Irit Chudner1, Anat Drach-Zahavy2, Hadass Goldblatt2, Margalit Goldfracht1, Khaled Karkabi1,3. 1. The Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel. 2. Department of Nursing, Faculty of Social Welfare and Health Sciences, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel. 3. Department of Family Medicine, Clalit Health Services, Haife, Israel.
Abstract
Introduction: Although some correlates of primary care physicians (PCPs) telemedicine adoption have been studied, little is known about whether the intention to use video-consultations (VCs) relates to how PCPs view their power, relative to other stakeholder groups in primary care. The aim of this study was (1) to describe PCPs', patients', and policy makers' (PMs) views of their power and (2) to explore how PCPs views of power are associated with their intention to use VC. Methods: A convergent parallel mixed-methods design was used. Interviews were conducted with five focus groups that comprised 42 patients; five focus groups with 52 PCPs; and 24 individual interviews with PMs. A total of 508 patients, 311 PCPs, and 141 PMs completed the questionnaire, assessing intention to use VC and stakeholders' relative power. The qualitative data were analyzed using the thematic method; survey data were analyzed using quantitative methods. Results: All stakeholder groups rated PCPs' power as significantly lower, relative to that of patients and managers. PCPs' intention to use telemedicine was found to be significantly related to perceived power gaps between them and patients (r = -0.24, p < 0.001) and between them and managers (r = -0.45, p < 0.001). Themes revealed in the analysis describing how PCPs' low power influences their intention to use VC were as follows: PCPs' low-impact telemedicine-related decisions, increased work overload, "big brother" control, and Health Maintenance Organization demands for telemedicine mandatory usage. Conclusions: To successfully adopt VC, efforts should be made to increase PCPs' relative power, by strengthening their involvement in decision-making procedures and by increasing PCPs' control over their work environment.
Introduction: Although some correlates of primary care physicians (PCPs) telemedicine adoption have been studied, little is known about whether the intention to use video-consultations (VCs) relates to how PCPs view their power, relative to other stakeholder groups in primary care. The aim of this study was (1) to describe PCPs', patients', and policy makers' (PMs) views of their power and (2) to explore how PCPs views of power are associated with their intention to use VC. Methods: A convergent parallel mixed-methods design was used. Interviews were conducted with five focus groups that comprised 42 patients; five focus groups with 52 PCPs; and 24 individual interviews with PMs. A total of 508 patients, 311 PCPs, and 141 PMs completed the questionnaire, assessing intention to use VC and stakeholders' relative power. The qualitative data were analyzed using the thematic method; survey data were analyzed using quantitative methods. Results: All stakeholder groups rated PCPs' power as significantly lower, relative to that of patients and managers. PCPs' intention to use telemedicine was found to be significantly related to perceived power gaps between them and patients (r = -0.24, p < 0.001) and between them and managers (r = -0.45, p < 0.001). Themes revealed in the analysis describing how PCPs' low power influences their intention to use VC were as follows: PCPs' low-impact telemedicine-related decisions, increased work overload, "big brother" control, and Health Maintenance Organization demands for telemedicine mandatory usage. Conclusions: To successfully adopt VC, efforts should be made to increase PCPs' relative power, by strengthening their involvement in decision-making procedures and by increasing PCPs' control over their work environment.
Entities:
Keywords:
PCPs' relative power; intention to use telemedicine; primary care stakeholders; telemedicine; video-consultations
Authors: Phoebe Lindsey Barton; Angela G Brega; Patricia A Devore; Keith Mueller; Marsha J Paulich; Natasha R Floersch; Glenn K Goodrich; Sylvia G Talkington; Jeff Bontrager; Bill Grigsby; Carol Hrincevich; Susannah Neal; Jeff L Loker; Tesfa M Araya; Rachael E Bennett; Neil Krohn; Jim Grigsby Journal: Telemed J E Health Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 3.536
Authors: Isabel de la Torre-Díez; Miguel López-Coronado; Cesar Vaca; Jesús Saez Aguado; Carlos de Castro Journal: Telemed J E Health Date: 2014-12-04 Impact factor: 3.536
Authors: Adam Darkins; Patricia Ryan; Rita Kobb; Linda Foster; Ellen Edmonson; Bonnie Wakefield; Anne E Lancaster Journal: Telemed J E Health Date: 2008-12 Impact factor: 3.536
Authors: Freda Mold; Simon de Lusignan; Aziz Sheikh; Azeem Majeed; Jeremy C Wyatt; Tom Quinn; Mary Cavill; Christina Franco; Umesh Chauhan; Hannah Blakey; Neha Kataria; Theodoros N Arvanitis; Beverley Ellis Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2015-03 Impact factor: 5.386