Literature DB >> 31060979

Guadecitabine (SGI-110) in patients with intermediate or high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes: phase 2 results from a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 1/2 trial.

Guillermo Garcia-Manero1, Gail Roboz2, Katherine Walsh3, Hagop Kantarjian4, Ellen Ritchie2, Patricia Kropf5, Casey O'Connell6, Raoul Tibes7, Scott Lunin8, Todd Rosenblat9, Karen Yee10, Wendy Stock11, Elizabeth Griffiths12, Joseph Mace13, Nikolai Podoltsev14, Jesus Berdeja15, Elias Jabbour4, Jean-Pierre J Issa16, Yong Hao17, Harold N Keer17, Mohammad Azab17, Michael R Savona18.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Guadecitabine is a next-generation hypomethylating agent whose active metabolite decitabine has a longer in-vivo exposure time than intravenous decitabine. More effective hypomethylating agents are needed for the treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes. In the present study, we aimed to compare the activity and safety of two doses of guadecitabine in hypomethylating agent treatment-naive or relapsed or refractory patients with intermediate-risk or high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes.
METHODS: This phase 2 part of the phase 1/2, randomised, open-label study enrolled patients aged 18 years or older from 14 North American medical centres with International Prognostic Scoring System intermediate-1-risk, intermediate-2-risk, or high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes, or chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia. They were either hypomethylating agent treatment-naive or had relapsed or refractory disease after previous hypomethylating agent treatment as determined by the investigators' judgment. Eligible patients had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) using a computer algorithm for dynamic randomisation to subcutaneous guadecitabine 60 or 90 mg/m2 on days 1-5 of a 28-day treatment cycle. Treatment was stratified by previous treatment with hypomethylating agents and neither patients nor investigators were masked. The primary endpoint was overall response (a composite of complete response, partial response, marrow complete response, and haematological improvement) assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01261312.
FINDINGS: Between July 9, 2012, and April 7, 2014, 105 patients were enrolled: 55 (52%) were allocated to guadecitabine 60 mg/m2 (28 patients were treatment-naive and 27 had relapsed or refractory disease after previous hypomethylating agent treatment) and 50 (48%) patients to 90 mg/m2 (23 patients were treatment-naive and 27 had relapsed or refractory disease). Three (3%) patients of 105 did not receive study treatment and were excluded from analyses. Median follow-up was 3·2 years (IQR 2·8-3·5). The proportion of patients achieving an overall response did not significantly differ between dose groups (21 of 53 [40%, 95% CI 27-54] with 60 mg/m2 and 27 of 49 [55%, 95% CI 40-69] with 90 mg/m2; p=0·16). 25 of 49 (51%, 95% CI 36-66) patients who were treatment-naive and 23 of 53 (43%, 30-58) patients with relapsed or refractory disease achieved an overall response. The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events in both groups, regardless of relationship to treatment, were thrombocytopenia (22 [41%] of 53 patients in the 60 mg/m2 group and 28 [57%] of 49 in the 90 mg/m2 group), neutropaenia (21 [40%] and 25 [51%]), anaemia (25 [47%] and 24 [49%]), febrile neutropaenia (17 [32%] and 21 [43%]), and pneumonia (13 [25%] and 15 [31%]). Seven (7%) of 102 patients died due to adverse events (three with 90 mg/m2 and four with 60 mg/m2), and all except one were in the relapsed or refractory cohort. Two deaths were deemed treatment related (septic shock with 60 mg/m2; pneumonia with 90 mg/m2).
INTERPRETATION: Guadecitabine was clinically active with acceptable tolerability in patients with intermediate-risk and high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes. Responses and overall survival in the relapsed or refractory cohort offer the potential of a new therapeutic option for patients for whom currently available hypomethylating agents are not successful. We therefore recommend guadecitabine at a dose of 60 mg/m2 on a 5-day schedule for these patients. FUNDING: Astex Pharmaceuticals and Stand Up To Cancer.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31060979      PMCID: PMC9012213          DOI: 10.1016/S2352-3026(19)30029-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Haematol        ISSN: 2352-3026            Impact factor:   18.959


  25 in total

1.  A simple method for estimating global DNA methylation using bisulfite PCR of repetitive DNA elements.

Authors:  Allen S Yang; Marcos R H Estécio; Ketan Doshi; Yutaka Kondo; Eloiza H Tajara; Jean-Pierre J Issa
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-02-18       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  S110, a 5-Aza-2'-deoxycytidine-containing dinucleotide, is an effective DNA methylation inhibitor in vivo and can reduce tumor growth.

Authors:  Jody C Chuang; Steven L Warner; David Vollmer; Hariprasad Vankayalapati; Sanjeev Redkar; David J Bearss; Xiangning Qiu; Christine B Yoo; Peter A Jones
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2010-05-04       Impact factor: 6.261

