Literature DB >> 31065626

Syringocystadenocarcinoma papilliferum with orbital invasion: a case report with literature review.

Carla Pagano Boza1, Joaquin Gonzalez-Barlatay1, Shoaib Ugradar2, Melina Pol3, Eduardo Jorge Premoli1.   

Abstract

We present a case of Syringocystadenocarcinoma papilliferum that originated in the eyelid and extended into the orbit. These tumors are very rare and have the potential to metastasize. A literature review of all the previous cases has been compiled from the Medline, EMBASE, and PubMed databases. We found that the majority of cases present on the head and neck and up to 17% of cases showed metastatic progression. This is the first case to show orbital involvement and highlights the need to remain vigilant with such lesions, as they have a tendency to become aggressive.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Syringocystadenocarcinoma papilliferum; eyelid; orbit

Year:  2019        PMID: 31065626      PMCID: PMC6487760          DOI: 10.1177/2515841419844087

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ther Adv Ophthalmol        ISSN: 2515-8414


Introduction

Syringocystadenocarcinoma papilliferum (SCACP) is a rare malignant sudoriferous gland tumor that is related to its more common, benign counterpart, syringocystadenoma papilliferum (SCAP). Since the original description of SCAP in 1917,[1] only 43 cases of SCACP have been described in the literature. To date, only one has appeared in the eyelid.[2] SCACP is thought to develop from SCAP, nevus sebaceous, and linear nevus verrucosus lesions.[3] However, due to the rarity of this tumor, little is known regarding its etiology and origin.[3] In this study, we report the first case of SCACP with orbital involvement. Interestingly, it recurred following exenteration. An informed written consent was obtained from the patient for the publication of medical data and images.

Case report

A 63-year-old man presented with a lesion on the right upper eyelid that had been present for 7 years. The lesion was nodular, measuring 5.0 cm × 7.0 cm, ulcerated, indurated, and erythematous. It involved the lower eyelid (Figure 1). The patient had no light perception with the right eye and had a visual acuity of 20/20 on the left. Due to the presence of the tumor over the right eye, his intraocular pressure could not be measured, and it was found to be 18 mmHg on the left.
Figure 1.

Lesion on presentation.

Lesion on presentation. The left orbital examination did not reveal any abnormalities. A full examination of his local lymph nodes and lacrimal duct did not reveal any abnormalities. He explained that he did not have any previous therapy for this lesion. He was otherwise systemically well with no relevant family history. He did not have any history of trauma and informed us that he was a farmer by occupation. A computed tomography (CT) scan of the orbit revealed right anterior orbital invasion with no bony or lacrimal gland involvement (Figure 2). A subsequent incisional biopsy revealed squamous cell invaginations extending from the epidermis into the dermis. The invaginations and papillary projections were lined with a bilayer epithelium: the luminal layer was composed of columnar cells with decapitation secretion and the outer layer was composed of small cuboidal cells. These cells had significant nuclear pleomorphism, prominent nucleoli, and increased mitotic activity (Figure 3). Immunohistochemical staining demonstrated positivity for epithelial membrane antigen (EMA), Cytokeratin 8/18, and a Cytokeratin cocktail of high and low density (Figure 3). It was negative for GCDFP-15 (protein 15 of the fibrocystic disease of the breast), which excluded a lesion of breast origin and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). The diagnosis of SCACP was therefore confirmed. A positron emission tomography (PET) scan did not reveal any metastatic spread.
Figure 2.

CT imaging of the lesion at presentation.

Figure 3.

Hematoxylin and eosin staining (H&E): (a) the transition between squamous and glandular epithelium (100×). (b) Large areas of superficial epithelium were sphacelated. Glandular invaginations showed a characteristic funnel shape. Papillary structures can be identified inside a dermal cyst (100×). (c) The papillary structures are lined with a stratified atypical epithelium. Micropapillae and secretion by decapitation can be seen (100×). (d) At high power magnification, atypical nuclei are evident. Large atypical nuclear shapes are seen and increased mitotic activity is observed (*).

