Literature DB >> 31065741

[Staff and organizational requirements for pain services in hospitals : A recommendation from the German Society for Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine].

J Erlenwein1, W Meißner2, F Petzke3, E Pogatzki-Zahn4, U Stamer5, W Koppert6.   

Abstract

Although pain services have been established in many hospitals, there is considerable heterogeneity among them with respect to organization of service, staff and qualifications of staff, and treatment approaches.With this recommendation, the German Society for Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine defines requirements for pain services in hospitals with respect to organizational standards and staff qualifications. The therapy offered by pain services supplements the treatment provided by the other departments involved, ensuring the high quality of specialized pain management in all areas of the hospital. Pain services shall oversee treatment with specialized analgesia techniques as well as the involvement of consultants, bringing together in-hospital pain medicine expertise in one service with availability 24 h and 7 days per week via a single contact. The medical head of the pain service shall be a qualified provider of pain medicine as defined by the German Medical Association and as a minimum should also have undergone additional training in basic psychosomatic medicine. Further members of the medical staff should possess the credentials of a medical specialist: non-medical staff should have completed continuing education in the treatment of pain. Minimal guidelines for personnel resources were defined: these included a specific time frame for first contacts (20 min) and follow-up (10 min) for specific analgesic techniques and for the involvement of consultants (first contact 45 min, follow-up 20 min), with additional time for travel, set-up, training and quality management. In addition to definition of the space and equipment needed, each service should draft its own budget, and this should be adequate and plannable. Written agreements between the disciplines and transparent documentation, including patient-reported outcomes, are recommended to ensure quality. The provision of specialized pain therapy should have high priority over all disciplines or departments.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute pain service; Analgesic techniques; Consultant; Pain management; Regional anesthesia

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31065741     DOI: 10.1007/s00101-019-0589-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesist        ISSN: 0003-2417            Impact factor:   1.041


  21 in total

1.  A survey of acute pain services in Germany and a discussion of international survey data.

Authors:  Ulrike M Stamer; Nektarios Mpasios; Frank Stüber; Christoph Maier
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.288

Review 2.  Does an acute pain service improve postoperative outcome?

Authors:  Mads U Werner; Lykke Søholm; Per Rotbøll-Nielsen; Henrik Kehlet
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 5.108

Review 3.  [Management of acute pain therapy: guidelines, recommendations and current practice in german hospitals].

Authors:  Joachim Erlenwein
Journal:  Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 0.698

4.  [Clinical pain consultation. Profiles of clinical pain consultation and requirements for management of complex pain patients in inpatient care].

Authors:  J Erlenwein; J Schlink; M Pfingsten; F Petzke
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.107

5.  The quality of pain management in German hospitals.

Authors:  Christoph Maier; Nadja Nestler; Helmut Richter; Winfried Hardinghaus; Esther Pogatzki-Zahn; Michael Zenz; Jürgen Osterbrink
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2010-09-10       Impact factor: 5.594

6.  [Pre-existing pain as comorbidity in postoperative acute pain service].

Authors:  J Erlenwein; J Schlink; M Pfingsten; J Hinz; M Bauer; M Quintel; F Petzke
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 1.041

7.  Pre-Existing Chronic Pain Influences the Severity of Acute Herpes Zoster Pain-A Prospective Observational Cohort Study.

Authors:  Joachim Erlenwein; Kai-Martin Thoms; Felix Brandebusemeyer; Michael Pfingsten; Ashham Mansur; Michael Quintel; Michael Peter Schön; Frank Petzke
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2016-03-05       Impact factor: 3.750

Review 8.  Predictors of postoperative pain and analgesic consumption: a qualitative systematic review.

Authors:  Hui Yun Vivian Ip; Amir Abrishami; Philip W H Peng; Jean Wong; Frances Chung
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 7.892

9.  The Influence of Chronic Pain on Postoperative Pain and Function After Hip Surgery: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study.

Authors:  Joachim Erlenwein; Michael Przemeck; Astrid Degenhart; Stefan Budde; Deborah Falla; Michael Quintel; Michael Pfingsten; Frank Petzke
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 5.820

10.  A cost-utility and cost-effectiveness analysis of an acute pain service.

Authors:  Michaela Stadler; Michael Schlander; Monique Braeckman; Thanh Nguyen; Jean G Boogaerts
Journal:  J Clin Anesth       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 9.452

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  [Management of patients with chronic pain in acute and perioperative medicine : An interdisciplinary challenge].

Authors:  J Erlenwein; M Pfingsten; M Hüppe; D Seeger; A Kästner; R Graner; F Petzke
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  [Critical incidents in acute pain management-A risk analysis of CIRS reports].

Authors:  J Erlenwein; M Maring; M I Emons; H J Gerbershagen; R M Waeschle; L Saager; F Petzke
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2021-10-06       Impact factor: 1.052

3.  Description, Organization, and Individual Postgraduate Perspectives of One Italian School of Anesthesia and Intensive Care.

Authors:  Matteo Villani; Valentina Lob; Anna Del Prete; Emmanuele Guerra; Elisabetta Chili; Elisabetta Bertellini
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 4.614

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.