Literature DB >> 31060368

The clinical spectrum of reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome: The Italian Project on Stroke at Young Age (IPSYS).

Filomena Caria1, Marialuisa Zedde2, Massimo Gamba3, Anna Bersano4, Maurizia Rasura5, Alessandro Adami6, Carlo Piantadosi7, Luca Quartuccio8, Cristiano Azzini9, Maurizio Melis10, Maria Luisa Delodovici11, Carlo Dallocchio12, Carlo Gandolfo13, Paolo Cerrato14, Cristina Motto15, Fabio Melis16, Alberto Chiti17, Mauro Gentile18, Valeria Bignamini19, Andrea Morotti20, Enrico Maria Lotti21, Antonella Toriello22, Paolo Costa23, Giorgio Silvestrelli24, Andrea Zini25, Valeria De Giuli1, Loris Poli1, Maurizio Paciaroni26, Corrado Lodigiani27, Simona Marcheselli28, Sandro Sanguigni29, Massimo Del Sette30, Serena Monaco31, Piergiorgio Lochner32, Carla Zanferrari33, Sabrina Anticoli34, Alessandro Padovani1, Alessandro Pezzini1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: To describe clinical, neuroimaging, and laboratory features of a large cohort of Italian patients with reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome.
METHODS: In the setting of the multicenter Italian Project on Stroke at Young Age (IPSYS), we retrospectively enrolled patients with a diagnosis of definite reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome according to the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD)-3 beta criteria (6.7.3 Headache attributed to reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome, imaging-proven). Clinical manifestations, neuroimaging, treatment, and clinical outcomes were evaluated in all patients. Characteristics of reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome without typical causes ("idiopathic reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome") were compared with those of reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome related to putative causative factors ("secondary reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome").
RESULTS: A total of 102 patients (mean age, 47.2 ± 13.9 years; females, 85 [83.3%]) qualified for the analysis. Thunderclap headache at presentation was reported in 69 (67.6%) patients, and it typically recurred in 42 (60.9%). Compared to reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome cases related to putative etiologic conditions (n = 21 [20.6%]), patients with idiopathic reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (n = 81 [79.4%]) were significantly older (49.2 ± 13.9 vs. 39.5 ± 11.4 years), had more frequently typical thunderclap headache (77.8% vs. 28.6%) and less frequently neurological complications (epileptic seizures, 11.1% vs. 38.1%; cerebral infarction, 6.1% vs. 33.3%), as well as concomitant reversible brain edema (25.9% vs. 47.6%).
CONCLUSIONS: Clinical manifestations and putative etiologies of reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome in our series are slightly different from those observed in previous cohorts. This variability might be partly related to the coexistence of precipitating conditions with a putative etiologic role on disease occurrence.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS); stroke; thunderclap headache

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31060368     DOI: 10.1177/0333102419849013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cephalalgia        ISSN: 0333-1024            Impact factor:   6.292


  8 in total

Review 1.  Heritable and non-heritable uncommon causes of stroke.

Authors:  A Bersano; M Kraemer; A Burlina; M Mancuso; J Finsterer; S Sacco; C Salvarani; L Caputi; H Chabriat; S Lesnik Oberstein; A Federico; E Tournier Lasserve; D Hunt; M Dichgans; M Arnold; S Debette; H S Markus
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  Quantifying Intra-Arterial Verapamil Response as a Diagnostic Tool for Reversible Cerebral Vasoconstriction Syndrome.

Authors:  J M Sequeiros; J A Roa; R P Sabotin; S Dandapat; S Ortega-Gutierrez; E C Leira; C P Derdeyn; G Bathla; D M Hasan; E A Samaniego
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Early Risk of Readmission Following Hospitalization for Reversible Cerebral Vasoconstriction Syndrome.

Authors:  Aayushi Garg; Matthew Starr; Marcelo Rocha; Santiago Ortega-Gutierrez
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 4.  Vessel Wall Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Cerebrovascular Diseases.

Authors:  Federico Mazzacane; Valentina Mazzoleni; Elisa Scola; Sara Mancini; Ivano Lombardo; Giorgio Busto; Elisa Rognone; Anna Pichiecchio; Alessandro Padovani; Andrea Morotti; Enrico Fainardi
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-20

5.  The Application of the GP Model to Manage Controllable Risk Factors in Stroke Patients with Diabetes Can Effectively Improve the Prognosis and Reduce the Recurrence Rate.

Authors:  Zhehua Zou; Kai Liu; Yunjing Li; Shuangyan Yi; Xiaotang Wang; Changying Yu; Haiying Zhu
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 2.650

Review 6.  Vessel wall MR imaging in neuroradiology.

Authors:  Yasutaka Fushimi; Kazumichi Yoshida; Masakazu Okawa; Takakuni Maki; Satoshi Nakajima; Akihiko Sakata; Sachi Okuchi; Takuya Hinoda; Mitsunori Kanagaki; Yuji Nakamoto
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2022-07-30       Impact factor: 6.313

Review 7.  Pathophysiology of reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome.

Authors:  Shih-Pin Chen; Shuu-Jiun Wang
Journal:  J Biomed Sci       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 12.771

8.  Prevalence of non-contrast CT abnormalities in adults with reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ryan Daniel Gotesman; Naomi Niznick; Brian Dewar; Dean A Fergusson; Risa Shorr; Michel Shamy; Dar Dowlatshahi
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 2.692

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.