Literature DB >> 31065144

Sustained Drug Free Remission of Lupus Panniculitis with Methotrexate: A Case Report From Nepal.

Binit Vaidya1, Rikesh Baral1, Hritu Baral1, Shweta Nakarmi1.   

Abstract

Cutaneous manifestations are second most common presenting feature of lupus. Discoid lupus erythematosus is the most common variant amongst all; lupus panniculitis being described in only 2-5% of cases. Most cases of cutaneous lupus are associated with autoantibodies and either precede or follow the systemic manifestations of lupus. There is no proven treatment for cutaneous manifestations of lupus including lupus panniculitis. Available non-randomized studies show efficacy of hydroxychoroquine in most cases, whereas methotrexate and other immunosuppressant are used in relapsing cases. We describe a case of lupus panniculitis presenting as isolated manifestation of lupus with negative autoantibody titers which responded well to methotrexate. We observed that lesions went into drug free remission in 1 year and did not recur on 1 year follow-up. There was no residual skin atrophy or scarring. Drug free remission in isolated cases of lupus panniculitis variant could be possible with timely intervention in the absence of autoantibodies. Keywords: lupus; Methotrexate; Nepal; panniculitis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 31065144      PMCID: PMC8827611     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc        ISSN: 0028-2715            Impact factor:   0.406


INTRODUCTION

Cutaneous manifestations are the second most common presenting feature of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).[1] Around 80% develop skin disease during their course.[2] Lupus panniculitis (LP) is an uncommon form of chronic cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CCLE).[3] The diagnosis of LP is usually delayed and considered after non-resolution of skin lesions. Most of the patients with LP are ANA positive and either precede or follow the systemic manifestations of lupus.[4] Current evidence suggests use of hydroxychloroquine; followed by methotrexate (MTX), azathioprine and mycophenolate in recalcitrant cases.[5] We describe a case of young female with isolated lupus panniculitis who had sustained drug free remission with methotrexate.

CASE REPORT

A 22-year-old female presented to us in August 2016 with painful, non-itchy, non-healing and progressively increasing skin lesion on her left arm region since 3 months (Fig 1). The lesions appeared as confluent areas of erythema and induration with superficial ulceration. She denied any history of previous trauma, surgery, insect bite or chemical exposure. There was no history of malar rash, hair loss, oral ulcers, Raynaud's phenomenon and joint pains. Examination revealed an ulcerated plaque with induration and erythema at the base with crusts and scabs on the surface and purulent discharge. Systemic examination was unremarkable. Laboratory evaluation revealed normal blood counts and biochemistry (Table 1). Anti-nuclear antibody (ANA) was positive in low titres (1:80 speckled) and extractable nuclear antigens (ENA) were absent; anti-cardiolipin IgG/IgM and lupus anti-coagulant were negative (Table 2); erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) by Westergren's method was 42mm in 1st hour and C-reactive protein (CRP) was 36.4 mg/L. Swab culture was sterile. Skin biopsy revealed atrophied epidermis with basal vacuolation and lymptocytic infilteration with septal panniculitis. There was no evidence of giant cells, granulomas or necrosis. A diagnosis of lupus panniculitis was made (Fig 2 and 3).
Figure 1.

Presenting skin lesion.

Table 1

Baseline parameters.

BASELINE3 MONTHS1YEAR
HEMOGLOBIN (gm/dl)12.011.411.9
WHITE BLOOD COUNT (per mm[3])880067005600
PLATELETS (per mm[3])155000195000179000
ERYTHROCYTE SEDIMENTATION RATE (ESR) mm at 1st hour424020
CRP TITRE (mg/L)36.43.11.2
Table 2

Results of immunological tests.

PARAMETERRESULTREFERENCE
ANA BY IFA1:80 SPECKLED<1:40
DSDNA35U/ML(<25)
ANTICARDIOLIPIN IGG/IGMNEGATIVE
LUPUS ANTICOAGULANTNEGATIVE
U1RNPNEGATIVE
ANTI SCL-70NEGATIVE
ANTI SMITH ABNEGATIVE
ANTI CENP ABNEGATIVE
ANTI RIBOSOMAL P PROTEINNEGATIVE
ANTI RO 60NEGATIVE
ANTI RO 52NEGATIVE
ANTI LA ABNEGATIVE
ANTI PM-SNEGATIVE
ANTI JO-1NEGATIVE
ANTI MI-2NEGATIVE
Figure 2.

Low magnification.

Figure 3.

High magnification.

Confluent areas of erythema and induration with superficial ulceration on left arm of the patient at presentation. Low power field showing areas of lymphocytic infiltration and collagen deposition. She was started on prednisolone 20mg per day tapered by 5 mg every 2 weeks and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) 200mg twice a day, along with a course of Flucoxacillin and topical mupirocin for 7 days for secondary bacterial infection. The lesion responded to steroids and significantly reduced in size over next 3 weeks. However, it again began to ulcerate when prednisolone was tapered to 5mg per day. Therapy was escalated to prednisolone 20mg (again tapered in same regimen) with the addition of methotrexate (MTX) 15mg once a week along with folic acid. HCQ was maintained throughout the period. The lesion gradually reduced in size and ulceration healed without recurrence over next 3 months. Prednisolone was maintained at 5mg every week for 3 months and then discontinued. She was observed on MTX and HCQ therapy for next 6 months. Her follow-up ESR and CRP were normal after initial 3months of MTX addition. After 6 months of steroid free remission, her MTX was gradually reduced at 5mg every 3months and after 9 month (i.e 1 year of treatment), HCQ was also stopped. She did not show any sign of relapse in the following year. There was post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation with no scarring or atrophy of overlying skin (Figure 4).
Figure 4.

