Allison C Hu1,2,3, Jeffrey T Gu4, Brian J F Wong2,3,5. 1. School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California. 2. Beckman Laser Institute and Medical Clinic, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California. 3. Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California. 4. Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, U.S.A. 5. Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: The objective of this study were to determine if any of the 10 attributes of the standardized letter of recommendation (SLOR) correlate significantly with objective measures of each applicant and to determine whether professor characteristics were associated with reported SLOR attributes. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: We reviewed 339 SLORs from 187 otolaryngology residency applicants. The 10 SLOR attributes were converted into a percentile score and statistically analyzed. RESULTS: All 10 SLOR attributes had a mean ± standard deviation above the 80th percentile (0.82-0.93 ± 0.08-0.52) and negative skewness. United States Medical Licensing Examination step 1 and 2 scores correlated most strongly with match potential (B = 93.1,P < .001 and B = 96.3, P = .002, respectively). Students from top 40 National Institutes of Health-funded institutions had a significant difference in length of relationship with their letter writer (B = -0.51, P = .02) and interpersonal communication skills (B = -12.9, P = .011). Alpha Omega Alpha (AOA) and non-AOA members differed in medical knowledge (B = 21.0, P = .007), research (B = -8.80, P = .036), and commitment to otolaryngology (B = -25.89, P = .020). Total number of research experiences correlated most strongly with medical knowledge (B = -16.55, P = .011). There was a significant difference in means between length of relationship and professorial rank (F[4, 339] = 3.61, P = .023), administrative position (F[5, 339] = 5.43, P = .002), and institution of the letter writer (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the lack of correlation between SLOR attributes and objective measures suggests that the SLOR adds little to the residency application. Professor characteristics were similarly not associated with any of the 10 SLOR attributes; however, there were significant differences in the length of relationship between the professor and students with respect to professor rank, administrative rank, and institution of the letter writer. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA Laryngoscope, 130:603-608, 2020.
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: The objective of this study were to determine if any of the 10 attributes of the standardized letter of recommendation (SLOR) correlate significantly with objective measures of each applicant and to determine whether professor characteristics were associated with reported SLOR attributes. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: We reviewed 339 SLORs from 187 otolaryngology residency applicants. The 10 SLOR attributes were converted into a percentile score and statistically analyzed. RESULTS: All 10 SLOR attributes had a mean ± standard deviation above the 80th percentile (0.82-0.93 ± 0.08-0.52) and negative skewness. United States Medical Licensing Examination step 1 and 2 scores correlated most strongly with match potential (B = 93.1,P < .001 and B = 96.3, P = .002, respectively). Students from top 40 National Institutes of Health-funded institutions had a significant difference in length of relationship with their letter writer (B = -0.51, P = .02) and interpersonal communication skills (B = -12.9, P = .011). Alpha Omega Alpha (AOA) and non-AOA members differed in medical knowledge (B = 21.0, P = .007), research (B = -8.80, P = .036), and commitment to otolaryngology (B = -25.89, P = .020). Total number of research experiences correlated most strongly with medical knowledge (B = -16.55, P = .011). There was a significant difference in means between length of relationship and professorial rank (F[4, 339] = 3.61, P = .023), administrative position (F[5, 339] = 5.43, P = .002), and institution of the letter writer (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the lack of correlation between SLOR attributes and objective measures suggests that the SLOR adds little to the residency application. Professor characteristics were similarly not associated with any of the 10 SLOR attributes; however, there were significant differences in the length of relationship between the professor and students with respect to professor rank, administrative rank, and institution of the letter writer. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA Laryngoscope, 130:603-608, 2020.
Authors: Michael J Feldman; Alexander V Ortiz; Steven G Roth; Robert J Dambrino; Aaron M Yengo-Kahn; Rohan V Chitale; Lola B Chambless Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2021-11-18 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Matthew J Pacana; Zachary T Thier; J Benjamin Jackson; David E Koon; Gregory Grabowski Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2021-08-01 Impact factor: 4.755
Authors: Alice L Tang; Javier J M Howard; Eshita Singh; Meredith E Tabangin; James C Wang; Charles M Myer; Mekibib Altaye; Sarah L Rohde Journal: J Med Educ Curric Dev Date: 2019-12-09