| Literature DB >> 31061932 |
E O Omondi1, R W Mbogo1, L S Luboobi1.
Abstract
The control of HIV demands different interventions for different age groups. In the present manuscript, we formulate and analyze a mathematical compartmental models of HIV transmission within and between two age groups in Kenya. We fitted the model to data using MCMC technique and inferred the parameters. We also estimate the reproduction numbers, namely within age group transmission and between age groups transmission basic reproduction numbers. The analysis of the data revealed that there is significant difference in mean number of new HIV infections between males and females within the two age groups. More, particularly, females are highly infected with HIV as compared to their male counterparts. Calculation of the reproduction numbers within and between age groups provides insights into control that cannot be deduced simply from observations on the prevalence of infection. More specifically, the analysis showed that the per capita rate of HIV transmission was highest when there is interaction between young adults to adults and most HIV infections occurred in adult population. Furthermore, the sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the reproduction numbers depend mainly on the probabilities of infection. This results can be used to guide HIV interventions, condom distribution and antiretroviral therapy. Precisely, the results can be used to educate the young adults on practicing safe sex with their partners in order to contain the occurrence of new infections.Entities:
Keywords: Basic reproduction number; Correlation; Heterosexual transmission (HIV); Kruskal–Wallis test; MCMC; Probability distribution
Year: 2019 PMID: 31061932 PMCID: PMC6488544 DOI: 10.1016/j.idm.2019.04.003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Infect Dis Model ISSN: 2468-0427
Fig. 1Schematic diagram of HIV model in the presence of ART.
Description of the parameters and the initial conditions estimates for the system (5). The parameters are given per month.
| Par/var | Range | Value | Source | Par | Range | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4,148,153–4,552,448 | Est. | 0.0–1.0 | Est. | ||||
| 0–8,000 | Est. | 0.0–1.0 | Est. | ||||
| 0–6,000 | Est. | 0.0–1.0 | Est. | ||||
| 4,147,896–4,567,894 | Est. | 0.0–1.0 | Est. | ||||
| 0–11,000 | Est. | 0.0–1.0 | Est. | ||||
| 0–8,000 | Est. | 0.0–1.0 | Est. | ||||
| 8,460,138–9,641,107 | Est. | 0.0–1.0 | Est. | ||||
| 0–11,000 | Est. | 0.0–1.0 | Est. | ||||
| 0–9,000 | Est. | 0.0–1.0 | Est. | ||||
| 8,624,799–9,799,146 | Est. | 0.0–1.0 | Est. | ||||
| 0–17,000 | Est. | 0.0–1.0 | Est. | ||||
| 0–14,000 | Est. | 0.0–1.0 | Est. | ||||
| 40,000–85,000 | 44,000 | 0.0–1.0 | Est. | ||||
| 0.0–1.0 | 0.48 | 0.0–1.0 | Est. | ||||
| 0.0011–0.0017 | 0.0013 | 0.0–1.0 | Est. | ||||
| 0.0011–0.0017 | 0.00128 | 0.0–1.0 | Est. | ||||
| 1–4 | 3 | Assumed | 1–4 | 3 | Assumed | ||
| 1–4 | 2 | Assumed | 1–4 | 2 | Assumed | ||
| 0.0–1.0 | 0.24 | 0.0–1.0 | 0.58 | ||||
| 0.0–1.0 | 0.28 | 0.0–1.0 | 0.68 | ||||
| 0.0083 |
Descriptive characteristics of the dataset retrieved for the duration spanning from January 2011 to September 2018.
| Age group | Male | Female | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | SE | 95% CI | Mean | SD | SE | 95% CI | |
| 15–24 years | 1336.9 | 1082.4 | 112.2 | [1114.0,1559.8] | 3164.7 | 1891.0 | 196.1 | [2775.3,3554.1] |
| 25 + years | 5319.2 | 2434.3 | 252.4 | [4817.9,5820.5] | 7692.5 | 3597.4 | 373.0 | [6951.9,8433.4] |
| d | 3328.1 | 2741.5 | 201.0 | [2931.5,3724.7] | 5428.6 | 3656.1 | 268.1 | [4899.7,5957.5] |
95% Confidence Interval.
The young adults aged 15–24 years.
The adults aged 25 and over years.
Fig. 2A graph showing the distribution of the average number of new HIV infections in two age groups for males and females. Error bars are 95% confidence intervals.
Shapiro Wilk test for normality of the dataset.
| Age group | Male | Female | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| W | P-value | W | P-value | |
| 15–24 years | 0.8585 | 0.0000 | 0.9549 | 0.0028 |
| 25 + years | 0.9692 | 0.0268 | 0.9600 | 0.0061 |
Fig. 3Density distribution of the dataset.
