Literature DB >> 31061120

Endothelial NMDA receptors mediate activity-dependent brain hemodynamic responses in mice.

Adam D Hogan-Cann1,2, Ping Lu1,2, Christopher M Anderson3,2.   

Abstract

Dynamic coupling of blood supply with energy demand is a natural brain property that requires signaling between synapses and endothelial cells. Our previous work showed that cortical arteriole lumen diameter is regulated by N-methyl-d-aspartate receptors (NMDARs) expressed by brain endothelial cells. The purpose of this study was to determine whether endothelial NMDARs (eNMDARs) regulate functional hyperemia in vivo. In response to whisker stimulation, regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) and hemodynamic responses were assessed in barrel cortex of awake wild-type or eNMDAR loss-of-function mice using two-photon microscopy. Hyperemic enhancement of rCBF and vasodilation throughout the vascular network was observed in wild-type mice. eNMDAR loss of function reduced hyperemic responses in rCBF and plasma flux in individual vessels. Discovery of an endothelial receptor that regulates brain hyperemia provides insight into how neuronal activity couples with endothelial cells.
Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by PNAS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NMDA receptor; endothelium; hyperemia; neurovascular coupling; two-photon microscopy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31061120      PMCID: PMC6535036          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1902647116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


Functional hyperemia ensures that regional brain blood supply matches local metabolic demand and requires local vasodilation in active regions in addition to upstream conduction of vasomotor signals (1). Conducted responses are dependent on endothelial function (1, 2), but signaling between synapses and endothelial cells is poorly understood. N-methyl-d-aspartate receptors (NMDARs) are glutamate-gated, heterotetrameric ion channels composed of seven subunits (GluN1, GluN2A–D, GluN3A/B) (3). NMDARs have been studied extensively in neurons, but they are also expressed by endothelial cells (4). NMDAR activation dilates cerebral arteries ex vivo (5), and arteriolar vasodilation can be mitigated by selective endothelial NMDAR (eNMDAR) loss of function in cortical slices (4). The purpose of the current study was to determine whether eNMDARs regulate regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) and hemodynamic responses in sensory hyperemia in vivo. To study eNMDARs, floxed GluN1 mice (grin1fl/fl, JAX 005246) were crossed with mice expressing Cre-recombinase driven by Tie2 promoter elements (JAX 008863). grin1fl/fl · Cre+/− (Cre+) mice had eNMDAR loss of function, while grin1fl/fl · Cre−/− (Cre−) littermates were used as wild-type controls. Mice (30 to 40 d old) were craniotomized over the barrel cortex through a plastic plate implanted to permit head fixation during imaging. Before imaging by two-photon laser scanning microscopy (TPLSM), mice were injected with FITC-dextran to label plasma. Some mice received intracortical Fluo-4 (Ca2+-sensitive dye) and SR101 (astrocyte label) for monitoring of neuronal activity. Head plates were secured in an air-supported mobile cage on the stage of a Bruker Ultima IV TPLSM instrument, allowing limb locomotion with fixed head. Topological maps of vascular signals were created to a depth of ∼300 μm in layer II/III of the barrel cortex. Mice were subjected to contralateral whisker stimulation using trains of air puffs (10 Hz, 20-ms pulse, 10-s pulse train). Active areas were identified by surface artery dilations, and tracing flow identified penetrating arterioles (0th branch), precapillary arterioles (PCAs) (first order), and capillaries (third order or greater) (Fig. 1). Line scans were used to study individual vessels. Scans parallel to the lumen were acquired sequentially and composited into space–time images that produced red blood cell (RBC) motion streaks along the lumen central axis. These were analyzed using a MATLAB toolbox, and RBC velocity was calculated using the Radon transform method (6). Transecting line scans were used to measure fluorescence intensity across the lumen diameter, which was calculated as the width spanning the 50% maximum points of the outer intensity projection peaks (6). Fig. 1 shows representative responses in penetrating arterioles. Plasma flux was derived mathematically from RBC velocity and lumen diameter (F(t) = v(t) d2(t)) (7).
Fig. 1.