Follow-up at 2years.

High power field showing concentric areas of collagen deposition with perivascular and fat tissue lymptocytic infiltration The patient's skin lesion improved with mild post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation with no scarring or atrophy of overlying skin at 2years of treatment.

DISCUSSION

Skin manifestations are the second most common presenting feature of lupus with three different subtypes: acute, subacute and chronic. Acute cutaneous lupus erythematosus constitutes<10% of cases whereas subacute forms account for around 20% cases. These acute and subacute form present with photosensitive rashes and heal without scarring. Majority of remaining cases are discoid lupus, presenting as erythematous, annular plaques with central hyperkeratosis healing with scarring and atrophy. Lupus panniculitis, also known as lupus profundus, is a rare variant occurring in 2 to 5% of SLE cases and is usually associated with systemic manifestations of lupus.[6] The approximate risk of conversion of CCLE to full lupus is estimated around 12%.[3] There are reports of lupus panniculitis as an initial manifestation of SLE, where patient developed full systemic symptoms after 2 years of panniculitis onset.[7,8] Approximately half of patients with lupus panniculitis show some evidence of systemic disease. Our patient presented only with isolated unilateral skin lesion and did not show any systemic features during 2 years follow-up period. LP usually presents as indurated, painful plaques or nodules with or without overlying cutaneous changes and lipoatrophy. Sites commonly affected are scalp, face, upper arms, chest (particularly breasts), lower back, flank, upper thighs, or buttocks. Ulceration and/or calcification may develop at the affected site. Characteristic histological findings are perivascular infiltrates of mononuclear cells plus panniculitis, manifested as hyaline fat necrosis with mononuclear cell infiltration and lymphocytic vasculitis.[9] Studies have reported varying association of cutaneous lupus with ANA positivity and few described associations of anti-Ro antibodies with subacute and chronic forms of lupus, specially DLE.[4] Our patient had low titer ANA with negative testing for all ENA. In the absence of systemic features and serological markers, the diagnosis was only clinched by biopsy. Treatment of LP is quite difficult in absence of specific guidelines. Topical and intralesional corticosteroid is considered as initial management followed by anti-malarial therapy. A subset of patients who fail to respond to these therapies can be treated with MTX, MMF, Dapsone, Thalidomide, IVIG, Rituximab.[5] MTX has found to be beneficial in the treatment of refractory CCLE.[10] There are no randomized trials for therapeutic agent of choice for cutaneous lupus, especially LP. In few reports, patients responded well to HCQ[7] and cyclophosphamide[8] with tapering dosage of GC.[7] Our patient also did not initially respond to HCQ but responded to MTX and systemic corticosteroids. Another unusual experience from this patient was the successful tapering of DMARDs after 1year of treatment and healing without scarring. There are no reports of sustained drug free remission of lupus panniculitis reported in literature. This might suggest a possible drug free remission of isolated lupus panniculitis if treated early with DMARDs. On the other hand, it might be a milder form of self-limiting disease as suggested by absence of significant autoantibody profile and lack of systemic symptoms throughout the course of disease.
  10 in total

1.  Markers in cutaneous lupus erythematosus indicating systemic involvement. A multicenter study on 296 patients.

Authors:  B Tebbe; U Mansmann; U Wollina; P Auer-Grumbach; A Licht-Mbalyohere; M Arensmeier; C E Orfanos
Journal:  Acta Derm Venereol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 4.437

2.  Manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  Manole Cojocaru; Inimioara Mihaela Cojocaru; Isabela Silosi; Camelia Doina Vrabie
Journal:  Maedica (Buchar)       Date:  2011-10

3.  Cutaneous lupus erythematosus and the association with systemic lupus erythematosus: a population-based cohort of 1088 patients in Sweden.

Authors:  C M Grönhagen; C M Fored; F Granath; F Nyberg
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 9.302

4.  Treatment of Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus: Review and Assessment of Treatment Benefits Based on Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine Criteria.

Authors:  R R Winkelmann; Grace K Kim; James Q Del Rosso
Journal:  J Clin Aesthet Dermatol       Date:  2013-01

5.  Lupus panniculitis as an initial manifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  Raksha M Patel; Y S Marfatia
Journal:  Indian J Dermatol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.494

6.  Systemic lupus erythematosus: clinical and immunologic patterns of disease expression in a cohort of 1,000 patients. The European Working Party on Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.

Authors:  R Cervera; M A Khamashta; J Font; G D Sebastiani; A Gil; P Lavilla; I Doménech; A O Aydintug; A Jedryka-Góral; E de Ramón
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 7.  Lupus erythematosus panniculitis.

Authors:  Javier Fraga; Amaro García-Díez
Journal:  Dermatol Clin       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.478

8.  Management of cutaneous lupus erythematosus with low-dose methotrexate: indication for modulation of inflammatory mechanisms.

Authors:  I B Boehm; G A Boehm; R Bauer
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.631

9.  Useful Parameters for Distinguishing Subcutaneous Panniculitis-like T-Cell Lymphoma From Lupus Erythematosus Panniculitis.

Authors:  Robert E LeBlanc; Mahkam Tavallaee; Youn H Kim; Jinah Kim
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 6.394

Review 10.  Lupus Panniculitis as an Initial Manifestation of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Case Report.

Authors:  Yu-Kun Zhao; Fang Wang; Wen-Na Chen; Rui Xu; Zhuo Wang; Yuan-Wen Jiang; Di-Qing Luo; Jian-De Han
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 1.889

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.