| Literature DB >> 31064512 |
Nicholas A Coles1, Leonid Tiokhin2, Anne M Scheel3, Peder M Isager3, Daniël Lakens3.
Abstract
The debate about whether replication studies should become mainstream is essentially driven by disagreements about their costs and benefits and the best ways to allocate limited resources. Determining when replications are worthwhile requires quantifying their expected utility. We argue that a formalized framework for such evaluations can be useful for both individual decision-making and collective discussions about replication.Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 31064512 DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X18000596
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Behav Brain Sci ISSN: 0140-525X Impact factor: 12.579