Sensory-evoked hemodynamic responses in awake mice. Head-fixed mice were imaged in an air-supported mobile cage. (A) Cortical vascular network mapping identified distinct vessel subtypes. Line scans allowed calculation of RBC velocity, lumen diameter (B), and plasma flux following whisker stimulation. (C–F) Time to vasodilatory onset and cumulative plasma flux in different vessel subtypes. *P < 0.05 compared with other groups using ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparison test. (G–I) Baseline lumen diameter, RBC velocity, and plasma flux throughout the vascular network. (J) Sensory-evoked neuronal Ca2+ responses in barrel cortex, in grin1fl/fl · Cre−/− and grin1fl/fl · Cre+/− mice. AUC, area under the curve; PenA, penetrating arteriole.

Sensory-evoked hemodynamic responses in awake mice. Head-fixed mice were imaged in an air-supported mobile cage. (A) Cortical vascular network mapping identified distinct vessel subtypes. Line scans allowed calculation of RBC velocity, lumen diameter (B), and plasma flux following whisker stimulation. (C–F) Time to vasodilatory onset and cumulative plasma flux in different vessel subtypes. *P < 0.05 compared with other groups using ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparison test. (G–I) Baseline lumen diameter, RBC velocity, and plasma flux throughout the vascular network. (J) Sensory-evoked neuronal Ca2+ responses in barrel cortex, in grin1fl/fl · Cre−/− and grin1fl/fl · Cre+/− mice. AUC, area under the curve; PenA, penetrating arteriole. In Cre− control mice, all vessel subtypes dilated in response to whisker stimulation, with peak lumen diameter increases of 29 ± 8%, 23 ± 7%, and 28 ± 7% in penetrating arterioles, PCAs, and capillaries, respectively (Fig. 1). Responses in PCAs were faster (50% maximum at 1.9 ± 0.3 s) than in penetrating arterioles (3.2 ± 0.3 s) and capillaries (3.1 ± 0.4 s) (Fig. 1). Capillary plasma flux responses were significantly greater than PCA and penetrating arteriole responses during the 10-s stimulation (Fig. 1 ). The mean, unstimulated lumen diameter of Cre− pial arteries was 21.4 ± 1.8 μm, while penetrating arterioles, PCAs, and capillaries had lumen diameters of 11.4 ± 0.5 μm, 8.7 ± 0.5 μm, and 4.5 ± 0.1 μm, respectively (Fig. 1). Cre+ mice had ∼60% loss of endothelial GluN1 protein (4), but this did not influence baseline tone, RBC velocity, plasma flux (Fig. 1 ), or sensory-evoked neuronal Ca2+ responses (Fig. 1). rCBF was assessed by laser Doppler flowmetry during whisker stimulation. In Cre− mice, rCBF peaked at 25 ± 2% over baseline (Fig. 2). Cre expression mitigated the peak effect (10 ± 1%) and reduced the cumulative response during stimulation by 55 ± 4% (area under the curve). Increased lumen diameter and plasma flux were observed in penetrating arterioles, PCAs, and capillaries (Fig. 2 ). eNMDAR loss of function inhibited responses by more than 50% in each vessel subtype.
Fig. 2.

Endothelial GluN1 silencing impairs functional hyperemia in awake mice. (A) Relative changes in barrel cortical blood flow following whisker stimulation, assessed by laser Doppler flowmetry. (B–D) Evaluation of eNMDAR loss of function (grin1fl/fl · Cre+/−) on peak (left axis and left group of bars) and cumulative [right axis and right group of bars; time-course area under the curve (AUC)] lumen diameter and plasma flux responses in penetrating arterioles, precapillary arterioles, and capillaries (control: grin1fl/fl · Cre−/−). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001 compared with grin1fl/fl · Cre−/− groups using two-tailed t tests.

