Literature DB >> 31064766

Single-Copy Knock-In Loci for Defined Gene Expression in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Carlos G Silva-García1, Anne Lanjuin1, Caroline Heintz1, Sneha Dutta1, Nicole M Clark1, William B Mair2.   

Abstract

We have generated a single-copy knock-in loci for defined gene expression (SKI LODGE) system to insert any DNA by CRISPR/Cas9 at defined safe harbors in the Caenorhabditis elegans genome. Utilizing a single crRNA guide, which also acts as a Co-CRISPR enrichment marker, any DNA sequence can be introduced as a single copy, regulated by different tissue-specific promoters. The SKI LODGE system provides a fast, economical, and effective approach for generating single-copy ectopic transgenes in C. elegans.
Copyright © 2019 Silva-Garcia et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  C. elegans; CRISPR; methods

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31064766      PMCID: PMC6643881          DOI: 10.1534/g3.119.400314

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)        ISSN: 2160-1836            Impact factor:   3.154


The C. elegans community has developed multiple protocols to express transgenes in this genetic model. These protocols include extrachromosomal arrays (Mello ), gamma/UV integration (Evans 2006), biolistic transformation (Praitis ), and Mos1-mediated single copy insertion (MosSCI) (Frøkjær-Jensen ). The use of these tools has expedited our understanding of innumerable molecular and physiological mechanisms. However, many issues remain with these systems that limit efficacy, including inter-individual variability in expression levels, potential for disruption of one or more endogenous genes, laborious methodologies, and co-selection/rescue markers (i.e., unc or roller) linked to the transgene that can influence C. elegans physiology. To circumnavigate these issues, we have taken advantage of precise and rapid CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing (Dickinson ; Friedland ) to make a single-copy knock-in loci for defined gene expression (SKI LODGE) system at safe harbors in the C. elegans genome. The SKI LODGE system allows rapid single copy tissue-specific expression of any gene. SKI LODGE uses simple PCR amplicons as repair templates along with a single well characterized targeting sequence ( crRNA sequence), that also facilitates Co-CRISPR selection to enrich for mutants. Furthermore, after outcrossing, SKI LODGE does not leave other alterations in the genome that may be detrimental to the organism (e.g., rescue sequences used for selection, or random insertional events that can disrupt untargeted coding or regulatory sequences), and can facilitate rapid generation of stably expressed, tissue-specific transgenes.

Materials and Methods

We sought to generate transgenic C. elegans strains in which a single copy tissue-specific promoter had been knocked in at a defined safe harbor locus, along with the target sequence of a well characterized crRNA that could later be used to knock in any DNA of choice by CRISPR/Cas9 (Figure 1A and Table 1). Since the discovery of genome editing via CRISPR/Cas9, many methods have been developed to make genomic edits in C. elegans. One of these methods includes entirely cloning-free steps and direct injection of in vitro-assembled Cas9-CRISPR RNA (crRNA) trans-activating crRNA (tracrRNA) ribonucleoprotein complexes into the C. elegans gonad (Paix , 2016). Utilizing this protocol as a base, we developed a toolkit to generate single copy insertions using only one crRNA guide. To define safe harbor loci for the SKI LODGE system, we used those that are well characterized by the MosSCI community (Frøkjær-Jensen ) and are known to give stable expression with no silencing (Figure 1B). We generated a suite of transgenic cassettes that have a common general design. Each SKI LODGE consists of a tissue-specific promoter, followed by an epitope tag, a highly efficient CRISPR target sequence copied from the gene, and a 3′ UTR for stable expression: tissue-specific promoter::3xFLAG::dpy-10 protospacer & PAM::3′UTR (Figure 1). By inserting 30 bases of protospacer and PAM sequence from gene (Arribere ), hereafter referred to as “ site” we can simultaneously induce double-stranded breaks at both the transplanted SKI LODGE site and the endogenous locus using a single crRNA guide (El Mouridi ) (Figure 2A). In addition, due to the high efficiency of the site, the likelihood of getting a template inserted into the SKI LODGE cassette is amplified. In order to introduce the site into the SKI LODGE cassettes, we established another easily identifiable Co-CRISPR target gene, (Figure 1A). Finally, we also added an N-terminal 3xFLAG (Figure 1A), which can be used for cell type specific biochemical applications.
Figure 1

Generation of SKI LODGE lines. (A) Schematic of the SKI LODGE cassettes. Every SKI LODGE cassette was introduced into a defined chromosomal location. SKI LODGE PCR template(s) was combined with the CRISPR/Cas9 complex in vitro. This reaction mix was then injected into wild type animals. (Details about SKI LODGE construction can be accessed in Methods section). (B) Genomic locations of SKI LODGE insertions and composition of each cassette.