Pairwise comparisons using Tukey and Kramer (Nemenyi) test. F-15-24 and M-15-24 means the female and male young adults while F-25 + and M-25 + means the female and male adults, respectively. The lower triangles of the matrices respectively contain the and p-values of the pairwise comparisons.
| P-value | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F-15-24 | F-25+ | M-15-24 | F-15-24 | F-25+ | M-15-24 | ||
| F-25+ | 10.978 | F-25+ | 0.0000 | ||||
| M-15-24 | 6.828 | 17.806 | M-15-24 | 0.00001 | 0.0000 | ||
| M-25+ | 6.377 | 4.601 | 13.205 | M-25+ | 0.00004 | 0.006 | 0.0000 |
Fig. 4Model system (5) fitted to data for the reported new cases of HIV infection. 4a shows the model fitted to the data for the young male adults (aged 15–24 years) while 4b shows the model fitted to data for the young female adults (aged 15–24 years). On the other hand 4c shows the model fitted to the data for the male adults (aged 25 + years) while 4d shows the model fitted to data for the female adults (aged 25 + years). The blue dots indicate the actual data and the red line indicates the model fit to the data. All the fitted curves are done with 95% confidence limits.
Fig. 5The projected cases of new HIV infection within the age groups as fitted in Fig. 4.
Estimated variable values from the model fitting to data for the period January 2011 to September 2018.
| Male | Female | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SE | 95% CI | Mean | SE | 95% CI | |
| 4326140 | 1665 | [4325114, 4327166] | 4333384 | 548.6 | [4332309, 4334459] | |
| 180 | 0.4845 | [179.05, 180.95] | 191 | 1.766 | [187.54, 194.46] | |
| 105 | 0.4625 | [104.09, 105.91] | 126 | 0.2417 | [125.53, 126.47] | |
| 9011930 | 1418 | [9009150, 9014710] | 9312839 | 1417 | [9310062, 9315616] | |
| 665 | 1.671 | [661.73, 668.28] | 370 | 0.9102 | [368.22, 371.78] | |
| 144 | 0.4261 | [143.16, 144.84] | 333 | 0.6121 | [331.8, 334.2] | |
95% Confidence Interval.
Estimated parameter values of the system (5) obtained from model fitting for the period January 2011 to September 2018.
| Par | Mean | SE | 95% CI | Par | Mean | SE | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.3743 | 7.8e-4 | [0.3728, 0.3758] | 0.4.01e-3 | 5.0e-6 | [4.0e-3, 4.02e-3] | ||
| 4.2e-5 | 5.33e-8 | [4.23e-5, 4.25e-5] | 0.7451 | 0.0015 | [0.7421, 0.7481] | ||
| 0.1698 | 2.86e-4 | [0.1693, 0.1704] | 2.76e-4 | 4.57e-7 | [2.7e-4, 2.8e-4] | ||
| 1.282e-5 | 8.2e-9 | [1.28e-5, 1.29e-5] | 0.0422 | 1.301e-4 | [0.0419, 0.0425] | ||
| 0.0248 | 7.531e-5 | [0.0246, 0.0250] | 0.2195 | 2.712e-4 | [0.2189, 0.2202] | ||
| 0.0432 | 1.167e-4 | [0.0429, 0.0434] | 0.6256 | 1.0704e-3 | [0.6235, 0.6277] | ||
| 0.0680 | 1.078e-4 | [0.0678, 0.0683] | 5.181e-4 | 1.181e-6 | [5.15e-4, 5.2e-4] | ||
| 5.494e-3 | 1.735e-5 | [5.46e-3, 5.53e-3] | 0.2169 | 2.392e-4 | [0.2165, 0.2174] |
Estimation of young adults transmission reproduction number , adults transmission reproduction number , basic reproduction number between the male young adults and the female adults , basic reproduction number between the female young adults and the male adults and the system (5) basic reproduction number .
| Statistics | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 1.135 | 1.921 | 2.432 | 2.432 |
| Std. error | 0.000035 | 0.00014 | 0.00089 | 0.00089 |
| 95% Confidence Interval | 1.131–1.139 | 1.901–1.941 | 2.397–2.467 | 2.397–2.467 |
Fig. 6Tornado plots showing PRCCs for the different parameter values. 6a and 6b are produced assuming that the HIV infection is localised only the young adults (15–24 years) and adults (15 + years) age groups respectively. On the other hand 6c and 6d are produced assuming that there is interaction between young male adults (15–24 years) and adult females (15 + years) and young female adults (15–24 years) and male adults (15 + years), respectively.