Endothelial GluN1 silencing impairs functional hyperemia in awake mice. (A) Relative changes in barrel cortical blood flow following whisker stimulation, assessed by laser Doppler flowmetry. (B–D) Evaluation of eNMDAR loss of function (grin1fl/fl · Cre+/−) on peak (left axis and left group of bars) and cumulative [right axis and right group of bars; time-course area under the curve (AUC)] lumen diameter and plasma flux responses in penetrating arterioles, precapillary arterioles, and capillaries (control: grin1fl/fl · Cre−/−). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001 compared with grin1fl/fl · Cre−/− groups using two-tailed t tests. There are several reports that grin1 levels are low in endothelial cells [e.g., refs. 8 and 9], raising the question of how a robust deletion phenotype could be produced. One possibility is that only certain endothelial cell phenotypes have significant grin1. This is supported by a recent finding that two of six brain endothelial cell subtypes identified had grin1 at levels similar to astrocytes (10). It is also important to acknowledge that macrophages express Tie2 and consider the possible contribution of NMDARs in these cells. This is unlikely because perivascular brain macrophages are located in the Virchow–Robin space, between the glia limitans and vascular basement membranes in larger cerebral vessels. We observed hemodynamic effects in smaller vessels, suggesting that macrophages were not required. In addition, studies in Tie2-GFP rodents revealed that Tie2+ macrophages were not associated with brain blood vessels (11) and that Tie2 was absent from the choroid plexus, which is a rich source of resident brain macrophages (12). We previously showed that GluN1 is expressed at basolateral endothelial membranes and that cortical vasodilation is mitigated by eNMDAR loss of function (4). The current results show that eNMDARs regulate activity-dependent CBF responses, in vivo. There is growing recognition that the cerebral endothelium is necessary for hyperemic CBF regulation (1), and that diseases of endothelial dysfunction contribute to cognitive decline (13). Our discovery of an endothelial receptor that regulates hyperemic hemodynamics provides insight into how neuronal activity couples with the cerebral endothelium and attributes a critical regulatory process to a well-known receptor at a unique cellular locus. Animals were used in accordance with the guidelines of the Canadian Council on Animal Care. The University of Manitoba Protocol Management and Review Committee has attested to this compliance by approving our animal use protocol (15-012).
  13 in total

Review 1.  Glutamate receptor ion channels: structure, regulation, and function.

Authors:  Stephen F Traynelis; Lonnie P Wollmuth; Chris J McBain; Frank S Menniti; Katie M Vance; Kevin K Ogden; Kasper B Hansen; Hongjie Yuan; Scott J Myers; Ray Dingledine
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 25.468

2.  Coactivation of NMDA receptors by glutamate and D-serine induces dilation of isolated middle cerebral arteries.

Authors:  Jillian L LeMaistre; Samuel A Sanders; Michael J Stobart; Lingling Lu; J David Knox; Hope D Anderson; Christopher M Anderson
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 6.200

3.  An RNA-sequencing transcriptome and splicing database of glia, neurons, and vascular cells of the cerebral cortex.

Authors:  Ye Zhang; Kenian Chen; Steven A Sloan; Mariko L Bennett; Anja R Scholze; Sean O'Keeffe; Hemali P Phatnani; Paolo Guarnieri; Christine Caneda; Nadine Ruderisch; Shuyun Deng; Shane A Liddelow; Chaolin Zhang; Richard Daneman; Tom Maniatis; Ben A Barres; Jian Qian Wu
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  CHIPS: an Extensible Toolbox for Cellular and Hemodynamic Two-Photon Image Analysis.

Authors:  Matthew J P Barrett; Kim David Ferrari; Jillian L Stobart; Martin Holub; Bruno Weber
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2018-01

5.  Astrocytes drive cortical vasodilatory signaling by activating endothelial NMDA receptors.

Authors:  Lingling Lu; Adam D Hogan-Cann; Andrea K Globa; Ping Lu; James I Nagy; Shernaz X Bamji; Christopher M Anderson
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 6.200

Review 6.  The Neurovascular Unit Coming of Age: A Journey through Neurovascular Coupling in Health and Disease.

