Literature DB >> 31067037

Morphology-Directed Synthesis of LiFePO4 and LiCoPO4 from Nanostructured Li1+2 xPO3+ x.

Hany El-Shinawi1, Edmund J Cussen1,2, Serena A Corr1,2.   

Abstract

A LiPO3-type nanostructure has been developed using a simple microwave approach at temperatures as low as 200 °C. This phase presents an ideal architecture for the morphology-directed synthesis of the olivine-type phases LiFePO4 and LiCoPO4, through a simple and scalable solution-based technique. Pure and carbon-composited olivine phases of interconnected nanoparticulate morphologies display excellent performance at high rates (up to 20 C) over 500 cycles in Li-ion battery cells.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31067037      PMCID: PMC7007206          DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.9b00517

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Inorg Chem        ISSN: 0020-1669            Impact factor:   5.165


Introduction

Olivine-type LiMPO4 phases present excellent candidate cathode materials for sustainable and scalable lithium ion (Li-ion) batteries. Their high thermal safety, associated with strong P–O covalent bonding in the olivine structure, their excellent Li-reversibility as demonstrated for phases such as LiFePO4, and their ability to offer a range of operating voltages (e.g., 3.5 and 4.8 V vs Li+/Li for LiFePO4 and LiCoPO4, respectively) all present considerable advantages.[1,2] While in pristine form the poor intrinsic ionic and electronic conductivities of these materials limit electrochemical performance, this performance can be greatly improved by particle-size reduction, carbon coating, and surface modifications.[3−6] Reducing the particle size of LiFePO4, for example, enables high-rate cycling,[7] attributed to shorter Li-ion path lengths and the formation of a nonequilibrium solid solution phase that inhibits the structural rearrangements typically related to phase transformations during cycling.[8,9] However, nanosizing may adversely affect the tap density and volumetric energy density of electrode materials. To mitigate these effects, porous materials and extended nanostructured architectures have been recently developed through template-assisted and solvothermal syntheses.[10−14] Challenges arise with low-temperature solvothermal methods whereby electrochemical performance can be compromised due to the presence of antisite defects in the crystal structure (i.e., appreciable transition-metal occupancy on the Li sites, leading to blocking the 1D Li-ion pathways in the structure).[15,16] Subsequent postannealing treatments at high temperatures can alleviate this, but typically leads to undesirable particle growth. In this report, we present a new, facile preparation of LiMPO4 and LiMPO4/C (M = Fe and Co) nanoarchitectures engineered through a morphology-directed synthesis from a nanostructured LiPO3-type precursor. These cathode materials retain porous, extended nanostructured morphologies at temperatures up to 500–600 °C, retaining excellent electrochemical properties. LiPO3 is conventionally obtained either in a polycrystalline form through high-temperature solid-state reactions or in the form of 50Li2O–50P2O5 glass.[17] The material crystallizes in a monoclinic unit cell, characterized by infinite linear chains of metaphosphate groups.[18,19] Previously, LiPO3 was reported by Talebi-Esfandarani et al. as a precursor to olivine LiFePO4 by reaction with iron ore concentrates in graphite crucibles at 1100 °C.[20] Such high-temperature treatments can preclude morphology control, resulting in particle growth. Here, we developed a simple approach to synthesize LiMPO4 phases (M = Fe, Co) from lithium-rich LiPO3 at relatively low temperatures, allowing a high degree of control over the final morphology. Nanostructured LiPO3-type material is first obtained via the microwave heat treatment of a tetraglyme solution of phosphorus pentasulfide and lithium tert-butoxide at temperatures as low as 200 °C (see Supporting Information for experimental details). This colorless precipitate is subsequently dispersed in a solution containing either FeCl2 or CoCl2, followed by solvent evaporation and a final calcination step at 500–600 °C, to produce nanoarchitectures of LiFePO4 and LiCoPO4.

