Hany El-Shinawi1, Edmund J Cussen1,2, Serena A Corr1,2. 1. Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering , University of Sheffield , Sir Robert Hadfield Building , Sheffield , S1 3JD , U.K. 2. Department of Materials Science and Engineering , University of Sheffield , Sir Robert Hadfield Building , Sheffield , S1 3JD , U.K.
Abstract
A LiPO3-type nanostructure has been developed using a simple microwave approach at temperatures as low as 200 °C. This phase presents an ideal architecture for the morphology-directed synthesis of the olivine-type phases LiFePO4 and LiCoPO4, through a simple and scalable solution-based technique. Pure and carbon-composited olivine phases of interconnected nanoparticulate morphologies display excellent performance at high rates (up to 20 C) over 500 cycles in Li-ion battery cells.
A LiPO3-type nanostructure has been developed using a simple microwave approach at temperatures as low as 200 °C. This phase presents an ideal architecture for the morphology-directed synthesis of the olivine-type phases LiFePO4 and LiCoPO4, through a simple and scalable solution-based technique. Pure and carbon-composited olivine phases of interconnected nanoparticulate morphologies display excellent performance at high rates (up to 20 C) over 500 cycles in Li-ion battery cells.
Olivine-type LiMPO4 phases present excellent candidate cathode
materials for sustainable and scalable lithium ion (Li-ion) batteries.
Their high thermal safety, associated with strong P–O covalent
bonding in the olivine structure, their excellent Li-reversibility
as demonstrated for phases such as LiFePO4, and their ability
to offer a range of operating voltages (e.g., 3.5 and 4.8 V vs Li+/Li for LiFePO4 and LiCoPO4, respectively)
all present considerable advantages.[1,2] While in pristine
form the poor intrinsic ionic and electronic conductivities of these
materials limit electrochemical performance, this performance can
be greatly improved by particle-size reduction, carbon coating, and
surface modifications.[3−6] Reducing the particle size of LiFePO4, for example, enables
high-rate cycling,[7] attributed to shorter
Li-ion path lengths and the formation of a nonequilibrium solid solution
phase that inhibits the structural rearrangements typically related
to phase transformations during cycling.[8,9] However, nanosizing
may adversely affect the tap density and volumetric energy density
of electrode materials. To mitigate these effects, porous materials
and extended nanostructured architectures have been recently developed
through template-assisted and solvothermal syntheses.[10−14] Challenges arise with low-temperature solvothermal methods whereby
electrochemical performance can be compromised due to the presence
of antisite defects in the crystal structure (i.e., appreciable transition-metal
occupancy on the Li sites, leading to blocking the 1D Li-ion pathways
in the structure).[15,16] Subsequent postannealing treatments
at high temperatures can alleviate this, but typically leads to undesirable
particle growth. In this report, we present a new, facile preparation
of LiMPO4 and LiMPO4/C (M = Fe and Co) nanoarchitectures engineered
through a morphology-directed synthesis from a nanostructured LiPO3-type precursor. These cathode materials retain porous, extended
nanostructured morphologies at temperatures up to 500–600 °C,
retaining excellent electrochemical properties.LiPO3 is conventionally obtained either in a polycrystalline form through
high-temperature solid-state reactions or in the form of 50Li2O–50P2O5 glass.[17] The material crystallizes in a monoclinic unit cell, characterized
by infinite linear chains of metaphosphate groups.[18,19] Previously, LiPO3 was reported by Talebi-Esfandarani
et al. as a precursor to olivineLiFePO4 by reaction with
iron ore concentrates in graphite crucibles at 1100 °C.[20] Such high-temperature treatments can preclude
morphology control, resulting in particle growth. Here, we developed
a simple approach to synthesize LiMPO4 phases (M = Fe, Co) from lithium-rich LiPO3 at relatively low temperatures, allowing a high degree of
control over the final morphology. Nanostructured LiPO3-type material is first obtained via the microwave heat treatment
of a tetraglyme solution of phosphorus pentasulfide and lithium tert-butoxide at temperatures as low as 200 °C (see Supporting Information for experimental details).
This colorless precipitate is subsequently dispersed in a solution
containing either FeCl2 or CoCl2, followed by
solvent evaporation and a final calcination step at 500–600
°C, to produce nanoarchitectures of LiFePO4 and LiCoPO4.
