Literature DB >> 31064512

The costs and benefits of replication studies.

Nicholas A Coles1, Leonid Tiokhin2, Anne M Scheel3, Peder M Isager3, Daniël Lakens3.   

Abstract

The debate about whether replication studies should become mainstream is essentially driven by disagreements about their costs and benefits and the best ways to allocate limited resources. Determining when replications are worthwhile requires quantifying their expected utility. We argue that a formalized framework for such evaluations can be useful for both individual decision-making and collective discussions about replication.

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 31064512     DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X18000596

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Sci        ISSN: 0140-525X            Impact factor:   12.579


  3 in total

1.  Replications in Comparative Cognition: What Should We Expect and How Can We Improve?

Authors:  Benjamin G Farrar; Markus Boeckle; Nicola S Clayton
Journal:  Anim Behav Cogn       Date:  2020-02

2.  Low replicability can support robust and efficient science.

Authors:  Stephan Lewandowsky; Klaus Oberauer
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 14.919

3.  Putting the Self in Self-Correction: Findings From the Loss-of-Confidence Project.

Authors:  Julia M Rohrer; Warren Tierney; Eric L Uhlmann; Lisa M DeBruine; Tom Heyman; Benedict Jones; Stefan C Schmukle; Raphael Silberzahn; Rebecca M Willén; Rickard Carlsson; Richard E Lucas; Julia Strand; Simine Vazire; Jessica K Witt; Thomas R Zentall; Christopher F Chabris; Tal Yarkoni
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2021-03-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.