Table 1

SKI LODGE strains

StrainShort descriptionExpressionChromosomeVerified Expression With:
WBM1119pie-1 promoterGermlineIIIGFP
WBM1126myo-3 promoterMusclesIwrmScarlet
WBM1140eft-3 promoterUbiquitousVwrmScarlet
WBM1141rab-3 promoterNeuronsIVwrmScarlet
WBM1179eft-3 promoterUbiquitousIVGFP
WBM1214eft-3 promoter + SL2::wrmScarletUbiquitousVN/A
WBM1215rab-3 promoter + SL2::wrmScarletNeuronsIVN/A
WBM1216ges-1 promoter + SL2::wrmScarletIntestineVN/A
Figure 2

Using the SKI LODGE system to generate single-copy insertions. (A) Flow chart for the generation of single-copy insertions using the SKI LODGE system. (1) Select the SKI LODGE strain to express your gene of interest. Design primers to amplify your gene as homology repair template, including ∼35 bp stretches of SKI LODGE sequences immediately 5′ and 3′ to the dpy-10 site. (2) Assemble CRISPR/Cas9 complex in vitro. (3) Inject pre-assembled CRISPR mix into desired SKI LODGE strain. 3-4 days post injection, isolate individual dumpy/rollers animals, and screen for desired insertion. See step by step guide in Methods section for details. (B) Each SKI LODGE strain was tested by knock-in of a fluorescent protein to confirm tissue-specific expression. wrmScarlet was used to confirm ubiquitous, muscle and neuronal expression from the eft-3, myo-3, and rab-3 SKI LODGE cassettes, respectively. GFP was used to confirm germline expression in the pie-1 SKI LODGE. (c) dpy-10 crRNA::SL2 sequence was introduced into eft-3p::wrmScarlet and rab-3p::wrmScarlet strains to generate alternative SKI LODGE lines. Animals pictured are at day 1 of adulthood.

Generation of SKI LODGE lines. (A) Schematic of the SKI LODGE cassettes. Every SKI LODGE cassette was introduced into a defined chromosomal location. SKI LODGE PCR template(s) was combined with the CRISPR/Cas9 complex in vitro. This reaction mix was then injected into wild type animals. (Details about SKI LODGE construction can be accessed in Methods section). (B) Genomic locations of SKI LODGE insertions and composition of each cassette. Using the SKI LODGE system to generate single-copy insertions. (A) Flow chart for the generation of single-copy insertions using the SKI LODGE system. (1) Select the SKI LODGE strain to express your gene of interest. Design primers to amplify your gene as homology repair template, including ∼35 bp stretches of SKI LODGE sequences immediately 5′ and 3′ to the dpy-10 site. (2) Assemble CRISPR/Cas9 complex in vitro. (3) Inject pre-assembled CRISPR mix into desired SKI LODGE strain. 3-4 days post injection, isolate individual dumpy/rollers animals, and screen for desired insertion. See step by step guide in Methods section for details. (B) Each SKI LODGE strain was tested by knock-in of a fluorescent protein to confirm tissue-specific expression. wrmScarlet was used to confirm ubiquitous, muscle and neuronal expression from the eft-3, myo-3, and rab-3 SKI LODGE cassettes, respectively. GFP was used to confirm germline expression in the pie-1 SKI LODGE. (c) dpy-10 crRNA::SL2 sequence was introduced into eft-3p::wrmScarlet and rab-3p::wrmScarlet strains to generate alternative SKI LODGE lines. Animals pictured are at day 1 of adulthood. Initially we generated four SKI LODGE strains with differing spatial expression (Table 1), with each SKI LODGE cassette introduced in an intergenic region and on different chromosomes (Figure 1B). Harboring the cassettes on different chromosomes allows the user to cross different SKI LODGE lines into each other. The SKI LODGE lines initially generated include ubiquitous (eft-3p -eef-1A.1p-), neuronal (rab-3p), muscle (myo-3p), and germline (pie-1p) promoters. We generated all strains following the Paix et al. protocol (Paix , 2016) (See File S1 Supplemental Materials and Methods, and Figures 1A,B and S1). After each edit, strains were outcrossed to remove any off-target and Co-CRISPR marker mutations. We modified the method of SKI LODGE cassette insertion into the C. elegans genome depending on the size of each promoter sequence. We did one (, eft-3 and ) or two () edit steps to generate the final cassettes (Figure S1). , eft-3 and were inserted using two overlapping PCR fragments, and one template was used for , (Figure S1). All final SKI LODGE lines were outcrossed six times, and subsequently assayed for fertility, embryonic lethality, developmental timing and lifespan (Figure S2). Across all parameters tested, SKI LODGE strains were indistinguishable from wild type. In addition, we also checked potential off-target mutations that might result from use of the Co-CRISPR target gene. We sequenced the three closest genes to each SKI LODGE site that had potential for off target mutation (See File S1). After sequencing, we did not find mutations, and in concordance with the phenotypic assays (Figure S2), these data suggest that SKI LODGE lines have a wild type phenotype, which will markedly facilitate microinjections.

