| Literature DB >> 31064367 |
Wei-Long Tan1,2, Chun-Xiao Li1, Rui-Chen Lv2, Yan-De Dong1, Xiao-Xia Guo1, Dan Xing1, Ming-Hao Zhou3, Yan Xu3, Hong-Liang Chu3, Gang Wang1, Chang-Qiang Zhu2, Jun Sun4, Tong-Yan Zhao5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Anopheles sinensis is one of the major malaria vectors in China and other southeast Asian countries, including Vietnam, Cambodia, Thailand. Vector control is considered to be the critical measure for malaria control, while the increasing prevalence of insecticide resistance caused by long-term use of insecticides, especially pyrethroids, is threatening the successful control of An. sinensis. In order to understand the underlying resistance mechanisms involved and molecular basis, the principal malaria vector, An. sinensis from Jiangsu and Anhui provinces, Southeast China, was investigated.Entities:
Keywords: Anopheles sinensis; Knockdown resistance; Pyrethroids; kdr mutation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31064367 PMCID: PMC6505223 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-019-2793-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Malar J ISSN: 1475-2875 Impact factor: 2.979
Fig. 1The location of collection sites of adult Anopheles sinensis specimens and distribution of kdr allele. 1: YL (Yunlong); 2: XN (Xiaonian); 3: SZ (Shazhuang); 4: DT (Dangtu); 5: DY (Danyang); 6: BN (Benniu); 7: CS (Changshu); 8: FC (Fanchang); 9: CZ (Chizhou); 10: WH (Wanghe); 11: PZ (Panzheng). In the colour circles, different colour indicated different substitutions in percentage
Sites where An. sinensis specimens were collected in Anhui and Jiangsu provinces, China
| Collection site | Code | Collection method | Sample size | Latitude/longitude coordinates | Ecology | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Xuzhou, Yunlong (YL) | YL | IR-HC | 66 | 34°79′041″N, 117°18′374″E | Paddy field | 7/10 |
| Fengxian, xiaonian (XN) | XN | IR-HC | 72 | 34°54′949″N, 116°43′199″E | Paddy field | 7/10 |
| Fengxian, shazhuang (SZ) | SZ | IR-HC | 48 | 34°54′941″N, 116°37′568″E | bullpen | 7/10 |
| Zhengjiang, Dangtu (DT) | DT | IR-HC | 72 | 32°09′520″N, 119°32′803″E | Paddy field | 7/10 |
| Zhengjiang, Danyang (DY) | DY | IR-HC and IR-PSC | 26 | 32°03′631″N, 119°50′903″E | Paddy field | 7/10 |
| Changzhou, Changshu (CS) | CS | IR-HC and LC | 49 | 31°24′630″N, 119°47′900″E | Paddy field | 7/10 |
| Changzhou, Benniu (BN) | BN | IR-HC | 72 | 31°52′076″N, 119°49′506″E | Paddy field | 8/10 |
| Fanchang, e-shan (FC) | FC | IR-HC | 72 | 31°02′010″N, 118°15′040″E | Paddy field | 8/10 |
| Chizhou, Meilong (CZ) | CZ | IR-NET | 72 | 30°77′130″N, 117°67′640″E | Pigsty | 8/10 |
| Qianshan, Wanghe (WH) | WH | IR-NET | 68 | 30°48′810″N, 117°45′660″E | Pigsty | 8/10 |
| Qianshan, Panzheng (PZ) | PZ | IR-NET | 72 | 30°42′010″N, 116°33′340″E | Pigsty | 8/10 |
IR-HC, hand-operated aspirators, indoor collection; IR-NET, indoor resting mosquitoes in bed-nets; IR-PSC, pyrethrum spray collection; LC, larval collection
Fig. 2Schematic diagram of the the Multiple-PCR strategy was used to detect “TTG” to “TTT”, “TGT”, “TTC”and “TCG” mutations, predict the size of PCR products in the para sodium channel gene and identify the anopheles species. a P1–P2 with kdr-L, kdr-F, kdr-C and kdr-S indicate PCR primers. Paired-primer kdr-L and P2 amplifies a 170 bp fragment for the susceptible allele (for codon TTG). Primers pair kdr-F and P2 yields 170 bp fragments for the resistant TTT/TTC mutations (codon TTT and TTC). Similarly, primer pair kdr-S and P2 amplify a 170 bp fragment diagnostic of the TGT mutation (codon TGT). The primer pair P1 and P2 are allele-nonspecific outer primers. Paired primers of UP/PA and UP/PS were used to diagnostic the Anopheles specimen of An. anthropophagus and An. sinensis, respectively. b Species identification results (Lane 1: positive control of An. anthropophagus, Lane 2: positive control of An. sinensis, Lane 3–12: Partial sample amplification results). c Partial results by the Multiple-PCR showed the genotypes of TTT/TTT, TTT/TTC and TTT/TGT [Lane1: kdr-L(TTG), Lane2: kdr-C(TGT), Lane3: kdr-F(TTT), Lane4: kdr-F(TTC)]
