| Literature DB >> 31061967 |
Seth Capehart1, Brenden J Balcik2, Rosanna Sikora2, Melinda Sharon2, Joseph Minardi2,3.
Abstract
Traumatic hip dislocation in children is relatively rare but presents a true emergency, as a delay in reduction can result in avascular necrosis of the femoral head and long-term morbidity. After sustaining a traumatic posterolateral hip dislocation, a seven-year-old boy presented to an outside facility where no attempt was made at reduction. The patient was transferred to our emergency department (ED) where he was promptly sedated and the dislocation was reduced in a timely manner. Emergency physicians have demonstrated high success rates with dislocation reduction. ED reduction should occur immediately to reduce the likelihood of long-term complications. While timely consultation with a pediatric orthopedist is recommended, that should not delay reduction. The reduction should ideally be performed before the patient leaves the department or is transferred to another facility.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31061967 PMCID: PMC6497190 DOI: 10.5811/cpcem.2019.1.41131
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Pract Cases Emerg Med ISSN: 2474-252X
Image 1Anterioposterior pelvic radiograph demonstrating superior and lateral displacement of the right femoral head relative to the acetabulum (arrow) and internal hip rotation consistent with posterior hip dislocation.
Image 2Post-reduction anterioposterior view of the pelvis demonstrating normal alignment of the right femoral head within the acetabulum (arrow).
Review of techniques for hip dislocation reduction by Gottlieb.11
| Name | Technique | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|---|
| Allis | Provider grasps affected leg with both knee and hip flexed to 90 degrees, applying traction toward the ceiling. | Well-established | Risk of falls and lower back injury to the provider. |
| Bigelow | Provider grasps affected leg with both knee and hip flexed to 90 degrees, applying in-line traction while abducting, externally rotating, and extending the leg. | This technique is no longer recommended. | Risk of falls and lower back injury to the provider. Increased risk of femoral neck fractures. |
| East Baltimore lift | Two providers place their arms underneath the affected knee with their knees bent and their hands on each other’s shoulders. Providers slowly stand up while countertraction is applied to the patient’s ankle. | Strong, controlled upward force and ability to internally and externally rotate the hip | Requires multiple providers. |
| Tulsa/Rochester/Whistler | Provider places the arm underneath the affected knee with the provider’s palm on the flexed, unaffected knee. Using the forearm as a fulcrum, the provider applies downward pressure on the ankle, while internally and externally rotating the hip. | Requires only one provider | Less upward force is possible. Potential injury to the provider’s forearm |
| Flexion adduction | One provider flexes and maximally adducts the affected hip, while the second provider applies manual pressure on the femoral head. | Allows for a controlled, steady reduction attempt | Limited data on efficacy |
| Foot fulcrum | Provider places patient’s foot against his or her inner ankle and places provider’s outer foot against the patient’s femoral head. Provider grasps patient’s flexed knee and leans backward. | Requires only one provider and allows for a controlled, steady reduction attempt | Potential injury to provider’s back and patient’s sciatic nerve if incorrectly performed. Risk of fall injury. |
| Howard | Provider grasps affected leg with both knee and hip flexed to 90 degrees, applying in-line traction, while a second provider applies lateral traction. | Allows for a slow, controlled reduction attempt | Multiple providers are needed. Limited data on efficacy. |
| Lateral traction | Provider grasps affected leg in extension and applies in-line traction, while a second provider applies lateral traction. | Valuable technique when the patient is unable to flex the affected hip | Multiple providers are needed. Limited data on efficacy. |
| Lefkowitz | Provider places his or her knee underneath the affected leg with both knee and hip flexed to 90 degrees. Provider applies a downward force on the patient’s lower leg, using the knee as a fulcrum. | Requires only one provider and allows for a controlled, steady reduction attempt | Potential to injure patient’s knee ligaments. Difficult to provide significant force for the reduction. |
| Captain Morgan | Provider places his or her knee underneath the affected leg with both knee and hip flexed to 90 degrees. Provider plantarflexes ankle to facilitate the reduction. | Requires only one provider and allows for a controlled, steady reduction attempt | May be more difficult in patients with longer legs. |
| Postgraduate Institute (PGI) | Provider gradually flexes knee to 120 degrees of flexion, then abducts to 45 degrees, and finally externally rotates until the hip reduces. | Allows for a controlled, steady reduction attempt and does not require significant force | Limited data, but appears promising. |
| Piggyback/rocket launcher | Provider places patient’s flexed knee over his or her shoulder and rises to a standing position | Requires only one provider and allows for a controlled, steady reduction attempt | Excess pressure on the lower leg can injure the knee ligaments. |
| Skoff | Patient is placed in left lateral decubitus with the leg in 100 degrees of hip flexion, 45 degrees of internal rotation, 45 degrees of adduction, and the knee bent to 90 degrees. In-line traction is applied to the leg, while another provider applies pressure to the greater tuberosity. | Allows for a controlled, steady reduction attempt | Multiple providers are needed. May be difficulty to palpate the greater tuberosity. Limited data on efficacy. |
| Stimson | Patient is placed prone with the affected leg 90 degrees past the end of the gurney. Downward traction is applied by the provider using either the provider’s arm or the provider’s bent knee. | Well-established. Uses gravity to facilitate the reduction | Multiple providers are needed. Difficulty to monitor the patient in the prone position. Potential for the patient to fall off the gurney. |
| Traction–countertraction | Patient is placed in left lateral decubitus with the leg in 100 degrees of hip flexion, 45 degrees of internal rotation, and 45 degrees of adduction. One provider applies posterior traction at the upper thigh, while a second provider applies anterior traction at the lower leg. | Allows for a controlled, steady reduction attempt. The use of bed sheets for traction allows the provider freedom to use his or her hands to facilitate the reduction. | Multiple providers are needed. Limited data on efficacy. |