3.  Safety and tolerability of guadecitabine (SGI-110) in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukaemia: a multicentre, randomised, dose-escalation phase 1 study.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre J Issa; Gail Roboz; David Rizzieri; Elias Jabbour; Wendy Stock; Casey O'Connell; Karen Yee; Raoul Tibes; Elizabeth A Griffiths; Katherine Walsh; Naval Daver; Woonbok Chung; Sue Naim; Pietro Taverna; Aram Oganesian; Yong Hao; James N Lowder; Mohammad Azab; Hagop Kantarjian
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 4.  Myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  Ayalew Tefferi; James W Vardiman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Revised international prognostic scoring system for myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  Peter L Greenberg; Heinz Tuechler; Julie Schanz; Guillermo Sanz; Guillermo Garcia-Manero; Francesc Solé; John M Bennett; David Bowen; Pierre Fenaux; Francois Dreyfus; Hagop Kantarjian; Andrea Kuendgen; Alessandro Levis; Luca Malcovati; Mario Cazzola; Jaroslav Cermak; Christa Fonatsch; Michelle M Le Beau; Marilyn L Slovak; Otto Krieger; Michael Luebbert; Jaroslaw Maciejewski; Silvia M M Magalhaes; Yasushi Miyazaki; Michael Pfeilstöcker; Mikkael Sekeres; Wolfgang R Sperr; Reinhard Stauder; Sudhir Tauro; Peter Valent; Teresa Vallespi; Arjan A van de Loosdrecht; Ulrich Germing; Detlef Haase
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 6.  The genetics of myelodysplastic syndrome: from clonal haematopoiesis to secondary leukaemia.

Authors:  Adam S Sperling; Christopher J Gibson; Benjamin L Ebert
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 60.716

7.  Approval summary: azacitidine for treatment of myelodysplastic syndrome subtypes.

Authors:  Edvardas Kaminskas; Ann Farrell; Sophia Abraham; Amy Baird; Li-Shan Hsieh; Shwu-Luan Lee; John K Leighton; Hasmukh Patel; Atiqur Rahman; Rajeshwara Sridhara; Yong-Cheng Wang; Richard Pazdur
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2005-05-15       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  Efficacy of azacitidine compared with that of conventional care regimens in the treatment of higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes: a randomised, open-label, phase III study.

Authors:  Pierre Fenaux; Ghulam J Mufti; Eva Hellstrom-Lindberg; Valeria Santini; Carlo Finelli; Aristoteles Giagounidis; Robert Schoch; Norbert Gattermann; Guillermo Sanz; Alan List; Steven D Gore; John F Seymour; John M Bennett; John Byrd; Jay Backstrom; Linda Zimmerman; David McKenzie; Cl Beach; Lewis R Silverman
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2009-02-21       Impact factor: 41.316

9.  Decitabine improves patient outcomes in myelodysplastic syndromes: results of a phase III randomized study.

Authors:  Hagop Kantarjian; Jean-Pierre J Issa; Craig S Rosenfeld; John M Bennett; Maher Albitar; John DiPersio; Virginia Klimek; James Slack; Carlos de Castro; Farhad Ravandi; Richard Helmer; Lanlan Shen; Stephen D Nimer; Richard Leavitt; Azra Raza; Hussain Saba
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2006-04-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Rigosertib versus best supportive care for patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes after failure of hypomethylating drugs (ONTIME): a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial.

Authors:  Guillermo Garcia-Manero; Pierre Fenaux; Aref Al-Kali; Maria R Baer; Mikkael A Sekeres; Gail J Roboz; Gianluca Gaidano; Bart L Scott; Peter Greenberg; Uwe Platzbecker; David P Steensma; Suman Kambhampati; Karl-Anton Kreuzer; Lucy A Godley; Ehab Atallah; Robert Collins; Hagop Kantarjian; Elias Jabbour; Francois E Wilhelm; Nozar Azarnia; Lewis R Silverman
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 41.316

View more
  21 in total

Review 1.  Treatment advances for pediatric and adult onset neoplasms with monocytosis.

Authors:  Kristen B McCullough; Alexis K Kuhn; Mrinal M Patnaik
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 3.952

Review 2.  Following in the footsteps of acute myeloid leukemia: are we witnessing the start of a therapeutic revolution for higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes?

Authors:  Jan Philipp Bewersdorf; Amer M Zeidan
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2020-05-18

3.  Existing agents, novel agents, or transplantation for high-risk MDS.

Authors:  Bart L Scott
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2020-12-04

4.  Baseline and serial molecular profiling predicts outcomes with hypomethylating agents in myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  Anthony M Hunter; Rami S Komrokji; Seongseok Yun; Najla Al Ali; Onyee Chan; Jinming Song; Mohammad Hussaini; Chetasi Talati; Kendra L Sweet; Jeffrey E Lancet; Eric Padron; Alan F List; David A Sallman
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2021-02-23

Review 5.  DNA methyltransferase inhibitors combination therapy for the treatment of solid tumor: mechanism and clinical application.

Authors:  Chunhong Hu; Xiaohan Liu; Yue Zeng; Junqi Liu; Fang Wu
Journal:  Clin Epigenetics       Date:  2021-08-27       Impact factor: 6.551

Review 6.  Cancer Epigenomics and Beyond: Advancing the Precision Oncology Paradigm.

Authors:  Daniel Y Lee
Journal:  J Immunother Precis Oncol       Date:  2020-10-07

Review 7.  Increasing recognition and emerging therapies argue for dedicated clinical trials in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia.

Authors:  Aline Renneville; Mrinal M Patnaik; Onyee Chan; Eric Padron; Eric Solary
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 8.  Hypomethylating agents (HMA) for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes: mechanisms of resistance and novel HMA-based therapies.

Authors:  Julia Stomper; John Charles Rotondo; Gabriele Greve; Michael Lübbert
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 9.  Epigenetic Therapies for Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Their Immune-Related Effects.

Authors:  Valentina Gambacorta; Daniela Gnani; Luca Vago; Raffaella Di Micco
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2019-10-11

Review 10.  DNA Methylation as a Therapeutic Target for Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Sandra P Nunes; Rui Henrique; Carmen Jerónimo; Jesús M Paramio
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 6.600

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.