CT imaging of the lesion at presentation. Hematoxylin and eosin staining (H&E): (a) the transition between squamous and glandular epithelium (100×). (b) Large areas of superficial epithelium were sphacelated. Glandular invaginations showed a characteristic funnel shape. Papillary structures can be identified inside a dermal cyst (100×). (c) The papillary structures are lined with a stratified atypical epithelium. Micropapillae and secretion by decapitation can be seen (100×). (d) At high power magnification, atypical nuclei are evident. Large atypical nuclear shapes are seen and increased mitotic activity is observed (*). The patient was treated with exenteration of the right orbit to remove the tumor. After 11 months of follow-up, we noted local recurrence of the original tumor (confirmed with biopsy) in the anophthalmic orbit. There was no associated lymph node enlargement on examination, though the patient refused any further imaging. Radical exenteration with adjuvant radiotherapy has been planned for the patient.

Discussion

SCACP is an extremely rare adnexal neoplasm of the sweat glands and has only been documented 43 times in the literature. It is believed to arise from a malignant transformation of SCAP lesions.[4] Clinically, it may present as an asymptomatic long-standing lesion, which may be flat or nodular, cystic, or ulcerated. We performed a literature review of the Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases to characterize the cases previously listed in the literature (Table 1).
Table 1.

Previous case reports on SCACP.

