Rilei Yu1,2, Han-Shen Tae3, Qingliang Xu1,2, David J Craik4, David J Adams3, Tao Jiang1,2, Quentin Kaas4. 1. Key Laboratory of Marine Drugs, Chinese Ministry of Education, School of Medicine and Pharmacy, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, China. 2. Laboratory for Marine Drugs and Bioproducts, Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology, Qingdao, China. 3. Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute (IHMRI), University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia. 4. Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The heteromeric α4β2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) is abundant in the human brain and is associated with a range of CNS disorders. This nAChR subtype has been recently crystallised in a conformation that was proposed to represent a desensitised state. Here, we investigated the conformational transition mechanism of this nAChR from a desensitised to a closed/resting state. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: The competitive antagonist dihydro-β-erythroidine (DHβE) was modelled by replacement of the agonist nicotine in the α4β2 nAChR experimental structure. DHβE is used both in vitro and in vivo for its ability to block α4β2 nAChRs. This system was studied by three molecular dynamics simulations with a combined simulation time of 2.6 μs. Electrophysiological studies of mutated receptors were performed to validate the simulation results. KEY RESULTS: The relative positions of the extracellular and transmembrane domains in the models are distinct from those of the desensitised state structure and are compatible with experimental structures of Cys-loop receptors captured in a closed/resting state. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Our model suggests that the side chains of α4 L257 (9') and α4 L264 (16') are the main constrictions in the transmembrane pore. The involvement of position 9' in channel gating is well established, but position 16' was only previously identified as a gate for the bacterial channels, ELIC and GLIC. L257 but not L264 was found to influence the slow component of desensitisation. The structure of the antagonist-bound state proposed here should be valuable for the development of therapeutic or insecticide compounds.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The heteromeric α4β2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) is abundant in the human brain and is associated with a range of CNS disorders. This nAChR subtype has been recently crystallised in a conformation that was proposed to represent a desensitised state. Here, we investigated the conformational transition mechanism of this nAChR from a desensitised to a closed/resting state. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: The competitive antagonist dihydro-β-erythroidine (DHβE) was modelled by replacement of the agonist nicotine in the α4β2 nAChR experimental structure. DHβE is used both in vitro and in vivo for its ability to block α4β2 nAChRs. This system was studied by three molecular dynamics simulations with a combined simulation time of 2.6 μs. Electrophysiological studies of mutated receptors were performed to validate the simulation results. KEY RESULTS: The relative positions of the extracellular and transmembrane domains in the models are distinct from those of the desensitised state structure and are compatible with experimental structures of Cys-loop receptors captured in a closed/resting state. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Our model suggests that the side chains of α4 L257 (9') and α4 L264 (16') are the main constrictions in the transmembrane pore. The involvement of position 9' in channel gating is well established, but position 16' was only previously identified as a gate for the bacterial channels, ELIC and GLIC. L257 but not L264 was found to influence the slow component of desensitisation. The structure of the antagonist-bound state proposed here should be valuable for the development of therapeutic or insecticide compounds.
Authors: David A Case; Thomas E Cheatham; Tom Darden; Holger Gohlke; Ray Luo; Kenneth M Merz; Alexey Onufriev; Carlos Simmerling; Bing Wang; Robert J Woods Journal: J Comput Chem Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 3.376
Authors: F Revah; D Bertrand; J L Galzi; A Devillers-Thiéry; C Mulle; N Hussy; S Bertrand; M Ballivet; J P Changeux Journal: Nature Date: 1991-10-31 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Cecilia Bouzat; Fernanda Gumilar; Guillermo Spitzmaul; Hai-Long Wang; Diego Rayes; Scott B Hansen; Palmer Taylor; Steven M Sine Journal: Nature Date: 2004-08-19 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: D Bertrand; A Devillers-Thiéry; F Revah; J L Galzi; N Hussy; C Mulle; S Bertrand; M Ballivet; J P Changeux Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1992-02-15 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Francis A Acquah; Matthew Paramel; Adama Kuta; Syed R Hussaini; David R Wallace; Blaine H M Mooers Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2021-07-25 Impact factor: 5.923