Literature DB >> 31062523

Cochlear implants for patients with inner ear malformation: Experience in a cohort of 877 surgeries.

Ying Shi1, Yongxin Li1, Yue Gong1, Biao Chen1, Jingyuan Chen1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyse clinical information from a cohort of 877 cochlear implant (CI) surgeries performed in patients with inner ear malformations and report our experience with this procedure.
METHODS: Clinical information on patients with inner ear malformation who underwent CI surgery in our department from January 2010 to April 2017 was analysed.
RESULTS: Seven hundred and fifty-four CI surgeries (86.0%) were uneventful but cerebrospinal fluid gusher occurred during surgery in 118 cases (13.5%). Not including the patients lost to follow-up, postoperative Categories of Auditory Performance (CAP) and Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR) scores were collected from 13 patients with common cavity deformity, 38 with IP-I, 11 with hypoplasia, 13 with IP-III, 285 with IP-II and 43 with cochlear nerve deficiency. The mean CAP scores were 2.55, 3.39, 3.45, 3.77, 3.98, 2.95 and 2.90, and the mean SIR scores were 1.54, 3.68, 3.72, 3.54, 3.80, 2.31 and 2.32. Patients with common cavity deformity who underwent surgery using the traditional facial recess approach or transmastoid slotted labyrinthotomy approach had significantly better post-activation scores on the CAP, SIR and Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale/Infant-Toddler Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale, with no significant differences between the two approaches.
CONCLUSION: The traditional facial recess approach can be successful, and several approaches may be used for electrode insertion and gusher control in patients with a severe deformity, particularly common cavity deformity and IP-III. A gusher was the most common intraoperative finding and occurred most often in patients with IP-III. Careful consideration of the type of electrode used is important.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical experience; cochlear implant; inner ear malformation

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31062523     DOI: 10.1111/coa.13360

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1749-4478            Impact factor:   2.597


  4 in total

Review 1.  Cochlear implantation in common cavity deformity: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ayshah Al-Mahboob; Salman F Alhabib; Yassin Abdelsamad; Farid Alzhrani
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-05-29       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Analysis of Long-Term Cochlear Implantation Outcomes and Correlation With Imaging Characteristics in Patients With Common Cavity Deformity.

Authors:  Lifang Zhang; Biao Chen; Ying Kong; Natalia Liau; Xingmei Wei; Ying Shi; Jingyuan Chen; Mengge Yang; Anandhan Dhanasingh; Yongxin Li
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 4.677

3.  Machine Learning-Based Prediction of the Outcomes of Cochlear Implantation in Patients With Cochlear Nerve Deficiency and Normal Cochlea: A 2-Year Follow-Up of 70 Children.

Authors:  Simeng Lu; Jin Xie; Xingmei Wei; Ying Kong; Biao Chen; Jingyuan Chen; Lifang Zhang; Mengge Yang; Shujin Xue; Ying Shi; Sha Liu; Tianqiu Xu; Ruijuan Dong; Xueqing Chen; Yongxin Li; Haihui Wang
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 5.152

4.  Cochlear Implants for Patients With Common Cavity Deformities and the Impact of Electrode Positioning.

Authors:  Seong Hoon Bae; Jihoon Choi; Jae Young Choi
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-01-22       Impact factor: 3.372

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.