Michail Galanopoulos1, Rory McFadyen2, Ioanna Drami3, Rishi Naik2, Nicholas Evans2, Tu Vinh Luong4, Jennifer Watkins4, Martyn Caplin1, Christos Toumpanakis5. 1. Neuroendocrine Tumour Unit, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Royal Free Hospital, London, United Kingdom. 2. Medical School, University College London, London, United Kingdom. 3. Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Free Hospital, London, United Kingdom. 4. Department of Histopathology, Royal Free Hospital, London, United Kingdom. 5. Neuroendocrine Tumour Unit, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Royal Free Hospital, London, United Kingdom, c.toumpanakis@ucl.ac.uk.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Appendiceal neuroendocrine neoplasms (ANEN) are uncommon entities, which run mostly an indolent course. Appendicectomy alone is usually curative, except for in a selected group of patients that are deemed to be at risk of loco-regional metastases, in whom a completion right hemicolectomy (RHC) is recommended. The current "Guidelines" criteria for the latter have been controversial, and may result in overtreatment, which is concerning for a young patient population. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the prognostic value of the current criteria in identifying more accurately those at-risk patients. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of the 263 cases of ANEN referred for advice or management to a tertiary referral unit over a 10-year period. Seventy-two patients underwent RHC, based on criteria, suggested by International Guidelines. Each one of those was assessed to identify whether it correlated with lymph node invasion (LNI) at the RHC surgical specimen. RESULTS: Tumour grade (p < 0.001), vascular (p = 0.044) and lymph vessel invasion (p < 0.001) were all found to be statistically significant independent risk factors for LNI identified following RHC, whilst tumour size (p = 0.375) and mesoappendiceal invasion (MAI) (p = 0.317) were not statistically significant. However, deep MAI and tumour size >2 cm showed a correlation with each other on LNI positive subgroup analysis. Location in appendiceal base made LNI more likely but again was not significant (p = 0.133). CONCLUSIONS: Higher tumour grade and lymphovascular invasion should be considered as the most important risk prognosticators. Surprisingly, tumour size was not found to be significant in our cohort. Further international multicentre studies with large numbers of patients are needed to fully validate those data.
BACKGROUND:Appendiceal neuroendocrine neoplasms (ANEN) are uncommon entities, which run mostly an indolent course. Appendicectomy alone is usually curative, except for in a selected group of patients that are deemed to be at risk of loco-regional metastases, in whom a completion right hemicolectomy (RHC) is recommended. The current "Guidelines" criteria for the latter have been controversial, and may result in overtreatment, which is concerning for a young patient population. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the prognostic value of the current criteria in identifying more accurately those at-risk patients. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of the 263 cases of ANEN referred for advice or management to a tertiary referral unit over a 10-year period. Seventy-two patients underwent RHC, based on criteria, suggested by International Guidelines. Each one of those was assessed to identify whether it correlated with lymph node invasion (LNI) at the RHC surgical specimen. RESULTS:Tumour grade (p < 0.001), vascular (p = 0.044) and lymph vessel invasion (p < 0.001) were all found to be statistically significant independent risk factors for LNI identified following RHC, whilst tumour size (p = 0.375) and mesoappendiceal invasion (MAI) (p = 0.317) were not statistically significant. However, deep MAI and tumour size >2 cm showed a correlation with each other on LNI positive subgroup analysis. Location in appendiceal base made LNI more likely but again was not significant (p = 0.133). CONCLUSIONS: Higher tumour grade and lymphovascular invasion should be considered as the most important risk prognosticators. Surprisingly, tumour size was not found to be significant in our cohort. Further international multicentre studies with large numbers of patients are needed to fully validate those data.
Authors: José Luis Muñoz de Nova; Jorge Hernando; Miguel Sampedro Núñez; Greissy Tibisay Vázquez Benítez; Eva María Triviño Ibáñez; María Isabel Del Olmo García; Jorge Barriuso; Jaume Capdevila; Elena Martín-Pérez Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2022-04-07 Impact factor: 5.374