ReferenceAgeSexLocationSize (mm)DurationDiagnosisAssociationFollow-upTreatment
Dissanayake and Salm[5]74FScalp6530 yearsSCACP in situSCAPNED (6.75 years)Surgery
71FBack30N/ASCACP invasiveN/ANED (7 years)Surgery
Seco Navedo and colleagues[6]50FScalp65CongenitalSCACP invasiveNevus sebaceous3 Local lymph node, lymph node metastasisSurgery + Rt + Ct (NED—2 years)
Numata and colleagues[7]52FChest130 × 8020 yearsSCACP invasiveN/A1 Local lymph node, lymph node metastasisSurgery NED (12 months)
Bondi and Urso[8]47MScalp25N/ASCACP invasiveN/AN/ASurgery
Ishida-Yamamoto and colleagues[9]61MPerianal6010 yearsSCACP in situN/ANED (11 months)Surgery
Arai and colleagues[10]64MScalp352 yearsSCACP in situSCAPN/ASurgery
Chi and colleagues[11]60MAuricle40 × 10Since childhoodSCACP invasiveSCAPNED (72 months)Surgery
Woestenborghs and colleagues[12]81FScalp15N/ASCACP in situSCAPN/ASurgery
Park and colleagues[13]65MSuprapubic region352 yearsSCACP in situN/ANED (24 months)Surgery
Langner and Ott[14]83MPerianal15N/ASCACP in situSCAPN/ASurgery
Sroa and colleagues[15]77MCalf259 yearsSCACP invasiveN/ANED (15 months)Surgery
Kazakov and colleagues[16]56FNeck2010 yearsSCACP in situSCAPNED (9 months)Surgery
58MForehead2525 yearsSCACP invasiveSCAPNED (4 years)Surgery
46FScalp35N/ASCACP invasiveSCAPNED (6 years)Surgery
67MScalp25N/ASCACP in situSCAPNED (2 years)Surgery
60FScalp30>30 yearsSCACP invasiveSCAPN/ASurgery
81MScalp20N/ASCACP invasiveSCAPNED (21 months)Surgery
Leeborg and colleagues[17]86FNeck454 monthsSCACP invasiveInvasive squamous cell carcinomaLocal recurrence (18 months)Surgery + Rt
Abrari and Mukherjee[18]62MAxilla356 monthsSCACP invasiveN/AN/ASurgery
Aydin and colleagues[19]67MScalp40Since childhoodSCACP invasiveSCAPNED (2 years)Surgery
Hoekzema and colleagues[3]83FArm307 yearsSCACP invasiveSCAP nevus verrucosusN/ASurgery
Hoguet and colleagues[20]86MEyelid4N/ASCACP invasiveN/ANED (3 months)Surgery
Plant and colleagues[21]83MPenis12N/ASCACP in situN/AN/ASurgery
Bakhshi and colleagues[22]45FScalp60 × 3012 monthsN/ASCAPNED (12 months)Surgery in situ
Zhang and colleagues[23]75FArm1512 monthsSCACP invasiveSCAPNED (6 months)Surgery
Peterson and colleagues[24]65MScalp30x3012 monthsSCACP invasiveSCAPNEDSurgery
Arslan and colleagues[2]66MScalpN/A20 yearsSCACP invasiveSCAP3 Local lymph node, lymph node metastasisSurgery + Rt (NED—15 months)
66FScalp30>12 monthsSCACP invasiveN/ANED (2 years)Surgery
Castillo and colleagues[25]32FScalp22N/ASCACP in situN/ALocal recurrence (8 years)Surgery
Paradiso and colleagues[26]88MShoulder15 × 15N/ASCACP invasiveN/ADied from other causeN/A
Shan and colleagues[27]93MPopliteal fossa20>10 yearsN/ASCAPNEDSurgery
Mohanty and colleagues[28]80FScalp508 yearsSCACP in situN/ANED (5 years)Surgery
Satter and colleagues[29]42MScalp45 × 40>1 monthSCACP invasiveSCAP and Nevus sebaceousLymph node metastasisSurgery
Parekh and colleagues[4]74MScalp20Since childhoodSCACP invasiveSCAP, nevus sebaceous of Jadassohn, trichoblastomaLymph node metastasisSurgery
Chen and colleagues[30]60FScalp28 × 2012 monthsSCACP in situNevus sebaceousN/ASurgery
Singh and colleagues[31]60FBack15 × 10>10 yearsSCACP in situSCACP in situ with macular amyloidosisN/ASurgery
Zhang and colleagues[32]26MChest5022 yearsSCACP in situInvasive adenocarcinoma subcutisLeft axillary lymph node and bilateral lung metastases, DOD 2 months after diagnosisSurgery + Ct
47MAbdomen1523 yearsSCACP in situN/ANED (9 years)Surgery
67MLeft Axilla206 yearsSCACP in situInvasive adenocarcinoma subcutisN/ASurgery + left axilla lymphadenectomy
64MScalp201 yearsSCACP in situInvasive adenocarcinoma in dermis + mucinous metaplasiaMetastases to multiple distant lymph nodes and lung metastases, DOD 34 months after diagnosisSurgery + Rt
63MChest1010 yearsSCACP in situInvasive adenocarcinoma in dermisNED (36 months)Surgery
74MChest206 yearsSCACP in situInvasive adenocarcinoma subcutisNED (30 months)Surgery
63FAxilla503 monthsSCACP in situInvasive adenocarcinoma + invasive squamous cell carcinomaWidespread subcutaneous metastases, DOD 20 months after diagnosisSurgery + right axilla lymphadenectomy
40MChest505 yearsSCACP in situInvasive adenocarcinoma subcutisNED (14 months)Surgery + bilateral lymphadenectomy + Ct
29FForehead152 yearsSCACP in situInvasive squamous cell carcinomaNED (10 months)Surgery
64MAxilla2210 yearsSCACP in situInvasive adenocarcinoma subcutisNED (3 months)Surgery + right axilla lymphadenectomy + Ct
Present case63MEyelid50 × 70>6 yearsSCACP invasiveSCAPLocal recurrenceSurgery

Ct, chemotherapy; Rt, radiation therapy; N/A, not available; NED, no evidence of disease; DOD, died of disease.

