| Literature DB >> 31060345 |
Ning Li1,2, Aimin Shi3, Qiang Wang4, Guoquan Zhang5.
Abstract
The multivesicular liposome (MVL) provides a potential delivery approach to avoid the destruction of the structure of drugs by digestive enzymes of the oral cavity and gastrointestinal system. It also serves as a sustained-release drug delivery system. In this study, we aimed to incorporate a water-soluble substance into MVLs to enhance sustained release, prevent the destruction of drugs, and to expound the function of different components and their mechanism. MVLs were prepared using the spherical packing model. The morphology, structure, size distribution, and zeta potential of MVLs were examined using an optical microscope (OM), confocal microscopy (CLSM), transmission electron cryomicroscope (cryo-EM) micrograph, a Master Sizer 2000, and a zeta sizer, respectively. The digestion experiment was conducted using a bionic mouse digestive system model in vitro. An in vitro release and releasing mechanism were investigated using a dialysis method. The average particle size, polydispersity index, zeta potential, and encapsulation efficiency are 47.6 nm, 1.880, -70.5 ± 2.88 mV, and 82.00 ± 0.25%, respectively. The studies on the controlled release in vitro shows that MVLs have excellent controlled release and outstanding thermal stability. The angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitory activity of ACE-inhibitory peptide (AP)-MVLs decreased only 2.84% after oral administration, and ACE inhibitory activity decreased by 5.03% after passing through the stomach. Therefore, it could serve as a promising sustained-release drug delivery system.Entities:
Keywords: ACE; controlled-release; digestive stability; multivesicular liposomes; peanut peptide
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31060345 PMCID: PMC6539825 DOI: 10.3390/molecules24091746
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.927
Scheme 1Schematic diagram of the aimed controlled-release drug delivery system made of angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE)-inhibitory peptide multivesicular liposomes (AP-MVLs) in vitro.
The factors and levels of preparation technology.
| Factors | X1 | X2 | X3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Levels | First-Vortex Speed (rpm) | First-Vortex Time (min) | Second-Vortex Time (s) |
| 1 | 12000 | 5 | 5 |
| 2 | 15000 | 10 | 10 |
| 3 | 18000 | 15 | 20 |
| 4 | 20000 | 20 | 40 |
| 5 | 25000 | 25 | 60 |
The factors and levels of prescription and artwork.
| Factors | X1 | X2 | X3 | X4 | X5 | X6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Levels | Lecithin Concentration (mg/mL) | Cholesterol Concentration (mg/mL) | Triolein Concentration (mg/mL) | O/W | Primary Emulsion/Second Aqueous Solution | |
| 1 | 10 | 6 | 6 | 20 | 1:2 | 1:1 |
| 2 | 14 | 8 | 8 | 40 | 1:1 | 1:2 |
| 3 | 16 | 12 | 10 | 60 | 2:1 | 1:3 |
| 4 | 18 | 14 | 12 | 80 | 3:1 | 1:4 |
| 5 | 20 | 16 | 16 | 100 | 4:1 | 1:5 |
Figure 1The results of the preparation technology. a–d Different superscript letters in the same series indicate statistical difference (p < 0.05).
Figure 2The results of the prescription and artwork. a–e Different superscript letters in the same series indicate statistical difference (p < 0.05).
Figure 3Optical microscopy (OM), confocal microscopy (CLSM), and transmission electron cryomicroscopy (cryo-EM) in multivesicular liposome (MVL) characterization.
Figure 4Leakage rate of AP-MVLs under different temperatures.
Figure 5Cumulative release of AP-MVLs with different usages of cholesterol and trioleate.
Figure 6Effect of temperature on the peanut peptide (principal component and hypotensive activity) and multivesicular liposomes.
Figure 7Digestive stability of AP and AP-MVLs.
Preparation of stock solutions of simulated digestion fluids.
| Constituent | Stock Conc. | SSF | SGF | SIF | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pH 7 | pH 3 | pH 7 | ||||||
| Vol. of Stock | Conc. in SSF | Vol. of Stock | Conc. in SGF | Vol. of Stock | Conc. in SIF | |||
| g L−1 | mol L−1 | mL | mmol L−1 | mL | mmol L−1 | mL | mmol L−1 | |
|
| 37.3 | 0.5 | 15.1 | 15.1 | 6.9 | 6.9 | 6.8 | 6.8 |
|
| 68 | 0.5 | 3.7 | 3.7 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
|
| 84 | 1 | 6.8 | 13.6 | 12.5 | 25 | 42.5 | 85 |
|
| 117 | 2 | - | - | 11.8 | 47.2 | 9.6 | 38.4 |
|
| 30.5 | 0.15 | 0.5 | 0.15 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 1.1 | 0.33 |
|
| 48 | 0.5 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.5 | 0.5 | - | - |
|
| ||||||||
| mol L−1 | mL | mmol L−1 | mL | mmol L−1 | mL | mmol L−1 | ||
|
| 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
|
| 6 | 0.09 | 1.1 | 1.3 | 15.6 | 0.7 | 8.4 | |
|
| ||||||||
| g L−1 | mol L−1 | mmol L−1 | mmol L−1 | mmol L−1 | ||||
|
| 44.1 | 0.3 | 1.5 (0.75 *) | 0.15 (0.75 *) | 0.6 (0.75 *) | |||
|
| ||||||||
| CAS | U mL−1 | |||||||
| α-Amylase | EC 3.2.1.1 | 200 | ||||||
| Porcine Pepsin | EC 3.4.23.1 | 2000 | ||||||
| Porcine trypsin | EC 3.4.21.4 | 100 | ||||||
| Bovine chymotrypsin | EC 3.4.21.1 | 25 | ||||||
| Porcine pancreatic lipase | EC 3.1.1.3 | 2000 | ||||||
* in brackets corresponds to the Ca2+ concentration in the final digestion mixture. Simulated salivary fluid (SSF), simulated gastric fluid (SGF), and simulated intestinal fluid (SIF).