| Literature DB >> 31061942 |
Hao Chi Zhang1, Bhavtosh Dedania1, Nirav Thosani1.
Abstract
Entities:
Keywords: CBD, common bile duct; CHD, common hepatic duct; EHL, electrohydraulic lithotripsy; LHD, left hepatic duct
Year: 2019 PMID: 31061942 PMCID: PMC6492629 DOI: 10.1016/j.vgie.2019.01.013
Source DB: PubMed Journal: VideoGIE ISSN: 2468-4481
Figure 1Endoscopic and fluoroscopic images related to diagnosis, technique, and outcome. A, Initial cholangiogram demonstrating filling defects in tandem in the common bile duct (CBD) extending to the common hepatic duct and the left hepatic duct, suggesting significant stone burden. B, Fluoroscopic image demonstrating the “J” maneuver involving retroflexion of the tip of the 8-mm endoscope with simultaneous retraction of and rotational maneuvers with the endoscope. C, The tip of the endoscope partially straightened after direct intubation of the CBD. D, High-definition, white-light view of the lumen of the CBD with the upper-endoscope, with submersion in saline solution. E, Significant stone burden in the CBD. F, Direct lithotripsy of the stones in the CBD; however, the aqueous medium, saline solution, which is optimal for electrohydraulic lithotripsy, frequently drained and was difficult to retain in the CBD lumen. G, Use of snare instrument in the CBD to achieve stone disimpaction. H, Outcome of stone extraction, with innumerable stones and stone fragments settling in the duodenum. I, Final occlusion cholangiogram demonstrating no residual filling defects in the biliary tree.