbs; C Shun Wong; David A Larson Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2012-06-17 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Kristin J Redmond; Simon S Lo; Scott G Soltys; Yoshiya Yamada; Igor J Barani; Paul D Brown; Eric L Chang; Peter C Gerszten; Samuel T Chao; Robert J Amdur; Antonio A F De Salles; Matthias Guckenberger; Bin S Teh; Jason Sheehan; Charles R Kersh; Michael G Fehlings; Moon-Jun Sohn; Ung-Kyu Chang; Samuel Ryu; Iris C Gibbs; Arjun Sahgal Journal: J Neurosurg Spine Date: 2016-11-11
Authors: Susan M Hiniker; Leslie A Modlin; Clara Y Choi; Banu Atalar; Kira Seiger; Michael S Binkley; Jeremy P Harris; Yaping Joyce Liao; Nancy Fischbein; Lei Wang; Anthony Ho; Anthony Lo; Steven D Chang; Griffith R Harsh; Iris C Gibbs; Steven L Hancock; Gordon Li; John R Adler; Scott G Soltys Journal: Semin Radiat Oncol Date: 2015-12-04 Impact factor: 5.934
Authors: Michael T Milano; Jimm Grimm; Scott G Soltys; Ellen Yorke; Vitali Moiseenko; Wolfgang A Tomé; Arjun Sahgal; Jinyu Xue; Lijun Ma; Timothy D Solberg; John P Kirkpatrick; Louis S Constine; John C Flickinger; Lawrence B Marks; Issam El Naqa Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2018-01-31 Impact factor: 8.013
Authors: Adrian Nalichowski; Isaac Kaufman; John Gallo; Todd Bossenberger; Tim Solberg; Ezequiel Ramirez; Yulong Yan; Julie Fredrick; Tewfik Bichay; Alan Mayville; Jay Burmeister Journal: J Appl Clin Med Phys Date: 2016-12-29 Impact factor: 2.102
Authors: Kun Qing; Ke Nie; Bo Liu; Xue Feng; James R Stone; Taoran Cui; Yin Zhang; Jiahua Zhu; Quan Chen; Xiao Wang; Li Zhao; Shreel Parikh; John P Mugler; Sung Kim; Joseph Weiner; Ning Yue; Anupama Chundury Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2022-02-24 Impact factor: 6.244
Authors: Kerstin A Kessel; Christian D Diehl; Markus Oechsner; Bernhard Meyer; Jens Gempt; Claus Zimmer; Friederike Schmidt-Graf; Stephanie E Combs Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2019-11-27 Impact factor: 6.639