Literature DB >> 31064613

Variation in Bacterial Contamination of Microisolation Cage Tops According to Rodent Species and Housing System.

Marian A Esvelt1, Lisa Steiner2, Carrie Childs-Thor2, Robert C Dysko2, Jason S Villano2, Zachary T Freeman3.   

Abstract

The Guide recommends sanitizing cage components, including microisolation cage tops (MCT), at a minimum of every 2 wk. Previously published data demonstrated that mouse MCT microbial loads do not increase until at least 2 wk and that sanitation can be delayed past 2 wk. How microbial loads differ on mouse compared with rat MCT, as well as across different ventilation systems, remains unclear. We hypothesized that MCT microbial loads would be higher in tops from rats compared with mice and would differ according to IVC ventilation system. We evaluated bacterial loads on MCT at serial time points to 90 d from static cages housing mice or rats and from rat and mouse cages on several ventilation systems (mice, 6; rats, 4). MCT were determined to have sufficiently elevated bacterial loads to necessitate changing based on either statistically significant changes in bacterial loads or values greater than 50 cfu. Across all ventilation systems, bacterial counts at 14 d were significantly higher on rat MCT compared with mouse MCT. Across the ventilation systems examined, rat MCT cfu remained similarly elevated from 14 d through 90 d. Mouse MCT total cfu were also stable across multiple ventilation systems yet remained lower than 50 cfu until at least 90 d. Patterns of bacterial species isolated from rat MCT were relatively consistent over time and ventilation system, whereas mice showed greater variability in both contexts. We found that 14 d is an appropriate sanitization time point for rat MCT, whereas the interval at which mouse MCT are cleaned can be extended to 90 d at least. Our data highlight interspecies differences in the accumulation of bacteria on MCT and that mouse MCT sanitation intervals for several housing systems can be extended beyond 14 d.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31064613      PMCID: PMC6643085          DOI: 10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-18-000126

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci        ISSN: 1559-6109            Impact factor:   1.232


  12 in total

1.  Investigation of appropriate sanitization frequency for rodent caging accessories: evidence supporting less-frequent cleaning.

Authors:  Curtis W Schondelmeyer; Dirck L Dillehay; Sonji K Webb; Michael J Huerkamp; Deborah M Mook; Jennifer K Pullium
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 1.232

2.  Efficacy and limitations of an ATP-based monitoring system.

Authors:  Danielle E Turner; Erin K Daugherity; Craig Altier; Kirk J Maurer
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.232

3.  The impact of reduced frequency of cage changes on the health of mice housed in ventilated cages.

Authors:  C K Reeb-Whitaker; B Paigen; W G Beamer; R T Bronson; G A Churchill; I B Schweitzer; D D Myers
Journal:  Lab Anim       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.471

4.  Effects of cage density, sanitation frequency, and bedding type on animal wellbeing and health and cage environment in mice and rats.

Authors:  Mandy J Horn; Shanice V Hudson; Linda A Bostrom; Dale M Cooper
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.232

5.  Microenvironment in Ventilated Animal Cages with Differing Ventilation Rates, Mice Populations, and Frequency of Bedding Changes.

Authors:  Carolyn Reeb; Robert Jones; David Bearg; Hendrick Bedigan; David Myers; Beverly Paigen
Journal:  Contemp Top Lab Anim Sci       Date:  1998-03

6.  Resident bacterial flora in the skin of C57BL/6 mice housed under SPF conditions.

Authors:  Zarry Tavakkol; Derrick Samuelson; Elinor deLancey Pulcini; Robert A Underwood; Marcia L Usui; J William Costerton; Garth A James; John E Olerud; Philip Fleckman
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.232

7.  Evaluation of Extended Sanitation Interval for Cage Top Components in Individually Ventilated Mouse Cages.

Authors:  Brianne Ls Ball; Kathleen M Donovan; Steven Clegg; James T Sheets
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 1.232

8.  Effects of cage-change frequency and bedding volume on mice and their microenvironment.

Authors:  Matthew D Rosenbaum; Susan VandeWoude; Thomas E Johnson
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.232

9.  Matriptase-deficient mice exhibit ichthyotic skin with a selective shift in skin microbiota.

Authors:  Tiffany C Scharschmidt; Karin List; Elizabeth A Grice; Roman Szabo; Gabriel Renaud; Chyi-Chia R Lee; Tyra G Wolfsberg; Thomas H Bugge; Julia A Segre
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2009-04-23       Impact factor: 8.551

10.  Repeated Measures Correlation.

Authors:  Jonathan Z Bakdash; Laura R Marusich
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-04-07
View more
  1 in total

1.  Assessing Accumulation of Organic Material on Rodent Cage Accessories.

Authors:  Kenneth P Allen; Tarrant J Csida; Joseph D Thulin
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 1.232

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.