| Literature DB >> 31060925 |
Roberto Salgado1, David B Solit2, David L Rimm3, Jan Bogaerts4, Renzo Canetta5, Tracy Lively6, Kim Lyerly7, Paul N Span8, Alison Bateman-House9, Amr Makady10, L Bergmann11, Sumimasa Nagai12, Chris Smith13, Mark Robson2, Mary Savage14, Emile Voest15, Christopher Sweeney16, Philippe Lambin17, Marlene Thomas18, Lyndsay Harris6, Denis Lacombe4, Chistophe Massard19.
Abstract
Academic, industry, regulatory leaders and patient advocates in cancer clinical research met in November 2018 at the Innovation and Biomarkers in Cancer Drug Development meeting in Brussels to address the existing dichotomy between increasing calls for personalised oncology approaches based on individual molecular profiles and the need to make resource and regulatory decisions at the societal level in differing health-care delivery systems around the globe. Novel clinical trial designs, the utility and limitations of real-world evidence (RWE) and emerging technologies for profiling patient tumours and tumour-derived DNA in plasma were discussed. While randomised clinical trials remain the gold standard approach to defining clinical utility of local and systemic therapeutic interventions, the broader adoption of comprehensive tumour profiling and novel trial designs coupled with RWE may allow patient and physician autonomy to be appropriately balanced with broader assessments of safety and overall societal benefit.Entities:
Keywords: Biomarkers; Clinical trials; Evidence-driven optimal health-care delivery; Health technology assessment; Molecular and immunologic profiling
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31060925 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.03.025
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Cancer ISSN: 0959-8049 Impact factor: 9.162