Lisa Dolovich1, Doug Oliver2, Larkin Lamarche2, Lehana Thabane2, Ruta Valaitis2, Gina Agarwal2, Tracey Carr2, Gary Foster2, Lauren Griffith2, Dena Javadi2, Monika Kastner2, Dee Mangin2, Alexandra Papaioannou2, Jenny Ploeg2, Parminder Raina2, Julie Richardson2, Cathy Risdon2, Pasqualina Santaguida2, Sharon Straus2, David Price2. 1. Departments of Family Medicine (Dolovich, Oliver, Lamarche, Agarwal, Carr, Javadi, Mangin, Risdon, Price), Medicine (Papaioannou), and Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact (Thabane, Foster, Griffith, Raina, Santaguida, Papaioannou), McMaster Institute for Research on Aging (Raina), Schools of Rehabilitation Science (Richardson) and of Nursing (Valaitis, Ploeg), McMaster University; Hamilton Health Sciences (Price), Hamilton, Ont.; Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy (Dolovich); University of Toronto; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Kastner), Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto; Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael's Hospital (Straus), Toronto, Ont. lisa.dolovich@utoronto.ca. 2. Departments of Family Medicine (Dolovich, Oliver, Lamarche, Agarwal, Carr, Javadi, Mangin, Risdon, Price), Medicine (Papaioannou), and Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact (Thabane, Foster, Griffith, Raina, Santaguida, Papaioannou), McMaster Institute for Research on Aging (Raina), Schools of Rehabilitation Science (Richardson) and of Nursing (Valaitis, Ploeg), McMaster University; Hamilton Health Sciences (Price), Hamilton, Ont.; Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy (Dolovich); University of Toronto; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Kastner), Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto; Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael's Hospital (Straus), Toronto, Ont.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Health TAPESTRY (Health Teams Advancing Patient Experience: STRengthening QualitY) intervention was designed to improve primary care teamwork and promote optimal aging. We evaluated the effectiveness of Health TAPESTRY in attaining goals of older adults (e.g., physical activity, productivity, social connection, medical status) and other outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a pragmatic randomized controlled trial between January and October 2015 in a primary care practice in Hamilton, Ontario. Older adults were randomized (1:1) to Health TAPESTRY (n = 158) or control (n = 154). Trained community volunteers gathered information on people's goals, needs and risks in their homes, using electronic forms. Interprofessional primary care teams reviewed summaries and addressed issues. Participants reported goal attainment (primary outcome), self-efficacy, quality of life, optimal aging, social support, empowerment, physical activity, falls, and access to and comprehensiveness of the health system. We determined use of health care resources through chart audit. RESULTS: There were no differences between groups in goal attainment or many other patient-reported outcome and experience assessments at 6 months. More primary care visits took place in the intervention versus control group over 6 months (mean ± standard deviation [SD] 4.93 ± 3.86 v. 3.50 ± 3.53; difference of 1.52 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.84 to 2.19]). The odds of having 1 or more hospital admission were lower for the intervention group (odds ratio [OR] 0.44 [95% CI 0.20 to 0.95]). INTERPRETATION: Health TAPESTRY did not improve the primary outcome of goal attainment but showed signals of shifting care from reactive to active preventive care. Further evaluation will help in understanding effective components, costs and consequences of the intervention. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, no. NCT02283723.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The Health TAPESTRY (Health Teams Advancing Patient Experience: STRengthening QualitY) intervention was designed to improve primary care teamwork and promote optimal aging. We evaluated the effectiveness of Health TAPESTRY in attaining goals of older adults (e.g., physical activity, productivity, social connection, medical status) and other outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a pragmatic randomized controlled trial between January and October 2015 in a primary care practice in Hamilton, Ontario. Older adults were randomized (1:1) to Health TAPESTRY (n = 158) or control (n = 154). Trained community volunteers gathered information on people's goals, needs and risks in their homes, using electronic forms. Interprofessional primary care teams reviewed summaries and addressed issues. Participants reported goal attainment (primary outcome), self-efficacy, quality of life, optimal aging, social support, empowerment, physical activity, falls, and access to and comprehensiveness of the health system. We determined use of health care resources through chart audit. RESULTS: There were no differences between groups in goal attainment or many other patient-reported outcome and experience assessments at 6 months. More primary care visits took place in the intervention versus control group over 6 months (mean ± standard deviation [SD] 4.93 ± 3.86 v. 3.50 ± 3.53; difference of 1.52 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.84 to 2.19]). The odds of having 1 or more hospital admission were lower for the intervention group (odds ratio [OR] 0.44 [95% CI 0.20 to 0.95]). INTERPRETATION: Health TAPESTRY did not improve the primary outcome of goal attainment but showed signals of shifting care from reactive to active preventive care. Further evaluation will help in understanding effective components, costs and consequences of the intervention. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, no. NCT02283723.
Authors: David E Bloom; Somnath Chatterji; Paul Kowal; Peter Lloyd-Sherlock; Martin McKee; Bernd Rechel; Larry Rosenberg; James P Smith Journal: Lancet Date: 2014-11-06 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Robert Briggs; Anna McDonough; Graham Ellis; Kathleen Bennett; Desmond O'Neill; David Robinson Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2022-05-06
Authors: Ignatios Ioakeim-Skoufa; Beatriz Poblador-Plou; Jonás Carmona-Pírez; Jesús Díez-Manglano; Rokas Navickas; Luis Andrés Gimeno-Feliu; Francisca González-Rubio; Elena Jureviciene; Laimis Dambrauskas; Alexandra Prados-Torres; Antonio Gimeno-Miguel Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-06-14 Impact factor: 3.390