| Literature DB >> 31063116 |
Asish K Mukhopadhyay1, Alok K Deb2, Goutam Chowdhury1, Falguni Debnath2, Prosenjit Samanta1, Rudra Narayan Saha1, Byomkesh Manna3, Mihir K Bhattacharya4, Dharitri Datta4, Keinosuke Okamoto5, Uchhal K Bhadra6, Shanta Dutta1.
Abstract
The Infectious Diseases and Beliaghata General Hospital, Kolkata, India witnessed a sudden increase in admissions of diarrhoea cases during the first 2 weeks of August 2015 following heavy rainfall. This prompted us to investigate the event. Cases were recruited through hospital-based surveillance along with the collection of socio-demographic characteristics and clinical profile using a structured questionnaire. Stool specimens were tested at bacteriological laboratory of the National Institute of Cholera and Enteric Diseases (NICED), Kolkata. Admission of 3003 diarrhoea cases, clearly indicated occurrence of outbreak in Kolkata municipal area as it was more than two standard deviation of the mean number (911; s.d. = 111) of diarrhoea admissions during the same period in previous 7 years. Out of 164 recruited cases, 25% were under-5 children. Organisms were isolated from 80 (49%) stool specimens. Vibrio cholerae O1 was isolated from 50 patients. Twenty-eight patients had this organism as the sole pathogen. Among 14 infants, five had cholera. All V. cholerae O1 isolates were resistant to nalidixic acid, followed by co-trimoxazole (96%), streptomycin (92%), but sensitive to fluroquinolones. We confirmed the occurrence of a cholera outbreak in Kolkata during August 2015 due to V. cholerae O1 infection, where infants were affected.Entities:
Keywords: Cholera; Vibrio cholerae; diarrhoea
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31063116 PMCID: PMC6518531 DOI: 10.1017/S0950268819000529
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Epidemiol Infect ISSN: 0950-2688 Impact factor: 2.451
Fig. 1.Distribution of the number of diarrhoea cases admitted to the ID&BG Hospital, Kolkata during 1–15 August 2015.
Socio-demographic characteristics of the diarrhoea cases
| Socio-demographic characteristics | Distribution ( |
|---|---|
| Age (years) | |
| Mean ± | 28.3 ± 22.5 |
| Median | 26.0 |
| Age groups (years) | |
| <1 | 14 (8.5%) |
| 1 to <5 | 28 (17.1%) |
| 5 to <18 | 17 (10.4%) |
| 18 to <30 | 27 (16.5%) |
| 30 to <50 | 46 (28.1%) |
| ⩾50 | 32 (19.5%) |
| Gender | |
| Male | 92 (56.1%) |
| Female | 72 (43.9%) |
| No. of members in the family | |
| Mean ± | 5.4 ± 1.7 |
| Monthly family income (Rs.) | |
| Mean ± | 9062 ± 2504 |
| Up to Rs. 7500 | 41 (25.0%) |
| Rs. 7501–9000 | 55 (33.5%) |
| Rs. 9001–10 000 | 41 (25.0%) |
| >Rs. 10 000 | 27 (16.5%) |
| Education status (if aged ⩾7 years; | |
| Illiterate | 16 (13.5%) |
| Primary (grades 1–4) | 11 (9.2%) |
| Middle (grades 5–8) | 40 (33.6%) |
| Secondary (grades 9–10) | 30 (25.2%) |
| >Secondary | 22 (18.5%) |
| Occupation of primary earning member in the family | |
| Unskilled labour | 33 (20.1%) |
| Skilled worker | 43 (26.2%) |
| Service (Govt./private) | 61 (37.2%) |
| Business | 27 (16.5%) |
| House type | |
| Pucca | 131 (79.9%) |
| Semi-pucca | 30 (18.3%) |
| Mud house | 3 (1.8%) |
| Source of drinking water | |
| Tap | 157 (95.7%) |
| Tube well | 7 (4.3%) |
Fig. 2.Spot map of Kolkata Municipal Corporation area showing spatial distribution of diarrhoea cases during the outbreak. Green dots indicate culture-confirmed cholera cases whereas the red dots denote diarrhoea with other pathogens.
Clinical characteristics of the diarrhoea cases
| Clinical characteristic | Distribution ( |
|---|---|
| Visited another care provider before attending this hospital | |
| Yes | 114 (69.5%) |
| No | 50 (30.5%) |
| If | |
| Pharmacy | 29 (25.4%) |
| Govt. health facility | 19 (16.7%) |
| Private health facility | 3 (2.6%) |
| Private doctor (allopathic) | 62 (54.4%) |
| Private doctor (homeopathic) | 1 (0.9%) |
| Duration of diarrhoea before admission (hours) | |
| Mean ± | 28.9 ± 17.9 |
| Stool consistency | |
| Watery | 156 (95.1%) |
| Loose | 3 (1.8%) |
| Bloody | 2 (1.2%) |
| Bloody and mucoid | 3 (1.8%) |
| No. of stool passed before admission | |
| Mean ± | 8.6 ± 2.5 |
| Median | 9 |
| Other symptoms associated with diarrhoea | |
| Vomiting | 135 (82.3%) |
| Fever | 42 (25.6%) |
| Abdominal pain | 83 (50.6%) |
| Received antimicrobials before admission | |
| Yes | 69 (42.1%) |
| No | 47 (28.7%) |
| Not sure | 48 (29.3%) |
| Received ORS before admission | |
| Yes | 131 (79.9%) |
| No | 33 (20.1%) |
| Received home available fluid before admission | |
| Yes | 99 (60.4%) |
| No | 65 (39.6%) |
| Dehydration status on admission | |
| Severe | 1 (0.6%) |
| Some | 163 (99.4%) |
| Duration of hospital stay (hours) | |
| Mean ± | 31.5 ± 22.8 |
| Median | 27 |
Fig. 3.Distribution of different enteric bacterial pathogens isolated from the stool specimens (N = 204) during 1–15 August 2015. V. cholerae strains were marked with two different colour codes based on their ctxB genetic status. (a) Indicates the distribution of sole pathogens in diarrhoeal patients and (b) depicts the number of patients infected with different set of mixed pathogens.
Fig. 4.Antibiotic-resistance profile of the V. cholerae isolates (n = 34) during the study period. Different colour codes for sensitive, resistance and intermediate level of resistance were used. Red, blue and yellow colour codes indicate resistant, sensitive and intermediate phenotypes, respectively.
Genetic background and mode of infection of V. cholerae O1 strains isolated in this study
| Total No. of sample screened | Total No. of samples positive for | Sole infection with | Mixed infection along with | No. of | No. of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 204 | 63 | 40 | 23 | 41 | 22 |
*Mixed infection along with V. cholerae O1 includes other pathogens which have been depicted in Figure 3.