Fig. 3Schematic diagram of the TaqMan assay. Two parallel tests were used to genotype each DNA templates. The two tests were done in the same conditions except that one contained probe 1 and probe 3 with an outcome of red or green colour to detect the kdr allele of “TGT” and “TTT”, whereas the other contained probe 2 and probe 4 with an outcome of brown or green colour to detect the kdr allele of “TTG” and “TTC”
Resistance characteristics (KT50 and R/S) of adults of a susceptible laboratory strain (S.S.) of An. sinensis adults and An. sinensis adults collected at sites in Anhui and Jiangsu provinces, China (see Fig. 1 and Table 1 for site locations)
| Specimen origin | Beta-cypermethrin | Delta-methrin | Permethrin | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KT50 (min) | R/S | KT50 (min) | R/S | KT50 (min) | R/S | |
| S.S. | 3.67 | 1.00 | 3.03 | 1.00 | 5.00 | 1.00 |
| YL | 8.95 | 2.44 | 12.55 | 4.14 | 22.22 | 4.44 |
| XN | 12.43 | 3.39 | 11.22 | 3.70 | 16.13 | 3.23 |
| SZ | 13.97 | 3.81 | 10.03 | 3.31 | 20.42 | 4.08 |
| DT | 33.73 | 9.20 | 37.03 | 12.22 | 43.30 | 8.64 |
| DY | 13.65 | 3.72 | / | / | / | / |
| CS | 16.75 | 4.56 | 14.62 | 4.83 | 20.17 | 4.03 |
| BN | 20.30 | 5.53 | 22.20 | 7.33 | 30.38 | 6.08 |
| ES | 26.27 | 7.16 | 27.57 | 9.10 | 28.65 | 5.73 |
| ML | 23.65 | 6.44 | 16.20 | 5.35 | 33.53 | 6.71 |
| WH | 26.87 | 7.32 | 27.82 | 9.18 | 47.62 | 9.52 |
| PZ | 14.50 | 3.95 | 16.97 | 5.60 | 27.17 | 5.43 |
| Average | 19.20 | 5.23 | 19.60 | 6.48 | 29.00 | 5.79 |
Percent sensitivity and specificity of three methods of kdr allele genetyping
| Genotype | Genotyping methods | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Sequence (n = 100) | Multiple-PCR (n = 100) | TaqMan-MGB (n = 100) | |
| TTG/TTG | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| TTT/TTT | 60.00 | 68.00 | 64.00 |
| TGT/TGT | 4.00 | 2.00 | 4.00 |
| TTG/TTT | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 |
| TTT/TGT | 20.00 | 22.00 | 18.00 |
| TTG/TGT | 6.00 | 2.00 | 8.00 |
| TTT/TTC | 8.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 |
| Sensitivity (%) | / | 94.00 | 98.00 |
| Specificity (%) | / | 94.00 | 100.00 |
Fig. 4Correlation of the R/S values of betamethrim, deltamethrin and permethrim with kdr frequencies and genotypic frequencies. a Correlation between the different kdr allele requencies and R/S value of betamethrin on An. sinensis populations. b Correlation between the different kdr allele requencies and R/S value of deltamethrin on An. sinensis populations. c Correlation between the different kdr allele requencies and R/S value of permethrin on An. sinensis populations
Allelic and genotype kdr frequencies of adult An. sinensis from a susceptible laboratory strain (SS) and those of adult An. sinensis specimens collected at sites in Anhui and Jiangsu provinces, China (see Fig. 1 and Table 1 for site locations)
| Specimen origin | SS | YL | XN | SZ | DT | DY | CS | BN | PZ | ES | ML | WH |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sample size (n) | 50 | 66 | 72 | 48 | 72 | 36 | 49 | 72 | 72 | 72 | 72 | 68 |
| Frequency of | ||||||||||||
| TTG (L1014) | 100 | 33 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 4 |
| TTT/TTC (1014F) | 0 | 74 | 86 | 89 | 87 | 77 | 76 | 87 | 75 | 80 | 81 | 79 |
| TGT (1014C) | 0 | 23 | 14 | 9 | 11 | 23 | 23 | 13 | 24 | 17 | 18 | 17 |
| Frequency of | ||||||||||||
| L/L (TTG/TTG) | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| L/F (TTG/TTT) | 0 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 6 |
| L/C (TTG/TGT) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| F/F (TTT/TTT) | 0 | 48 | 72 | 79 | 75 | 54 | 51 | 73 | 60 | 61 | 65 | 62 |
| C/C (TGT/TGT) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 3 | 1 |
| F/C (TTT/TGT) | 0 | 46 | 28 | 15 | 22 | 46 | 47 | 27 | 30 | 33 | 29 | 28 |
Correlation between KT50 and frequencies of para-kdr gene and genotype
| Insecticides | Genotype | Equation | R2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta-cypermethrim | Y = 31.593Ln(x) + 28.159 | 0.615 | |
| RR-F/F | Y = 27.42Ln(x) + 18.506 | 0.614 | |
| Y = 37.527Ln(x) + 34.491 | 0.62 | ||
| Deltamethrin | Y = 21.585Ln(x) + 37.984 | 0.698 | |
| RR-F/F | Y = 16.767Ln(x) + 30.3498 | 0.624 | |
| Y = 25.758Ln(x) + 46.78 | 0.47 | ||
| Permethrim | Y = 21.585Ln(x) + 37.984 | 0.608 | |
| RR-F/F | Y = 16.767Ln(x) + 30.349 | 0.554 | |
| Y = 25.758Ln(x) + 46.78 | 0.47 |