Previous case reports on SCACP. Ct, chemotherapy; Rt, radiation therapy; N/A, not available; NED, no evidence of disease; DOD, died of disease. The tumor appears to affect middle-aged or elderly individuals[15] and does not seem to have a gender bias. The most frequent location is the head and neck (53%), with only one case in the eyelid. Other locations where these lesions occur frequently are the back, chest, suprapubic, and perianal regions. Treatment is based on a complete tumor resection with oncological margins, which is essential for a better prognosis. Mohs surgery has also been successfully used for this purpose.[11] Sentinel lymph node biopsy may be feasible in some cases when there is suspicion of lymph spread, although lymphatic spread has been shown to be rare with this tumor (6 of the 42 documented cases; Table 1). Radiotherapy and chemotherapy have also been used rarely, but the experience with these treatments is scarce due to the rarity of the lesion.[25] SCACP characteristically presents with squamous cell invaginations extending from the epidermis into the dermis. The invaginations and papillary projections are lined by two-layer epithelium: the luminal layer composed of columnar cells with decapitation secretions and the outer layer composed of small cuboidal cells. The immunohistochemical features of SCACP are still under study, but the most frequently reported markers are CEA,[15,20,28] followed by EMA,[9,28] GDFP-15,[20,28,32] and cytokeratin.[11,28,32] Due to its appearance, the differential diagnosis includes other skin tumors such as basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, sebaceous carcinoma, metastatic breast or gastrointestinal adenocarcinomas, and other sweat gland neoplasms.[2,20] Of the cases that reported head and neck involvement, 16 (72.72%) were in remission following therapy, 2 (9.09%) had local recurrence, 3 (13.63%) had regional lymphatic invasion, and 1 (4.54%) had distant metastases. Of the reports describing involvement of the thorax, abdomen, and pelvis, 17 (85%) went into remission following therapy, none had local recurrence, 1 (5%) had regional lymphatic invasion and 2 (10%) had distant metastases. This is the first reported case of SCACP with extension into the anterior orbit. While SCACP is an exceedingly rare tumor, we found that of the reported cases, 16% showed signs of metastasis. It is therefore an important diagnosis to consider when reviewing skin lesions around the orbit. It also encourages us to monitor patients with SCAP more closely as our literature review suggests that SCACP may be more aggressive than previously considered.
  31 in total

1.  Syringocystadenocarcinoma papilliferum in situ with pagetoid spread: a case report.

Authors:  H Woestenborghs; P Van Eyken; A Dans
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.087

2.  Syringocystadenocarcinoma papilliferum in situ originating from the perianal skin.

Authors:  Cord Langner; Arthur Ott
Journal:  APMIS       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.205

3.  Syringocystadenocarcinoma papilliferum.

Authors:  Novie Sroa; Nitie Sroa; Matthew Zirwas
Journal:  Dermatol Surg       Date:  2009-12-07       Impact factor: 3.398

4.  Diagnostic pitfalls in syringocystadenocarcinoma papilliferum: case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Nicky Leeborg; Michele Thompson; Sarah Rossmiller; Neil Gross; Clifton White; Ken Gatter
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 5.534

Review 5.  Morphologic diversity of syringocystadenocarcinoma papilliferum based on a clinicopathologic study of 6 cases and review of the literature.

Authors:  Dmitry V Kazakov; Luis Requena; Heinz Kutzner; Maria Teresa Fernandez-Figueras; Denisa Kacerovska; Thomas Mentzel; Peter Schwabbauer; Michal Michal
Journal:  Am J Dermatopathol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.533

6.  Syringocystadenocarcinoma papilliferum: case report and immunohistochemical comparison with its benign counterpart.

Authors:  A Ishida-Yamamoto; K Sato; T Wada; H Takahashi; H Iizuka
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 11.527

Review 7.  Syringocystadenocarcinoma papilliferum: successfully treated with Mohs micrographic surgery.

Authors:  Ching-Chi Chi; Ren-Yeu Tsai; Shu-Hui Wang
Journal:  Dermatol Surg       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.398

8.  A case of syringocystadenocarcinoma papilliferum in situ occurring partially in syringocystadenoma papilliferum.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Arai; Hidenari Kusakabe; Kimihiro Kiyokane
Journal:  J Dermatol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.005

9.  Syringocystadenocarcinoma papilliferum in a linear nevus verrucosus.

Authors:  Rick Hoekzema; Marjolein F E Leenarts; Erik W P Nijhuis
Journal:  J Cutan Pathol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.587

10.  Syringocystadenocarcinoma papilliferum: a case report.

Authors:  So Hyun Park; Young Min Shin; Dong Hoon Shin; Jong Soo Choi; Ki Hong Kim
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.153

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Current Diagnosis and Treatment Options for Cutaneous Adnexal Neoplasms with Apocrine and Eccrine Differentiation.

Authors:  Iga Płachta; Marcin Kleibert; Anna M Czarnecka; Mateusz Spałek; Anna Szumera-Ciećkiewicz; Piotr Rutkowski
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 5.923

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.