Results and Discussion

The as-synthesized LiPO3 has been characterized by X-ray powder diffraction (XRD), induced coupled plasma mass spectroscopy (ICP-MS), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Elemental analysis showed no evidence for the presence of sulfur and reveals a Li:P molar ratio of 1.21(8):1. XRD analysis indicates that an amorphous material is obtained. On heating this sample to 600 °C, a characteristic XRD pattern of crystalline LiPO3 is found (Figure a), suggesting the as-synthesized material is likely an amorphous LiPO3-type phase. The appearance of a small impurity of Li-rich Li4P2O7 in the XRD pattern after calcination at 600 °C (Figure a) is consistent with the ICP-MS analysis, indicating a lithium-rich material (i.e., Li1+2PO3+). Figure b shows IR spectra for the as-synthesized material and the material calcined at 600 °C, both displaying characteristic peaks corresponding to vibrational modes of the PO4 tetrahedra and the P–O–P bonds present in LiPO3 phosphate chains.[21−23] Interestingly, SEM images reveal a novel nanoparticulate morphology (Figure c), with typical particle sizes ranging from 20 to 35 nm (see Figure S1). The material showed a large specific surface area of 41.6 m2 g–1, as determined from nitrogen adsorption using the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) method. To investigate the potential for this X-ray amorphous and high-surface-area material as a precursor for the synthesis of olivine LiMPO4 compounds under mild conditions, the as-synthesized LiPO3 was immersed in suitable metal ion solutions followed by solvent evaporation and calcination. LiFePO4 and LiCoPO4 were successfully synthesized using this approach, where LiPO3 is dispersed in tetrahydrofuran (THF) solutions of FeCl2 and CoCl2, followed by a calcination step after solvent evaporation at 500–600 °C under either inert (Ar) or reducing (H2/Ar) atmospheres (Figure a). Thanks to the relatively low calcination temperature, this approach offers excellent control over the resulting morphology, inhibiting large particle growth. SEM analyses of the obtained LiMPO4 phases reveal networks of interconnected nanoparticles with open pores enabling shorter path lengths for Li-ion transport and large electrode–electrolyte contact areas (Figure a).[10−14] BET surface analysis revealed specific surface areas of 18.1 and 12.6 m2 g–1 for LiFePO4 and LiCoPO4, respectively. Samples of LiFePO4 and LiCoPO4 were annealed in air at 550 °C to ensure removal of carbon prior to surface area measurements. Figure b shows XRD data collected from the synthesized materials.
Figure 1

(a) XRD patterns of the LiPO3 phase, synthesized at 200 °C (LP-200, black line) and after calcination at 600 °C (LP-600, red line), with markers shown for crystalline LiPO3.[19] (b) IR spectra of the LiPO3 phase, synthesized at 200 °C (LP-200, black line) and after calcination at 600 °C (LP-600, red line). (c) SEM image of the LiPO3 phase synthesized at 200 °C.

Figure 2

(a) Morphologies of the as-synthesized LiPO3 phase (LP), LiFePO4 (LFP), and LiCoPO4 (LCP). (b) XRD patterns of LiFePO4 (LFP) and LiCoPO4 (LCP). The top markers (red) are for LiFePO4, and the bottom markers (black) are for LiCoPO4.

(a) XRD patterns of the LiPO3 phase, synthesized at 200 °C (LP-200, black line) and after calcination at 600 °C (LP-600, red line), with markers shown for crystalline LiPO3.[19] (b) IR spectra of the LiPO3 phase, synthesized at 200 °C (LP-200, black line) and after calcination at 600 °C (LP-600, red line). (c) SEM image of the LiPO3 phase synthesized at 200 °C. (a) Morphologies of the as-synthesized LiPO3 phase (LP), LiFePO4 (LFP), and LiCoPO4 (LCP). (b) XRD patterns of LiFePO4 (LFP) and LiCoPO4 (LCP). The top markers (red) are for LiFePO4, and the bottom markers (black) are for LiCoPO4. A small amount of Li3PO4 (5.0(5) wt %; see Figure S2) is observed in the case of LiFePO4, while LiCoPO4 is obtained predominately as a single phase. Refined data, against olivine-type structure with orthorhombic unit cells (Figure S2), reveal unit cell parameters of a = 10.3306(1) Å, b = 6.0089(1) Å, c = 4.69415(8) Å and a = 10.2044(2) Å, b = 5.9208(1) Å, c = 4.6994(1) Å for LiFePO4 and LiCoPO4, respectively, consistent with previous reports.[24,25] ICP-MS analysis indicated M:Li ratios of 1:0.98(3) and 1:1.13(3) for LiCoPO4 and LiFePO4, respectively, consistent with the presence of a small Li3PO4 impurity for LiFePO4. In addition to providing a simple route to controlled LiMPO4 particle morphology, we demonstrate that the same approach can be modified to obtain LiMPO4/C composite phases where this nanostructured morphology is retained. FeCl2 and CoCl2 form relatively stable complexes with the THF solvent,[26] thus enabling the formation of LiPO3/MCl2/THF solid precursors through slow evaporation of excess THF at ∼70–80 °C. These solid precursors are directly converted to LiMPO4/C nanocomposites after calcination in an oxygen-free atmosphere. Carbon-free materials are achieved through removal of THF from the LiPO3/MCl2/THF solid precursors by precalcination in air at suitable temperature (∼300 °C) prior to a final calcination step under inert conditions. Interestingly, the LiFePO4/C composite retains its interconnected nanoparticulate morphology, with carbon homogeneously surrounding the nanoparticles (Figure and Figure S3). Elemental analysis indicates a carbon content of 2.8 wt %. Figure c displays a typical discharge/charge profile of the LiFePO4/C composite at room temperature at a 1C rate, represented by the 200th cycle (Li metal anode; 1 M LiPF6 in 1:1 EC/DMC). A specific capacity of 153 mAh g–1 is observed at 0.1C rate, with capacities of up to 65 mAh g–1 at 20C rate. The material also shows an excellent cyclability, retaining a capacity of 130 mAh g–1 after 500 cycles at 1C rate. The excellent electrochemical performance suggests this synthetic approach affords materials with a lack of defects that can inhibit Li-ion diffusion. This is consistent with FTIR observations of the LiFePO4 and LiFePO4/C phases (see Figure S4), where the P–O vibration of the PO4 groups at 959 cm–1 is very close to the value expected for defect-free LiFePO4 (957 cm–1), assuming sensitivity of this vibration mode to anti-site defect formation.[16]
Figure 3