Data availability

Supplemental Materials and Methods can be found in File S1. Strains and plasmids are available upon request. The authors affirm that all data necessary for confirming the conclusions of the article are present within the article, figures, and tables. Supplemental material available at FigShare: https://doi.org/10.25387/g3.8085740.

Results

To verify that our SKI LODGE strains could indeed be used to drive tissue-specific gene expression, we first tested all of them by CRISPR knock-in of the wrmScarlet fluorescent protein (El Mouridi ). We amplified wrmScarlet with ∼35 bases homology arms for 3xFLAG (, , and eft-3 cassettes) in the left side, and ∼35 bases homology arms for (, and eft-3 cassettes) or ( cassette) in the right side. CRISPR/Cas9 mix was assembled in vitro (Paix ) using purified Cas9 protein. As predicted, utilizing only one crRNA guide (Figure 2A), we were able to obtain mutant animals that also contained inserted wrmScarlet into the SKI LODGE cassette. We observed expected patterns of tissue-specific expression for wrmScarlet driven by eft-3, and promoters (Figures 2B and S3). However, we did not observe expression of wrmScarlet in the germline of the strain (data not shown). wrmScarlet does not have introns (El Mouridi ), which greatly enhance transgene expression (Boulin ). To test whether lack of intronic sequence in wrmScarlet might have impacted germline expression, we inserted GFP with artificial introns into the SKI LODGE. Using GFP (with intronic sequences) as a template, the SKI LODGE cassette drove GFP expression in the germline (Figures 2B and S3). We also observed wrmScarlet intestinal ectopic expression in our initial SKI LODGE single-copy rab-3p (neuronal) strain that contained the (data not shown). Since, 3′UTRs can modulate gene expression in C. elegans (Merritt ), and lies upstream of which is expressed in intestine, we generated an additional rab-3p SKI LODGE line, swapping out the for the . Knock-in of wrmScarlet into the rab-3p with the 3′UTR SKI LODGE line resulted in no identifiable expression in the intestine at day one and six of adulthood (Figures 2B and S3), suggesting this line can be used to more cleanly drive gene expression in the C. elegans nervous system, and that use of the 3′UTR rather than high copy number may explain previous examples of non-neuronal leaky expression for pan-neuronal promoters such as (Wang ). All tested SKI LODGE lines were outcrossed at least four times and verified for off-target events of , particularly in the R12E2.15 gene. After sequencing, we did not find mutations in this region (See File S1). Lastly, we generated three SKI LODGE lines that introduce SL2 trans-splicing sequence between 3xFLAG and wrmScarlet: eft-3p::3xFLAG::wrmScarlet, rab-3p::3xFLAG::wrmScarlet, and ges-1p::3xFLAG::wrmScarlet (Figure 2C and File S1). Using these lines, a gene of interest can be co-expressed with wrmScarlet without generating a gene::wrmScarlet translational fusion reporter. We have successfully introduced templates of different sizes into different SKI LODGE lines (Table S1). The shortest template introduced was 774 bp (wrmScarlet) with a frequency of up to 13.04% of F1 animals. As the template increased in size, the frequency decreased: 0.44% of 1872 bp, and 2.08% of 2319 bp. We also introduced two templates at the same time with overlapping sequences with a frequency of 13.39% of 1534 bp and 778 bp; and 9.56% of 829 bp and 778 bp. All these insertions were made following Paix protocol (Paix , 2016) using PCR products with blunt-strand ends and with at least 35 bp of homology arms. Recently, Dokshin et al. (Dokshin ) proposed that PCR products with single-strand ends work more efficiently than products with blunt-strand ends. Single-strand ended PCR products are hybrid asymmetric molecules originated from two donors: one with 120 bp homology arms and the other with no homology arms (Dokshin ). To compare blunt- vs. single-strand ends in some of our SKI LODGE lines, we introduced wrmScarlet with single-strand ends (See File S1). We observed similar frequency of insertion in the SKI LODGE strain in both blunt- and single-strand ends, 13.04% and 13.33%, respectively (Table S1). The frequency of insertion increased when we introduced wrmScarlet into the SKI LODGE eft-3 strain, from 8.57% (blunt-strand ends) to 26% (single-strand ends) (Table S1). Overall, both protocols, Paix and Dokshin, can be used in the SKI LODGE lines, but the efficiency of insertion will depend on several factors. For example, in our hands, we have noted that a successful CRISPR edit relies on template length, complexity of template sequence, template concentration, size of homology arms, and microinjection proficiency. Thus, while short sequences (i.e., 3xFLAG tag) are easily inserted, repetitive sequences (i.e., those located in promoters) reduce efficiency. Large homology arms increase frequency of insertion, and a well-honed microinjection technique is crucial to obtain the CRISPR edit.