Authors:  Costantino Iadecola
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  Vascular endothelium-selective gene induction by Tie2 promoter/enhancer in the brain and retina of a transgenic rat.

Authors:  Sumio Ohtsuki; Naoko Kamiya; Satoko Hori; Tetsuya Terasaki
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2005-06-08       Impact factor: 4.200

8.  Active dilation of penetrating arterioles restores red blood cell flux to penumbral neocortex after focal stroke.

Authors:  Andy Y Shih; Beth Friedman; Patrick J Drew; Philbert S Tsai; Patrick D Lyden; David Kleinfeld
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2009-01-28       Impact factor: 6.200

9.  A critical role for the vascular endothelium in functional neurovascular coupling in the brain.

Authors:  Brenda R Chen; Mariel G Kozberg; Matthew B Bouchard; Mohammed A Shaik; Elizabeth M C Hillman
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 5.501

10.  Capillary K+-sensing initiates retrograde hyperpolarization to increase local cerebral blood flow.

Authors:  Thomas A Longden; Fabrice Dabertrand; Masayo Koide; Albert L Gonzales; Nathan R Tykocki; Joseph E Brayden; David Hill-Eubanks; Mark T Nelson
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  23 in total

1.  Structure and Function of the Blood-Brain Barrier (BBB).

Authors:  Fabienne Benz; Stefan Liebner
Journal:  Handb Exp Pharmacol       Date:  2022

2.  tPA-NMDAR Signaling Blockade Reduces the Incidence of Intracerebral Aneurysms.

Authors:  Estelle R Louet; Martina Glavan; Cyrille Orset; Jerome Parcq; Daniel F Hanley; Denis Vivien
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 6.829

Review 3.  Cells of the Blood-Brain Barrier: An Overview of the Neurovascular Unit in Health and Disease.

Authors:  Heather L McConnell; Anusha Mishra
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

Review 4.  Targetability of the neurovascular unit in inflammatory diseases of the central nervous system.

Authors:  Brandon C Smith; Rachel A Tinkey; Benjamin C Shaw; Jessica L Williams
Journal:  Immunol Rev       Date:  2022-07-31       Impact factor: 10.983

5.  Amyloid-β disrupts unitary calcium entry through endothelial NMDA receptors in mouse cerebral arteries.

Authors:  Emily C Peters; Michael T Gee; Lukas N Pawlowski; Allison M Kath; Felipe D Polk; Christopher J Vance; Juliana L Sacoman; Paulo W Pires
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2021-08-31       Impact factor: 6.960

Review 6.  Neuronal regulation of the blood-brain barrier and neurovascular coupling.

Authors:  Luke Kaplan; Brian W Chow; Chenghua Gu
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 7.  Regulation of cerebral blood flow in humans: physiology and clinical implications of autoregulation.

Authors:  Jurgen A H R Claassen; Dick H J Thijssen; Ronney B Panerai; Frank M Faraci
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 37.312

8.  Precapillary sphincters and pericytes at first-order capillaries as key regulators for brain capillary perfusion.

Authors:  Stefan Andreas Zambach; Changsi Cai; Hans Christian Cederberg Helms; Bjørn Olav Hald; Yiqiu Dong; Jonas Christoffer Fordsmann; Reena Murmu Nielsen; Jingshi Hu; Micael Lønstrup; Birger Brodin; Martin Johannes Lauritzen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  More than just summed neuronal activity: how multiple cell types shape the BOLD response.

Authors:  Clare Howarth; Anusha Mishra; Catherine N Hall
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Neurovascular coupling and oxygenation are decreased in hippocampus compared to neocortex because of microvascular differences.

Authors:  L Bell; K Boyd; D M Grijseels; K Shaw; D Clarke; O Bonnar; H S Crombag; C N Hall
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.