| Literature DB >> 31061024 |
George M Watson1, Christina W Chan1, Laura Belluscio2, Kit Doudney3, Cameron J Lacey4, Martin A Kennedy5, Paul Bridgman1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: In takotsubo syndrome, QTc prolongation is a measure of risk of potentially fatal arrhythmia. It is not known how this risk, or derangement of other markers, differs across the echo variants of takotsubo syndrome. Therefore, we sought to explore whether apical takotsubo syndrome differs from the variants of the syndrome in more ways than just regional wall motion pattern. As the region of affected myocardium is usually larger, we hypothesised that patients with the classic apical ballooning form of takotsubo syndrome would have more severe derangement of their markers.Entities:
Keywords: cardiomyopathy; echocardiography; heart failure; takotsubo
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31061024 PMCID: PMC6502030 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025253
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMJ Open ISSN: 2044-6055 Impact factor: 2.692
Figure 1Comparison of age for patients with apical takotsubo versus variant pattern. The horizontal line in the middle of the box represents the median of each group, while the diamonds represent the mean. The box upper and lower bounds represent the upper and lower quartiles, respectively. The whiskers represent the minimum and maximum values excluding those that are 1.5×IQR away from the median (circles). *P=0.011.
Comparison of LVEF, hsTnI and ECG measures between apical and variant takotsubo
| Apical takotsubo | Variant takotsubo | P value | |
| Initial LVEF (%) | 36.67 (SEM 0.69) | 43.52 (SEM 1.60) | <0.0001 |
| Peak hsTnI (ng/L) | 2308 (1244–3936) | 1638 (289–2441) | 0.01 |
| Heart rate (bpm) | 79 (70–94) | 76 (66–95) | 0.18 |
| PR interval (ms) | 166 (150–178) | 165 (143–180) | 0.49 |
| QRS duration (ms) | 88 (82–100) | 88 (80–96) | 0.90 |
| QTc interval (ms) | 465 (434–490) | 459 (433–484) | 0.93 |
| T-wave axis | 75 (54–106.5) | 76 (52–98) | 0.95 |
All ECG variables are as at presentation. LVEF is mean and SE, and other data are median and IQR.
hsTnI, high-sensitivity troponin I; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; SEM, standard error of the mean.
Associations between LVEF, peak hsTnI and peak QTc
| Correlation coefficient | P value | |
| Peak hsTnI versus LVEF | −0.091 | 0.0609 |
| Peak hsTnI versus peak QTc | −0.022 | 0.6498 |
| Peak QTc versus LVEF | −0.097 | 0.0457 |
hsTnI, high-sensitivity troponin I; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction.
Figure 2Scatter plot showing the correlation between peak QTc interval and LVEF. LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction.
Figure 3Change in hsTnI and QTc interval over time after admission. hsTnI, high-sensitivity troponin I.