Results and Discussion
The as-synthesized LiPO3 has been characterized by X-ray powder diffraction (XRD),
induced coupled plasma mass spectroscopy (ICP-MS), Fourier transform
infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM).
Elemental analysis showed no evidence for the presence of sulfur and
reveals a Li:P molar ratio of 1.21(8):1. XRD analysis indicates that
an amorphous material is obtained. On heating this sample to 600 °C,
a characteristic XRD pattern of crystalline LiPO3 is found
(Figure a), suggesting
the as-synthesized material is likely an amorphous LiPO3-type phase. The appearance of a small impurity of Li-rich Li4P2O7 in the XRD pattern after calcination
at 600 °C (Figure a) is consistent with the ICP-MS analysis, indicating a lithium-rich
material (i.e., Li1+2PO3+). Figure b shows IR spectra for the as-synthesized material and the
material calcined at 600 °C, both displaying characteristic peaks
corresponding to vibrational modes of the PO4 tetrahedra
and the P–O–P bonds present in LiPO3 phosphate
chains.[21−23] Interestingly, SEM images reveal a novel nanoparticulate
morphology (Figure c), with typical particle sizes ranging from 20 to 35 nm (see Figure S1). The material showed a large specific
surface area of 41.6 m2 g–1, as determined
from nitrogen adsorption using the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller
(BET) method. To investigate the potential for this X-ray amorphous
and high-surface-area material as a precursor for the synthesis of
olivine LiMPO4 compounds under mild conditions,
the as-synthesized LiPO3 was immersed in suitable metal
ion solutions followed by solvent evaporation and calcination. LiFePO4 and LiCoPO4 were successfully synthesized using
this approach, where LiPO3 is dispersed in tetrahydrofuran
(THF) solutions of FeCl2 and CoCl2, followed
by a calcination step after solvent evaporation at 500–600
°C under either inert (Ar) or reducing (H2/Ar) atmospheres
(Figure a). Thanks
to the relatively low calcination temperature, this approach offers
excellent control over the resulting morphology, inhibiting large
particle growth. SEM analyses of the obtained LiMPO4 phases reveal networks of interconnected nanoparticles
with open pores enabling shorter path lengths for Li-ion transport
and large electrode–electrolyte contact areas (Figure a).[10−14] BET surface analysis revealed specific surface areas
of 18.1 and 12.6 m2 g–1 for LiFePO4 and LiCoPO4, respectively. Samples of LiFePO4 and LiCoPO4 were annealed in air at 550 °C
to ensure removal of carbon prior to surface area measurements. Figure b shows XRD data
collected from the synthesized materials.
Figure 1
(a) XRD patterns of the
LiPO3 phase, synthesized at 200 °C (LP-200, black
line) and after calcination at 600 °C (LP-600, red line), with
markers shown for crystalline LiPO3.[19] (b) IR spectra of the LiPO3 phase, synthesized
at 200 °C (LP-200, black line) and after calcination at 600 °C
(LP-600, red line). (c) SEM image of the LiPO3 phase synthesized
at 200 °C.
Figure 2
(a) Morphologies of the
as-synthesized LiPO3 phase (LP), LiFePO4 (LFP),
and LiCoPO4 (LCP). (b) XRD patterns of LiFePO4 (LFP) and LiCoPO4 (LCP). The top markers (red) are for
LiFePO4, and the bottom markers (black) are for LiCoPO4.