Discussion

In summary, the SKI LODGE system allows insertion of single-copy transgenes in C. elegans into safe harbor loci using CRISPR/Cas9 editing in one week (Figure 2A and Table 1). This protocol has several advantages over existing methods. These include, the ease of CRISPR knock-in using a crRNA guide both for knock-in and Co-CRISPR edits, and reduced time and cost due to the use of PCR amplicons and a single crRNA guide. SKI LODGE strains are phenotypically wild type, and as such are easier to inject into than mutant strains, such as animals often used in other methods (Praitis ; Frøkjær-Jensen ). The final generated transgenes are single copy, expressed at known loci that do not impact endogenous gene expression, and do not contain additional material such as selection markers or rescue constructs that impact their utility. SKI LODGE also facilitates optional tissue-specific epitope tagging for future biochemical applications such as IP, ChIP, IF, or Western blotting. SKI LODGE lines can be used to insert one or two templates (with overlapping sequences) at the same time (Figure 2A). However, for large insertions (>3000 bp) we recommend following protocols that use plasmid templates with long homology arms (Dickinson and Goldstein 2016). We will continue to develop new SKI LODGE lines with enhanced application, and encourage the community to do the same (see Table S2 for pipeline). All SKI LODGE lines are available freely to the C. elegans community, and a step by step user guide for use can be found in the File S2. Finally, strains reported here, new strains, updated protocols, and all sequences can be found at www.themairlab.com/skilodge.
  15 in total

Review 1.  Reporter gene fusions.

Authors:  Thomas Boulin; John F Etchberger; Oliver Hobert
Journal:  WormBook       Date:  2006-04-05

2.  Creation of low-copy integrated transgenic lines in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  V Praitis; E Casey; D Collar; J Austin
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  3' UTRs are the primary regulators of gene expression in the C. elegans germline.

Authors:  Christopher Merritt; Dominique Rasoloson; Darae Ko; Geraldine Seydoux
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2008-09-25       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  High Efficiency, Homology-Directed Genome Editing in Caenorhabditis elegans Using CRISPR-Cas9 Ribonucleoprotein Complexes.

