Literature DB >> 31061574

Radiographic appearance of the distal clavicle in relation to the acromion after acromioclavicular joint reconstruction using a braided polyester mesh.

Sven A F Tulner1,2, Andy Fowler2, Kimberley L Edwards3, Vinod Kumar4, Paul Manning2, John M Geoghegan2, William A Wallace2,3.   

Abstract

ACJ stabilization using a braided polyester mesh has become popular in ACJ injuries. However, concerns have been raised about excessive anterior clavicle displacement. The purpose of this study was to report radiographic position of the distal clavicle in relation to the acromion after ACJ reconstruction using this device immediately postoperative and after 6 months follow-up compared with a healthy control group. Thirty-eight patients with ACJ instability treated with a braided polyester mesh were compared within group (pre-/postoperatively) and between groups (with age/sex matched controls). Biplane radiographic measurements by 2 observers were made preoperatively, immediate postoperatively and at 6 months follow-up. Inter-observer reliability was assessed and clinical outcome scores were recorded. ACJ stabilization significantly reduced vertical displacement immediately postoperatively (13.8 ± 4.2 to 3.5 ± 5.5 mm; p < 0.0001) towards controls (1.7 ± 2.3 mm,p < 0.0873). Slight further superior displacement (4.4 mm) occurred at 6 months follow-up compared to immediately postoperative (p = 0.0029) and 6.2 mm more than mean controls (p < 0.0001). In the axial plane, significant early reduction of posterior displacement was achieved (10.3 ± 8.0 to 1.1 ± 5.1 mm,p = 0.0240) and the clavicle settled back to a more posterior position at 4.5 ± 6.7  mm at 6 months post-surgery (p = 0.3062). At both time points, posterior displacement was comparable with the controls (3.4 ± 3.0 mm,p = 0.4371 postoperative, p = 0.563 at 6 months follow-up). Excessive anterior displacement has been observed in 2 of the 5 available axial radiographs early postoperative and in 4 of 14 available axial radiographs at 6 months. Constant, Oxford Shoulder and Nottingham Clavicle scores significantly improved (25 ± 12 to 43 ± 7:p < 0.0001, 46 ± 27 to 80 ± 19:p = 0.0038, 53 ± 14 to 80 ± 17:p < 0.0001). ACJ stabilization using a braided polyester device in ACJ instability is effective at reducing both superior and posterior clavicle displacement with excellent clinical outcome. Overcorrection in the axial plane seems to occur, however this is of no clinical and radiographic significance. Posterior displacement is significantly reduced towards control values at 6 months follow-up.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31061574      PMCID: PMC6492045          DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2019.01.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0976-5662


  15 in total

1.  Acromioclavicular joint reconstruction using the Nottingham Surgilig: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Rajarshi Bhattacharya; Lorna Goodchild; Amar Rangan
Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 0.500

Review 2.  Management of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations: current concepts.

Authors:  Mark Tauber
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 3.067

3.  Biomechanical evaluation of 3 stabilization methods on acromioclavicular joint dislocations.

Authors:  Jakob V Nüchtern; Kay Sellenschloh; Nick Bishop; Sabrina Jauch; Daniel Briem; Michael Hoffmann; Wolfgang Lehmann; Klaus Pueschel; Michael M Morlock; Johannes M Rueger; Lars G Großterlinden
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  Preliminary results of the 'Surgilig' synthetic ligament in the management of chronic acromioclavicular joint disruption.

Authors:  T A Wood; P A E Rosell; J C Clasper
Journal:  J R Army Med Corps       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.285

5.  Biomechanical comparison of coracoclavicular reconstructive techniques.

Authors:  Kristen Thomas; Alan Litsky; Grant Jones; Julie Y Bishop
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 6.  Acromioclavicular joint separations grades I-III: a review of the literature and development of best practice guidelines.

Authors:  Duncan Reid; Kate Polson; Louise Johnson
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 7.  Controversies relating to the management of acromioclavicular joint dislocations.

Authors:  C S Modi; J Beazley; M G Zywiel; T M Lawrence; C J H Veillette
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.082

8.  Is retrospective application of the Oxford Shoulder Score valid?

Authors:  James Wilson; Paul Baker; Amar Rangan
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 3.019

9.  Chronic acromioclavicular separation: the medium term results of coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction using braided polyester prosthetic ligament.

Authors:  In-Ho Jeon; Girish Dewnany; Richard Hartley; Lars Neumann; W Angus Wallace
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2007-09-19       Impact factor: 2.586

10.  Modified Weaver-Dunn procedure versus the use of a synthetic ligament for acromioclavicular joint reconstruction.

Authors:  Vinod Kumar; Sunil Garg; IhabI Elzein; Tom Lawrence; Paul Manning; W Angus Wallace
Journal:  J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong)       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.118

View more
  1 in total

1.  Acromioclavicular joint reconstruction implants have differing ability to restore horizontal and vertical plane stability.

Authors:  Mohamed Alkoheji; Hadi El-Daou; Jillian Lee; Adrian Carlos; Livio Di Mascio; Andrew A Amis
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-08-26       Impact factor: 4.342

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.