(a) XRD patterns of the
LiPO3 phase, synthesized at 200 °C (LP-200, black
line) and after calcination at 600 °C (LP-600, red line), with
markers shown for crystalline LiPO3.[19] (b) IR spectra of the LiPO3 phase, synthesized
at 200 °C (LP-200, black line) and after calcination at 600 °C
(LP-600, red line). (c) SEM image of the LiPO3 phase synthesized
at 200 °C.(a) Morphologies of the
as-synthesized LiPO3 phase (LP), LiFePO4 (LFP),
and LiCoPO4 (LCP). (b) XRD patterns of LiFePO4 (LFP) and LiCoPO4 (LCP). The top markers (red) are for
LiFePO4, and the bottom markers (black) are for LiCoPO4.A small amount of Li3PO4 (5.0(5) wt %; see Figure S2) is observed in the case of LiFePO4, while LiCoPO4 is obtained predominately as a single phase. Refined data,
against olivine-type structure with orthorhombic unit cells (Figure S2), reveal unit cell parameters of a = 10.3306(1) Å, b = 6.0089(1) Å, c = 4.69415(8) Å and a = 10.2044(2)
Å, b = 5.9208(1) Å, c =
4.6994(1) Å for LiFePO4 and LiCoPO4, respectively,
consistent with previous reports.[24,25] ICP-MS analysis
indicated M:Li ratios of 1:0.98(3) and 1:1.13(3)
for LiCoPO4 and LiFePO4, respectively, consistent
with the presence of a small Li3PO4 impurity
for LiFePO4.In addition to providing a simple route
to controlled LiMPO4 particle morphology,
we demonstrate that the same approach can be modified to obtain LiMPO4/C composite phases where this nanostructured
morphology is retained. FeCl2 and CoCl2 form
relatively stable complexes with the THF solvent,[26] thus enabling the formation of LiPO3/MCl2/THF solid precursors through slow evaporation
of excess THF at ∼70–80 °C. These solid precursors
are directly converted to LiMPO4/C nanocomposites after
calcination in an oxygen-free atmosphere. Carbon-free materials are
achieved through removal of THF from the LiPO3/MCl2/THF solid precursors by precalcination in air at suitable
temperature (∼300 °C) prior to a final calcination step
under inert conditions.Interestingly, the LiFePO4/C composite retains its interconnected nanoparticulate morphology,
with carbon homogeneously surrounding the nanoparticles (Figure and Figure S3). Elemental analysis indicates a carbon
content of 2.8 wt %. Figure c displays a typical discharge/charge profile of the LiFePO4/C composite at room temperature at a 1C rate, represented
by the 200th cycle (Li metal anode; 1 M LiPF6 in 1:1 EC/DMC).
A specific capacity of 153 mAh g–1 is observed at
0.1C rate, with capacities of up to 65 mAh g–1 at
20C rate. The material also shows an excellent cyclability, retaining
a capacity of 130 mAh g–1 after 500 cycles at 1C
rate. The excellent electrochemical performance suggests this synthetic
approach affords materials with a lack of defects that can inhibit
Li-ion diffusion. This is consistent with FTIR observations of the
LiFePO4 and LiFePO4/C phases (see Figure S4), where the P–O vibration of
the PO4 groups at 959 cm–1 is very close
to the value expected for defect-free LiFePO4 (957 cm–1), assuming sensitivity of this vibration mode to
anti-site defect formation.[16]
Figure 3
(a) SEM and
(b) TEM images of the LiFePO4/C composite. (c) Representative
charge/discharge profile of the LiFePO4/C composite, represented
by the 200th cycle at 1C rate (1C corresponds to 170 mA g–1). (d) Specific capacity as a function of cycle number for LiFePO4/C at different charge–discharge rates.
(a) SEM and
(b) TEM images of the LiFePO4/C composite. (c) Representative
charge/discharge profile of the LiFePO4/C composite, represented
by the 200th cycle at 1C rate (1C corresponds to 170 mA g–1). (d) Specific capacity as a function of cycle number for LiFePO4/C at different charge–discharge rates.
Conclusion
The synthetic approach
developed here presents a new route to LiMPO4 electrode materials through a soft chemical route that maintains
the parent LiPO3 nanostructured morphology. The development
of nanostructured LiPO3 as a precursor material opens up
the possibility of chemically tuning the metal content in LiMPO4 in nanoparticulate forms with high surface
areas. The development of this simple and scalable route to nanostructured
LiPO3 provides an alternative to conventional polycrystalline
and glass forms, often synthesized at temperatures exceeding 550 °C.
This morphology-directed approach to electrode nanoarchitectures also
demonstrates great promise for obtaining carbon-composited olivines
with excellent battery performance and cycling stability up to 500
cycles.
Authors: Hao Liu; Fiona C Strobridge; Olaf J Borkiewicz; Kamila M Wiaderek; Karena W Chapman; Peter J Chupas; Clare P Grey Journal: Science Date: 2014-06-27 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Michael G Fischer; Xiao Hua; Bodo D Wilts; Elizabeth Castillo-Martínez; Ullrich Steiner Journal: ACS Appl Mater Interfaces Date: 2018-01-05 Impact factor: 9.229