Authors:  Alexandre Paix; Andrew Folkmann; Dominique Rasoloson; Geraldine Seydoux
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  cGAL, a temperature-robust GAL4-UAS system for Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Han Wang; Jonathan Liu; Shahla Gharib; Cynthia M Chai; Erich M Schwarz; Navin Pokala; Paul W Sternberg
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 28.547

6.  Reliable CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Engineering in Caenorhabditis elegans Using a Single Efficient sgRNA and an Easily Recognizable Phenotype.

Authors:  Sonia El Mouridi; Claire Lecroisey; Philippe Tardy; Marine Mercier; Alice Leclercq-Blondel; Nora Zariohi; Thomas Boulin
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 3.154

7.  Efficient gene transfer in C.elegans: extrachromosomal maintenance and integration of transforming sequences.

Authors:  C C Mello; J M Kramer; D Stinchcomb; V Ambros
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 11.598

8.  Single-copy insertion of transgenes in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Christian Frøkjaer-Jensen; M Wayne Davis; Christopher E Hopkins; Blake J Newman; Jason M Thummel; Søren-Peter Olesen; Morten Grunnet; Erik M Jorgensen
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2008-10-26       Impact factor: 38.330

9.  Cas9-assisted recombineering in C. elegans: genome editing using in vivo assembly of linear DNAs.

Authors:  Alexandre Paix; Helen Schmidt; Geraldine Seydoux
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 10.  CRISPR-Based Methods for Caenorhabditis elegans Genome Engineering.

Authors:  Daniel J Dickinson; Bob Goldstein
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Recent advances in functional genomics for parasitic nematodes of mammals.

Authors:  Michelle L Castelletto; Spencer S Gang; Elissa A Hallem
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 2.  Metabolic Communication and Healthy Aging: Where Should We Focus Our Energy?

Authors:  Hannah J Smith; Arpit Sharma; William B Mair
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 12.270

3.  Optimizing expression of a single copy transgene in C. elegans.

Authors:  Scott Dour; Michael Nonet
Journal:  MicroPubl Biol       Date:  2021-05-12

4.  Mos1 Element-Mediated CRISPR Integration of Transgenes in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Nicholas S Philip; Fernando Escobedo; Laura L Bahr; Brandon J Berry; Andrew P Wojtovich
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 3.154

5.  Neuronal TORC1 modulates longevity via AMPK and cell nonautonomous regulation of mitochondrial dynamics in C. elegans.

Authors:  Yue Zhang; Anne Lanjuin; Suvagata Roy Chowdhury; Meeta Mistry; Carlos G Silva-García; Heather J Weir; Chia-Lin Lee; Caroline C Escoubas; Emina Tabakovic; William B Mair
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 8.140

6.  Tyramine Acts Downstream of Neuronal XBP-1s to Coordinate Inter-tissue UPRER Activation and Behavior in C. elegans.

Authors:  Neşem P Özbey; Soudabeh Imanikia; Christel Krueger; Iris Hardege; Julia Morud; Ming Sheng; William R Schafer; M Olivia Casanueva; Rebecca C Taylor
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 12.270

7.  rab-27 acts in an intestinal pathway to inhibit axon regeneration in C. elegans.

Authors:  Alexander T Lin-Moore; Motunrayo J Oyeyemi; Marc Hammarlund
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 6.020

8.  Melting dsDNA Donor Molecules Greatly Improves Precision Genome Editing in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Krishna S Ghanta; Craig C Mello
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Rapid Self-Selecting and Clone-Free Integration of Transgenes into Engineered CRISPR Safe Harbor Locations in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Zachary C Stevenson; Megan J Moerdyk-Schauwecker; Brennen Jamison; Patrick C Phillips
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2020-10-05       Impact factor: 3.154

10.  Split-wrmScarlet and split-sfGFP: tools for faster, easier fluorescent labeling of endogenous proteins in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Jérôme Goudeau; Catherine S Sharp; Jonathan Paw; Laura Savy; Manuel D Leonetti; Andrew G York; Dustin L Updike; Cynthia Kenyon; Maria Ingaramo
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.