Literature DB >> 31060461

Balancing Effort and Rewards at University: Implications for Physical Health, Mental Health, and Academic Outcomes.

Brad Hodge1, Brad Wright1, Pauleen Bennett1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The effort-reward imbalance model suggests that, when the efforts required within the workplace are disproportionately large in comparison to the rewards resulting from those efforts, there is an increased risk of stress-related health issues. The model posits that higher levels of "overcommitment," in addition to a high effort-reward imbalance ratio, magnifies this risk of ill-health. While work has been conducted to assess the validity of this model within the school setting, research in the higher education sector is limited.
OBJECTIVES: This study explored the validity of the effort-reward imbalance model for explaining burnout, poor health, and academic productivity among university students. DESIGN AND METHODS: This study utilized a cross-sectional survey of Australian university students (n = 395) from a range of universities.
RESULTS: An imbalance of effort and reward was associated with poorer physical health, increased burnout, and reduced productivity. Effort-reward imbalance mediated a relationship between overcommitment and burnout; those high in overcommitment were more likely to experience an imbalance of effort and reward at university.
CONCLUSION: The relationships between effort-reward imbalance, health, burnout, and academic productivity support the generalizability of this model to the university setting. In addition, the personal characteristic of overcommitment also appears to have an important relationship with burnout.

Keywords:  Burnout; achievement goals; effort–reward imbalance; higher education; student

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31060461     DOI: 10.1177/0033294119841845

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Rep        ISSN: 0033-2941


  1 in total

1.  Gender moderates the association between chronic academic stress with top-down and bottom-up attention.

Authors:  Bradley J Wright; Kira-Elise Wilson; Michael Kingsley; Paul Maruff; Jian Li; Johannes Siegrist; Ben Horan
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 2.199

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.