(a) SEM and (b) TEM images of the LiFePO4/C composite. (c) Representative charge/discharge profile of the LiFePO4/C composite, represented by the 200th cycle at 1C rate (1C corresponds to 170 mA g–1). (d) Specific capacity as a function of cycle number for LiFePO4/C at different charge–discharge rates.

(a) SEM and (b) TEM images of the LiFePO4/C composite. (c) Representative charge/discharge profile of the LiFePO4/C composite, represented by the 200th cycle at 1C rate (1C corresponds to 170 mA g–1). (d) Specific capacity as a function of cycle number for LiFePO4/C at different charge–discharge rates.

Conclusion

The synthetic approach developed here presents a new route to LiMPO4 electrode materials through a soft chemical route that maintains the parent LiPO3 nanostructured morphology. The development of nanostructured LiPO3 as a precursor material opens up the possibility of chemically tuning the metal content in LiMPO4 in nanoparticulate forms with high surface areas. The development of this simple and scalable route to nanostructured LiPO3 provides an alternative to conventional polycrystalline and glass forms, often synthesized at temperatures exceeding 550 °C. This morphology-directed approach to electrode nanoarchitectures also demonstrates great promise for obtaining carbon-composited olivines with excellent battery performance and cycling stability up to 500 cycles.
  7 in total

1.  Hydrothermally synthesized LiFePO4 crystals with enhanced electrochemical properties: simultaneous suppression of crystal growth along [010] and antisite defect formation.

Authors:  Xue Qin; Jiemin Wang; Jie Xie; Fangzhi Li; Lei Wen; Xiaohui Wang
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2012-01-23       Impact factor: 3.676

2.  Battery materials for ultrafast charging and discharging.

Authors:  Byoungwoo Kang; Gerbrand Ceder
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Monodisperse porous LiFePO4 microspheres for a high power Li-ion battery cathode.

Authors:  Chunwen Sun; Shreyas Rajasekhara; John B Goodenough; Feng Zhou
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 15.419

4.  Batteries. Capturing metastable structures during high-rate cycling of LiFePO₄ nanoparticle electrodes.

Authors:  Hao Liu; Fiona C Strobridge; Olaf J Borkiewicz; Kamila M Wiaderek; Karena W Chapman; Peter J Chupas; Clare P Grey
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Kinetics of non-equilibrium lithium incorporation in LiFePO4.

Authors:  Rahul Malik; Fei Zhou; G Ceder
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2011-07-17       Impact factor: 43.841

6.  Polymer-Templated LiFePO4/C Nanonetworks as High-Performance Cathode Materials for Lithium-Ion Batteries.

Authors:  Michael G Fischer; Xiao Hua; Bodo D Wilts; Elizabeth Castillo-Martínez; Ullrich Steiner
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 9.229

7.  Engineering 3D bicontinuous hierarchically macro-mesoporous LiFePO4/C nanocomposite for lithium storage with high rate capability and long cycle stability.

Authors:  Qian Zhang; Shao-Zhuan Huang; Jun Jin; Jing Liu; Yu Li; Hong-En Wang; Li-Hua Chen; Bin-Jie Wang; Bao-Lian Su
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-05-16       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.